General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Obama climate move that nobody noticed
By David Roberts
The Obama administration just made a fairly significant move on climate change, and it flew right under the radar.
To explain, let me back up a bit...One thing Obama doesnt get enough credit for is the Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon, which his administration convened to establish a social cost of carbon that OMB and other agencies can use in assessing carbon-related regulations. In 2010, the working group released its report (PDF)...Last week, the White House put up a blog post touting new energy-efficiency standards for microwave ovens. Thrilling, right? Halfway down, it mentions that the underlying analysis of these standards includes an update to the social cost of carbon values.
Oh?
Sure enough, over on OMBs website we find a Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis [PDF], dated May 2013. It doesnt change the basic mechanics of the earlier analysis same discount rates, same emission scenarios, same climate sensitivity. All it does is update the climate impact models (the Integrated Assessment Models) to reflect the most recent versions used in the peer-reviewed literature.
Heres the result:
The (social cost of carbon) estimates using the updated versions of the models are higher than those reported in the 2010 (report). By way of comparison, the four 2020 SCC estimates reported in the 2010 [report] were $7, $26, $42 and $81 (2007$). The corresponding four updated SCC estimates for 2020 are $12, $43, $65, and $129 (2007$).
You dont have to be an economist to see that the second set of numbers is about 60 percent higher than the first. Why the big jump? It sounds like it mostly had to do with the models updating their estimates of damage from sea-level rise, though there are several other factors as well...Regardless, this is really something to pause and take note of:
The federal government just bumped up the cost of carbon by 60 percent. This will, all things being equal, increase by 60 percent the amount of carbon mitigation that can be economically justified. Thats a big deal, especially in light of the fact that EPA regulations are going to make (or break) Obamas second-term climate legacy.
- more -
http://grist.org/climate-energy/the-obama-climate-move-that-nobody-noticed/
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)These sorts of things are complex and hard to understand, unless you follow the issue.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)On paper.
Thank gawd there is no crisis, because if it were a crisis, seeing how there is nothing really being done, we'd be doomed.
In all fairness, if it wasn't for the "Clownish Activists" who are fighting with every tool available, and sometimes looking clownish to everyone who is not an activist, we'd have worse pollution than we have. Right?
Octafish
(55,745 posts)They're at the top of the carbon credit action pyramid. Er. Bubble.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Since the 'value' of co2 pollution has been increased by 60%, there now is a market that can be manipulated to a greater degree.
Buy your co2 bonds now. Be the first on the street to get in on a earth warming opportunity!
politicasista
(14,128 posts)Cha
(297,481 posts)sheshe2
(83,843 posts)Good news, you should be moving over to the front page just about now!
K&R!
MoreGOPoop
(417 posts)Thanks, ProSense.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Yep, the Grand Ol' Poop was getting on my last nerve that day and finally had to sign
up to commiserate.
spanone
(135,857 posts)AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)TBH, I really do wish things could be better for us all, but the thing is, at least Obama's trying to do what ought to be done. Let's keep encouraging him by pushing for more and more energy reform.