So, her computer was attacked by a virus, and doubtlessly some morons on the right (and perhaps the left) will scream NSA over this.

Could that be related to the breaches of her computer?

Just my opinion, just a hunch.

This was no virus. It was a hack. By whom is the question.

Lol.

yet also altered system times to guarantee getting caught. Strange.

And yet somehow they were detected. Wow.

I'm sure it was an attack by the vaccination lobby. I'm also sure that as an anti-vaxer, Attkisson doesn't believe in virus protection.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]

But they're not rightwing trolls or anything.

What member of the GC/RKBA group has already decided it's the Obama Admin.?
For the record, I haven't decided anything, I, at least, have an open mind, all I did was advance a theory, no accusations.

Talk about trying to have it both ways.

talking point peddlers from the Gungeon promoting the theory that Obama is targeting Benghazi/Fast&Furious critics.

Just shocking.



Must have popped up on ar15.com

What have any of them done to win my trust?

the Rev. Wright one is priceless.

Is it the "divides" that are "Deep" or something else?

It was fun to go back and read my post then.. thanks geek

"Your post

literally cracked me up. You're way too generous..I'm giving it a big fat F for unoriginality and yeah, it was about a mile too thick."

What is it with you and the few others here who run around the board hurling personal attacks at anyone who posts something you disagree with?

What a silly, shallow and childish way to behave.

that the government is persecuting an anti-vaxxer, rightwing conspiracy loon known hyping Benghazi and Fast & The Furious is "gun rights enthusiast' with a record of posting Republican talking points here.

seems that's all he's got lately.

it would be a lot tougher.

People who refer to "gun grabbers" and repeat Darrel Issa's talking points on Benghazi and Fast & Furious and then allege without evidence that Obama is bugging the computers of conservative reporters are not credible.

your smears are backfiring, LOL.

hundreds of times on DU.

since 2008 is not a personal attack.

You're the one who decided to come in here and barf up Glenn Beck's talking points on Atkisson without any substantiation.

What a pathetic display of harassment of fellow DUers.

Republican (as in NRA/RNC/Fox/Breitbart) talking points to be fellow DUers.

His harassment doesn't bother, I just consider the source and dismiss it.

Poor woman was harassed relentlessly

her husband seeks to lead"

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4749919&mesg_id=4752284

This aint Meta, and you and the geek haven't been appointed as judges. This self-anointed purity shit is the reason Meta was shut down.

I bet you posted there more than I did.

the NSA is targeting rightwing critics.

Ar15.com must be on red alert.

Don't like hearing alternative theories? Too bad.
BTW, nice try at smearing someone who's comments you don't like, too bad, I'll keep on posting them.

against Democratic president, whines when called out on it.

Where? Seems the only smearing going on here is from you.
Have a nice day.

using the NSA to punish conservative journalists.

I put out an alternative theory, it's not my problem that you have a problem with reading comprehension.
You're so transparent it's pathetic, anything that goes against your beliefs must be conservative or NRA talking points. Keep on keeping on.

can you? Anything that doesn't fit your world, you dismiss it with phrases like RW talking points, NRA talking points, etc., whatever, you go ahead and live in your knowledge that anyone with a different possible theory is wrong and should be smeared or shouted down.
Have a nice day.

Thanks for the advice and you have a great day.

It is so sad.

We all get posts hidden now and them for things we say, it's probably happened to you also.
Have a great day.

that's really not my style. I prefer to use critical thinking skills and research to come to my conclusions.

But thanks ever...

you're here repeating what he said.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2842364

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2842444

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2846095

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022643270

I stand by every post I've ever made on DU. If you don't like or agree with them, I really could not possibly care less.

And if it bothers you so much that I disagree with some of your dearly held beliefs, maybe you should alert Skinner. You'd be doing me a favor really. If free speech and diversity of opinions isn't allowed on this board, I really don't want to be here anyway.

Seems some here can't tolerate any difference of opinons of their tightly held beliefs.
Oh well, such is life in the big city, ultimately, all the discourse here on DU means nothing in the real world.
You have a great day and don't let the few discourage you from voicing opinions.

you keep.

hence their promotion of rightwing conspiracy theories and talking points.

Favor eventual transition to single payer
Favor vigorous climate control action on state and especially national level
Favor marriage equality
Favor passage of ENDA with protections for transmen and women

And, I don't get my talking points from Breitbart.com, don't support the NRA, don't bleat on about how Benghazi and Fast & Furious are Obama 'scandals' etc

I favor all those also and and more, yet, just because I post a theory you didn't like, you immediately try to smear me as a RW conservative.

Your posting history is generally liberal/progresive/etc

And I owe you an apology for some of the things I said also.
Have a great day.

Oppose the coming prohibition of tobacco, and a return to non-patented seeds, and a big expansion of cheap housing to accomodate the millions of former mid-class people. I also support a strenthened NLRB, and legislation favoring basic workers' rights, whether unionized or not, and some firm of of wage indexing to protect against wild swings of inflation and interest rates, and the return to separation of banks from stock trading. I also support a strong RKBA, and a strong BOR.

