General Discussion

zeemike

(18,998 posts) Wed Jun 5, 2013, 08:34 AM Jun 2013

Allen West now being rehabilitated by C-Span.

Blows the mind that a congressman that served 2 years and was voted out because he said radical things is now a guest on C Span...
I sent them an email but it will probably not be read...

And I noticed that the first democratic caller said he agreed with him 95%...WTF?

Sometimes I think the whole of media has been corrupted.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Allen West now being rehabilitated by C-Span. (Original Post) zeemike Jun 2013 OP

Cspan callers are quite possibly the dumbest people on Earth. And I'm convinced that JaneyVee Jun 2013 #1

Well I listen to it every morning with my coffee. zeemike Jun 2013 #2

I actually watch Cspan alot myself. Can't bring myself to calling in though. JaneyVee Jun 2013 #3

I have called in 2 times in the last 20 years zeemike Jun 2013 #4

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)

1. Cspan callers are quite possibly the dumbest people on Earth. And I'm convinced that

Reply to zeemike (Original post)

Wed Jun 5, 2013, 08:40 AM

Jun 2013

Democrats pose as Republicans and Republicans pose as Democrats.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)

2. Well I listen to it every morning with my coffee.

Reply to JaneyVee (Reply #1)

Wed Jun 5, 2013, 08:49 AM

Jun 2013

And I never see a GOP caller say they agree 95% with say Dennis Kucinich...

And I doubt you will see Kucinich or say Cynthy McKinney on C Span sense they left congress...they are no longer relevant. but a congressman that served 2 years is?

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)

3. I actually watch Cspan alot myself. Can't bring myself to calling in though.

Reply to zeemike (Reply #2)

Wed Jun 5, 2013, 09:02 AM

Jun 2013

zeemike

(18,998 posts)

4. I have called in 2 times in the last 20 years

Reply to JaneyVee (Reply #3)

Wed Jun 5, 2013, 09:15 AM

Jun 2013

But not for at least 5 years...and both times I was nervous.
The ones that do best are the ones that call in all the time...or are just naturals.

Reply to this discussion