Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsReport Says T.S.A. Screening Is Not Objective
(NYT) The Transportation Security Administration has little evidence that an airport passenger screening program, which some employees believe is a magnet for racial profiling and has cost taxpayers nearly one billion dollars, screens passengers objectively, according to a report by the inspector general for the Homeland Security Department.
The T.S.A.s behavioral detection program is supposed to rely on security officers who pull aside passengers who exhibit what are considered telltale signs of terrorists for additional screening and questioning. It is illegal to screen passengers because of their nationality, race, ethnicity or religion.
According to the report, the T.S.A. has not assessed the effectiveness of the program, which has 2,800 employees and does not have a comprehensive training program. The T.S.A. cannot show that the program is cost-effective, or reasonably justify the programs expansion, the report said.
As a result of the T.S.A.s ineffective oversight of the program, it cannot ensure that passengers at U.S. airports are screened objectively, the report said. ....................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/05/us/report-says-tsa-screening-program-not-objective.html?_r=2&
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1086 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Report Says T.S.A. Screening Is Not Objective (Original Post)
marmar
Jun 2013
OP
So do we frisk all young white guys who walk into movie theaters, since they've committed .....
marmar
Jun 2013
#7
No. Just the ones who are behaving strangely or look like they might be packing
badtoworse
Jun 2013
#8
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)1. Well, duh, the 'random screenings' exist so that they have cover to
pull people who look Arab . . .
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)2. Oh,swell. Mission creep and job preservation rather than terror screening.
In August, The Times reported that more than 30 officers at Logan International Airport in Boston had said that the program was being used to profile passengers like Hispanics traveling to Florida or blacks wearing baseball caps backward.
The officers said that such passengers were being profiled by the officers in response to demands from managers who believed that stopping and questioning them would turn up drugs, outstanding arrest warrants or immigration problems.
The managers wanted to generate arrests so they could justify the program, the officers said, adding that officers who made arrests were more likely to be promoted.
The officers said that such passengers were being profiled by the officers in response to demands from managers who believed that stopping and questioning them would turn up drugs, outstanding arrest warrants or immigration problems.
The managers wanted to generate arrests so they could justify the program, the officers said, adding that officers who made arrests were more likely to be promoted.
And racial/ethnic profiling of Latinos and African-Americans as a bonus!
Can we please put our shoes on and revamp this bloated, ineffective agency now?
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)3. Screening on the basis of behavior or appearance is inherently subject
There is no way to apply an objective standard to that and that's fine with me.
marmar
(77,081 posts)5. "or appearance"
Sorry, but that's not fine with me, because it becomes subject to all kinds of personal prejudices.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)6. So we have to grope granny in her wheelchair to prove we're being unbiased.
We should hire pros, train them well and not force them to appear unbiased. Middle Eastern males have committed many more terrorist acts than white haired old ladies. Our screening procedures should consider that.
marmar
(77,081 posts)7. So do we frisk all young white guys who walk into movie theaters, since they've committed .....
...... many more mass shootings than anyone else?
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)8. No. Just the ones who are behaving strangely or look like they might be packing
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)4. The theory (other countries use a version of this)
Is sound. The implementation is not. (Those other countries recruit people with four year psychology degrees to start, not HS graduates, or later liberal arts graduates)