Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBarrett Brown vs. the Private Intelligence Business | scary read
This is worth reading the original in fullAlso Hissyspit has an important related thread about this. "How Barrett Brown Shone Light on Security Contractors" (Remember the Plan to Discredit Greenwald?)
Urizenus Sklar
irl Peter Ludlow, Professor of Philosophy at Northwestern University
Barrett Brown vs. the Private Intelligence Business
Posted: 06/23/2013 5:12 pm
In June of 2011, the journalist Barrett Brown published an article in the Guardian, outlining a sinister cyber-surveillance program -- "a disturbing public-private partnership to spy on web users." In view of the recent exposure of the PRISM program by Edward Snowden, one might think Brown would be in the news discussing the strikingly similar new revelations, but he isn't. He is in federal custody, facing charges that add up to 105 years in prison. The question is: Why? In a recent article in The Nation I walked through the details of his case, but some additional contextualization is called for.
....
( Here a mention of the discovery of a power point presentation outlining a strategy to undermine the credibility of Glenn Greenwald" to "neutralize his defense of WikiLeaks" and a "conspiracy of government agencies, lobbying and cybersecurity firms to carry out a disinformation campaign" and "plans for data mining and disinformation campaigns targeting social organizations and advocacy groups".)
...
For example, how did The Chamber of Commerce and the Bank of America get wrapped up in this? WikiLeaks had been claiming that they had a large data dump of emails from a hack of the Bank of America. The Bank of America was clearly concerned about this and, according to the leaked HBGary emails, it approached the U.S. Department of Justice for assistance. The DoJ in turn directed the Bank of America to the law/lobbying firm Hunton and Williams, which does legal work for Wells Fargo and General Dynamics and also lobbies for Koch Industries, Americans for Affordable Climate Policy, Gas Processors Association, Entergy among many other firms. (Significantly, they hired the FBI's senior cybersecurity advisor just last month. We will come back to this). The DoJ not only recommended that the Bank of America hire Hunton and Williams, but explicitly suggested they utilize H&W's Richard Wyatt, who famously was the lead attorney in the Chamber of Commerce's lawsuit against the Yes Men and was also the attorney in Food Lion's lawsuit against ABC News.
...
It is worth noting that the contents of the Stratfor hack (which I discuss in my article in The Nation) are even more outrageous than those of the HBGary hack. This time the emails ranged from blatant admissions of renditions and talk of throwing people out of helicopters to plans to discredit the Yes Men on behalf of Union Carbide. One remarkable exchange revealed that the Coca-Cola company was asking Stratfor for intelligence on dealing with PETA, and the Stratfor Vice President for Intelligence remarked in a leaked email that "The FBI has a classified investigation on PETA operatives. I'll see what I can uncover." Suggesting, of course, that not only did Stratfor have access to the classified material, but that it would be provided to Coca-Cola. The FBI had been turned into a private dick for corporate America.
...
But even this tells only half the story. One might have thought that private intelligence agencies were simply doing outsourced intelligence work for the U.S. Government. But unfortunately it seems that the tail has begun to wag the dog -- it appears that in many respects the U.S. Government and in particular the Department of Justice is now working for private intelligence firms. This is evident when, for example, Stratfor asks for FBI classified files on PETA or the Department of Justice is used to try and punish journalists for probing into these private intelligence companies.
....
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/urizenus-sklar/barrett-brown-vs-the-priv_b_3487161.html
irl Peter Ludlow, Professor of Philosophy at Northwestern University
Barrett Brown vs. the Private Intelligence Business
Posted: 06/23/2013 5:12 pm
In June of 2011, the journalist Barrett Brown published an article in the Guardian, outlining a sinister cyber-surveillance program -- "a disturbing public-private partnership to spy on web users." In view of the recent exposure of the PRISM program by Edward Snowden, one might think Brown would be in the news discussing the strikingly similar new revelations, but he isn't. He is in federal custody, facing charges that add up to 105 years in prison. The question is: Why? In a recent article in The Nation I walked through the details of his case, but some additional contextualization is called for.
....
( Here a mention of the discovery of a power point presentation outlining a strategy to undermine the credibility of Glenn Greenwald" to "neutralize his defense of WikiLeaks" and a "conspiracy of government agencies, lobbying and cybersecurity firms to carry out a disinformation campaign" and "plans for data mining and disinformation campaigns targeting social organizations and advocacy groups".)
...
