Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCorporate Spooks Are Watching You: The Dangerous Rise of the Industrial-Surveillance Complex
http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/outsourced-spooksWhether one views Edward Snowden as a hero or a villain, perhaps we could all agree that if the government is to keep secrets, a 29-year-old private contractor with a soft spot for Ron Paul shouldn't have access to a treasure trove of its most sensitive information.
Of course, that assumes that there still exists a bright line between government and the private sector. But that's become an antiquated notion after two decades of ideologically driven outsourcing of what were once considered core government functions. As a result of that effort, there are now a million potential Edward Snowdons or, more precisely, 483,263 contractors with top-secret clearances, according to James Clapper, the director of National Intelligence any of whom could slip out with sensitive data on a thumb drive if they have a personal or ideological axe to grind.
More troubling is the fact that we're being constantly monitored by private spy companies with virtually no oversight or accountability. According to journalist Tim Shorrock, around 70 percent of our national security spending now goes to private firms. Michael Hayden, who oversaw the privatization effort as NSA director from 1999 to 2005, told Shorrock that the largest concentration of cyber power on the planet is the intersection of the Baltimore Parkway and Maryland Route 32, where the NSA's top contractors are located. Hayden coined the term, Digital Blackwater to describe the privatization of American cyber security agencies.
I think it's extraordinarily frightening because the oversight by Congress is so minimal to begin with, says Robert McChesney, a professor of communications at the University of Illinois and author of Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism Is Turning the Internet Against Democracy. From what we know, the oversight of spying, intelligence and surveillance is really rock-bottom, with members of Congress often knowing little or nothing about the details of these programs. So, they're going off the books [with private firms] to avoid even the minimal oversight they do have.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 549 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Corporate Spooks Are Watching You: The Dangerous Rise of the Industrial-Surveillance Complex (Original Post)
xchrom
Jun 2013
OP
Berlum
(7,044 posts)1. Digital Backwater of the Borg, Inc.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)2. The ubiquitous corporate spying on America is what has enabled the NSA gather its information.
The difference is there's Congressional and judicial oversight on the NSA.
If you're really worried about the erosion of privacy, worry about Coca-Cola and Walmart.