Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

1-Old-Man

(2,667 posts)
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 03:56 PM Jun 2013

So let's say Snowden is extradited back and stands trial

I suppose the trial would take place in Maryland's District Court, Northern Division if my placement of Fort Mead is correct. That would put the trial in Baltimore if I'm not mistaken.

Let us imagine that there would be great demonstrations in the streets with both those who support what Mr. Snowden has done out in equal force to those who think him a traitor and demand suitable punishment.

And what amazes me is how much this question transcends Party affiliation. While I suspect that most of those who would support Snowden's actions are Democrats there would also be a strong showing from Libertarians and a good number of old school Conservatives too. And opposite them would be a crowd made up mostly of Republicans but not without a strong showing from mainstream Democrats too.

So at least he has brought matters to a point. What we've all known from rumor is now open truth. And Party affilliation aside its more a matter of how sensitive one is to the notion of privacy and Constitutional guarantees to see which side of the issue one lands one.

This discussion is good for the country. Very good.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So let's say Snowden is extradited back and stands trial (Original Post) 1-Old-Man Jun 2013 OP
The issue of being a traitor is not party dependent ksoze Jun 2013 #1
Not charged with treason atreides1 Jun 2013 #2
George? Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #4
I think it's an even mix Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #3
I sincerely doubt there would be an equal number of protesters in favor of his being on trial. randome Jun 2013 #5

ksoze

(2,068 posts)
1. The issue of being a traitor is not party dependent
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 04:00 PM
Jun 2013

This is not a political issue - it is a criminal issue involving a traitor. The discussion is simple - he stole secrets and has given them to our enemy's.

atreides1

(16,093 posts)
2. Not charged with treason
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 04:08 PM
Jun 2013

He was charged under the Espionage Act...and the last time I checked the only enemies we had were the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

Russia, China, and even little Ecuador are mostly adversaries...because the US Government wouldn't be trading with enemies...and wouldn't owe a good percentage of its debt to an enemy nation, because that would show how stupid the US really is...

Just saying.

Puzzledtraveller

(5,937 posts)
3. I think it's an even mix
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 04:10 PM
Jun 2013

so much so that you can't extract which party has a majority on the pro or con. It's a rare instance indeed.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
5. I sincerely doubt there would be an equal number of protesters in favor of his being on trial.
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 04:11 PM
Jun 2013

Those who think he stepped over the line are more content to let the justice system handle him. (Cue the Bradley Manning references. And no, I do not believe his treatment was justified.)

Much of the trial would likely be secret, however, not only because of national security secrets but because Snowden can't be trusted. He'd likely blurt out the name of a spy in China just to fuck everyone over.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So let's say Snowden is e...