General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRobert F Kennedy Jr compares childhood vaccines to Nazi Death Camps...
So Bobby Kennedy was the keynote speaker at this year's anti-vaccination insanity conference (otherwise known as Autism One). A gathering point of everything wrong in the world of medicinal science (Last year's keynote was Jenny McCarthy.).
Age of Autism, the kings of anti-vaccine bullshit, hasn't made the video of the keynote public yet, but that didn't stop them from sharing thoughts from Bobby on vaccines. Unfortunately, Bobby Kennedy buys into the horrendous autism conspiracy theory to the core.
From Collide-A-Scape
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/collideascape
For a taste of what Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in his keynote address at this years event, lets go to a post at the Age of Autism website, written by its managing editor, who reports:
...
Paul Offit, for those not in the know, is, as his Wikipedia page describes him, an American pediatrician specializing in infectious diseases and an expert on vaccines, immunology, and virology. He is an outspoken critic of the anti-vaccine movement and an author of numerous books challenging their claims. (Amy Wallace wrote a great profile on him for Wired in 2009.)
-------------------------
Tremendous amount of respect for Kennedy was just flushed away.
MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)much better life WITH a vaccine. I had the vaccine, my school mates had the vaccine. We also had the Whooping cough vaccine.
These things killed children in the most horrifying way imaginable. There is NO proof that the vaccines children receive contributes to Autism. None. Nada. Nothing.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Wish he knew better because this overshadows a lot of the good he does.
MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)Doctors are diagnosing this way too much. Sorry- I know that is not a popular view but its the God's honest truth. Autism is a real problem but its prevalence is WAY overstated. Unlike Polio, Chicken Pox, and Measles.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)My son is autistic and I know other autistic people. It is a real neurological diagnosis and it is as prevelent as they say.
MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)competing diagnosis. They follow a medical diagnosis procedure that does not often account for the social aspects of the problems of Autism. They do not have the resources in their offices for that. Nor do they often consult with school personnel for data to support their diagnosis. I have seen cases where they completely miss the signs and others where it is merely a figment of their imagination.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)specialist. We were sent to the UW Autism Center, a part of the Center on Human Development and Disability. There they did an extensive test and diagnosed him on the autism spectrum.
MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)Believing that Physicians always get a diagnosis 100% correct whether its Autism or anything else is stupid.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)I've read that some think it is overdiagnosed because some kids get better overtime. People get better over time with lots of conditions. My mother in law was diagnosed with diabetes, changed what she ate and then was no longer diabetic. Does that mean she was never diabetic? No. Some kids do get better. My son has made huge leaps since his first diagnosis. His therapists at school and his special education teachers had a lot to with that. But even now after all those significant leaps he still exhibits autistic behaviors, socially, academically, and neurologically. So, just because some of these kids get better does not mean the initial diagnosis was wrong.
MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)I stated that I think that, in my (professional) experience Doctors are diagnosing this too often. But since you seem to need have the last word, have at it.
MADem
(135,425 posts)He has a fucked up voice because he messed with Mister Drugs too hard and too long. That goes to his judgment.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)Taverner
(55,476 posts)Bay Boy
(1,689 posts)...psychological grandmother?
LuvNewcastle
(16,855 posts)I don't think I had one. Did I miss out on something?
MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)Visiting or Social Teachers back in the 1940's. She was an amazing person. I had one Grandmother growing up who was a pretty traumatized person and could not offer me the kind of Grandparenting that children crave and need. The other maternal/paternal Grandparents were all either dead or drunk.
She adopted me. As it turns out, her life work is used in various graduate level social work courses in the State of Michigan.
Lucky me.
She died one night of heart failure. Although she never complained, she was pretty tired of living with her various health problems. She had called me in obvious distress. All she had to say was my name on the phone and I knew she was in trouble. I told her I would be right there. So I went and she was prostrate on her bed when I arrived. I set her up, got her some water so I could assess what was happening. She took a sip of water and almost immediately suffered a massive heart attack. I held her hands as she raised them up. She died. I knew now she was gone but I tried to follow thru on the obvious medical emergency.
I went to the phone and tried to dial out to 911. No response. I went across the hall to the neighbors apt. and called from there. But when you are the psychological granddaughter you know when its a lost cause. The EMT's arrive and did what they could which was nothing. She was taken to the hospital and pronounced dead.
Julia never married. She loved a WWI soldier who never returned.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)Response to MichiganVote (Reply #1)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)but when they get it right-its incredibly important to the lives of children and adults. So...we live with uncertainty. Nothing new in that.
indepat
(20,899 posts)vaccine to have been developed much earlier, as would have FDR.
otohara
(24,135 posts)was approved.
I'd take a series of vaccines vs having Polio...it gets worse in the golden years because it comes back in the form of weakness, pain, and more pain. I also had Whopping cough once as a child.
RFK spewing nonsense - how sad.
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)and Kathleen Sebelius.
He plans on transcribing and distributing the transcript.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Time to face facts...the man is a fruit loop.
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)about reading the transcript and giving it one SHRED of credulity.
At least out loud. Here.
womanofthehills
(8,759 posts)Why would there be a National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program? There is an excise tax on each dose of vaccine for this fund.
Many people have suffered neurological injuries, anaphylactic shock, paralysis, encephalopathy, chronic arthritis, thrombocytopenic purpura according to the "Vaccine Injury Table" put out by the US Dept of Health and Human Services.
30,000 cases of adverse reactions to vaccines are reported each yr of which 13% are classified as serious -
I commend Bobby Kennedy Jr. I can just imagine how many parents have contacted his law firm with vaccine horrors. Listen to "Ring of Fire" (Mike Papantonio, Bobby Kennedy and Sam Sedar) - these 3 guys are some of the most intelligent guys on talk radio. Kennedy specializes in environmental law.
After my great grandson got a bunch of vaccines all at once, he became ill for a month and stopped babbling and talking for a yr. Luckily, he is talking up a storm now, but we became very scared. If you check online personal stories, this is not uncommon. We are very afraid to give him more vaccines. My belief is that he was given way too many at once and his little body was overloaded. Different children have different tolerances to vaccines and environmental chemicals. Mercury in kids vaccines has been replaced with aluminum, but mercury is still in flu shots. If you get a flu shot, request one that's mercury free.
Cody Unser, daughter of race car driver, Al (out here in NM) became paralyzed from the waist down at 12 yrs old after a hep b vaccine which some drs. believe triggered her to get transverse myelitis.
Read about all the teen girls that just can't stop fainting after the HPV vaccine.
Are_grits_groceries
(17,111 posts)there is a risk with all of them. There will never be a vaccine, drug, etc. that does not cause complications for someone.
The fainting girls problem has not been tied to a vaccination. There is no proof that it's caused by that. If they can find a biological link that will be a different story. It sounds like a mass hysteria problem. Whatever it is, I hope they get to the bottom of it. Even if it's psychological and not biological, it is still a real problem.
As far as Cody Unser, you stated that SOME doctors thought the vaccination caused her condition. What is their evidence and what are the other doctors saying?
The multiple vaccinations has come up a lot. I haven't seen proof of that. It might be wise to break them up just to be sure.
I believe that these problems might be caused by so many chemicals and other things that are in the environment now. So many kids are being diagnosed with autism that something is going on. It could be that doctors recognize it more. It could also be something in the environment that triggers this problem.
I want problems with vaccinations thoroughly examined. The vaccine link has been studied many times and no link was found. If there is one, it has escaped detection and vaccinations are a convenient excuse. If there are proven problems, they must be corrected immediately. The vaccination link claim is specious and regrettable. Vaccines save millions of lives.
Heywood J
(2,515 posts)If you want to refer to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, what fund is supposed to pay out to the families of children killed or crippled when they contracted a disease that could otherwise have been prevented by a vaccine (e.g. contracts polio)? Or if a child becomes a disease vector and infects others, who pays those victims? At least an autistic child is alive.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)LOL
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Answer these issues for me -
Why is it that when the San Francisco Chronicle, hardly a loony bin of conspiracy theories, sent its reporters out in 1999-2000 to investigate the labs where the vaccines are produced, so they could PROVE to the public that all is well within the v. industry, its reporters found such contamination, filth, bacterial and viral contamination of vaccine material etc, that the Chronicle instead ran a mini series detailing all the problems the reporters found. What does that say about the state of these laboratories? If you want the public to support vaccines, then make sure the labs re clean and that there are inspections done without pre-visit announcements!
Although veterinarians carefully train their staff not to vaccinate sick animals, the staff at many pediatrician offices insist on vaccinating children who are there on a day when they are sick, as it will "make it more convenient for the parents." There are at least three hundred credible studies showing that cancer ends up being the result of vaccinating sick mammals. People are mammals, last time I checked. So why are the vets more responsible than the people doctors?
How come in France, which has less press and media control over the vaccine issue, when there was a a nation wide campaign for people to have their flu shots, only 5 million out of eighty million people get those shots? What ar ethe french aware of that the American public is deluded about??
Actually, the American public still do refuse to get flu shots. Even though there is so much forcing the issue as mandates (In California, you cannot get AFDC or food stamps unless you have vaccinated your kids, etc,) only 50- % of all Americans get the flu shot. Legally, I can not get one - it says right on the insert that if you have had serious problems with any flu shot in the past, you cannot have the shot now. (I had Guillaume Barr, resulting from the mid 1970's swine flu shot.)
