in vain over this one. They have no fugging say.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/06/us/politics/tom-donilon-to-resign-as-national-security-adviser.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&

the republicon leadership in both houses should be brought up on sedition charges if you ask me. Its clear for all to see what their agenda is. They can't be having this very good man be seen as successful for two real reasons, One is he is a Democratic President the other is he is a Black Man. The old white mans club that has had a lock of the white house since day one is the driver for all this too. You can bet on that. They see it as if Obama is seen as a good President then it will surely usher in more people of color and heaven forbid a woman to the oval office.
IMO

treason.
Truth is a successful Obama destroys their carefully cultivated caricature of the black man - a stereotype that prevailed for centuries.
Sadly for them he has already torn down that wall. I detest ReTHUGs.

America is better for having elected Obama no matter what they do now

It's in Article III.

That the President can get advise from whomever he chooses - even without a title. So, if Obama wanted Rice's opinion, he already had it. However, this is a gain because now we can get an effective diplomatic person as Secretary to the UN.

Note this implicitly gives them a strong defense as to why they were negative on the idea of her as SoS. (It also matches what seemed to be the opinion of some Democrats - and may explain why few Senators sprang to her defense.) It is insidious as it places the charge that she is not diplomatic almost as fact - and because it is not important to anyone (other than Rice), it likely would not be challenged.

I didn't know about this, but she doesn't appear to be a brainwashed ideologue.

I'm not up on her history, but extremist ideology seems to be the province of repukes/fundies/CONservaturds. She's none of those.

But I am totally happy to see P.O. give the pukes heart attacks. May they all keel over. Face first. Into a pile of pig shit.

I love our President, I don't understand him sometimes, but I sure do love it when he stands firmly against his adversaries. Susan Rice and the appointment of the 3 judges to the DC circuit, I'm one happy guy!

It means "congratulations" in Demspeak.

nt

he called her a liar on a morning show this am....again fuck you karl

but on others, such as any rights for LGBT people we are told that our Republican partners must be pleased with what we do, many Democrats spent years and years and years in agreement with Republicans about gay people. Obama spent years agreeing with them, opposing us. Joe Biden literally shouted out that he agreed with Palin during the debates, no marriage rights.
Just odd, that when it is for millions treated unfairly, it is easy for Democrats to stand with Republicans. They will do it again this week, they just took protections for us out of the Immigration Bill to please the GOP, yet again.
So when will 'Karl opposes' become reason enough to stand with those who are not rich ladies born to power with full rights and no empathy? That's my question.
The Republicans opposed a Public Option. Many Democrats,elected and otherwise, stood with them in that, or bowed to the pressure.
Selective 'courage' makes the typical cowardice seem even more pronounced.

hilarious!

Now just listen for the "national security" "terrorists" cries by the Traitors.

FUCK THEM ALL!!!!!

malaise

That woulds make some GOP heads blow up when the news is coming in

Diclotican

GObama!!

but isn't Hillary the same and everyone is promoting her as the next Presidential candidate?

I hate war hawks.

Obama must be impeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeached!!!!!!!

she is a brilliant woman and knows her national security...also, it will make rw heads explode.

one of her predecessors, the other Ms. Rice.