Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Tue May 21, 2013, 09:40 AM May 2013

PBS's Koch Problem: How a Major Right-Wing Funder Undercut Key Films

http://www.thenation.com/blog/174426/pbss-koch-problem-how-major-right-wing-funder-undercut-key-films


Don’t miss Jane Mayer’s feature at The New Yorker, just posted online, on little-known story of how PBS’s WNET in New York reacted in showing Alex Gibney doc Park Avenue: Money, Power and the American Dream. The film did air, but see what surrounded it.

Problem: It partly focused on the Koch Brothers, and David Koch is a major, longtime WNET funder. So WNET bent over backwards to give him a chance to respond even before the doc aired, and also scheduled a roundtable to discuss it. Gibney: “They tried to undercut the credibility of the film, and I had no opportunity to defend it…. Why is WNET offering Mr. Koch special favors? And why did the station allow Koch to offer a critique of a film he hadn’t even seen? Money. Money talks.”

And then another documentary realating to the Kochs ran into trouble and lost funding.

But Mayer’s conclusion: “In the end, the various attempts to assuage David Koch were apparently insufficient. On Thursday, May 16th, WNET’s board of directors quietly accepted his resignation. It was the result, an insider said, of his unwillingness to back a media organization that had so unsparingly covered its sponsor.”



Read more: http://www.thenation.com/blog/174426/pbss-koch-problem-how-major-right-wing-funder-undercut-key-films#ixzz2TvyimEzA


A WORD FROM OUR SPONSORPublic television’s attempts to placate David Koch
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/05/27/130527fa_fact_mayer?mbid=gnep&google_editors_picks=true?mbid=social_retweet

LLast fall, Alex Gibney, a documentary filmmaker who won an Academy Award in 2008 for an exposé of torture at a U.S. military base in Afghanistan, completed a film called “Park Avenue: Money, Power and the American Dream.” It was scheduled to air on PBS on November 12th. The movie had been produced independently, in part with support from the Gates Foundation. “Park Avenue” is a pointed exploration of the growing economic inequality in America and a meditation on the often self-justifying mind-set of “the one per cent.” As a narrative device, Gibney focusses on one of the most expensive apartment buildings in Manhattan—740 Park Avenue—portraying it as an emblem of concentrated wealth and contrasting the lives of its inhabitants with those of poor people living at the other end of Park Avenue, in the Bronx.

Among the wealthiest residents of 740 Park is David Koch, the billionaire industrialist, who, with his brother Charles, owns Koch Industries, a huge energy-and-chemical conglomerate. The Koch brothers are known for their strongly conservative politics and for their efforts to finance a network of advocacy groups whose goal is to move the country to the right. David Koch is a major philanthropist, contributing to cultural and medical institutions that include Lincoln Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital. In the nineteen-eighties, he began expanding his charitable contributions to the media, donating twenty-three million dollars to public television over the years. In 1997, he began serving as a trustee of Boston’s public-broadcasting operation, WGBH, and in 2006 he joined the board of New York’s public-television outlet, WNET. Recent news reports have suggested that the Koch brothers are considering buying eight daily newspapers owned by the Tribune Company, one of the country’s largest media empires, raising concerns that its publications—which include the Chicago Tribune and the Los Angeles Times—might slant news coverage to serve the interests of their new owners, either through executive mandates or through self-censorship. Clarence Page, a liberal Tribune columnist, recently said that the Kochs appeared intent on using a media company “as a vehicle for their political voice.”
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
PBS's Koch Problem: How a Major Right-Wing Funder Undercut Key Films (Original Post) xchrom May 2013 OP
No man should be so rich he has nothing left to buy but his government. aquart May 2013 #1
No woman either, not anyone. ananda May 2013 #2
David Koch's look embodies everything that's soulless and evil. HughBeaumont May 2013 #3
I want to cry when I look at what these people are doing to America katmondoo May 2013 #4
Public Enemy No. 1! A Syndicate of Oligarchs Newest Reality May 2013 #5

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
3. David Koch's look embodies everything that's soulless and evil.
Tue May 21, 2013, 09:51 AM
May 2013

A dark pit of decaying manure who's playing a "Most Toys At The End" game he knows he won't win, so he's taking as much as he can before the whole shithouse goes up in flames.

People like this guy can't get off the Earth soon enough for my tastes. The sooner Plutocracy dies, the better off we'll be. This notion should have been buried for good in the 1950s, had good ol' GE Puppet Reagan and his merry band of executives not resurrected it.

katmondoo

(6,457 posts)
4. I want to cry when I look at what these people are doing to America
Tue May 21, 2013, 09:52 AM
May 2013

With what is left of PBS we now have almost 10 minutes cut from every program for commercials.

Newest Reality

(12,712 posts)
5. Public Enemy No. 1! A Syndicate of Oligarchs
Tue May 21, 2013, 09:56 AM
May 2013

All the power that money can buy. Wow!

So, if we work hard and be productive some people will get very rich while the Lords of Dynasties continue to rule and we get to vote for something that is presented to us.

It's a tragicomedy. The irony and cognitive dissonance can create as unhealthy an environment in a culture that you could ever want. At least barbarians were clear and open about pillaging and looting. The facade is brilliant though since so many people are convinced that they are represented in government and fully responsible for their circumstances, which is a form of manipulated, magical thinking similar to other belief systems.

That's fine if you like to placate yourself and dwell within a diaphanous shell of delusions, but that comfortable bubble is not only more fragile than it appears, it is a prison. Willful ignorance is the fuel that spins the engines of the public relations machines that spew the hot air of influence and largely self-serving and deceptive propaganda.

The denial is in the details.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»PBS's Koch Problem: How a...