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Not one case of autism has ever been shown to be caused by childhood vaccinations. Not one.
Considering that is what his presence at autism one was about vaccines and autism, I would say that he is refuted.
Since we are not talking about flu vaccines, they are a non-issue. My son can't get the normal flu vaccine either due to an egg allergy (The vaccine is grown in embryos), though.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)In the last five years. The parents of a child that got autism after the MMR shot went on to collect a lot of more from the program that hands out settlements to people who have had their children hurt.
Besides which -- there is no credible proof that the autism/vaccine situation is not worrisome. The "proof" that was handed to the public about two years ago had a very faulty study. In that study, children whose vaccines contained formaldehyde as an adjuvant were compared to a group of children where the vaccines had mercury. And since formaldehyde is almost as toxic a chemical as mercury, it is a most ludicrous illogical study that means nothing. (I think, if memory serves, that radioactive material, followed by benzene, followed by mercury followed by formaledehyde, are the top most dangerous chems. i might not have them in the right order; I gleaned much of this from consulting with John Froines of the Blue Ribbon Panel on MTBE, over a decade ago.)
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Huge difference. The vaccine was unsafe due to a preexisting condition that was ignored.
So, nope, not one.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)And the parents believe that the disorder itself might have ben caused by vaccines.
Citation: http://www.aapsonline.org/newsoftheday/0021
Goddess help us when we start havng to look at the results of when the first generation EVER of pregnant women starts in with reporting the damage done to their kids, on account of vaccinating while pregnant.
That was always a big no no, back in the day when even vaccine experts wanted us to be safe. But now it is all about profits. Many vaccines have less than six weeks to nine weeks worth of studies done.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Parents can believe whatever they want, but the science doesn't support it. Vaccines have no correlation with autism, period.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)there are NO peer reviewed studies a person can find on the fact that if a car runs over a five year old, that five year old is injured by the car. Yet we all avoid hitting kids (If we can,) when we are out there on the roads driving.
Observation used to be one of the first steps into understanding reality. In fact, when it doesn't affect American industries, we still use observational methods to determine a product's safety. When tens of thousands of Americans told the FDA and CDC that their beloved pets were dying in droves, after eating melanine-laced pet foods made in China, our governmental agencies responded IMMEDIATELY.
Warnings were put out, IMMEDIATELY and the specific name brands were listed on websites.And no one in the government agencies said, "Oh wait, we need lots of peer reviewed studies."
But the vaccine industry rules over so many aspects of American and British life, so that when tens of thousand of parents of children who were perfectly normal and who ahd reached every developmental point exactly on time, yet once a certain vaccine or set of vaccines was concluded, these parents who watched their kids immediately and as a direct response tot he shot(s) begin to convulse, scream, become diarrhetic and having the diarrhea last for days, and then autism descended, our government suddenly adopted the "that is a mere anecdotal experience and doesn't count.'
What total BS!
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)One, prove that it happened. The problem with anecdotal evidence is this; "My son got diarrhea after he got a vaccine." or "after her vaccine, my 13 year old girl started being very argumentative and unresponsive!" As if the only thing in the world that could explain a bad case of the runs is the vaccine? As if the vaccine somehow turned a 13 year old into a snarky asshat? They're usually such doting sweethearts!
There's also the problem there's no rhyme or reason. It's all "random bad things," even from identical shots. Going into convulsions is a very different reaction to catching a case of the runs. You inject a toxin into someone, and it will have about the same effect every time. It's reliable. It's one way of diagnosing poison exposure, because toxin A has a different effect than Toxin F, and both behave consistently.
What it looks like is parents arbitrarily linking something to the vaccination. Their son has an undercooked burger, oh, the vaccine gave him the shits. The parent suddenly realizes their teenager is a teenager, oh no,the shot must have done it.
Two, prove that it was linked to the vaccine. Reactions tend to be acute and fairly immediate. There's a reason they ask if you have allergies, after all. There's also the fact that the whole point of a vaccine is to trigger your body's immune system which, let's face it, is no fucking fun at all. And yes, that can be dangerous, leading to dehydration and high fevers. Nobody's ever said that there are no risks. But...
Three, expound on what magical,substance can cause this life-shattering reaction with one injection. This is the real trouble, because there isn't one. Anti-vaccers imagine some mystical witches brew of eeeeeevil compounds that when mixed juuuuust right, have all these random bad effects... Unfortunately this isn't the case; even if it were, the results would be regular and consistent, as I've just noted. Instead you get random and weird. Again it's not that there are no risks, but if we're talking chemicals, the major concern is exposure... and one injection of something, unless it's something super-scary, just isn't going to do anything. Long term exposure is what does it, and even then, it can be years and years for it to add up. Do you have any idea how much arsenic is in your water? More than you'd be comfortable with, I assure you. And you're chucking that down your gullet with regularity, and you think an injection is going to magically transform your child into a werewolf?
Which brings me to the main problem... Most anti-vaccers are caareer idiots. And I don't say that just to be insulting, but because they fucking are. They believe in black helicopters, homeopathy, and contacting deceased pets through seances. They're what is termed "magical thinkers," where everything that happens in the world is the result of direct agency, and wild intuitive leaps are exactly as valid as studied reasoning.
All the stuff above? The random bad effects, the assumption of grand conspiracies, and the belief that a single injection of some substance can magically - yes, magically - re-engineer a personality overnight? it's bullshit, and it's bullshit nobody believed until Andrew Wakefield and Jenny McCarthy joined forces.
While you're waving your torches and pitchforks about the "vaccine industry" and how evil it is, please to realize your entire argument is based on the claims of a man who faked research and launched a media scare campaign specifically to turn the public against a competing vaccine, enabling him to (in his imagination) command that market, and a former playmate whose knowledge of medicine seems to stretch only so far as eating flintstones chewables and buying dollar store magnet bracelets.
Orrex
(63,223 posts)But otherwise that was a magnficent post!
These people are like creationists and climate change deniers.
I like to call 'em Ferngullians; like, ohmigawd, science and technology are bad and make dolphins and faeries cry! We don't need medicine, just practice laying on hands and remember to eat lots of acai! Scientists are heartless evil people who want us all to, like, be brainwashed! It's just like religion!
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 4, 2013, 05:26 PM - Edit history (1)
If someone mentions the term "American scientists," the people at those agencies break out laughing?
After all, American scientists refuse to follow International Protocols in their set ups of studies, and then after they use a totally inappropriate method of looking at a problem, the American scientist basically is pressured into cherry pick data to give industry what it wants.
It is extremely telling that when a friend of mine was attending an international symposium of top level researchers, she heard an American scientist saying to a Japanese scientist "You people don';t have any reason in the world to state that your children should not be having vaccinations before the age of two."
Now the Japanese scientist could have offered up the totally valid answer that like many nations in the world, Japan follows the preventative principle - in other words, you avoid a product until you know it is harmless. That would have been adequate,. But instead, the Japanese scientist answered with this: "Well in just a few years we will have data showing we are right in having infants and toddlers avoid vaccines. and the data will be using infants and toddlers."
The American scientist acted appalled. But the Japanese scientist responded: "We have gotten our data from the American CDC - so it is American infants and toddlers that will show us how dangerous and risky the vaccine programs for infants and toddlers happen to be."
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Pure anti-vax, nutbar horseshit. Typical of the CT nonsense you see on so many anti-vax loon sites.
Sid
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Post hoc ergo propter hoc, Latin for "after this, therefore because of this", is a logical fallacy (of the questionable cause variety) that states "Since that event followed this one, that event must have been caused by this one." It is often shortened to simply post hoc. It is subtly different from the fallacy cum hoc ergo propter hoc, in which two things or events occur simultaneously or the chronological ordering is insignificant or unknown, also referred to as false cause, coincidental correlation, or correlation not causation.
Post hoc is a particularly tempting error because temporal sequence appears to be integral to causality. The fallacy lies in coming to a conclusion based solely on the order of events, rather than taking into account other factors that might rule out the connection.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)Again assess the HISTORICAL FACTS. Please forgive the Noam Chomsky-style delivery and overt advocacy in the final 20 seconds against ethylmercury containing multidose flu vaccines.
<>
Seventy years ago this month, in April 1943, a psychiatry journal called The Nervous Child published an article titled Autistic Disturbances of Affective Contact. Written by Leo Kanner, a Johns Hopkins child psychiatrist who is widely considered the founder of the field, it begins:
SINCE 1938, there have come to our attention a number of children whose condition differs so markedly and uniquely from anything reported so far, that each case merits -- and, I hope, will eventually receive -- a detailed consideration of its fascinating peculiarities. Elsewhere, he called it "a behavior pattern not known to me or anyone else theretofore."
The three of us have always found those words remarkable, coming as they did from an acknowledged authority who eight years earlier had catalogued every known childhood mental disability in his landmark 500-page book Child Psychiatry. Those pages contained not a whisper of autism, or anything that in retrospect looks similar.
Our own research convinced us the autism rate before 1930 was effectively zero (it is now 1 in 50). A handful of cases over several centuries might conceivably qualify, but there was nothing approaching the cluster of children whose worried parents brought them to see Leo Kanner in the years between 1938 and 1943.
