Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Tue May 28, 2013, 09:27 AM May 2013

FBI shared child porn to nab pedophiles; Washington home raided

BY LEVI PULKKINEN, SEATTLEPI.COM STAFF
Published 10:19 pm, Monday, May 27, 2013

The FBI seized and ran a child pornography service late last year as investigators worked to identify its customers, one Western Washington man allegedly among them.

Following a lengthy investigation, Nebraska-based agents raided the large child pornography service in November hoping to catch users who shared thousands of images showing children being raped, displayed and abused.

The Bureau ran the service for two weeks while attempting to identify more than 5,000 customers, according to a Seattle FBI agent's statements to the court. Court records indicate the site continued to distribute child pornography online while under FBI control; the Seattle-based special agent, a specialist in online crimes against children, detailed the investigation earlier this month in a statement to the court.

The investigation appears to mark a departure for the Bureau and other federal law enforcement agencies aiming to root out child porn purveyors.

Historically, child pornography investigations stem from tips made to law enforcement, interactions with undercover officers posing as customers or reviews of documentation seized during searches of child porn clearinghouses like the one recently raided in Nebraska. While investigators are known to have posed as child porn dealers – a 2011 effort involved targeted emails to suspected pedophiles – it is not apparent that the FBI previously dealt child porn as part of a sting.


Read more: http://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/FBI-shared-child-porn-to-nab-pedophiles-4552044.php

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FBI shared child porn to nab pedophiles; Washington home raided (Original Post) n2doc May 2013 OP
How does this work? gollygee May 2013 #1
Read the paragraph before your quote--no way to get the user info otherwise. As for the children msanthrope May 2013 #3
I think you left out the most important part of the article---the reason why: msanthrope May 2013 #2
Isn't this entrapment? enlightenment May 2013 #4
No, it's not entrapment jeff47 May 2013 #5
Okay - I wasn't sure. Thanks. enlightenment May 2013 #6
Not at all, since the 'customers' find the website on their own. Dash87 May 2013 #7
Don't care if it was eissa May 2013 #9
Well, I was asking a question - enlightenment May 2013 #12
Sometimes my opposition to the death penalty is tested shawn703 May 2013 #8
Well, if you are wanting a severe punishment jeff47 May 2013 #13
Releasing this news will serve as a great deterrent as well. Pragdem May 2013 #10
I'm glad I didn't have that job. N.T. Donald Ian Rankin May 2013 #11

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
1. How does this work?
Tue May 28, 2013, 09:34 AM
May 2013

Is it computer altered so it isn't of real kids, or are they getting permission from families whose kids have had pornographic photos taken of them?

OK here's what the article says: "Court records do not note how many images of raped and abused children were shared or accessed while the FBI was operating “Website A.” Investigators also do not indicate whether known victims of child pornography – abused children pictured in widely distributed pornographic series – have been notified photos of their abuse were again shared as part of the investigation."

If photos of a child of mine were involved, I'd be pretty upset.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
3. Read the paragraph before your quote--no way to get the user info otherwise. As for the children
Tue May 28, 2013, 09:50 AM
May 2013

depicted, it's not as if these guys post names and dates---each picture needs to be investigated. It's entirely probable that the families themselves are complicit in the abuse.

I can see why you would do this for 2 weeks, in the hopes that you would get the user information and then track through each user hopefully, the victim. No easy answers here.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
2. I think you left out the most important part of the article---the reason why:
Tue May 28, 2013, 09:45 AM
May 2013




On Nov. 9, a U.S. District Court judge in Nebraska approved a request by law enforcement agents to track down the website’s users.

According to the agent’s statement, investigators were unable to identify “Website A” users through the service’s records. Allowing the site to continue to operate – allowing pedophiles to continue swapping photos and accessing images stored on the site – was necessary to identify the customers.
Court records do not note how many images of raped and abused children were shared or accessed while the FBI was operating “Website A.” Investigators also do not indicate whether known victims of child pornography – abused children pictured in widely distributed pornographic series – have been notified photos of their abuse were again shared as part of the investigation.

Read more: http://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/FBI-shared-child-porn-to-nab-pedophiles-4552044.php#ixzz2UavBK9Pc



That they ran it for two weeks for a limited purpose is one of those pragmatic and gut-wrenching decisions I am glad I do not have to make.

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
4. Isn't this entrapment?
Tue May 28, 2013, 09:51 AM
May 2013

I thought that was illegal.

I know child pornography is illegal - how is it legal for the FBI to run an illegal operation to catch people doing something illegal?

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
5. No, it's not entrapment
Tue May 28, 2013, 09:55 AM
May 2013

The FBI is making it available, and then seeing who comes to get it. There's no pressure by the FBI to break the law.

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
6. Okay - I wasn't sure. Thanks.
Tue May 28, 2013, 10:03 AM
May 2013

I still don't think that breaking the law to catch law-breakers is necessarily a good thing.

Dash87

(3,220 posts)
7. Not at all, since the 'customers' find the website on their own.
Tue May 28, 2013, 10:18 AM
May 2013

Had the FBI not taken over, they would have still used the website. Many were also customers before and after the takeover.

Entrapment, on the other hand, would be tricking people into going to the website (like, for instance, telling people that it's a website for getting coupons, and then arresting them if they clicked the link).

eissa

(4,238 posts)
9. Don't care if it was
Tue May 28, 2013, 12:00 PM
May 2013

Pedophiles are the lowest of the lows. Not about to defend anyone on any basis who gets his kicks off watching/engaging in child rape. Sick mother fuckers

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
12. Well, I was asking a question -
Tue May 28, 2013, 05:18 PM
May 2013

which was answered, twice. Not sure I equate asking the question with defending the people who engage in this vile practice.

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
8. Sometimes my opposition to the death penalty is tested
Tue May 28, 2013, 10:37 AM
May 2013

This is one of those cases.

Most often, though, “Website A” users chatted about their shared interests – the rape and molestation of children. Message threads on the site included “How to lure a child in my car,” “Meeting other pedos in real life,” and “Do kids LIKE anal sex?”


jeff47

(26,549 posts)
13. Well, if you are wanting a severe punishment
Tue May 28, 2013, 05:45 PM
May 2013

Just remember what happens to child molesters serving life in prison.

If they were given the option, I think a large number of them would choose execution over life in prison.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FBI shared child porn to ...