Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Archae

(46,328 posts)
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 08:54 PM Jun 2013

Serious question about Obamacare...

I just got a forwarded e-mail critical of "Obamacare," the writer claims that in England, patients cannot sue a bad doctor or other health care provider.

The writer also states that under "Obamacare," our right to sue for malpractice even in egregious cases is curtailed.

Having sued an ER "doctor" (who ignored my broken collarbone,) about 20 years ago, this does concern me.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Serious question about Obamacare... (Original Post) Archae Jun 2013 OP
Total horseshit. It's coming from the same people who thought tort reform would solve our problems. Gravitycollapse Jun 2013 #1
Cite? Archae Jun 2013 #2
Here is proof that Brits can sue for malpractice... Gravitycollapse Jun 2013 #6
It's BS magellan Jun 2013 #3
"a forwarded e-mail" is a red flag. Does this email have any citations or links? arcane1 Jun 2013 #4
Already deleted the e-mail, since it was a forward. Archae Jun 2013 #7
here's a cite Cicada Jun 2013 #5
Thanks for the cite, BUT... Archae Jun 2013 #8
Even with cites, you can assume it is wrong. Curmudgeoness Jun 2013 #9
Tort reform took the wind out of the sail on suing, before Obama care. Thinkingabout Jun 2013 #10
More RW BS. Obamacare regulates medical insurance. kestrel91316 Jun 2013 #11

Archae

(46,328 posts)
2. Cite?
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 08:57 PM
Jun 2013

Oh, believe me, I know how bad "tort reform" is.

Lets bad health care providers off the hook, and those promised reductions in premiums never showed.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
6. Here is proof that Brits can sue for malpractice...
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 09:07 PM
Jun 2013
http://www.loc.gov/law/help/medical-malpractice-liability/uk.php


The ACA does little or nothing to reform malpractice law. And, in that very respect, one should expect the same capacity to bring forth malpractice claims. It has been the claim of opponents since the beginning that the ACA would actually lead to more "frivolous" lawsuits. So to see the exact opposite claim now provides self-evident proof that it is absurd.
 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
4. "a forwarded e-mail" is a red flag. Does this email have any citations or links?
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 09:04 PM
Jun 2013

I'm interested in knowing what the email's solution is. From the left, there are plenty of arguments against "Obamacare", but it seems odd that this email is against the tort reform that republicans are always endorsing.

I would need to see the text of this email, and the sources for its claims about England and about Obamacare.

Archae

(46,328 posts)
7. Already deleted the e-mail, since it was a forward.
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 09:07 PM
Jun 2013

No, no cites in it.

Just the "Obamacare won't let you sue" text.

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
5. here's a cite
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 09:06 PM
Jun 2013

first, over 90% of mass emails are false - so even without a cite you can assume it's wrong. But it's easy to search, and find things like this

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/10/05/health/youn-liability-reform

Archae

(46,328 posts)
8. Thanks for the cite, BUT...
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 09:14 PM
Jun 2013

The writer of this article obviously won't address why people sue in the first place!

Because doctors and nurses do *NOT* self-police their ranks.

I have a sister who saw doctors who would fail DUI roadside tests in ER's.
Had she reported Dr Lush, she would have been blackballed.

There are guys in jail for multiple rapes who still have a license to practice medicine.

"Tort reform" is a lie created to let insurance companies and health care providers off the hook even for egregious violantion, like cutting the wrong leg off a diabetic patient, even though the gangrenous one is clearly labeled.

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
9. Even with cites, you can assume it is wrong.
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 09:15 PM
Jun 2013

I cannot tell you how many emails I have gotten with links included, but if you click the link, it says just the opposite of what the email says. I guess no one that already believes this shit checks the source.

This especially happens with "Snopes says this is true", with a link to the "false" Snopes article. I would laugh if it were not so pathetic that people write these emails, and fall for them.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
10. Tort reform took the wind out of the sail on suing, before Obama care.
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 09:54 PM
Jun 2013

In the early days after ACA was passed I was sitting in a medical waiting room listening to a Medicare patient claim "we had good medical care until Obamacare passed and now it is ruined". I continued to listen and of course where did she get her source, FOX news.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
11. More RW BS. Obamacare regulates medical insurance.
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 10:03 PM
Jun 2013

It has no bearing on tort law.

This claim is just a first cousin to the death panels claim.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Serious question about Ob...