Curious whether the family backgrounds of those first 11 cases might point to common environmental exposures, we began trying to identify them in 2005.
More below (posts #137 and #146).
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)June 3, 2013
Stanford U's Dr. Carl Feinstein Responds to Autism Questions
By Anne Dachel
On May 30, 2013, there was a piece on SCOPE, the Stanford University Medical School site, with the title, "Director of Stanford Autism Center responds to your questions on research and treatment."
Link: http://scopeblog.stanford.edu/2013/05/30/director-of-stanford-autism-center-responds-to-your-questions-on-research-and-treatment/
<>
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Last edited Wed Jun 5, 2013, 04:27 AM - Edit history (1)
You can google and you will find them. Please note that the reporters work done for the San Francisco Chronicle is totally valid reporting.
Answer these issues for me -
Why is it that when the San Francisco Chronicle, hardly a loony bin of conspiracy theories, sent its reporters out in 1999-2000 to investigate the labs where the vaccines are produced, so they could PROVE to the public that all is well within the v. industry, its reporters found such contamination, filth, bacterial and viral contamination of vaccine material etc, that the Chronicle instead ran a mini series detailing all the problems the reporters found. What does that say about the state of these laboratories? If you want the public to support vaccines, then make sure the labs re clean and that there are inspections done without pre-visit announcements!
Although veterinarians carefully train their staff not to vaccinate sick animals, the staff at many pediatrician offices insist on vaccinating children who are there on a day when they are sick, as it will "make it more convenient for the parents." There are at least three hundred credible studies showing that cancer ends up being the result of vaccinating sick mammals. People are mammals, last time I checked. So why are the vets more responsible than the people doctors?
How come in France, which has less press and media control over the vaccine issue, when there was a a nation wide campaign for people to have their flu shots, only 5 million out of eighty million people get those shots? What ar ethe french aware of that the American public is deluded about??
Actually, the American public still do refuse to get flu shots. Even though there is so much forcing the issue as mandates (In California, you cannot get AFDC or food stamps unless you have vaccinated your kids, etc,) only 50- % of all Americans get the flu shot. Legally, I can not get one - it says right on the insert that if you have had serious problems with any flu shot in the past, you cannot have the shot now. (I had Guillaume Barr, resulting from the mid 1970's swine flu shot.)
On edit: Dórea JG. Exposure to mercury during the first six months via human milk and vaccines: modifying risk factors. Am J Perinatol. 2007;24:387400. [PubMed]
Dórea JG, Marques RC. Modeling neurodevelopment outcomes and ethylmercury exposure from thimerosal-containing vaccines. Toxicol Sci. 2008;103:414416. [PubMed]
Duszczyk-Budhartokioki
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2957583/
Also note - if there has been a true discovery that mercury is a bad thing to have in vaccines, (As demonstrated in the study by Dorea, and by Duszczyk) then it follows that formaldehyde should also be avoided, as both these chemical elements have a nasty response inside the human body. But it is highy unlikely that with our government enforcing vaccines containing formaldehyde, that we will see much research done about this element.)
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Who wanted to know if there were any scientific reasons to find herself at fault for her daughter's autism (She was, after all, as she clearly states in the introduction to her piece on this, the one who took her daughter in for the shot that crippled her with autism.)
http://www.regardingcaroline.com/pubmed.html
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)On this topic I have presented several arguments.
One argument I have been making in this topic is this one: that we no longer have scientists that practice real science. So we in the USA don't have the answers we should have. Your Post Hoc-Ergo etc does not apply to that aspect of my arguing.
So can you specifically talk about what you mean. feel free to use copy and paste if you want, but show me specifically, Mr Lesser, what you are referring to.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)That bit about other nations laughing is something you just made up.
As for Japan they are noted for being one of the country that allows any quack to market herbs under the idea that "natural" means safe and good.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)LeftishBrit
(41,210 posts)truedelphi
(32,324 posts)People here who are not falling into the Confirmation bias trap.
Those who want safe vaccines are constantly told that their side has not proven the risks of the pro0ducts. And we who want safe vaccines also watch as those who have attempted proofs have been made into pariahs.
But the thing is, most nations in the world now try to follow the Preventative Priniciple, wherein you don't have people using products till the products are proven safe.
Many people here in the USA don't know that the average vaccine is tested for less than three months.
LeftishBrit
(41,210 posts)MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)Vaccines do not have six to nine weeks of studies. That is pure baloney.
Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)Anti-vaccers are going to be the death of many people. Public Health has done a great job getting rid of lots of deadly diseases. We don't see the ravages of these diseases anymore, so people think they're not such a big deal. That is pure stupidity.
There is no credible proof that the vaccine / autism situation is anything but baloney. Kids start showing symptoms of autism around the same time as these vaccinations are administered.
Here's something you need to learn: correlation is not causation.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)BZZZZZZZZZZTTTTTTT.
Danger Will Robinson.. Bad Science Ahead.
I think, if memory serves, that radioactive material, followed by benzene, followed by mercury followed by formaledehyde, are the top most dangerous chems.
Meaningless statement. Along the lines of "in what context Charlie".
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)Vaccine package inserts that list encephalitis or encephalopathy as an adverse reaction
LIST AND LINK TO PACKAGE INSERT
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)You are seriously ok linking to a site that claims GardisilGardisil is ruining lives one girl at a time?
And they are listed under possible side effects not actual. I am not sure how familiar you are with clinical trials, but the very quickly version is this: any non-normal reaction that occurs during the testing and monitoring periods of a trial is included as a possible side effect as both a requirement and CYA behavior. This is why medicine commercials have a huge list of reactions, even though the vast majority are not related to the medicine.
This is also the reason that only the insane anti-vac websites give a shot about the inserts. If it actually meant anything, it would be seen by now in both cases, successful lawsuits and scientific refutation.
I didn't think you could find a worse website than AoA but props for doing so.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)I know nothing about the site. That's ok, because the site is IRRELEVANT to the collection of pharmaceutical package inserts they have acquired and posted, unless the inserts are forgeries.
FYI, the site popped during a google search on Dr. Offitt, specifically the smart satirical April Fool's Day essay.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)And you linked to a site and told us to scroll down. The website is reprehensible. And source is important, sorry to say. Of course, I googled inserts, and the only websites interested are all equally as crazy.
Now, I might have wondered about that before posting the link, because there is no smoking gun there.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)You know better. It certainly already has.
It is my understanding that court cases proving encephalitis (encephalopathy) are successful, even when autism co-exists. The controversy is that cases only alleging autism are dismissed, even as the link between encephalitis (encephalopathy) and autism is developed. I refer you to AOA for more informed and compelling analysis than mine. The collective intelligence there is formidable and you can find detailed analyses of every public court case, including links to primary documents.
I don't personally have the expertise to do this subject justice. Others do and I refer you to them.
Vaccine package inserts that list encephalitis as an adverse reaction
Merck M-M-R® II Package Insert (Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Virus Vaccine Live) ADVERSE REACTIONS, Nervous System
Encephalitis; encephalopathy
Merck Hepatitis B Vaccine Package Insert RECOMBIVAX HB®
ADVERSE REACTIONS, Marketed Experience, Nervous System
Encephalitis
Merck GARDASIL Package Insert (Human Papillomavirus Quadrivalent) ADVERSE REACTIONS, Postmarketing Experience, Nervous system
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
Merck Chickenpox Vaccine Package Insert VARIVAX® Varicella Virus Vaccine Live
ADVERSE REACTIONS, post-marketing
Encephalitis
Glaxo Pertussis Vaccine Package Insert INFANRIX (DTaP)
Postmarketing Experience, Nervous System Disorders
Encephalopathy
DTaP IPV and HIB Combo Vaccine Package Insert PENTACEL Sanofi Pasteur
Data from Clinical Studies, Serious Adverse Events
Encephalopathy
Flu Mist Vaccine Package Insert MedImmune FLUMIST® (Influenza Vaccine Live, Intranasal Spray)
Postmarketing Experience, Nervous system disorders
Vaccine-associated encephalitis
Flu Vaccine Package Insert AFLURIA CSL marketed by Merck
Postmarketing Experience, Nervous system disorders
Encephalopathy
Flu Vaccine Package Insert AGRIFLU Novartis Vaccines
Postmarketing Experience, Nervous system disorders
Encephalomyelitis and transverse myelitis
Flu Vaccine Package Insert FLUARIX GlaxoSmithKline
Postmarketing Experience, Nervous system disorders
Encephalomyelitis
LINKS
http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/m/mmr_ii/mmr_ii_pi.pdf
http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/r/recombivax_hb/recombivax_pi.pdf
http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/g/gardasil/gardasil_pi.pdf
http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/v/varivax/varivax_pi.pdf
http://us.gsk.com/products/assets/us_infanrix.pdf
https://www.vaccineshoppe.com/image.cfm?doc_id=11169&image_type=product_pdf
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM123743.pdf
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM263239.pdf
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM192127.pdf
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM335392.pdf
longship
(40,416 posts)A parody of both his father and his uncle who were both honorable and thoughtful people. Unlike the addled brain of RFK Jr.
Far too many drugs in his early life, methinks.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)than the drugs. Antivax is very big there, along with it's cousin Scientology. Robert has taken to dating Hollywood actresses of late.
