Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
74 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama Liberals Aren’t Buying the Media’s False Equivalency to Bush (Original Post) rhett o rick Jun 2013 OP
I am. I am an LBJ liberal. graham4anything Jun 2013 #1
The 53% of America that elected him twice. JaneyVee Jun 2013 #2
So you are a left wing liberal? nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #3
It's a "Dying Breed" remember we are the "Party of the Disenfranchised" KoKo Jun 2013 #24
Barack Obama won the presidency with 32% of eligible votes. rhett o rick Jun 2013 #23
Running against the most awful candidate In decades MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #51
Democrats are ALWAYS running against the most awful candidates in decades, they're called JaneyVee Jun 2013 #54
This time, even the Republicans couldn't stand Romney MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #55
They still showed up in droves at the polls for him. Just like they did for McCain. JaneyVee Jun 2013 #57
Or they showed up to vote against Obama MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #66
Part of the problem is that the false equivalency nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #4
you make an excellent point Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #11
Well put Nadin. The empire existed long before Obama became president. He inherited the spy machine rhett o rick Jun 2013 #68
Quoting fictitious groups of people to deflect from the growing lack of faith for dear leader. Arctic Dave Jun 2013 #5
Obama jackalopes nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #10
If I called you a Puritopian, or a an emoprog you'd probably alert treestar Jun 2013 #13
I don't alert. I'm not an Internet wuss. Arctic Dave Jun 2013 #14
"dear leader?" Atman Jun 2013 #59
What p/l/d? Arctic Dave Jun 2013 #60
high quality journalism shines a light on the subject matter Monkie Jun 2013 #6
Netroots Nation is the biggest Progressive conference in the US. octoberlib Jun 2013 #7
+1 BumRushDaShow Jun 2013 #9
Exactly. octoberlib Jun 2013 #45
And dontcha just love how Howard Dean has been zeeland Jun 2013 #12
Sounds like a smart and extremely productive group of people. Number23 Jun 2013 #34
Thanks for that report. It's yet another example that shows how out of touch the critics here are. stevenleser Jun 2013 #37
People use DU to air their frustrations. In the real world octoberlib Jun 2013 #44
I wish people here would get over the obsession with defending the administration. rhett o rick Jun 2013 #56
+1 n/t magellan Jun 2013 #64
I wish people here would get over their obsession with being outraged at the administration nt stevenleser Jun 2013 #65
And you classify demands to know more about what OUR intelligence agencies are doing, as outrage at rhett o rick Jun 2013 #67
I totally agree . There was plenty of criticism of the surveillance state and other things at octoberlib Jun 2013 #71
Thank you for the report on the lack of Progressive outrage Hekate Jun 2013 #43
The problem is that sweet spot in the middle vi5 Jun 2013 #53
I have no idea what this writer meant by " Obama liberals". nt octoberlib Jun 2013 #8
Sounds like "fucking for virginity" WilliamPitt Jun 2013 #15
Why are you including "Also posted in the BOG"? What are you stalking a subforum and its members? KittyWampus Jun 2013 #16
LOL. You have to take the cake wampus. I saw the OP but of course the BOG is rhett o rick Jun 2013 #25
The only people pushing the Obama = Bush meme are Ron Paul libertarian rejects. n/t Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #17
Sheesh...what is this stuff about obsession with Paul...son and father..I guess? KoKo Jun 2013 #19
Wow, so now you accuse DU'ers of being paid. Pathetic. KittyWampus Jun 2013 #21
Looks like I touched a nerve Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #22
I think there is a "certain percentage"...although I don't put YOU in that category. KoKo Jun 2013 #29
i would say none at all, you pay for quality after all Monkie Jun 2013 #32
I love the non-sequitur. NSA Surveillance means... that some people are paid to post! LOL! stevenleser Jun 2013 #38
I agree. Some here want to return to Democratic principles and the Constitution. While others choose rhett o rick Jun 2013 #39
And you attempt to defend a non-sequitur with... another non-sequitur! stevenleser Jun 2013 #40
Your ridicule is so noted. It's the only tool you have. I support the Constitution and Democratic rhett o rick Jun 2013 #41
Damn Skippy nt MrScorpio Jun 2013 #31
Who are "Obama Liberals"? GeorgeGist Jun 2013 #18
It would appear to be that way Art_from_Ark Jun 2013 #46
Post removed Post removed Jun 2013 #20
Why? NoOneMan Jun 2013 #27
59 posts, only one message: if you dont love obama you are a racist Monkie Jun 2013 #30
Plezzz. That isnt even a good try. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #35
Obama + Liberal = Oxymoron. He's a centrist. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #26
"Obama Liberals" is an insult to liberals. The Link Jun 2013 #28
"Obama Liberals" Are To Liberals... WillyT Jun 2013 #33
What I see happening is that the media is trying to redefine liberal as those that worship Obama. rhett o rick Jun 2013 #36
Agreed Harmony Blue Jun 2013 #69
Kick! jazzimov Jun 2013 #42
"Obama liberal" is an oxymoron. Scuba Jun 2013 #47
I think calling Obama supporters "liberals" is an attempt at further disenfranchising true liberals rhett o rick Jun 2013 #48
Obama liberals? JW2020 Jun 2013 #49
"Obama Liberals" = oxymoron. nt LWolf Jun 2013 #50
I don't think he's equivalent to Bush at all... but... sibelian Jun 2013 #52
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2013 #61
"Obama liberals"...that's a good one! Safetykitten Jun 2013 #58
Obama liberals? Apophis Jun 2013 #62
they used it because bobduca Jun 2013 #63
Obama Centrists would be more appropriate. Zorra Jun 2013 #70
The only time you get them to discuss an issue is after the Pres has made his stand clear. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #72
I left my response to you in the BOG group. Major Hogwash Jun 2013 #73
"Kicked out" assumes I once belonged. I was banned. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #74

