General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHey Snowden, Ecuador recently passed a law which shuts down broadcasters and regulates websites
Snowden picked an interesting destination. Hopefully Snowden will continue his freedom luvin ways and speak out against the President of Ecuador once he arrives there.
BOGOTA -- Ecuador passed a sweeping media bill Friday that will shutdown many private broadcasters and regulate everything from reader comments on websites to the percentage of foreign music that can be played on the radio.
The Communications Law is the latest salvo in President Rafael Correas war on what he calls the corrupt press. But free speech advocates worry that the law will be used to cow the media and silence critical voices.
The law not only undermines journalists ability to report critically but threatens the right of citizens to be informed about sensitive issues, Carlos Lauría, with the Committee to Protect Journalists said in a statement. This legislation puts into law a key goal of the Correa presidency: muzzling all critics of his administration."
Among the major changes, the law will limit private broadcasters to 33 percent of the spectrum. Public media will control 33 percent, and community media run by nonprofit groups and community organizations will control 34 percent.
Read more here:
http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/06/14/3452126/ecuador-broadcasters-fear-being.html
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Just about every government is corrupt and intrusive, so what a guy to do? Snowden ignored the lessons of Candide and now has some consequences to face. Personally, I think I would of put my nose down and said fuck it to "the people", because they don't deserve better (and better may not exist). Takes some balls to hit the road, or stupidity (or ego or whatever).
Its sad this issue has become about him in any case. It was not an effective way to inform the people of government abuse.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)will let freedom luvin Snowden have access to classified information.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Snowden slipped through the first time. I don't think it will happen again.
flamingdem
(39,332 posts)They don't want him digging into their secrets, oh no, only attacks against the USA allowed
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)..."of government abuse."
And yet here we are, in the middle of a prolonged and serious discussion of the surveillance state. Not just on DU but in the MSM and around the world.
I get why people don't like that Snowden fled to Hong Kong, and now to Ecuador (probably) via Moscow. But to argue that his methods have been ineffective, is to deny what actually happening.
flamingdem
(39,332 posts)More to come
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...writ large.
Of course we all know our government has spied on China, and that China has spied on us. It's a given. We also know that we and Israel introduced the Stuxnet worm into Iran, to the dismay of computer security experts, who warned that such things tend to get out of control once they are let out.
Personally I don't think he gave that much away to China in terms of strengthening their hand. I have no doubt they were already fully aware that spying was occurring.
But now it is public knowledge. Having the Little People know about all this is what's so infuriating to the powers that be.
Well too damned bad.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)It goes like...
Since Snowden is fleeing to a state that is as bad as the one he criticizes, he is therefore a hypocrite. If Snowden is a hypocrite, therefore all information that he has presented is untrue.
No, Snowden putting his face on this leak has been an absolute disaster as far as "truth" is concerned. The mass majority of articles about the leak are about Snowden, not about intrustive domestic government spying.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...nevertheless, he has been more effective than other whistleblowers who preceded him.
still_one
(92,446 posts)or they tire of him?
For the time being he will not have to worry about board and room, so he doesn't need a job, that is for sure.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Your point is?
BeyondGeography
(39,386 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)1) The surprise being expressed by some that the U.S. is spying on other countries.
2) The pretense that these other countries don't have their own issues, and the U.S. looks good by comparison.
polly7
(20,582 posts)A US embassy cable from March 2009 released by WikiLeaks said there was some truth to Correas claim that the Ecuadorian media play a political role, in this case the role of the opposition.
The reason was evident: Many media outlet owners come from the elite business class that feels threatened by Correas reform agenda, and defend their own economic interests via their outlets.
Faced with this scenario, the Correa government, with the backing of its people, has sought to break this monopoly.
One way has been through the establishment of a public TV channel and giving support to community-based media outlets. This has been done via granting them licences and providing them with necessary equipment.
Full article: http://www.setyoufreenews.com/2012/09/04/ecuador-correa-pushes-free-speech-challenges-media-dictatorship/
Harmony Blue
(3,978 posts)for providing the truth as always.
polly7
(20,582 posts)You'd think they'd realize people can very easily look this stuff up and find out the real truth behind it.
BeyondGeography
(39,386 posts)http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/06/14/ecuador-end-assault-free-speech
polly7
(20,582 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,386 posts)Here's more, for those who care:
First, only those who have a degree in journalism will be able to work. Though high professional standards are supported, critics say this could be a barrier in a country where higher education is not very widespread.
Second, information is defined with precise words, saying it has to be verified, opportune, contextualized, and corroborated. It prohibits media lynching, defined as the repeated publication of information that can smear a person's reputation. Some fear this could extend to well-researched reporting on government policies or corruption, interpreting the law broadly.
(Within the context of the new law, satirical programming like The Daily Show would not be able to be broadcast in Ecuador, says Ms. Almeida.)
Finally, the creation of a media watchdog presided by a representative of the president that can impose fines and force media outlets to issue public apologies.
http://www.minnpost.com/christian-science-monitor/2013/06/assange-still-ecuadorean-embassy-country-tightens-press-freedom
polly7
(20,582 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)But they're not allowed here for some reason.
Glad you got a Cheap thrill, eh?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)He could vanish is a poof of glitter and vapor tonight and the story remains. Those who want to talk about him are those who don't want to talk about the issue.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)But yes there are two issues whether what he did and what the government did.
I don't like what either did! I don't trust the government with that kind of power nor do I trust Snowden.
BeyondGeography
(39,386 posts)America sucks, until you look at most of the alternatives.
Meantime, Mr. Snowden did put NSA empire building on the map as an issue, and for this he is owed a measure of gratitude.
RZM
(8,556 posts)It's a veritable freedom tour.
Not that it's his fault those countries are the way they are. But it is ironic.