Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lex

(34,108 posts)
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:05 PM Jun 2013

Just because one tweets a pic of their lunch, does NOT give the Gov't permission to

do ANYthing, much less collect information about internet use without at least probable cause to do so.

Just because one's mother calls them every single day about something trivial doesn't give the Government tacit approval to wiretap the call.

I keep seeing people who think the CONTENT of the use invites the Government somehow.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

clarice

(5,504 posts)
1. Lex...can you help me?
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:07 PM
Jun 2013

Exactly when did this whole Prism thing go into effect?
Was it under Bush?

eissa

(4,238 posts)
3. I worry more
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 12:11 PM
Jun 2013

about some perv recording me on their smartphone while I use a public restroom and uploading it on YouTube than I do the government tracking communication (not listening in to every single call.) If you're on the grid in any fashion -- using your debt card, searching Amazon for a garlic presser, and yes, using your phone -- you've been tracked for decades.

I'm still perplexed by the hysteria. We always read of some plot being "thwarted" or "intercepted." How do we think that happens if not for surveillance? If we want to debate the role of surveillance vis-à-vis the Patriot Act, then that's all good. But let's not pretend that this is something new, or that it doesn't serve a purpose.

Lex

(34,108 posts)
7. I worry less about Amazon tracking me to market to me than my Government
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 04:09 PM
Jun 2013

deciding it can record phone and internet usage by its citizens any time it would like for any reason it would like.



eissa

(4,238 posts)
9. I've trashed our government repeatedly over the phone and online
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 04:21 PM
Jun 2013

My family and I maintained contact with relatives in both Iraq (during war times), and currently Syria. In the Iraq case, we spoke vocally about our opposition to the war, and in the Syria case we sympathize with our family's loyalty to the Assad regime. To date, no black helicopters have appeared over my house, and no suit has attempted to throw me in a FEMA re-education camp. If my government is recording me, I'm not too worried.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
4. Is it not correct that should one choose to male a picture of one's food publicly available
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 12:54 PM
Jun 2013

Is it not correct that should one choose to male a picture of one's food publicly available, then the public has permission to access it?

Lex

(34,108 posts)
6. Tracked by the Government?
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 04:07 PM
Jun 2013

Point is, just using the internet in a trivial way (or a serious way, or ANY way) doesn't give the Government permission to track usage.

Hekate

(90,846 posts)
8. Big Brother is not Uncle Sam. Big Brother has been, for decades, Corporations.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 04:16 PM
Jun 2013

We love our shiny toys, and we PAY the corporations for the privilege of them gathering data on our every movement, thought, and purchase so they can sell us more shiny toys.

Corporations sell our personal data to each other, and they will give it away to the government/police/FBI for very little inducement.

Why does that not seem to disturb more people?

uppityperson

(115,681 posts)
10. I thought they were collecting data about who was called, not wiretapping.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 04:23 PM
Jun 2013

It still isn't right, but I thought it was data like number called, time on call, not wiretapping which is a different thing.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just because one tweets a...