Response to longship (Reply #9)
alp227 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)maddezmom
(135,060 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)My son has sensory problems and getting shots is very painful to him. Back when he was younger he had a much harder time regulating his emotions and his responses. He would scream and the look on his face was horrible. He was truly horrified and freightened. But I knew he had to have those vaccinations. So, I would make him get them. Luckily now he has had all of his adolescent vaccinations. The only thing I have to worry about now is the first time he has to have his blood drawn. He is better at regulating himself now so hopefully it will be better.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Two totally pathetic media-blitzed studies were released.
One of these two studies went on at great lengths to say that the kids who had been vaccinated with the old version of the MMR, containing Thimerosal, had autism rates no higher than kids who were more recently vaccinated with vaccines that contained no Thimerosal. But if you red the study, what you found out was that this study compared kids whose vaccines contained mercury as the adjuvant, with kids whose vaccines contained formaldehyde.
This was an extremely pathetic way to set up a study, so no real knowledge has come about. Both formaldehyde and mercury are extremely potent toxins. this would be like saying it's okay to breathe in car exhaust, because a study said so, and then you found out the study compared the lung tissue samples of people who breathed in diesel truck exhaust as compared to diesel car exhaust.
The other study was simply a "counting" of how many studies out there claimed that vaccines were safe, as opposed to how many studies claimed that vaccines were not safe. That is not science.If hat is how science had been handled here in the late Nineties, with the MTBE gas additive scandal, we would still have MTBe in our gasoline. there were over one thousand industry studies that stated MTBE was safe, while only two studies said MTBE had no benefits and only extreme risk.
Of course, to get the study showing that MTBE was a bad idea to come about, Gov Davis had to scrap his career.
Dr. Strange
(25,923 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)in Salon in 2005. It took 6 years for Salon to publish a retraction:
http://www.salon.com/2011/01/16/dangerous_immunity/
A famous name does not an expert make.
Sid
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Think the site in my OP has a YouTube embed of it.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Orac, at Respectful Insolence covered Kennedy at Autism One earlier this week too.
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/05/30/can-antivaccinationists-knock-it-off-with-the-autism-holocaust-analogies/
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is despicable.
I just wanted to get that off my chest. (Do clear Plexiglass boxes full of multicolored blinky multicolored lights even have chests?) The reason for my outburst will become painfully apparent all too soon, but I just had to say that. Theres also one other thing that I just have to say as well, and thats this. When the managing editor of the antivaccine crank blog to rule all antivaccine crank blogs gives me a blogging topic and practically begs me to blog about it, in general I usually blog about it because, well, how can I resist? Think of it this way. When Dan Olmsted says something like Im well aware Im handing Orac his next feces-flinging column, I feel as though it would be downright unsporting, unchivalrous, even, not to take him up on his offer. I also feel that I owe Olmsted my sincere thanks. its not every day I get such a massive, juicy target so deserving of a heapin helpin of the not-so-Respectful Insolence that Ive become known for over the last eight and a half years.
Of course, I must admit to some mild insult that Olmsted apparently thinks that my carefully crafted not-so-Respectful Insolence directed at cranks, quacks, and loons is akin to the sort of poo-flinging that Age of Autism (AoA) bloggers throw hither, thither, and yon upon anyone with the temerity to suggest to them that maybe, just maybe theyre off base in their fanatical belief that vaccines must cause autism. My criticism, Respectful or not-so-Respectful, consists of precision jabs fired exactly where I want them to land. In comparison, AoA bloggers are about as subtle as a brick to the head and even less fun.
In comparison to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., AoA bloggers are veritable Shakespeares of clear and witty thought.
If you have any doubt of that, just take a look at Dan Olmsteds latest post over at the wretched hive, RFK Jr., Nazi Death Camps and the Battle For Our Future http://www.ageofautism.com/2013/05/rfk-jr-nazi-death-camps-and-the-battle-for-our-future.html . Yes, its every bit as bad as anything you can imagine, and not only is there no subtlety but there is no creativity. I mean, seriously. Nazis? Comparing your enemies to Nazis? How boring is that, RFK, Jr.? Our good ol buddy Dan Olmsted seems blissfully unaware of this as he tries his very hardest to see how far he can stick his head up RFK, Jr.s nether regions. Suffice it to say, its pretty far, far enough to see his tonsils from the other side:
Thanks for the thread.
Sid
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)I am speculating but wouldn't be surprised at all if this turned out to contribute to the backstory.
...EBCALA also partnered with Pace Law School to undertake a study of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program of the Court of Federal Claims.
Elizabeth Birt | Elizabeth Birt Center for Autism Law & Advocacy
Elizabeth Birt (1956-2005) was one of the earlier advocates who helped shape what would become a community of parent activists committed to finding truth and securing justice for their children. Liz was an attorney, a co-founder of SafeMinds, a founding member of the National Autism Association, a co-founder of A-CHAMP, and a principal author of Mercury in Medicine, the 2003 report by the House Government Reform Committee that found mercury in vaccines was toxic.
Liz was a mom. In 1996 Lizs son, Matthew, then 15-months old, was diagnosed with autism. Liz spent the rest of her life helping her son and other affected children and families. The Birt Center is founded in her honor to continue her work.
Google : Liz Birt
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)in ambulance chasing the vaccine industry.
Just saying.
dsc
(52,166 posts)on vaccines he is Michelle Bachmann redux.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)Listen for the HISTORICAL FACTS. Please forgive the Noam Chomsky-style delivery and overt advocacy in the final 20 seconds against ethylmercury containing multidose flu vaccines.
TransitJohn
(6,932 posts)That will just delegitimize all the work he's done on the environment.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Archae
(46,345 posts)"Oh, what's the harm?"
The harm is the babies and little kids who die in agony due to RFK Jr's abject stupidity.
cpwm17
(3,829 posts)Last edited Sun Jun 2, 2013, 01:03 PM - Edit history (1)
I had the chicken pox and the mumps when I was young since the vaccines weren't available yet. My dad recently got the shingles, which adults often get when they have had the chicken pox. Most young people these days don't have to go through that.
Mariana
(14,860 posts)and/or their own children. This is a lie. No vaccine works 100% of the time for 100% of the people who get it, so some who have been vaccinated are still susceptible. There are also those who can't have the vaccines for legitimate medical reasons. All of these people are at put at risk.
And yes, this shit really does happen. It happened to me. My measles vaccine didn't work for whatever reason, and I got measles from an unvaccinated child.
LeftishBrit
(41,210 posts)for certain vaccines.
I know someone who caught whooping cough from an unvaccinated person when she was one week old (too young to have had the vaccine). She survived but suffered brain damage. She's intellectually completely fine, but has never been able to walk.
Beacool
(30,251 posts)Bobby Jr. just became Michelle Bachmann.
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)do think too many are given to children at such a young age. the european countries don't do half as many as we do.
as a child i had measles, chicken pox and whooping cough. never got the mumps even though i was exposed as a child -- my couisin had them and i was playing with her right before she got them -- then when i was in my late 20s my son got them. i was laying on the couch with him and never got them. guess i had an immunity.
my son also had measles and chicken pox. he was born in '61. i don't recall the shots being offered -- then again we didn't have health insurance.
i was born in '41 and lived in fear of polio. i have scoliosis and several docs think i might have had a mild case that went undiagnosed. who knows? i guess i got the vaccine when it became available.
that being said i know a naturapathic doc who had 6 children -- none of them were vaccinated and they're all healthy adults now.
MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)study.
In 1966, a venereal disease investigator named Peter Buxtun learned of the study and sent a letter to his department director expressing his moral concerns regarding the experiment. The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) responded by asserting that the study must continue until all of the patients had died, allowing the researchers the opportunity to autopsy all of the patients. This conclusion was supported by the National Medical Association and the American Medical Association. Nonetheless Buxtun continued his efforts to bring attention to the questionable ethics of the study, but his words failed to penetrate the tangled mass of bureaucracy and racism at the CDC.
http://www.damninteresting.com/bad-blood-in-tuskegee/
The first published report of the study appeared in 1936, with subsequent papers issued every four to six years until the early 1970s. In l969, a committee at the federally operated Center for Disease Control decided the study should continue. Only in 1972, when accounts of the study first appeared in the national press, did the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW) halt the experiment.
http://www.socialworker.com/tuskegee.htm
In 1969 I was at university. It's not ancient history.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)As long as Thimerosal is in these vaccines, this controversy will remain.
You can put up all the links you want. It doesn't change the fact that mercury is an extremely toxic substance that is PROVEN to cause significant damage even in small amounts. This is a substance more dangerous than arsenic. And when people see it in their vaccines, in their dental fillings, in their food and water.... people are going to ask questions and people are going to be concerned.
EvolveOrConvolve
(6,452 posts)And repeating a lie enough times isn't going to ever make it true. This conspiracy theory bullshit needs to go away - it doesn't accomplish anything other than filling the pockets of the anti-vaxxer nuts.
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/thimerosal/
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)Aluminum, formaldehyde, polysorbate and other chemicals.
You replace a toxic substance with another toxic substance. Polysorbate has shown to cause cancer in laboratory rats. Aluminum is a neurotoxin and studies still have to be done on its full effects. I hope I dont have to explain that formaldehyde is a poison.