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
24. It's a "Dying Breed" remember we are the "Party of the Disenfranchised"
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 09:19 PM
Jun 2013

WHO ASK QUESTIONS and STILL VOTE...(although the "meme is" that WE don't Vote!)

It get's to that point with me reading stuff here these days. If I wanted to be a "Free Republican" (FREEPER) then...I could do no better than to see what "passes for Left" on this site these days.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
23. Barack Obama won the presidency with 32% of eligible votes.
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 09:18 PM
Jun 2013

Far cry from 53% of America. And a lot of conservatives voted for him.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
54. Democrats are ALWAYS running against the most awful candidates in decades, they're called
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 10:16 AM
Jun 2013

Republicans.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
66. Or they showed up to vote against Obama
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 11:37 AM
Jun 2013

I suspect that the polling data points to that, but I haven't seen it.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
4. Part of the problem is that the false equivalency
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 08:23 PM
Jun 2013

Is based on a lack of historic understanding. This is an imperial presidency, has nothing to do with te occupant.

It started with Truman and it's high time we realize this. Empire is why we can't have nice things.

Puzzledtraveller

(5,937 posts)
11. you make an excellent point
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 08:45 PM
Jun 2013

from that historical blindness we continue to miss so much that happens right under our nose and in front of our eyes, it has become traitorous anymore to point these things out. Indoctrination is complete.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
68. Well put Nadin. The empire existed long before Obama became president. He inherited the spy machine
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 02:02 PM
Jun 2013

and the economic machine. He either choose or was told to keep them intact. Appears to me that it is bigger than him.

 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
5. Quoting fictitious groups of people to deflect from the growing lack of faith for dear leader.
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 08:32 PM
Jun 2013

I'm interesting in hearing what the Obama jackalopes have to say about all this.

Atman

(31,464 posts)
59. "dear leader?"
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 10:52 AM
Jun 2013

If I couldn't see your post count and membership date, I'd assume you are a mole/troll. What Progressive/Lib/Dem calls Obama "dear leader?" that Freepers/Cave Dwellar shit.

 

Monkie

(1,301 posts)
6. high quality journalism shines a light on the subject matter
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 08:33 PM
Jun 2013

its like a window opened and i could see things so much clearer, i feel uplifted and strangely secure.
bravo!

