Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 04:02 AM Jun 2013

The Strange Case of Barrett Brown

In early 2010, journalist and satirist Barrett Brown was working on a book on political pundits, when the hacktivist collective Anonymous caught his attention. He soon began writing about its activities and potential. In a defense of the group’s anti-censorship operations in Australia published on February 10, Brown declared, “I am now certain that this phenomenon is among the most important and under-reported social developments to have occurred in decades, and that the development in question promises to threaten the institution of the nation-state and perhaps even someday replace it as the world's most fundamental and relevant method of human organization.”

By then, Brown was already considered by his fans to be the Hunter S. Thompson of his generation. In point of fact he wasn’t like Hunter S. Thompson, but was more of a throwback—a sharp-witted, irreverent journalist and satirist in the mold of Ambrose Bierce or Dorothy Parker. His acid tongue was on display in his co-authored 2007 book, Flock of Dodos: Behind Modern Creationism, Intelligent Design and the Easter Bunny, in which he declared: “This will not be a polite book. Politeness is wasted on the dishonest, who will always take advantage of any well-intended concession.”

But it wasn’t Brown’s acid tongue so much as his love of minutia (and ability to organize and explain minutia) that would ultimately land him in trouble. Abandoning his book on pundits in favor of a book on Anonymous, he could not have known that delving into the territory of hackers and leaks would ultimately lead to his facing the prospect of spending the rest of his life in prison. In light of the bombshell revelations published by Glenn Greenwald and Barton Gellman about government and corporate spying, Brown’s case is a good—and underreported—reminder of the considerable risk faced by reporters who report on leaks.



Read more: The Strange Case of Barrett Brown | The Nation http://www.thenation.com/article/174851/strange-case-barrett-brown#ixzz2Wk1yndKF

Interesting Read

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Strange Case of Barrett Brown (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Jun 2013 OP
I was just thinking about this. Supposedly Hastings was working on an article about octoberlib Jun 2013 #1
I actually could NOT finish that article magellan Jun 2013 #2
The size and extent of the Security State pretty much insures annabanana Jun 2013 #3
fuck the InJustice Department. This is horrifying cali Jun 2013 #4
A Very a Kafkaistic nightmare story told here Ichingcarpenter Jun 2013 #5
From the article: cali Jun 2013 #6
this is horrifying. HiPointDem Jun 2013 #7
This is reaching... ReRe Jun 2013 #12
who is chief snoop? HiPointDem Jun 2013 #13
;-) ReRe Jun 2013 #16
oh. what with all the spy agencies and contractors, can't assume anything... HiPointDem Jun 2013 #24
Du rec. Nt xchrom Jun 2013 #8
Bookmarked malaise Jun 2013 #9
So the DOJ is just another enforcement arm of corporate America. fasttense Jun 2013 #10
that's certainly part of it. It's not all the DoJ does, but yep, it does that. cali Jun 2013 #11
Posting to read later... gotta get some sleep now liberalla Jun 2013 #14
The charges include ten counts of identity theft, associated with stolen credit card info he had struggle4progress Jun 2013 #15
The mechanism he used to transfer seems a bit iffy to me. Savannahmann Jun 2013 #18
Well, that's count one of the indictment filed 4 December 2012. Count Two further asserts struggle4progress Jun 2013 #20
Disturbing to say the least Savannahmann Jun 2013 #17
Great (if disgusting) read Hydra Jun 2013 #19
Very disturbing. Revolting, actually. deurbano Jun 2013 #25
He was also indicted 3 October 2012 for threats against a Federal agent struggle4progress Jun 2013 #21
yes, he was and he made them. look, there's no doubt that Brown cali Jun 2013 #22
A whistler-blower persecuted by Obama, just for making a few threats against a Federal agent struggle4progress Jun 2013 #23
I don't know enough about this case to make up my mind but I do know that indictment idwiyo Jun 2013 #26
K-&-R Lunacee_2013 Jun 2013 #27

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
1. I was just thinking about this. Supposedly Hastings was working on an article about
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 04:08 AM
Jun 2013

the legal persecution of Barrett Brown just before he died.

magellan

(13,257 posts)
2. I actually could NOT finish that article
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 04:30 AM
Jun 2013

It's very upsetting to read what goes on, and the lengths these monsters will go to protect themselves. Knowing that our government and corporations are this entwined in an unholy alliance freaks me out every time.

I only feel badly for Barrett Brown and his mother.

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
3. The size and extent of the Security State pretty much insures
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 04:42 AM
Jun 2013

that it will not end well for anyone. On either side.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
4. fuck the InJustice Department. This is horrifying
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 05:44 AM
Jun 2013

everyone here who isn't a mindless partisan should read this. Yes, it's complicated, even byzantine and there are a lot of players you'll never have heard of, but this should be a huge story.