You want to take the risks and inject this stuff into your body and your kids. Fine! I promise no one is going to run and pull the needle away from you. But you don't have a right to force other people to accept those risks. People should have a right to control what goes into their bodies. People have a right to make their own medical decisions that will effect their life.
EvolveOrConvolve
(6,452 posts)http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/hpv-vaccination-misinformation-and-bias-on-medscape/
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/cashing-in-on-fear-the-danger-of-dr-sears/
It's important to note that "the dose makes the poison". Water is dangerous in large quantities, but you're not going to stop drinking it because of that. Are you?
I'd chalk your lack of understanding up to simple ignorance of the issue, but attitudes like yours lead to policies that kill people - often children, the elderly or the infirm. Yes, there's a slight risk of side effects, or even death, from vaccines. But that's the price we pay for saving millions of lives.
Small pox:
Tetanus:
Mumps:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mumps_PHIL_130_lores.jpg
Rubella:
Polio
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)He stated clearly he doesn't care about facts or any links to those facts.
EvolveOrConvolve
(6,452 posts)Eventually, all the overwhelming evidence being presented will (hopefully) make a dent in his ignorance.
LeftishBrit
(41,210 posts)The MMR, which has been the subject of much of the controversy, never did.
The flu vaccine is the only one that sometimes still contains mercury, and you can ask to get it without mercury.
Removing mercury from vaccines, though a good thing in itself, did not change autism rates.
By the way: it's worth noting that early 20th century kids often got far more mercury than kids nowadays. It was often prescribed in medicines and even teething powders. This was certainly a bad thing, and many children got sick, or even died. But this goes against the idea of autism as 'a modern epidemic caused by mercury in vaccines'. Perhaps there were more autistic children then than now (I would not be surprised in fact, though the diagnostic category did not exist them); but this also goes against the anti-vaccine propaganda.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)a lot higher than Mercury in vaccines. Understand basic chemistry before you start your rants.
LeftishBrit
(41,210 posts)The UK does not provide the chicken-pox vaccine; but otherwise I think we get pretty much the same vaccines as the Americans,
Carolina
(6,960 posts)of what you're saying, particularly the vaccination schedule.
While I am a firm believer in vaccines, I was surprised when reviewing the CDC website for recommended pediatric vaccination schedules to learn how many more vaccines are given to young children today versus when my son was an infant and school-aged child in the 1980s-90s.
What gives me pause is not the vaccines per se but the combination of vaccines and environmental influences. For example, cough & cold preparations, vitamins and other OTC meds are artificially sweetened (aspartame, etc). Then kids are inundated in plastic... baby food is now packaged in plastic containers versus those great little glass jars of yesteryear (which served assorted other purposes). And while sippy cups, toys and some infant paraphernalia (e.g. car seats) have been plastic for sometime, what is the nature of all this plastic STUFF made somewhere offshore today.
Also, consider the industrial production of our food with increased use of all the 'cides' (pesticides, herbicides, fungicides) and the use of antimicrobials in animal feed and in soaps (that awful triclosan) and its no wonder that something is not awry with all of us.
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)when i was growing up everything was cooked fresh. i miss glass bottles. i remember when you could only keep milk and bread for a few days before it went bad -- now you can keep it for almost a month. and there were very few fat children. now childhood obesity is a problem.
Carolina
(6,960 posts)I remember in summer when fruit and vegetables were always good, fresh ... not mealy in texture and tasteless in flavor. You didn't have to force kids to eat peaches, plums, apples, grapes, tomatoes, cucumbers or even peppers... Certain things were not available in winter and for good reason.
As for bread, you are sooooo right. I forgot to mention all the preservatives
As for obesity, we played outside all the time. Now kids are tethered to plastic machines playing angry birds and candy games... WTF?! Whatever happened to being outside in real time, in real nature?
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)right. i used to love bananas -- no more.
yes. we played outside. went out in the morning -- came home for lunch -- went out again till dinner -- then back out. we played jump rope, hop scotch, stoop ball, etc. i lived in a city till i was 12. then we moved to the burbs. i got a bike and it was constant bike riding. when i was about 15 it wasn't cool to ride a bike anymore so we walked.
my mom was a stay at home mom who loved cooking and baking. she made awesome pies from scratch. didn't have to worry about gaining weight because we were so active.
Carolina
(6,960 posts)own thread about the way things were, but I suppose it would be more fitting in the Lounge.
Anyway, I find myself increasingly saddened by what we've lost and how we are devolving as a nation.
Though I was, and am, a city girl and both parents worked when I was growing up, family dinner was a standard that never wavered and it was always good. We had extended family nearby and spent a lot of time with grandparents and other 'kin' who grew produce and prepared it in wonderful ways. So I know what you mean about pies, in particular (my mouth is watering at the thought!)
Nice talking to you!
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)cousins were within a few blocks too. then slowly my aunts and uncles started to buy houses in the burbs.
i adored my grandmother. even when we moved to the burbs most school vacations were spent with her. i had friends in the burbs and friends in the city. i really loved the city. was not really happy in the burbs
one night a week we had leftovers. my mom would get everything out of the refrigerator and heat it up. i wasn't too crazy about that. we were catholic so on fridays we usually had fish cakes and spaghetti. sometimes my parents splurged and brought shrimp (already deep fried) from the fish store. i never liked shrimp. on those nights i would make a sandwich with the french fries that came with the shrimp.
gotta go. we should talk more -- maybe in the lounge or PMs.
Carolina
(6,960 posts)and may PM you sometime since of late I tend to lurk/read on DU more than log in/post. I got flamed (and alerted on) a couple of weeks back when I called the slimy senior US senator from the state I now call home: Little Miss Lindsey. Need I say, the PC police on DU bug the crap out of me
Anyway, by reading more than posting, I found I spent less time chatting (hanging out online) and more time doing things in the real world! Who'd have thought it LOL... But I had to check in when I read your post.
One more note regarding our trip down memory lane: As Episcopalians (Catholic-lite), we always had fish on Friday with my maternal grandparents... always fresh, usually fried and oh so good!
Keep in touch and all the best
Carolina
choie
(4,111 posts)a child who was diagnosed with autism? Perhaps that's an explanation for his grasping at straws...
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)There is lots of money to made in class action lawsuits.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)I don't know what got into him. It's sad to think of a Kennedy so bereft of critical thinking. It's like finding out that Arthur Conan Doyle really and truly believed in faeries.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)first , no one really know what causes autism. second , why do they think it is right to endanger other children by not getting shots. third ,to many people spend tens to hundreds of thousands of dollar seeking cures for autism.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)is a possible contributor to autism and other childhood neurological disorders, Thimerosal being a mercury-based adjutant (preservative) added to multi-dose vaccines since the 1930s? That point always seems to get forgotten but it's very important. So to repeat:
RFk Jr. has no objections to childhood vaccinations or to the vaccines themselves; his concerns are about the mercury-based adjutants used to this day to preserve multi-dose vaccines.
From opening of "Tobacco Science and the Thimerosal Scandal," by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., published June 22, 2005, comprising 66 pages of text and 139 very detailed footnotes:
Mounting evidence suggests that thimerosal, a preservative in many children's vaccines that breaks down to release neurotoxic ethyl mercury, may be responsible for the exponential growth of autism, attention deficit disorder (ADD), hyperactivity (ADHD), speech and language delays, and other childhood neurological disorders now epidemic in the United States.1
http://www.robertfkennedyjr.com/docs/ThimerosalScandalFINAL.PDF
This article also appeared in a shorter version called "Deadly Immunity," minus documentation, in Salon and Rolling Stone in June 2005, but is no longer available in either. Salon "retracted" it and Rolling Stone put it behind a paywall. However, it's still available at CommonDreams.Org and at RFK Jr's website:
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0616-31.htm
http://www.robertfkennedyjr.com/articles/2005_june_16.html
------------
NOTE: I am posting this information solely for the purpose of clarifying assertions made in the OP, and I am not endorsing anyone's claims.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)Sad really.
Good quote.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Was a comparison to Nazi death camps and called for the imprisonment of a man who has saved hundreds of thousands of lives in developing countries based on woo.
Heroin is a helluva drug, which is sad really.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)The materialist fundamentalists are funnier than the Christian fundamentalists, because they think they're rational! ~Robert Anton Wilson
''Orthodoxy means not thinking -- not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness.'' ~George Orwell, 1984
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)... is probably not a great idea.
Just sayin'
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)AUTISM RESEARCHER INDICTED FOR STEALING GRANT MONEY
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 13, 2011
Thorsen Allegedly Absconded With Over $1 Million
Background Report Poul Thorsen, MD, PhD
CDC Researcher Fugitive from Justice
November 2012
Tax evasion, money laundering, wire fraud, violations of dual employment regulations leading to dismissal from a leading research university -- all connected with embezzling grant money through an elaborate scheme of falsifying invoices and forging signatures.
With all these criminal irregularities, how can anyone trust the data this researcher produced? Why haven't calls for retracting his studies gone out? The money aside, Poul Thorsens research has had a profound influence on vaccine policy both here in the USA and abroad. Ultimately the health communitys acceptance of his research as being beyond reproach raises concerns about the safety of all children receiving vaccines. If data were altered to fit the desired outcomes, then outcomes using this research become tainted, especially the National Academies of Science Institute of Medicines (IOM) strong reliance on his work for determining the potential for harm from thimerosal in vaccines. The details of these issues are summarized in this report.
