Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnyone listening to NPR right now? Advisor for Romney wants MORE military spending
HELL NO!!
Even Baggers agree that we're spending an aweful amount on military spending and that's it's breaking the country.
Defense RELATED spending tops 1 trillion a year, again defense RELATED spending NSA, DIA, CIA and the rest of the alphabet programs suck up a LOT of cash.
I pray the DNC will at least expose these stupid bastards.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1169 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anyone listening to NPR right now? Advisor for Romney wants MORE military spending (Original Post)
uponit7771
Feb 2012
OP
think
(11,641 posts)1. 2 wars ending but we keep on spending
A Defense Budget at the Crossroads
Author: Jonathan Masters, Associate Staff Writer
February 7, 2012
~snip
~snip~
As the above chart illustrates, the Defense Department projects "savings" of approximately $259 billion over the next five years (white column), the first phase of $487 billion in reductions over the next decade. The "projected savings," which do not account for declining war costs in Iraq and Afghanistan (Overseas Contingency Operations), are calculated by subtracting the current FY2013 budget projections (blue columns) from prior FY2012 projections (red columns) that assumed larger annual increases (PDF). The budget is only set to fall in actual dollar amount from 2012 to 2013, after which it will continue to grow at or near the rate of inflation. So in effect, it would be more accurate to portray the real budget (green line) as roughly frozen for this period, rather than achieving the "savings" advertised by the Defense Department.
Some critics chide the Pentagon for failing to make meaningful cuts to a base budget that has risen by nearly 80 percent since 2001. "Mr. Obama is only barely shifting the needle," says Edward Luce in the Financial Times. "He is still reluctant to make an explicit trade-off between confronting a bloated U.S. military and rejuvenating U.S. economic competitiveness."
~snip~
More:
http://www.cfr.org/us-strategy-and-politics/defense-budget-crossroads/p27318
riverwalker
(8,694 posts)2. here's why
Republican Security Advisers Tied to $40 Billion in Contracts
Five of former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romneys 41 national security and foreign policy advisers have links to companies that last year alone received at least $7.9 billion in federal contracts, according to data compiled by Bloomberg Government analyst Christopher Flavelle. Of that, $7.3 billion came from the Department of Defense.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-23/republican-security-advisers-tied-to-40-billion-in-contracts.html
think
(11,641 posts)3. TY. Evil rotten war whores supporting Mitt the Ripper. Who'da thunk.../nt