General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOne can engage in a heroic act despite any other character flaws.
Ridiculous that this has to be pointed out. Doing something "heroic" does not necessarily, in fact rarely will, make them a "hero."
Whether the same person did unheroic things in the past, or after a heroic act, likewise does not alter the value of the act in question.
People are complex, and cannot be cabined in broad labeling terms.
When someone is focused on a persona, or seeks to place a broad label on another, ask yourself why. They are likely motivated by something other than the issue in question.
"Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people."
Eleanor Roosevelt
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)Despite his criminal background many on DU held him as being a hero saying his past deeds should not reflect on the actions he took to help save those kidnapped women.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)of phony American puritanism.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)The Romantic hero is a literary archetype referring to a character that rejects established norms and conventions, has been rejected by society, and has the self as the center of his or her own existence.[1] ... Literary critic Northrop Frye noted that the Romantic hero is often "placed outside the structure of civilization and therefore represents the force of physical nature, amoral or ruthless, yet with a sense of power, and often leadership, that society has impoverished itself by rejecting".[1] Other characteristics of the romantic hero include introspection, the triumph of the individual over the "restraints of theological and social conventions",[1] wanderlust, melancholy, misanthropy, alienation, and isolation