SafeMinds is a non-profit organization founded to restore health and protect future generations by eradicating the devastation of autism and associated health disorders induced by mercury and other man made toxicants. As part of SafeMinds' ongoing activities to inform the public and policy makers about the many research irregularities that continue to undermine the public trust in government health agencies and impede progress in curtailing the epidemic increase of autism rates, we are making available a background report on Poul Thorsen, a key figure in the building of a shaky foundation of research that denied justice to thousands of families whose children suffered a vaccine related neurological injury (brain and nervous system) that developed into autism spectrum disorder (ASD or autism).
This information has previously been provided to Congressional staff as part an ongoing education program to bring legislators' attention to the needs of the autism community including those who came to the community as a result of a vaccine related brain injury. With the recent announcement that Dr. Thorsen was placed on the top of the Most Wanted list form the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS); SafeMinds has decided to make this full report public.
<>
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)Multiple corroborating embedded links at original.
WARNING - SATIRE
Dr. Paul Offit is admitted to Philadelphia hospital after taking 100,000 vaccines
Posted on April 1, 2012 by The Refusers
Responding to a public challenge by neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock (link) to take the same vaccines that he recommends for others, Dr. Paul Offit had 100,000 vaccines injected by his wife, pediatrician Dr. Bonnie Offit. In a statement before the 24-hour injection session, Dr. Paul Offit said: As I stated in the October 2005, Parents Pack Newsletter from the Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia (link): My studies show healthy infants could safely get up to 100,000 vaccines at once and I intend to demonstrate this to debunk the false prophets of a vaccine/autism link once and for all.
Dr. Offit received 38 injections per square inch of his body in the marathon vaccine injection session. He developed seizures and was admitted to Philadelphia Childrens Hospital with severe cases of atypical measles, chickenpox, pertussis, pneumonia, rotavirus and encephalitis. This hospital issued a statement saying that Dr. Offit was probably faking his symptoms, because scientific studies show that vaccines have been proven to be 100% safe and effective and never cause adverse reactions.
A spokesman for Merck (which made 99,999 of the 100,000 vaccines) said: Sometimes neurological diseases occur in a random temporal association with vaccination. Correlation is not causation. No one should know this better than Dr. Offit and we refuse to take responsibility for his health problems. If he erroneously believes that vaccines have caused his illnesses, he should apply to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) for relief. The NVICP was created expressly to protect innocent vaccine manufacturers like us from frivolous lawsuits by so-called vaccine adverse reaction victims.
The Chief Special Master of the NVICP kangaroo court issued a statement saying: Unfortunately, Dr. Offits symptoms are not covered under our program. There is absolutely no scientific evidence showing that vaccines can cause the diseases they were designed to prevent. Dr. Offit is mistaken if he believes that he can milk the system with his phony vaccine injury claims. Anyway, the money obtained through vaccine taxes in the NVICP program has already been spent by the US government as part of the general budget, so we couldnt pay Offit even if we wanted to. Why do you think we reject so many claims anyway?
From his hospital bed, Dr. Offit gave this response: Now I understand how vaccines are injuring children and adults. I promise to work to correct the great injustice that I have personally inflicted on innocent vaccine victims. If I ever recover from this paralytic neurological damage caused by vaccination, I will work tirelessly to ensure that such a thing never happens to another innocent child.
mathematic
(1,439 posts)Mercury is a well known focal point of the spiritual. Just as it has the unique physical property of being a liquid and a metal at room temperature, it also has the unique property of interacting with the physical and non-physical world at room temperature. The mercury in the thimerosal is concentrated through the power of metaphor when its placed in a needle. This concentrated spiritual disturbance is a force too great for an innocent developing child to handle and the child's mind-sense gets knocked unbalanced. The child, instinctively appreciating this loss, cries. At this time it's unknown if the cry is a defense mechanism that helps set things right or a harbinger that things have once again gone horribly wrong.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)quite possibly the dumbest thing posted in this thread.
Well done.
Sid
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)learn new things, change ones perspective and expand ones understanding. XOXO
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)I thought that was a case of opening your mind so far that your brains fall out.
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)Silent3
(15,265 posts)Really? There's not, in fact, a large body of invention that more or less fulfills expectations of what might come next? You're sure there's not a large body of scientific knowledge that has been built incrementally and not-too-surprisingly from known science?
And yes, "refusal to bow to authority" and "disobedience" have their place in scientific discovery, but it's "survivor bias" (Google it) to not realize what low yields those things produce.
Most of what is laughed at deserves to be laughed at, and thankfully never goes anywhere.
Most crazy ideas are just that, crazy ideas.
The problem is, when a crazy, laughed-at idea hits the big time, everyone hears about it. Most of the vastly larger supply of bad ideas is quickly forgotten. To make matters worse, the degree of rejection and controversy about some scientific ideas that had a bit of struggle getting started gets greatly exaggerated by popularizing biographers and historians of science, just to make their stories seem more dramatic.
Orrex
(63,223 posts)The publication of that article was RFKJ declaring himself to be not worth listening to.
There is no evidence--none whatsoever--that Thimerosal causes, leads to, or contributes to autism. It is cruel and irresponsible to propogate that lie.
Whatever fine work RFKJ has done for the environment, his choice to this bullshit line of pseudoscience has rendered him a joke.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)including at least one prominent conervative, per Washington Post, Dec. 21, 2011:
"Dan Burton (R-Ind.), U.S. Representative (since January 1983)":
A quirky politician, Burton has represented Indiana's 5th district since 1983, but it wasn't until the late 1990s that he stumbled upon what has become his signature issue: fighting autism. Burton believes that thimerosal-laced vaccines may have contributed to his grandson's autism.
Burton has been outspoken in his opposition to thimerosal, arguing it should be banned and holding hearings on vaccines. This stance has alienated him from one of his district's major employers, Eli Lilly and Co., which developed the chemical.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/dan-burton-r-ind/gIQAbsbPAP_topic.html
---------------
More on Burton, from RFK's June 2005 "Deadly Immunity":
Even many conservatives are shocked by the government's effort to cover up the dangers of thimerosal. Rep. Dan Burton, a Republican from Indiana, oversaw a three-year investigation of thimerosal after his grandson was diagnosed with autism.
"Thimerosal used as a preservative in vaccines is directly related to the autism epidemic," his House Government Reform Committee concluded in its final report. "This epidemic in all probability may have been prevented or curtailed had the FDA not been asleep at the switch regarding a lack of safety data regarding injected thimerosal, a known neurotoxin."
The FDA and other public-health agencies failed to act, the committee added, out of "institutional malfeasance for self protection" and "misplaced protectionism of the pharmaceutical industry."
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0616-31.htm
"Deadly Immunity" is about a Bush-era political cover-up, and it's fairly short. so I'd at least glancing over it before coming to any conclusions. If what he wrote is true, and no has disputed this account it's pretty shocking.
Orrex
(63,223 posts)The evidence simply doesn't support the claim, a complete fabrication put forth most famously by the oft-debunked and too-late-disgraced Andrew Wakefield.
Impassioned testimonials from dignataries, celebrities, and Representatives can't overcome the fact that there is no evidence that Thimerosal has a causal relation to autism. A congressional report is not a scientific study; no scientific study has demonstrated the purported link.
Shame on RFKJ and his ilk for spreading this dangerous propaganda.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)So the Wakefield dust-up doesn't seem to be relevant here.
Orrex
(63,223 posts)Every anti-Thimerosal article can be traced back to Wakefield, even if the author of a given article doesn't cite or acknowlege Wakefield.
For that matter, the fact that RFKJ doesn't acknowledge Wakefield is itself conspiicuous and must be addressed; why omit the person who initiated the Thimerosal-causes-autism bullshit? RFKJ could have rejected Wakefield, thereby improving his own credibility on the subject. His choice to overlook Wakefield suggests that RFKJ hasn't heard of him (meaning that RFKJ hasn't done any research) or that he agrees with Wakefield but doesn't want to be linked to such a lightning rod. It's also possible that RFKJ thinks that Wakefield is full of shit but doesn't want to alienate Wakefield's acolytes.
In any case, there is simply no excuse for the omission.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)in the long one, before you spin yourself dizzy? Here's the link. Believe it or not Wakefield's is not the only study out there:
http://www.robertfkennedyjr.com/docs/ThimerosalScandalFINAL.PDF
Orrex
(63,223 posts)If you have a particular citation that you want me to review, then provide it.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Orrex
(63,223 posts)Why would I read bullshit again?
And why would you play this hide-and-seek game with the information that you seem to think will open my eyes to the evils of Thimerosal? Why not simply give the citation that I asked for?
Unless you realize it's bullshit, of course.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Are you okay?
Orrex
(63,223 posts)I'm not going to pore over 66 pages of bullshit in hope of finding the one reference that you think I need to see.
Your weird reluctance to answer a direct question is as conspicuous as RFKJ's choice to omit Wakefield from his 66 treatise on bullshit.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Orrex
(63,223 posts)Chan790
(20,176 posts)The origin of the entire recent flare-up of anti-vax woo is Wakefield; it all traces back to that asshole eventually, whether by-name or implicitly.