And this op should be on top of the greatest.

k&fuckingr.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
5. A Very a Kafkaistic nightmare story told here
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 05:55 AM
Jun 2013

I'm reminded of Kafka's books 'the trial' and "The Castle" rather than an Orwell or Huxley dystopia

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
6. From the article:
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:12 AM
Jun 2013

Some journalists are now understandably afraid to go near the Stratfor files. The broader implications of this go beyond Brown; one might think that what we are looking at is Cointelpro 2.0—an outsourced surveillance state—but in fact it’s worse. One can’t help but infer that the US Department of Justice has become just another security contractor, working alongside the HBGarys and Stratfors on behalf of corporate bidders, with no sense at all for the justness of their actions; they are working to protect corporations and private security contractors and give them license to engage in disinformation campaigns against ordinary citizens and their advocacy groups. The mere fact that the FBI’s senior cybersecurity advisor has recently moved to Hunton and Williams shows just how incestuous this relationship has become. Meanwhile the Department of Justice is also using its power and force to trample on the rights of citizens like Barrett Brown who are trying to shed light on these nefarious relationships. In order to neutralize those who question or investigate the system, laws are being reinterpreted or extended or otherwise misappropriated in ways that are laughable—or would be if the consequences weren’t so dire.

Read more: The Strange Case of Barrett Brown | The Nation http://www.thenation.com/article/174851/strange-case-barrett-brown#ixzz2WkUM3S4j
Follow us: @thenation on Twitter | TheNationMagazine on Facebook

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
7. this is horrifying.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:20 AM
Jun 2013

Brown began looking into Endgame Systems, an information security firm that seemed particularly concerned about staying in the shadows. "Please let HBGary know we don't ever want to see our name in a press release," one leaked email read.

One of its products, available for a $2.5 million annual subscription, gave customers access to “zero-day exploits”—security vulnerabilities unknown to software companies—for computer systems all over the world.

Business Week published a story on Endgame in 2011, reporting that “Endgame executives will bring up maps of airports, parliament buildings, and corporate offices. The executives then create a list of the computers running inside the facilities, including what software the computers run, and a menu of attacks that could work against those particular systems.”

For Brown, this raised the question of whether Endgame was selling these exploits to foreign actors and whether they would be used against computer systems in the United States. Shortly thereafter, the hammer came down.

http://www.thenation.com/article/174851/strange-case-barrett-brown#ixzz2Wk1yndKF


The obvious possibility is that firms with gov't intelligence contracts can mine data to extort entire countries and governments for private profit.

Even more horrifying is that when brown brings up this possibility the feds go after *him*.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
12. This is reaching...
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:55 AM
Jun 2013

... into the "Cyber-War" arena, which Chief Snoop has been putting all of his time over the past few years.

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
10. So the DOJ is just another enforcement arm of corporate America.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:48 AM
Jun 2013

Capitalists have bought off our justice system too. The whole economic/political system is rotting and dysfunctional. We have abandoned democracy a long time ago.

"While the media and much of the world have been understandably outraged by the revelation of the NSA's spying programs, Barrett Brown’s work was pointing to a much deeper problem. It isn’t the sort of problem that can be fixed by trying to tweak a few laws or by removing a few prosecutors. The problem is not with bad laws or bad prosecutors. What the case of Barrett Brown has exposed is that we confronting a different problem altogether. It is a systemic problem. It is the failure of the rule of law."

The Nation http://www.thenation.com/article/174851/strange-case-barrett-brown#ixzz2WkfiQ9k5


 

cali

(114,904 posts)
11. that's certainly part of it. It's not all the DoJ does, but yep, it does that.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:51 AM
Jun 2013

Here's a link to Project PM which Brown created:

Project PM operates this wiki in order to provide a centralized, actionable data set regarding the intelligence contracting industry, the PR industry's interface with totalitarian regimes, the mushrooming infosec/"cybersecurity" industry, and other issues constituting threats to human rights, civic transparency, individual privacy, and the health of democratic institutions.

http://wiki.echelon2.org/wiki/Main_Page

struggle4progress

(118,348 posts)
15. The charges include ten counts of identity theft, associated with stolen credit card info he had
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 08:54 AM
Jun 2013

According to the US attorney "he possessed stolen credit card account numbers and CVVs without the knowledge and authorization of the card holders"

And maybe there's motive: considering that he seems to have posted on youtube about his heroin addiction problem, one might wonder whether he planned to (or did) traffick in stolen credit card info for cash to support his habit

He's entitled to a fair trial, of course, before society-at-large believes these charges. But the fact, that folks like Glenn Greenwald claim this to be an unwarranted prosecution, doesn't mean squat to me







 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
18. The mechanism he used to transfer seems a bit iffy to me.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 10:24 AM
Jun 2013

He copied a link from one message, and posted it in another. At that link, in addition to the email messages he was interested in, were credit card information. That is according to the Federal Complaint against him. So his transfer of the credit card numbers was by copying a link from one place, to another.

