Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

antigop

(12,778 posts)
Mon May 27, 2013, 10:14 PM May 2013

Wendell Potter explains how millions will still be left without adequate coverage under Obamacare

http://wendellpotter.com/2013/05/a-cynical-search-for-loopholes/

But as reported by the Wall Street Journal last week, corporate loophole hunters have invalidated Reid’s statement, which honestly was an overstatement even then. While Obamacare will make affordable coverage available to millions of Americans for the first time, several million others-primarily low and middle-income workers-will still be left out.

According to the Journal, regulations written by the Obama administration pertaining to employers are being interpreted by health insurance benefits consultants as applying only to small businesses that buy coverage for their employees in the state online marketplaces. Those marketplaces, also called exchanges, were created for employers with up to 100 workers and individuals who cannot get coverage through the workplace.

So the good news is that anyone buying coverage through a state exchange will have the assurance of knowing that their policies will cover essential benefits and have lower deductibles than many policies being sold today.

The bad news for millions of others, however, especially those who work in low paying jobs at places like chain restaurants, retailers and nursing homes, is that many of the consumer protections that apply to policies bought through the exchanges will not apply to them. The adequacy of their coverage will depend on how much money their employers are willing to devote to health insurance.

We’ll probably never know, but I suspect the language in the law pertaining to employer-sponsored coverage was written in a purposefully ambiguous way by lobbyists for insurance companies that have found selling inadequate coverage quite profitable. Some of the biggest insurers, including Aetna, Cigna and UnitedHealthgroup, bought companies several years ago that specialize in so-called limited-benefit plans. You can be certain they would try to protect their investments, especially considering that limited-benefit plans typically have high profit margins. That’s because the insurance companies that sell them never have to pay out much in claims.



Related WSJ article here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/101664664
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wendell Potter explains how millions will still be left without adequate coverage under Obamacare (Original Post) antigop May 2013 OP
Maybe, but it is certainly a step in the right direction. PSPS May 2013 #1
not for the people who will be without adequate coverage nt antigop May 2013 #2
Of course it is. It's one step closer to coverage for them as well. PSPS May 2013 #5
tell that to the people who will be left without adequate coverage and have to go w/o medical care antigop May 2013 #6
Oh my. SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #7
It's one step closer to bankrupsy Demo_Chris May 2013 #9
Aetna is the worst bad faith insurance corporation ...period! L0oniX May 2013 #3
I think United Health is the worst. SharonAnn May 2013 #8
It's ProSense May 2013 #4

PSPS

(13,600 posts)
5. Of course it is. It's one step closer to coverage for them as well.
Mon May 27, 2013, 11:36 PM
May 2013

If one adopts an all or nothing attitude, nothing will ever be achieved especially when congress is dedicated to subverting the people's will.

antigop

(12,778 posts)
6. tell that to the people who will be left without adequate coverage and have to go w/o medical care
Mon May 27, 2013, 11:38 PM
May 2013

Keep spinning.

 

Demo_Chris

(6,234 posts)
9. It's one step closer to bankrupsy
Tue May 28, 2013, 01:19 AM
May 2013

These folks will be forced, by LAW, to purchase crap policies with sky high co-pays and deductibles that offer them nothing. The insurance companies win and win huge. They are now guaranteed people's money no matter how little they provide in exchange.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
3. Aetna is the worst bad faith insurance corporation ...period!
Mon May 27, 2013, 10:43 PM
May 2013

I wouldn't even call what they sell ...insurance. They will take your money and fight you in every and any way they can.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
4. It's
Mon May 27, 2013, 10:49 PM
May 2013
But as reported by the Wall Street Journal last week, corporate loophole hunters have invalidated Reid’s statement, which honestly was an overstatement even then. While Obamacare will make affordable coverage available to millions of Americans for the first time, several million others-primarily low and middle-income workers-will still be left out.

According to the Journal, regulations written by the Obama administration pertaining to employers are being interpreted by health insurance benefits consultants as applying only to small businesses that buy coverage for their employees in the state online marketplaces. Those marketplaces, also called exchanges, were created for employers with up to 100 workers and individuals who cannot get coverage through the workplace.

...never a good idea to cite the WSJ on the issue of health care. They could interpret until they're blue in the face.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2884170
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2885317
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wendell Potter explains h...