Wakefield is always relevant because without Wakefield, there is no substantial anti-vax movement of woo.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)That's in the May 21, 2003 US Congressional Record by the way. I don't think Wakefield was alive in 1935.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)It's in footnote #7 of RFK's "Tobacco Science," page image below and link to the full PDF doc below that:
http://www.robertfkennedyjr.com/docs/ThimerosalScandalFINAL.PDF
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)It doesn't get much clearer than that, does it? And yet 78 years later here we are, merrily shooting the messenger, a Kennedy no less.
Anyway I hope everyone will read at least read the first few pages of this important article and thanks for the thanks!
Petrushka
(3,709 posts). . . Thimerasol and merthiolate are one and the same thing.
Merthiolate: the red stuff in the medicine cabinet that felt like a bee-sting when Mom painted it on my skinned knee back in the late 30s?
"KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN"
Merthiolate, in childhood vaccines?
Oh, I get it: "Not for...use on large areas." the label says. "For external use only." Meaning, obviously, that Merthiolate was known to be unsafe when painted on large areas on the outside of anyone's body and IF, perhaps, anyone ingests it. However . . . WHEN someone decided to inject it into the bodies of small children?? THEN it became fine and dandy?
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)what could go wrong?
Petrushka
(3,709 posts). . . what could go wrong after one realizes---finally!---there's absolutely no need to worry about how to KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN that neurotoxic ethyl mercury germicide because, when injected, it'd be hidden where even the most inquisitive of children would never think to look.
Liberal Veteran
(22,239 posts)How many creationists and global warming deniers do we have in Congress compared to actual scientists?
MineralMan
(146,329 posts)I'll be listening to what he says with a grain of salt from now on, or maybe a full shaker of salt, if I can find it.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)The promotion of woo is always dangerous. Morons posting online promoting woo are dangerous enough (easily preying on the desperate and distraught)
It is more than unfortunate that Kennedy would use his position as a "public type" figure to promote woo.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)..lots of real science there:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/03/the-upper-class-is-more-republican/#.UatnQxpZ7hU
Which seems to mirror who Discover magazine and so many on this thread aim to reach.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)With relation to the blog you linked to and this thread. If you're questioning the legitimacy of reporting that Kennedy is scientifically ignorant, his quotes are from the event he spoke at, and he has been on the anti-vac bandwagon for at least 8 years.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)by impeaching the source you used in your OP.
Ignore it.
Sid
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Going by what you've written, you don't much like liberal Democrats.
FDR
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1847078
RFK, Jr.
http://sync.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2194573
Octafish
http://election.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2421262
As for why I would wear the label, loyalty:
http://sync.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2228843
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)I don't like conspiracy theorists.
I love liberal Democrats.
Sid
Octafish
(55,745 posts)But you are quick to label.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)"As for Oswald, I don't know if he was a hero in all this or not."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2232672
oh, I updated my journal for you...since you seem to attach such importance to journals.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Because that's what he told the FBI.
You, OTOH, make out like Oswald did it and that's that.
As for journals, they help measure how much someone contributes to DU. So, I looked at yours and it was sad, especially considering your post count.
As for my journal, show me what's wrong with it and I'll apologize and correct it. As long as I've been asking you that, you have yet to show where I am wrong.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Not knowing much yet about this topic, something I intend to correct, who should I believe?
That was easy. For now, until I do some research, I will go with RFK Jr.
I have a feeling that like it or not, being that RFK Jr has so much credibility in this country for his work on so many important issues, that I am not the only one who will give credence to his opinion until someone more credible, and so far I haven't seen that here, proves him wrong. It is certainly possible that he is wrong. However, the vitriol in this thread from some who apparently are not overly fond of Liberal Democrats to begin with, are not very convincing.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)after you've done your homework.
Sid
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)right about this, I would acknowledge that.. Attacking RFK and other Liberal Democrats who could be mistaken about one thing or another, that is human, doesn't gain someone much credibility with democrats here.
If you have a case to make on a Democratic forum, then my advice is to refrain from insulting Democrats. We reserve insults for morons on the Right. Democrats such as RFK Jr have a long history of being right on the issues and have gained therefore a lot of credibility. If he is wrong, then leave out the insults and explain why he is wrong. Otherwise people will ignore your opinion and go with his, right or wrong, based on the issue of credibility. As I said, due the status he has among Democrats in the US, his opinion is likely to be accepted rather than that of anonymous people who have a propensity for attacking liberal democrats on the internet.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)RFK Jr is sure to spill the beans this year about the JFK assassination and tell us who his dad thought killed JFK.
Can't have Jr's credibility besmirched, can we?
BTW, why doesn't your journal have 1000's of entries about the BFEE?
Something you're not telling us?
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)but the BFEE hacked my account and deleted everything.
I thought about recreating them, but meh.
Sid
Octafish
(55,745 posts)It's one of the first things I noticed about you.
Regarding the BFEE, start rebuilding your database here:
Know your BFEE: Spawn of Wall Street and the Third Reich
Regarding Sen. Kennedy, start rebuilding your database here:
Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy believed President Kennedy was killed by a conspiracy.
Regarding President Kennedy, start rebuilding your database here:
Poppy Bush was in Dallas on 22 November 1963. Why?
Feel free to show me any errors in content or analysis.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)The guy seems right at home on Free Republic.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Very unusual in the internet world. And yet, Kennedy's quotes are still right there for the world to read. So call me curious, if you believe the author has no credibility due to an earlier tiff, does that mean everything that Kennedy has done is negated by the fact that he is a moron when it comes to our children's health?
Octafish
(55,745 posts)I was there when he publicly called Scalia a Nazi. History has proven him correct.
As for mercury in vaccines, I'll also side with RFK, Jr.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Kennedy is not just wrong on this issue, he is about as wrong as it is possible to be. Escalating it by comparing one of the most important medical advances in history to the nazis, and advocating jailing people who are defending actual science. What is worse, his position will make parents feel better about endangering children. He did a lot of damage at that conference.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Or are you taking Keith Kloor's word on it?
I followed your link to Kloor's blog and had neither, recording or transcript.
It did have a link to a now-defunct page.
So, yes. I'll side with RFK, Jr. on the issue of mercury in vaccines over the blogger Kloor. RFK, Jr. says the science does not show mercury, even in trace amounts, to be safe for humans.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)And it is not just that one blog that quoted this, it just happens to be the one that I picked.
And there is no science anywhere that shows any one case of vaccines causing autism. Not in the pre or post thermisol era.
Kennedy is making the situation thousands of times worse, because there are some gullible people that think he knows what he is talking about on this issue.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)... because there are some gullible people that think he knows what he is talking about on this issue."
Couldn't have said it better and this thread makes the point!
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Ya think?
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)that would be a patently false statement.
Do you even know the half life of thiomersal.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)"As for mercury in vaccines, I'll also side with RFK, Jr."
Sid
zappaman
(20,606 posts)name not needed
(11,660 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)we haven't seen David Michael Green around here in ages.
Memories. http://election.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=863186&mesg_id=865621
Thanks for the chuckle.
Sid
name not needed
(11,660 posts)Boy, was I glad when that semester was over.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)harm and even death by vaccines for childhood diseases. MANY millions. Tens or hundreds of millions.
LeftishBrit
(41,210 posts)the comparison is INCREDIBLY offensive to anyone of Jewish origin (I am) or any of the other groups that were victims of the Nazis.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)GoneOffShore
(17,340 posts)And an even bigger fail on the part of his defenders in this woo fest.
Iggo
(47,565 posts)Fuckin idiot.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)I still do respect Bobby Jr., but this has me a bit worried about his health.
Though, to be honest, if you thought this was bad, here's an even nuttier theory that is based even more on woo & bull: apparently, there are people out there who think that global warming causes autism, supposedly. No fucking joke, man.
(There was one guy who supports this theory that went into a lot of detail on it, but I'm having a great deal of trouble finding it after a few hours of on-and-off Googling. If anyone finds it, please let me know. The one thing I do remember is that he went by "Bob".....)
Bucky
(54,065 posts)I don't excuse his dangerous rhetoric and wilfull ignorance. But I gotta wonder at where the pathology might come from.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)There may indeed be some issues with vaccines from time to time, but, speaking as a former anti-vaxxer of sorts(I didn't go all the way, though), Bobby Jr.'s skepticism is understandable to a point, but I'd wish he'd tone down the rhetoric and get a grip.....
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)It was a METAPHOR. Although I didn't personally care for it, I'm withholding judgement.
Each of us will have our highlights from last weekends extraordinary Autism One gathering in Chicago, but for me it was Bobby Kennedy Jr. saying, To my mind this is like the Nazi death camps.
This is the imprisonment of so many of our children in the grip of autism. Talk about cutting through the neurodiverse claptrap!
<>
Those who can advocate for themselves should do so. Move right along, please. Those who cannot have advocates like their parents and RFK Jr. who are sick of mincing words.
"But the scale of the catastrophe, the immensity of the denial, the suffering of the victims do justify the language."
Anne Dachel, Media
May 29
It was energizing to listen of RFK Jr. Things will never be the same.
AGE OF AUTISM
Dan Olmsted
Each of us will have our highlights from last weekends extraordinary Autism One gathering in Chicago, but for me it was Bobby Kennedy Jr. saying, To my mind this is like the Nazi death camps.
This is the imprisonment of so many of our children in the grip of autism. Talk about cutting through the neurodiverse claptrap!