Not as familiar with Breitbart (thought he was dead, does he have a site?), "am not, nor have I ever been a member of the Communist... er... NRA," and thoroughly understand that "Fast & Furious" originated with "Operation End Run." Benghazi is a popcorn fart.

Howzat, Senator?

When someone posts something that doesn't fit in his little world, he smears them with the title of RW conservative gungeon bullshit.

because they didn't like her reporting on Benghazi. Of course she provided no actual evidence that was the case.

Now she says there were multiple breaches.....but still no evidence it was the Obama Administration.

But you see....THERE WERE MULTIPLE BREACHES!!!!

It's OBAMA!!!!!!

but no evidence to prove that's the case.

LOL.

what a shock.

the computer forensic firm that was hired to examine the computer is also confirming it, now whether it was a govt. agency or little green men from Mars, nobody knows who breached her computer.

I ain't buying.

You and your compatriot are so predictable, you don't like what you hear, so you attempt to smear them with words like conservative gungeon bullshit, whatever, have a nice day.

Trying to claim the Obama admin is using the IRS to silence dissent, making dishonest claims that the federal government is "coming for your guns", , and of course pimping the Benghazi story.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2861635

have to ask, is it legal for a pastor to endorse a political candidate, in a church?
Many here were concerned about rw "preachers" pushing bush, because that was, as I recall, somehow illegal.

Anyone who has seen the particular youtube video of Wright praising Obama and slamming Hillary, for being white it seemed to me, would have to be blind to not see that as a campaign event for Obama.

Would we stand for a pastor praising in direct language g w bush, while slamming Kerry? Many here were upset about that. But if it was wrong, or even in violation of campaign laws, then, wouldn't that also be the case with Wright?

the NSA, or the DOJ?

No wait, that was the regulars in RKBA.

Totally not obvious.

No.

Please provide a link.

would come make that same speculation.

Do you really trust Holder at this point? Really?

So if it comes out that the Justice Department was hacking into her PC, what will your stance be on *that*?

But, thanks for playing.

Link please.

with fact. Fact is irrelevant. The belief, evidently, is that by attacking posters personally, the reality of the story will change or somehow be discredited. The ironic and hilarious truth is that these adolescent personal attacks only keep the thread kicked, so that more here will see what it is Cali_Democrat and the few like her want to hide.

+1000.

I'm a dude.

I didn't call you a she, or a he for that matter.

I actually meant to reply one post above.

hahahahaha.

Done that myself on occasion.

It came out after the AP made their claims. But as I already knew, based on the NSA revelations these people are not about the principles, they are in love with a man and will tear up anyone they perceive is pointing a finger at him.

What a heretic.

She was asked a point blank question and she said she didn't know but it was possible.

Newsflash. It's not only possible, it's highly likely.

because of her coverage of Solyndra and Fast & Furious?

Man, it must be fun loving in Drudge's fantasy world.

your refusal to consider the possibility is quaint.

That whole 'to the best of our knowlege' disclaimer is quaint as well.

I trust none of them.

:/

Shit, people, there's a reason we run anti-malware and anti-virus software on computers that access the internet: there is dangerous crap out there. Anyone who hits websites with cracked software downloads, porn, or astrology is at high risk for pulling in a rootkit. There are probably millions of people with actively compromised systems right now. Maybe basic network security awareness should be taught in public schools?

But apparently she is a "controversial" CBS reporter, so not only does her particular situation merit national coverage, but it also somehow implicates the NSA or the DOJ? And it's all Obama's fault too, right?

FUCK THAT. She got hacked and at the moment there's no evidence of who did it. For all we know, she could have had some intern at CBS mess with her system so she'd be part of a trendy topic.

The people suggesting that Obama is hacking her computer are conservative gun nuts.

be Murdoch's media empire. It' not like they aren't being investigated for hacking into people's personal devises to get a scoop 1st.

at this point, no one knows who did it, hopefully this Cyber Security Firm gets to the bottom of this.

they're known for hacking.

China has hacked into the Times and WaPo computers. These hacks occurred in the same time frame of Sharyl Attkisson's computer being hacked.


So nope I am not ready to jump on the Obama did it train.

it's not like the internet has a shortage of unorganized random assholes.

are breathing a sigh of relief right now.

So basically, we've whittled it down to 'someone who is not Sharyl Attkisson'.

5 billion to go.

There are 6 billion people in the world.

5,999,999,999 to go.

we are closing in.

of hacking her own computers. Nothing says "look at me, I must be important because my computer was hacked" as a way to get people interested in her as if she has something of value to say. It could be her own plan to drum up viewers to get her contract renewed.

The most likely suspect is the reporter herself. Second option would be she had someone do it for her. There are lots of other options, far more likely than the government focused on an air head newsreader, BUT.....

We all know who the gun nuts want you to think did it. No evidence, but hey,a President for gun control and in a suspicious color, they're going to go for it.

And I think CBS will get caught up in their own petard.