General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe new farm bill is an economic disaster
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/26/farm-bill-economic-disasterThe latest US farm bill smells and looks bad.
The US Congress, its approval rating still near all-time lows, is reinforcing its own record of stupefyingly short-sighted lawmaking with what may be the most harmful piece of economic legislation in America in years: the $1tn 2013 farm bill.
It should be called the 2012 farm bill or, officially, the Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act of 2012 because the habitually sluggish group of lawmakers in Washington were too busy in 2012 to pass it. Campaigning for office and ginning up the fake fiscal cliff crisis occupied a lot of time, so lawmakers passed an extension of the $650bn 2008 farm bill for another year. That set an expiration date of September 30 this year. The delayed timing, however, is the least of the problems with it.
As members of Congress have negotiated over various amendments and riders to the bill, they've set an impressively consistent trend: they mix good ideas and bad ideas and combine them to create the absolutely worst possible policies. Elements of the farm bill, as it stands, will cut food stamps to the poor and the previously incarcerated, thus increasing poverty and possibly crime; add to the growing obesity crisis by encouraging chemical sugar substitutes; push genetically modified food at the expense of public health with the so-called "Monsanto Protection Act"; and support factory farming at the expense of sustainable food production with abusive crop subsidies.
That's quite a lot of damage to wreak with a single law, but this Congress certainly seems up to the challenge
djean111
(14,255 posts)theaocp
(4,245 posts)the veto threat is very unlikely.
djean111
(14,255 posts)And, of course, what is evil to us unwashed peasants is pure and wondrous excellence to those in Washington.
That is a gorgeous reason to not veto bills with pure evil IN them, got to admit. Well played, Washington DC!
marmar
(77,091 posts)....... Who says our elected officials don't work hard for their (corporate) money?
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)But, at least we get rid of those loafers and Welfare Queens on food stamps. Call it the new and improved Catfood Commission.
onethatcares
(16,188 posts)someone with a criminal record to be able to eat, I mean it's in 3d Assholes chapter 2-6; Those that do time for no matter how small a crime shall be made to suffer forever.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,497 posts)things, but he has done many things to pay back his corporate masters. We have terrorized innocent in the Middle East and Africa, sold out to the victims of the Gulf oil spill (funny you don't hear him or anyone else talking about what is going on down here), gave up single payer right from the start so we get a health care bill much like this farm bill. I am a Progressive, and proud of it, but I don't wear Rose Colored Glasses and my political beliefs are not married to team "Democrats" or team, "Republican" where I overlook my teams fouls, penalties etc. Our country is spinning faster and faster toward ruin and violent conflict because our politicians owe their positions, not to us, but to corporations and the 1%. THEY DO NOT REPRESENT US THE PEOPLE! Democrats and Republican used to represent an ideology, not 2 sides used to manipulate, control, and distract us from what is really occurring. For example, Democrats are expected to hate this bill (for sure it's bad), and Republicans will overlook the bad to defend their team, the Republicans. Reality, both sides give their corporate masters what they want at our expense and we blame each other instead of really looking at the true problem. To modify a famous quote, "Our number one priority is give all Washington politicians no more terms and get COMPLETE CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM (CCFR) passed to "take our country back" from the corporations and the 1%!!!
G_j
(40,372 posts)Senate rejects farm bill amendments aimed at changing cuts to food stamps
By Ramsey Cox - 05/21/13 04:29 PM ET
The Senate rejected two amendments to the farm bill Tuesday that would have changed the $4 billion-worth of cuts to food stamps.
Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) introduced an amendment that would have cut at least an additional $12 billion for the supplemental food assistance program (SNAP), also known as food stamps. His amendment failed on a 40-58 vote.
My goal is simple to restore integrity to the supplemental food assistance program, Roberts said ahead of the vote.
The Senate is considering a $955 billion five-year farm bill and amendment votes are expected to continue throughout the week.
S. 954 would cut more than $23 billion from current spending levels over 10 years, including $4 billion-worth of cuts in food stamps, which has led to some Democratic opposition.
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) introduced an amendment, which would have restored the $4 billion in cuts to food stamps. Her amendment failed on a 26-70 vote, shortly after Roberts'. Gillibrand said during a recession, Congress should not be cutting food assistance.
.more..
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)The hits keep coming....
Every day. Every day.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)They are trying to overthrow the Government as set out in the Constitution, IMHO. Fortunately, all the nonsense bills in the House that have passed have been stopped by the Senate like repealing the ACA act for I believe the 37th time.
http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/16/18303935-house-again-votes-to-repeal-obamacare?lite