When Bobby Kennedy says something, it gives cover, in a sense, for others to use the same kind of language and frame the debate in the same kind of way. (Language that reminds me of David Kirbys phrase, the shuttered hell of autism, in Evidence of Harm.)
Those who can advocate for themselves should do so. Move right along, please. Those who cannot have advocates like their parents and RFK Jr. who are sick of mincing words.
Of course, playing what some call the Nazi card is always a risk. Ive been bashed for it when I compared the mainstream media to the how could we have known! German citizens in the face of the Holocaust (and Im well aware Im handing Orac his next feces-flinging column). Note that Bobby wasnt calling those whove enabled the autism epidemic Hitlers (just as I was not saying that about the media).
But the scale of the catastrophe, the immensity of the denial, the suffering of the victims do justify the language.
The enablers may not belong in Nuremburg, but they do belong in jail, Bobby said. I would do a lot to see Paul Offit and all these good people behind bars, he said, after listing Offits litany of lies and profit. Just to make sure people got the point, he returned to it in his speech. Is it hyperbole to say they should be in jail? They should be in jail and the key should be thrown away.
He quoted his fathers despair over the U.S. dropping napalm on Vietnamese villages and wondering if we are really any better than the Germans were. And he quoted Bible verse to say that if anyone harms so much as a hair on the head of a child, it would have been better if they were never born.
<>
Kennedy has put together a book-length treatment on the dangers of ethylmercury, given every year to 84 million children around the world including the United States (in prenatal and infant flu shots). He wants to get meetings with the CDC, AAP, FDA, etc., and get a commitment by the end of this summer to finally remove thimerosal from vaccines in one year. ONE year. If not, he said, hell publish the book.
If they dont do this, he said, this is what Im going to do with my life. Since theyre not going to do it, it looks like weve got a friend for life.
Comment:
Making any comparison to Nazi Germany is not going to be popular, but when it fits, it fits. We are well past the time when anyone can say they just didnt know. Health officials understand as well as we do what this bloated, toxic vaccine schedule is doing to children and they arent stopping it. Maybe they have some bizarre logic going on in their heads telling themselves that a generation of chronically ill and disabled children is an acceptable loss because they honestly believe so many lives have been saved by vaccines.
Thats hardly a defense, but in the end itll probably be the only one left to them. Its a pathetic excuse for sacrificing a generation of children on the high altar of corporate greed.
Anne Dachel, Media
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)and his equally insane fans and followers in the anti-vaxxer movement, who are literally killing people with their idiocy.
RFK Jr is a shithead.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)Personally, I'm a strong advocate of informed consent, PERIOD. Different strokes for different folks and all that. I would never presume otherwise.
IMO, that the video chooses sides detracts from the explosive material it documents about the first cases of autism and implications for the present. I wish it only contained historical information without blatant advocacy, although it is understandable. Check it out, then comment at AOA.
Well, here we go again. Nothing we've accomplished takes precedence over the evidence we've dug up about the 11 cases of autism reported by Leo Kanner in 1943. I see sharing this evidence as an urgent moral imperative, and I'll risk being redundant or looking naive in order to do it.
So if I can call in one favor after 10 years of chasing the autism story, this is it -- help us spread this video!
<>
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)Fox news would be a more legitimate site than that claptrap.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)Hey, you can even listen with the intent to rebut any factual errors and buttress your own case. I guarantee you'll benefit from the information. FACTS ARE FACTS whether uncovered by a source you dislike or not.
You won't regret it.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)You will not however, find any of them on ageofautism.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 4, 2013, 10:26 PM - Edit history (1)
The video summarizes explosive historical findings about the first eleven cases of autism ever documented, as published in peer-reviewed medical journals at the time, by disclosing the previously unknown parental occupational exposure to the newly invented ethylmercury introduced commercially as SEED DISINFECTANT, LUMBER TREATMENT, VACCINE PRESERVATIVE in each of the ~8 cases where the individual was identified.
I don't have time to make a transcript or do the subject justice. Please just watch the video.
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)So far, crickets from the critics, as far as I can tell.
Petrushka
(3,709 posts). . . and finding no alternate interpretations---I'm wondering if the more adamant critics refuse admittance to ANY historical facts for fear of being wrong in their close-minded opinions.
Anyway . . .
I'll post the following link on my FB Timeline --->
AnalystInParadise
(1,832 posts)showing the anti-vaccine crowd is full of crap.....Oh wait, it shows a kitty in a shark suit chasing a duck while riding a roomba.....And even still this video makes more sense than any of the anti-vaccine fools out there.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)Why It Took Decades of Blaming Parents Before We Banned Lead Paint
As with soda, demanding that all mechanisms of harm be completely understood before regulations are put in place is frightening.
DAVID ROSNER & GERALD MARKOWITZ
APR 22 2013, 10:33 AM ET
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)"We always knew they were crazy." That's how it always gos with things like this.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Sad.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)June 3, 2013
Stanford U's Dr. Carl Feinstein Responds to Autism Questions
By Anne Dachel
On May 30, 2013, there was a piece on SCOPE, the Stanford University Medical School site, with the title, "Director of Stanford Autism Center responds to your questions on research and treatment." Link: http://scopeblog.stanford.edu/2013/05/30/director-of-stanford-autism-center-responds-to-your-questions-on-research-and-treatment/
<>
"How meaningful are environmental factors, such as nutrition and exposure to toxins during pregnancy, in terms of autism risk?"
Feinstein's answer:
"During pregnancy, proper nutrition and taking reasonable measures to avoid exposure to known environmental toxins are basic steps an expectant mother, and family, can take to promote a baby's health and minimize risks of medical problems for the newborn. This principle certainly applies to giving birth to a baby with a healthy brain and nervous system, and pregnant women should consume proper nutrients to support brain development. There are a number of known toxins, including lead, alcohol, mercury, tobacco, various insecticides, petrochemical products and some medicines that are harmful to fetal development. An important area of concern is our current environment and findings showing that food and water sources, and other common materials, can contain man-made chemicals.
"A great deal of scientific attention is now being focused on the potential consequences of some of these chemicals on the bodily organs, including the brain, as well as possible mutagenic or harmful effects on the reproductive organs and human genes. There is a very real basis for concern that environmental toxins play a direct causative role or increase the risk for neurodevelopmental disorders, including ASDs. There is now much research underway to discover what types of chemicals present in the environment might be causatively implicated in ASDs."
Feinstein didn't tell us that all the autism is just better diagnosing of a genetic disorder that's always been around. He knows that environmental toxins are major players in neurological disorders like autism. He even knows about the mutagenic effects they have. He specifically cited MERCURY as a factor. Yet for some reason, he's not willing to talk about the horrendous level of untested mercury allowed in the majority of the flu vaccine that is recommended for pregnant women at all stages of pregnancy. He didn't mention anything about the other issues in the vaccine-autism debate like aluminum, human fetal cells, and the live viruses in the MMR vaccine.
"At present, it appears very unlikely that vaccines of any type are a meaningful causal factor in the vast majority of cases of ASDs."
That statement seemed to settle the issue, or did it?
"At present..." Does that mean that in the future vaccines may be shown to cause autism?
"It appears very unlikely...are a meaningful factor..." That's not the same thing as "there is absolutely no connection between vaccines and autism."
"In the vast majority of cases." So vaccines may be a casual factor in SOME cases?
Feinstein sounded a lot like Dr. David Amaral from the MIND Institute at UC-Davis and Dr. Martha Herbert from Harvard.
<>
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)Response to Godhumor (Original post)
mother earth This message was self-deleted by its author.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)We seem all to eager to say vaccination is all good at the same time we rail against big pharma, doesn't make sense. Some does a lot of good and I bet some is designed to fatten peoples wallets. Just saw a shingles ad that basically attempts to scare you into seeking out a preventative shingles medicine on the very off chance you may get shingles because you had chicken pox as a child. I know that's not the same as vaccinations to stave off potentially deadly childhood and adult illness but really, who stands to gain should always be asked IMO.
Response to Puzzledtraveller (Reply #157)
mother earth This message was self-deleted by its author.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Getting shingles in their lifetime. But among my friends, who happen to mostly be over the ge of sixty, the only ones who have gotten shingles eat very unhealthily, except for one friend who got shingles after a major surgery. (Stress can bring on shingles, and what is more stressful than major surgery?)
I found out the vaccine for shingles is over $ 250, and in some places almost $ 400. And guess what - it has only a 63 percent efficacy rate! So one out of three people shelling out that money will not get help anyway!
alp227
(32,048 posts)Bobby, if not for vaccines, would your dad have lived to be Senator and Attorney General? Think about that!
As for Ring of Fire Radio, at least Papantonio (while a fierce critic of the pharma industry) hasn't gone Wakefield.
See this post by Sid Dithers that shows that Andrew Wakefield is a HOMEWRECKER. Look how many kids' lives have been RUINED by that fucker and his followers like Jim Carrey and Jenny McCarthy and sadly ROBERT F KENNEDY JR.
RFK Jr. is a disgrace to the Kennedy name. If he told the truth in his studies, hey i'd rather be loaded with all those shitty chemicals like thimerosal whatever they are than catch polio or MMR. The antivaxers have NO RESPONSE in dealing with polio, smallpox, or those ancient diseases.