Let's say I read an article that is brilliant. I copy the web address of the article, and post it here. The article contains text that the author cut and pasted from another article, stealing the intellectual rights of the original author without giving him credit. The original author sues me for distributing the plagiarist's work. that is what we are talking about with the credit card numbers according to the article.

From the article http://www.thenation.com/article/174851/strange-case-barrett-brown#ixzz2Wk1yndKF

The Stratfor data included a number of unencrypted credit card numbers and validation codes. On this basis, the DOJ accused Brown of credit card fraud for having shared that link with the editorial board of ProjectPM. Specifically, the FBI charged him with Traffic in Stolen Authentication Features, Access Device Fraud, Aggravated Identity Theft, as well as an Obstruction of Justice charge (for being at his mother’s when the initial warrant was served)

All because he shared a link hoping to crowdsource tens of thousands of emails that had been hacked by somebody else in an effort to expose corruption and serious problems with the Intelligence and Security Contracting companies.

He snapped, why wouldn't he feel persecuted, and if his mental abilities were diminished when he made that asinine video, that should be taken into consideration. However, the charges related to that sharing of a link are far more asinine IMO. It is sending a message to Journalists, examine this stuff at your own peril, we shall not be trifled with.

struggle4progress

(118,348 posts)
20. Well, that's count one of the indictment filed 4 December 2012. Count Two further asserts
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:30 PM
Jun 2013

that Mr Brown himself personally possessed at least 15 credit card numbers and their CVVs without authorization of the credit card account holders. You can find the grand jury indictment here:

New federal indictment lists 12 more charges against Barrett Brown ...
By Robert Wilonsky
11:58 am on December 7, 2012
http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/2012/12/new-federal-indictment-lists-12-more-charges-against-barrett-brown-once-the-self-proclaimed-spokesman-for-anonymous.html/

 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
17. Disturbing to say the least
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 10:16 AM
Jun 2013

The hacker's who got the information was sentenced to ten years, while he faces a century in prison. We know who the main focus of the investigation was don't we?

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
19. Great (if disgusting) read
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 11:47 AM
Jun 2013

I found this section very relevant to current discussion climate:

The HBGary hack may have been designed to humiliate the company, but it had the collateral effect of dropping a gold mine of information into Brown’s lap. One of the first things he discovered was a plan to neutralize Glenn Greenwald’s defense of Wikileaks by undermining them both. (“Without the support of people like Glenn, wikileaks would fold,” read one slide.) The plan called for “disinformation,” exploiting strife within the organization and fomenting external rivalries—“creating messages around actions to sabotage or discredit the opposing organization,” as well as a plan to submit fake documents and then call out the error.” Greenwald, it was argued, “if pushed,” would “choose professional preservation over cause.”

Other plans targeted social organizations and advocacy groups. Separate from the plan to target Greenwald and WikiLeaks, HBGary was part of a consortia that submitted a proposal to develop a “persona management” system for the United States Air Force, that would allow one user to control multiple online identities for commenting in social media spaces, thus giving the appearance of grassroots support or opposition to certain policies.


Things that make you go "hmmm..."

struggle4progress

(118,348 posts)
21. He was also indicted 3 October 2012 for threats against a Federal agent
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:36 PM
Jun 2013

The indictment can be found here:

Feds indict .. Barrett Brown on retaliation, conspiracy charges
By Avi Selk
4:26 pm on October 4, 2012
http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/2012/10/feds-indict-self-proclaimed-anonymous-spokesman-on-retaliation-conspiracy-charges.html/

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
22. yes, he was and he made them. look, there's no doubt that Brown
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:39 PM
Jun 2013

is a flawed character and that he did some illegal things, but this story is really about the overcharging for those crimes. I think you're not looking at the full story and what's really going on.

struggle4progress

(118,348 posts)
23. A whistler-blower persecuted by Obama, just for making a few threats against a Federal agent
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:49 PM
Jun 2013

and for collecting some stolen credit card numbers and their CVVs!

Oh! 'tis such an obvious and tragic miscarriage of justice, b'gosh and b'gorra! that indeed it brings tears to m'rheumy old eyes!

idwiyo

(5,113 posts)
26. I don't know enough about this case to make up my mind but I do know that indictment
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 05:59 PM
Jun 2013

based on possession of credit card numbers and CVVs is very fishy one indeed.

Here, you are guilty too:

4506 3780 1356 2745 152
9783 2398 1234 5325. 171
3772 1345 2654 1378. 453


PS the numbers above are just random numbers. It would be damn easy to be "in possession" of real ones if one reads Anonymous' websites or goes to chat rooms.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Strange Case of Barre...