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
7. Netroots Nation is the biggest Progressive conference in the US.
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 08:34 PM
Jun 2013

My friend was there running social media. She said the mainstream press showed up because they wanted to catch some Progressive outrage so they could push their Obama = Bush meme. Most of the people there are activists and campaign workers who are strategizing on how to get more liberals/ Progressives elected from school boards on up. Howard Dean and DFA had seminars on his 50 state strategy for 2014. Most of the
attendees knew what CBS etc. were up to and weren't going to give them the satisfaction. This country has a lot of problems. Our party has a lot of problems. Handing this country over to the Republicans won't solve any of it. They addressed someofthe problems of our party through seminars and panels not outrage and press was extremely disappointed.

BumRushDaShow

(129,662 posts)
9. +1
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 08:41 PM
Jun 2013

Time is better spent bolstering the state parties so we can take governorships and legislatures back, thus allowing progressives to finally deep-six the ALEC agenda.

zeeland

(247 posts)
12. And dontcha just love how Howard Dean has been
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 08:46 PM
Jun 2013

embraced and utilized by this administration? Maybe Obama should offer
a photo op with Dean, Grayson, Bernie Sanders, any of the elected officials
people like me trust. That should pacify us...right, that's the ticket.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
34. Sounds like a smart and extremely productive group of people.
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 10:44 PM
Jun 2013

No wonder this article and the other one saying that the liberal activists have fully rejected the fringe elements that equate Obama to Bush are going down like lead balloons in this forum.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
37. Thanks for that report. It's yet another example that shows how out of touch the critics here are.
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 11:13 PM
Jun 2013

When you go out and talk with fellow Democrats in different parts of the country, they don't sound like the folks here on DU who seem to spend most of their time outraged against the administration.

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
44. People use DU to air their frustrations. In the real world
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 03:58 AM
Jun 2013

Progressives are working to get people elected. They're trying very hard to flip some of these states like Michigan and Wisconsin and take back the House (even though gerrymandering will make it difficult). This years conference was the largest ever and they trained a lot of new activists. Netroots 2014 will be held in Detroit next summer.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
56. I wish people here would get over the obsession with defending the administration.
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 10:20 AM
Jun 2013

Progressives arent at war with the administration. Progressives are at war with issues, policies and laws that are killing the middle and working classes. If that reflects badly on the Admin, then so be it, but it isnt about Pres Obama.

Tell me if this isnt the way some are thinking. Pres Obama is honest and has a wonderful family. I doubt that any progressive would disagree. Therefore any questions or criticisms of any issues government related are direct affronts to Pres Obama's character. Wait, what? No progressive would buy that. No decent Democrat should buy that.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
67. And you classify demands to know more about what OUR intelligence agencies are doing, as outrage at
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 01:02 PM
Jun 2013

the administration. In fact seems to me that when people said that Michael Hasting's accident was suspicious, some started in their defense of the administration. Even to the point of being disrespectful of Mr. Hastings within hours of his death.

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
71. I totally agree . There was plenty of criticism of the surveillance state and other things at
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 02:42 PM
Jun 2013

this conference. The progressive activist solution is to elect more progressives. Equating the leader of the Democratic party with Bush will not convince people to vote for us. They had no problem with heckling Pelosi but name-calling is counter-productive. Really, anybody who doesn't hold their government accountable is likely to end up with an authoritarian state. I don't like the surveillance state either or the TPP or chained CPI.

Hekate

(90,861 posts)
43. Thank you for the report on the lack of Progressive outrage
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 01:22 AM
Jun 2013

Sounds like they have their feet on the ground.

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
53. The problem is that sweet spot in the middle
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 10:15 AM
Jun 2013

What we have now is a Democratic party that knows that we don't want to turn the country over to Republicans. So they settle and make us settle for "Not as bad as the other guys" which means basically the Democratic party of 2013 is the Republican party of 1992 on a lot of issues (primarily economics, healthcare, education, poverty, income inequality, etc).

So how do we not "hand the country over to Republicans" but also push the party leftward back to some sense of reasonable, progressive sanity. How do we get them to make the case for progressive values and policies, especially since when detailed poll after detailed poll shows that when asked the specific questions on policies (rather than simply a "are you liberal or conservative&quot that people support those policies.

Especially when so many people in the party continue to take a "SHHHHH!! Speak no ill of our leaders!!!!" approach. Look where that got Republicans. They kept living inside of a bubble and rather than making sure their party and leader (Bush) expressed popular opinions in an easily digestable way (not that they had any, but still), they took the approach of everyone covering their ears and going "LALALALALALALALI CAN"T HEAR YOU!!!!!" and simply shouting down any dissent.

