Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madokie

(51,076 posts)
Wed Jun 5, 2013, 07:17 AM Jun 2013

Again with the face-eating monsters, Mark Morford

Oh, no. You guys. There is something under the ice. Alive. Malevolent. Bizarre. Enormously terrifying. It will soon hurl our entire cluster of space-traveling heroes into fits of insanity and violence and much panicked screaming. Oh, no.

How will our astronaut movie heroes possibly survive? And just what is the monster, exactly? What did this gritty new film’s creators come up with? Does it matter? Will you pay 15 bucks to find out and then be vaguely disappointed because you’ve seen 15,000 things just like it 15,000 times before? Oh heavens, yes, you almost certainly will.

By the way? The landscape in this upcoming movie – it does not matter what the title is, or who stars in it, or that it’s coming out soon, even though it is – is gorgeous. The cinematography is stunning. Many millions were obviously spent on the special effects because the realism is sort of effortlessly mind-blowing in that look-what-they-can-do-with-computer-graphics-these-days sort of way.

The plot is, as always, childishly simple: The usual humanistic buildup (news conferences, crew bonding, photos of the kids back home) is soon followed by Our Intrepid Crew landing majestically on Europa, the frozen fourth moon of Jupiter. The score swells. There is amazement, much cheering back home. It’s breathtaking out there, really.

The rest: http://blog.sfgate.com/morford/2013/06/04/again-with-the-face-eating-monsters/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Again with the face-eating monsters, Mark Morford (Original Post) madokie Jun 2013 OP
This trend is amplified by the film-studios' financial behavior: DetlefK Jun 2013 #1
That's more or less true, but it's always been more or less true Orrex Jun 2013 #2

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
1. This trend is amplified by the film-studios' financial behavior:
Wed Jun 5, 2013, 07:52 AM
Jun 2013

They are too afraid to go for new ideas, because a flop would mean huge losses. The only movies they make are special-effects-blockbusters for ~$400 million and comedies for ~$30 million. Anything that doesn't fit into these two categories is considered too risky.

Orrex

(63,213 posts)
2. That's more or less true, but it's always been more or less true
Wed Jun 5, 2013, 09:12 AM
Jun 2013

Can anyone point to a Golden Age when Hollywood routinely bankrolled massive, risk-taking gambles? Or has the film industry instead always gone after sure-thing safe bets?

The budget ceiling has risen, of course, but I'm not convinced that there's been a fundamental transformation in the way that Hollywood selects which films are to be made.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Again with the face-eatin...