Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

scoobiedavis

(222 posts)
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 01:38 PM Jun 2013

Book Review Addresses Chickenhawk Issue

I was in Barnes and Noble and noticed Ben Shapiro's book Bullies: How the Left's Culture of Fear and Intimidation Silences Americans. I read the book and realized what a twerp this guy is. Anyhow, I wrote a review for Amazon.com. If you like it, give it a thumbs up here.

Strawman Arguments Prevail in this Book

Shapiro is in the new crop of right-wingers attempting to appeal to the graying, shrinking, overwhelmingly white talk radio audience. The book notes Shapiro's impressive educational credentials, which makes his McCarthyite approach and appalling ignorance of basic issues in the book all the more egregious. A notable example of the Shapiro's supercilious tone and the lack of grasp of simple fundamental issues is his approach to the "chickenhawk" issue.

The term "chickenhawk" was coined in the 1990's (about 30 years too late) to describe the phony machismo of many pro-war advocates who took great effort to avoid the dangers of combat (through clever means such as rigged draft boards, questionable medical deferments, and "champagne units"--more on this later). Taking his cue from the right's playbook for the last 45 years, Shapiro addresses this issue in the chapter Shapiro sneeringly titled, "Anti-Patriotic Bullies": "Leftists routinely called President [George W.] Bush a chickenhawk, even though he served in the Air National Guard, because his daughters didn't join the military. (Bill Clinton, who actually dodged the draft, was not a chickenhawk, presumably because he is pro-abortion and raised taxes)."

This passage illustrates either abysmal obtuseness or intellectual dishonesty. Bush chickenhawk status has nothing to do with his daughters; it has everything to do with his own actions. After Bush graduated from Yale (and no longer had a student deferment), Bush's father, George H.W. Bush (who, by the way, voted for the Vietnam War), used his influence to push Bush the Younger to the front of the very long line to get into the Texas Air National Guard. The reason there was such a long line was not that large numbers of Texans were interested in the Air National Guard; rather, it was because it was an open secret that it was a notorious "champagne unit." A champagne unit is a reserve or National Guard unit that, during times of national conscription, serves to protect the pampered progeny of the influential from the dangers of the wars they supported (and whose stock portfolios were often fattened by a wartime economy). The prevailing thought among much of the American elite of the time was that dying in Vietnam was for the little guy---i.e., Appalachians, inner-city blacks, and men living in the barrio. One of Bush's professors at the Harvard business school noted how Bush swaggered around in his Texas Air National Guard bomber jacket and bragged that even though he was pro-war, he used his father's pull to get a spot in the Guard. Yuck!

Shapiro also demonstrates ignorance of the concept in his discussion of Bill Clinton. Under no circumstances could Clinton be considered a chickenhawk. Certainly Clinton didn't want to go to Vietnam but he didn't want any other Americans to go either.

Shapiro is obviously bright. It's a pity that he prostituted a promising intellect to try to become the next Rush Limbaugh.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Book Review Addresses Chickenhawk Issue (Original Post) scoobiedavis Jun 2013 OP
Nicely done. Jackpine Radical Jun 2013 #1
Nicely done karynnj Jun 2013 #2
Two things: RWers routinely make things up Kingofalldems Jun 2013 #3

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
1. Nicely done.
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 01:45 PM
Jun 2013

I would only add that NO Guard units were activated for service in RVN. They were instead activated to suppress revolt on the campuses.

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
2. Nicely done
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 02:03 PM
Jun 2013

I would add that at the same time that leftists were "bullying" poor W, his side engaged in a complete character assassination of John Kerry that continues to this day. While praising Bush's mediocre at best job in the Texas Air National Guard, they ignored the official Navy record that John Kerry was a genuine war hero - the Navy gave him a silver star and a Bronze Star with Valor. This done even though Kerry was at that point convinced that the war was a mistake and he could die for nothing.

Even this month, the Weekly Standard did not get it. They twisted Samantha Powers comment ( http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/samantha-power-john-kerry-his-military-service-didn-t-lend-him-any-credibility_733839.html ) that Kerry's official war record - available on his web site - was not enough to deflect questions. The point she was making was that it should have been. (This so emboldened the right that having successfully ignored official Navy documents, they then challenged official birth certificates in the next elections.) What better than the official record could have been produced? As Kerry said, the Navy gave him those medals. The media and the RW gave as much or more credibility to contradictory charges made for the first time 35 years after the fact by a group of people linked with Bush fundraisers.

Kind of makes the "bullying" of W by calling him a chicken hawk look pretty innocent. After all, they were not disputing facts or making up new ones.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Book Review Addresses Chi...