Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

apples and oranges

(1,451 posts)
Wed Jun 5, 2013, 10:56 AM Jun 2013

Should President Obama veto the Apple iPhone 4- iPad 3 import ban?

Over the next 60 days, Barack Obama faces a dilemma in a dispute pitting two of the world’s biggest companies against each other and carrying far-reaching implications about the ownership of intellectual property in the technology sector.
Mr Obama could use his presidential powers to overturn a ruling by the International Trade Commission, a Washington agency, that on Tuesday banned Apple from selling certain iPhones and iPads in the US.

Alternatively, he could follow the example of most of his predecessors in such cases and stand by the ITC ruling. This would favour South Korea’s Samsung, Apple’s bitter rival that was found in an earlier case to be copying the iPhone’s designs.

Mr Obama’s quandary comes as his administration has put renewed focus on patent reform. The last US president to use his veto in an ITC case was Ronald Reagan. Bans ordered by the ITC are subject to a 60-day window in which they are reviewed by the president.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/a690a1c0-cda0-11e2-a13e-00144feab7de.html


I think Obama should uphold the ban. Apple has been tying up the courts suing Google and Samsung over petty things, and they should play by the rules they themselves seem to have created. However, President Obama is an iFan, so who knows what will happen...
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should President Obama veto the Apple iPhone 4- iPad 3 import ban? (Original Post) apples and oranges Jun 2013 OP
Oh yeah. poor google and samsung, they are soooo honorable and would never steal anyones ideas or still_one Jun 2013 #1
Clue me in here. I don't understand this. denverbill Jun 2013 #2
Exactly, it has no real impact. In addition, while waiting on appeal these devices can still be still_one Jun 2013 #6
IMHO, he should avoid trying to interpret and apply patent claims jberryhill Jun 2013 #3
o the hypocrisy we can do it Jun 2013 #4
Reading the whole nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #5
Force independent arbitration usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #7
Since Samsung and Apple have each been busted for violating each other's patents, backscatter712 Jun 2013 #8

still_one

(92,204 posts)
1. Oh yeah. poor google and samsung, they are soooo honorable and would never steal anyones ideas or
Wed Jun 5, 2013, 11:07 AM
Jun 2013

patents.

Since this case is open on appeal the President should not do anything

However, the most revealing thing is the devices involved in this ban are outdated, and will have very little effect




denverbill

(11,489 posts)
2. Clue me in here. I don't understand this.
Wed Jun 5, 2013, 11:21 AM
Jun 2013

So Apple is fine in selling iPhone 5 or iPad 4, but can't sell older models? I don't get the point of this. How is them selling older models hurting Samsung or Google?

still_one

(92,204 posts)
6. Exactly, it has no real impact. In addition, while waiting on appeal these devices can still be
Wed Jun 5, 2013, 12:01 PM
Jun 2013

sold

As everything, and this is not directed against Apple, Samsung, or Google, it is political posturing to fool folks in thinking they are actually doing their job

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
5. Reading the whole
Wed Jun 5, 2013, 11:43 AM
Jun 2013

There is little precedent to overturn. Though Apple can go to court over this...expect them.

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
7. Force independent arbitration
Wed Jun 5, 2013, 12:09 PM
Jun 2013

Not sure if that's the POTUS job though.

Apparently Apple and Samsung couldn't negotiate a fair price on a small 3G component.

Otherwise, this will allow patent trolls to have a field day and stifle advancements in tech where mostly the consumer will suffer.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
8. Since Samsung and Apple have each been busted for violating each other's patents,
Wed Jun 5, 2013, 12:18 PM
Jun 2013

they'd do well by coming to a settlement and draw out a cross-licensing agreement.

Why would Obama need to get involved?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should President Obama ve...