For example, how did The Chamber of Commerce and the Bank of America get wrapped up in this? WikiLeaks had been claiming that they had a large data dump of emails from a hack of the Bank of America. The Bank of America was clearly concerned about this and, according to the leaked HBGary emails, it approached the U.S. Department of Justice for assistance. The DoJ in turn directed the Bank of America to the law/lobbying firm Hunton and Williams, which does legal work for Wells Fargo and General Dynamics and also lobbies for Koch Industries, Americans for Affordable Climate Policy, Gas Processors Association, Entergy among many other firms. (Significantly, they hired the FBI's senior cybersecurity advisor just last month. We will come back to this). The DoJ not only recommended that the Bank of America hire Hunton and Williams, but explicitly suggested they utilize H&W's Richard Wyatt, who famously was the lead attorney in the Chamber of Commerce's lawsuit against the Yes Men and was also the attorney in Food Lion's lawsuit against ABC News.
...
It is worth noting that the contents of the Stratfor hack (which I discuss in my article in The Nation) are even more outrageous than those of the HBGary hack. This time the emails ranged from blatant admissions of renditions and talk of throwing people out of helicopters to plans to discredit the Yes Men on behalf of Union Carbide. One remarkable exchange revealed that the Coca-Cola company was asking Stratfor for intelligence on dealing with PETA, and the Stratfor Vice President for Intelligence remarked in a leaked email that "The FBI has a classified investigation on PETA operatives. I'll see what I can uncover." Suggesting, of course, that not only did Stratfor have access to the classified material, but that it would be provided to Coca-Cola. The FBI had been turned into a private dick for corporate America.
...
But even this tells only half the story. One might have thought that private intelligence agencies were simply doing outsourced intelligence work for the U.S. Government. But unfortunately it seems that the tail has begun to wag the dog -- it appears that in many respects the U.S. Government and in particular the Department of Justice is now working for private intelligence firms. This is evident when, for example, Stratfor asks for FBI classified files on PETA or the Department of Justice is used to try and punish journalists for probing into these private intelligence companies.
....
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/urizenus-sklar/barrett-brown-vs-the-priv_b_3487161.html
This is why we have the FBI head defending NSAs surveillance programs. They share that day to use against citizens who get out of line.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1116 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Barrett Brown vs. the Private Intelligence Business | scary read (Original Post)
Catherina
Jun 2013
OP
...For those who feel unable to get upset about what Snowden uncovered...
Democracyinkind
Jun 2013
#2
xchrom
(108,903 posts)1. du rec.
Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)2. ...For those who feel unable to get upset about what Snowden uncovered...
There's plenty to be outraged about in this great article. Stratfor, HBGarry, try to deny that the NS infrastructure is not out of control and mainly working for their corporate masters.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)3. The disinformation campaign against Greenwald
is alive and well here at DU, I have noticed.
Wonder how many are paid........
Response to Catherina (Original post)
Catherina This message was self-deleted by its author.
snot
(10,538 posts)5. K&R'g both threads. This confirms our worst fears.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)6. The NSA whistleblowers confirmed this too so people can't say it's just 1or 2 journalists
Last edited Tue Jun 25, 2013, 12:16 PM - Edit history (1)
The NSA whistleblowers confirmed this too so it's not just 1-2 journalists misunderstanding things.
When Barack Obama took office, Binney hoped the new administration might be open to reforming the program to address his constitutional concerns. He and another former senior NSA analyst, J. Kirk Wiebe, tried to bring the idea of an automated warrant-approval system to the attention of the Department of Justices inspector general. They were given the brush-off. They said, oh, OK, we cant comment, Binney says.
Sitting in a restaurant not far from NSA headquarters, the place where he spent nearly 40 years of his life, Binney held his thumb and forefinger close together. We are, like, that far from a turnkey totalitarian state, he says.
William Binney was a senior NSA crypto-mathematician largely responsible for automating the agencys worldwide eavesdropping network. ... the 68-year-old spent nearly four decades breaking codes and finding new ways to channel billions of private phone calls and email messages from around the world into the NSAs bulging databases. As chief and one of the two cofounders of the agencys Signals Intelligence Automation Research Center, Binney and his team designed much of the infrastructure thats still likely used to intercept international and foreign communications.
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/all/
Sitting in a restaurant not far from NSA headquarters, the place where he spent nearly 40 years of his life, Binney held his thumb and forefinger close together. We are, like, that far from a turnkey totalitarian state, he says.
William Binney was a senior NSA crypto-mathematician largely responsible for automating the agencys worldwide eavesdropping network. ... the 68-year-old spent nearly four decades breaking codes and finding new ways to channel billions of private phone calls and email messages from around the world into the NSAs bulging databases. As chief and one of the two cofounders of the agencys Signals Intelligence Automation Research Center, Binney and his team designed much of the infrastructure thats still likely used to intercept international and foreign communications.
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/all/
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)7. But he's a former HEROIN ADDICT who THREATENED VIOLENCE!!!!!
Thus NOTHING he exposed matters, not matter how scary or heinous!