That's what our party is doing now and it's going to ruin a golden opportunity of finally knocking out a horrible, out of touch, out of step, idiotic Republican party. But instead of doing what is needed and contrasting our great policies with theirs, we have a leader who is too concerned with bipartisanship above all else, including what is good policy.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
25. LOL. You have to take the cake wampus. I saw the OP but of course the BOG is
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 09:24 PM
Jun 2013

a closed club. Only those that worship are allowed. A fact that doesnt bother me in the least but I saw the OP in Greatest Threads and wanted to discuss it.

Plez, you think I would waste my time "stalking" BOG members? I think it's great that you have such a place to be free from challenge.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
19. Sheesh...what is this stuff about obsession with Paul...son and father..I guess?
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 09:10 PM
Jun 2013

It's some kind of MEME that seems to be a "TP" by folks who have an object in mind in trying to paint Democratic Activists with some kind of "Somethin?" are you all raving about.

If you have some kind of issue POST AN OP and GET REPLIES! Otherwise this is just one of those "paid for profit" Internet Memes promoted by those who are getting paychecks or other compensation to keep posting this crap on this website.

What Gives here? NOT THAT ANY OF YOU WOULD REPLY!

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
29. I think there is a "certain percentage"...although I don't put YOU in that category.
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 09:30 PM
Jun 2013

Of course...I wouldn't.

but it would be silly to think that "paid folks" aren't out here on the Internets (lol's for GB)...given the new NSA Revelations. That would be quite naive.

 

Monkie

(1,301 posts)
32. i would say none at all, you pay for quality after all
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 09:34 PM
Jun 2013

if anyone is getting paid it looks like they are paid to make obama look bad by making a complete mess of defending him.
or the chinese are paying them to make the NSA look bad, otherwise i cant make any sense of it.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
38. I love the non-sequitur. NSA Surveillance means... that some people are paid to post! LOL!
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 11:15 PM
Jun 2013

A segment of DU has really lost themselves in this issue.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
39. I agree. Some here want to return to Democratic principles and the Constitution. While others choose
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 11:48 PM
Jun 2013

defend their president to the end regardless.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
41. Your ridicule is so noted. It's the only tool you have. I support the Constitution and Democratic
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 12:01 AM
Jun 2013

principles and you use asinine emoticons.

If you are banking that Pres Obama is going to stop or even slow our dissent into fascism, you are in denial. The economic and intelligence agency leaders are the same as the previous administration. I wonder why? Maybe Pres Obama had no choice. Maybe it's bigger than himself. Clapper is a lying Republican that is supported by the corporatist apologists among us.

You and your friends use of silly emoticons is so very telling.

We are in a class war. Do you honestly think Pres Obama is on our side?

Response to rhett o rick (Original post)

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
36. What I see happening is that the media is trying to redefine liberal as those that worship Obama.
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 11:06 PM
Jun 2013

The OP is saying that liberals agree with Pres Obama. This is an attempt to drive people farther to the right, right into the hands of Christie or Boosh III.

By the way, is Sarah Jones pushing a centrist agenda?

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
48. I think calling Obama supporters "liberals" is an attempt at further disenfranchising true liberals
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 10:00 AM
Jun 2013

Dean, Warren, Sanders, Grayson, Wyden, liberals.

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
52. I don't think he's equivalent to Bush at all... but...
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 10:10 AM
Jun 2013

I don't think he was ever as radical as he seemed to want people to think he was going to be either.

Response to sibelian (Reply #52)

bobduca

(1,763 posts)
63. they used it because
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 11:15 AM
Jun 2013

"Liberals who Vainly Hoped He'd Be Liberal, But Changed their Expectations Once He Made His Cabinet Picks." wouldnt fit.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
70. Obama Centrists would be more appropriate.
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 02:37 PM
Jun 2013

Centrists who believe that Obama is infallible, and that anything he does is more important and necessary than what is good for the country.

For instance, if Obama were to cut Social Security benefits for severely disabled retirees in half, Obama centrists would applaud this action as wise and necessary.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
73. I left my response to you in the BOG group.
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 02:51 PM
Jun 2013

I didn't know you had been kicked out of that group until today.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama Liberals Aren’t Buy...