General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums2013 Is Shaping Up To Be The Worst Year For Reproductive Freedom In Recent History
According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the 2013 legislative session is on track to be yet another record-breaking year for state-level restrictions on womens reproductive rights. As states current legislative sessions begin to come to a close, lawmakers have so far enacted more than 300 different abortion restrictions this year, as detailed in a map from the ACLU (click through for the interactive version):
According to the Guttmacher Institute, 2011 saw the highest number of anti-abortion restrictions enacted on the state level since 1985, when the womens health organization first began tracking the data. 2012 was right behind with the second highest number of restrictive abortion laws. And now, even following an presidential election season that heavily emphasized the ongoing War on Women post-election polling suggests that Mitt Romneys right-wing positions on womens health issues may have cost him the White House local lawmakers in red states are continuing to pursue a stringently anti-abortion agenda.
On a call with reporters, representatives from the ACLUs Reproductive Freedom project pointed out that abortion opponents have been more aggressive about their goals in 2013, and predicted this year will go down in record books for advancing some of the most stringent legislation this nation has seen since Roe v. Wade legalized abortion 40 years ago. The ACLU considers the mounting pile of state-level restrictions to be a coordinated campaign to eventually ban abortion in every clinic in every state. The group points out that there are three prongs of attack in this national strategy: making abortion services inaccessible for women, making it impossible for abortion doctors to continue their work, and forcing abortion clinics to close their doors.
Since the first part of that three-tiered strategy often involves outright bans on abortion, like the unprecedented 6-week ban in North Dakota and 12-week ban in Arkansas, it tends to incite the most outrage and receive the most media coverage. But the second and third tactics employed by the right wing are also incredibly successful at limiting womens reproductive options and, since those laws can more easily fly under the radar, they can actually be more dangerous.
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/06/13/2152801/2013-worst-year-reproductive-freedom/
warrant46
(2,205 posts)Passed with a Party Line republican vote of 56-39, the bill mandates an ultrasound be performed on a pregnant woman at least 24 hours before an abortion.
Republican State Representative Pat Strachota said during a speech on the chamber floor that the bill was "about having full knowledge of the decision that women are about to make" when choosing to have an abortion.
The bill mandates results of the ultrasound including images, a description of the fetus and a visualization of the fetal heartbeat be provided to the woman.
Doctors are also required to "counsel" the woman and other hoops they have to Jump through
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)So they are going to show a woman that too? Cruel. Will the doctor have to describe what those are, or just lie and say everything is just fine? Ectopic pregnancies? What about a rape pregnancy? Minor young women, and their parents?
Banned at 6 weeks? Excuse me? Most women don't even know they are pregnant before that so that will in effect end ALL abortions.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)make that pretty bad last 30 years.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Pathetic that people want to derail this thread already but ... there ya go. Doubt anyone is surprised.
sikofit3
(145 posts)It is always telling where these states are and aren't. Thank god I live in NY. It is expensive and I want to move but I would rather pay and live with mostly sound policies for all. I wonder if the women in those states are ready to take off their shoes, throw away their birth control pills and pop out babies regardless if the baby will live or they. They should have to answer that question before they vote. I guess they would just throw out that its gods will or something crazy like that.