Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,832 posts)
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:55 PM Jul 2013

"The Ageist Attack on Hillary" by Michael Tomasky at the Daily Beast

The Ageist Attack on Hillary

by Michael Tomasky at the Daily Beast

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/07/01/the-ageist-attack-on-hillary.html

"SNIP......................................



But the main way for her to beat them on whether she can relate to young people is simply through policy. Whomever she’s running against, she’ll be the candidate who supports same-sex marriage. She’ll be the one who backed a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants (granted, some Republicans will be able to say this too). She’ll be the one who backs lower student-loan rates. She’ll be the candidate who supports Obamacare, which permits young people to stay on their parents’ insurance until age 26. She’ll be the candidate who actually did something for young people and especially young women across the world as secretary of state. She’ll be the one who supports equality in all its forms instead of opposing it in all its forms, she’ll be the candidate for whom virtually every important young-people icon will be stumping, and she’ll be the candidate of the party that is not the comfortable home to America’s bigots and racists.


Republicans make the same mistake all the time with groups they don’t normally talk to or know much about, whether it’s African-Americans or Latinos or young people. They think they’ll change loyalties on the basis of symbolism. But people turn out not to be that stupid. They actually pay some attention to substance, and the GOP stands against what young people support in almost every particular.


The one partial exception is Rand Paul and his opposition to the surveillance state. That does give him some crossover potential with young voters, no doubt—he will be to Clinton’s left on that. But if Paul is the nominee, the Clinton campaign will ensure that young voters become aware that he compared same-sex marriage to tying the knot with animals, and that he thinks the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unfair to private-business owners. I’d guess that many of those who admire his surveillance position will start thinking twice.


Direct attacks on Clinton’s age will, if history is a guide, go overboard and backfire; and as for rebranding the GOP as the forward-looking party of young people, well, that has to start with changing policy positions that the party has no ability to change. Other than that, great idea.


...................................SNIP"
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
3. That gets me spittin' mad. I'm a woman in her 50's. There ain't nothin' wrong with my
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 11:02 PM
Jul 2013

brain. In fact, I'm a wiser person now than when I was younger. Experience is important. Physical stamina is important, so it's important she exhibit that. I think she IS physically fit. Women live a longer time than men. 65 for a woman? She's probably got 30 years to go, whereas many men have 10 or 15.

Arkansas Granny

(31,534 posts)
7. Plus, Hillary has the experience. Who else has met with so many
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 11:25 PM
Jul 2013

world leaders. She also knows what the right wing attack mechanism is all about and isn't afraid to take them on. There are some really good Democrats out there, but, IMO, she's the best chance we have for 2016.

David__77

(23,549 posts)
11. It's her politics that are outmoded, not her physically.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 11:44 PM
Jul 2013

I wish her well in her endeavors outside political office.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
12. This from a party that elected Strom Thurmond until he was 101 yrs old.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 11:47 PM
Jul 2013

This isn't about age, they HATE women.

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
13. She has to come out unmistakenly blunt on the following issues.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 11:50 PM
Jul 2013

Social Security
Patriot Act
Campaign Finance Reform
Fair Tax scheme.
Trade Agreements.
Investigate/prosecute financial moguls.

I could give a shit if the Tea Party legislatively blocks her agenda or not. She has to come clean, be rock solid, and not compromise.

If she does not unequivocally declare that she will not give ground on those fore mentioned issues, I leave the top of the ballot blank. I'm starting to believe that our nation must be shell shocked into sanity and nothing would do it quicker than putting a Tea Billy in charge. Hillary would give us another dose of boiled frog.

Hopefully, she is "primaried" before the general election.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
14. I couldn't care less about her age.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 11:51 PM
Jul 2013

It's her neo-liberal, Turd Way policies that make her ineligible to receive my vote or support.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"The Ageist Attack on Hil...