Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
68 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The "Righteous" Left- Blinded by Snowden (Original Post) LukeFL Jul 2013 OP
The fixation on Snowden is almost entirely from right wing authoritarians. Warren Stupidity Jul 2013 #1
Exactly. People who don't want to talk about domestic spying talk about Snowden instead. Marr Jul 2013 #14
you have been so spot on in your observations RainDog Jul 2013 #52
Me thinks the NSA supporters are getting desperate here. RC Jul 2013 #2
Yeah, it's the "blind" left, now. sibelian Jul 2013 #3
Why do you have to put those labels on people treestar Jul 2013 #49
Why do you equate the NSA to the EPA or OSHA, or even the IRS? RC Jul 2013 #57
The NSA is just an agency treestar Jul 2013 #63
You are twisting definitions. RC Jul 2013 #64
Hogwash. 99Forever Jul 2013 #4
The "professional" left, the "righteous" left Vinnie From Indy Jul 2013 #5
I don't even know why they're bothering sibelian Jul 2013 #6
Groundhog day AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #43
That site is notorious, well not really, it's sort of a tiny corner of the internet that only a few sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #13
It's in the article. Not my statement LukeFL Jul 2013 #31
Nice try, but it's still just a standard #13 on the hit parade, maybe with a bit of #9 PSPS Jul 2013 #7
You haven't played Snowden-Bashing Bingo yet? backscatter712 Jul 2013 #28
A setup requires a setter-upper DisgustipatedinCA Jul 2013 #8
The Baggers fiendish plot against women seems to be working really well for them. Whisp Jul 2013 #10
Ah! Glad to hear you have information on this secret plot. DisgustipatedinCA Jul 2013 #15
Enjoy your little time. Whisp Jul 2013 #17
I've enjoyed 12 years of my time here, no plans to stop anytime soon. DisgustipatedinCA Jul 2013 #20
You misunderstood. Whisp Jul 2013 #21
Thanks for the clarification. I now understand that you don't see what's happening DisgustipatedinCA Jul 2013 #25
Everybody on board the Cricket Train! flamingdem Jul 2013 #35
Yeah, but that's only women. Not very important in the overall scheme of things, MH1 Jul 2013 #24
They are so powerless that LukeFL Jul 2013 #32
don't poke holes in this ironclad theory bobduca Jul 2013 #12
Check out General Keith Alexander RC Jul 2013 #27
This guy has too much power. nt octoberlib Jul 2013 #37
That does seem to be most of the problem, doesn't it? RC Jul 2013 #41
Such a nice young man. He should run for President! Whisp Jul 2013 #9
Omg, not that site again. Try something with some credibility if you want to make some point. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #11
LOL Spandan strikes again! (n/t) WorseBeforeBetter Jul 2013 #19
Yes, Snowden's actual words have no credibility. Whisp Jul 2013 #22
Let me put this bluntly: I don't give a shit if he's the devil's spawn cali Jul 2013 #16
And somehow Morales convinced EU officials to talk about Snowden magellan Jul 2013 #18
So the Civil Rights Left shouldn't care? Savannahmann Jul 2013 #23
Ooh, it's the "divide the party" boogeyman. winter is coming Jul 2013 #26
Amen! nt Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #55
Skinner, we need unrec back...for these kinds nadinbrzezinski Jul 2013 #29
Why? Is not an attack -you LukeFL Jul 2013 #34
+1 flamingdem Jul 2013 #38
Why are you defending state surveillance? nadinbrzezinski Jul 2013 #40
I am not. LukeFL Jul 2013 #60
You are defending it nadinbrzezinski Jul 2013 #61
YES. I miss the unrec. This OP would be like -200. n-t Logical Jul 2013 #66
I was sitting with friends at the coffee shop, and we were discussing this very same thing. Safetykitten Jul 2013 #30
brava RainDog Jul 2013 #58
Sweet! truebluegreen Jul 2013 #68
Tripe. n/t Comrade Grumpy Jul 2013 #33
Obvious troll is obvious. *PLONK* backscatter712 Jul 2013 #36
Yep. They bamboozled Valerie Plame, Daniel Ellsberg, the ACLU and Amnesty International. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2013 #39
For me the jury is still out on whether this was planned but if so I suspect flamingdem Jul 2013 #42
Being anti-state surveilance = "Purist Left" AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #44
Note how quickly you simplify the argument and turn it into name calling flamingdem Jul 2013 #45
I restated your position AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #46
What false equivalencies? flamingdem Jul 2013 #47
This makes no sense Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #56
It's called optics. Can't attack Kerry for working from his yacht and not expect Snowden living flamingdem Jul 2013 #59
I have never posted on Kerry and the yacht Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #67
... LukeFL Jul 2013 #62
Blah, blah, blah...n/t. Downtown Hound Jul 2013 #48
Right, forgot it was all about 2014 NuclearDem Jul 2013 #50
yet another one Skittles Jul 2013 #51
Such lunacy. Democracyinkind Jul 2013 #53
The "Righteous" Left: Same as the "Professional" Left, but Cheaper. WinkyDink Jul 2013 #54
LOL, keep trying to use this as the justification for the NSA spying. Notice how there is not.... Logical Jul 2013 #65
 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
14. Exactly. People who don't want to talk about domestic spying talk about Snowden instead.
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 10:15 AM
Jul 2013

It's really bizarre watching them turn that around and accuse people to their left of being "obsessed with Snowden".

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
52. you have been so spot on in your observations
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 03:02 PM
Jul 2013

about this whole incident.

also, the wholesale propaganda framing of "righteous left" is bullshit that alienates a large percentage of the Democratic vote that is, like it or not, to the left of the national party, though often more aligned with state and/or city/county Democrats.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
2. Me thinks the NSA supporters are getting desperate here.
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 09:41 AM
Jul 2013

Demonizing the messenger to distract from the crimes of our government's unconstitutional, wholesale spying and storing that information in data bases, for later searches on everybody, both here and abroad.
How can one person that exposed that spying, be worse than what our government is doing to us?

The NSA groupies must have been given a new set of talking points.

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
3. Yeah, it's the "blind" left, now.
Reply to RC (Reply #2)
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 09:44 AM
Jul 2013

"Righteous" in inverted commas.... welll....

The thing is it's very easy to see what's happening if you just follow the rules of plain English. Lots of adjectives and no facts = low content.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
49. Why do you have to put those labels on people
Reply to RC (Reply #2)
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 02:59 PM
Jul 2013

Who don't agree with you?

I am starting to see that some people have undirected anger and have found something to latch onto.

Why are you calling people "NSA supporters" as if that would be so bad? I am also an EPA supporter, and OSHA supporter and and IRS supporter. Those exist to enforce duly passed laws not yet declared unconstitutional, so what is wrong with them? Is your real problem the American Constitution and its rule of law? You want to live under some other system? Is your rage directed at those who don't want this revolution? You can condemn us all day but we are in a huge majority. You won't see a revolution here. (I have seen the posts about how lucky the Egyptians are - but then they had a different government to rebel from).

It is not "authoritarian" to support the US government as it exists. It is not a dictatorship. It's odd how many people wish it were so that they could be in the middle of a revolution. It indicates a misery far greater than politics.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
57. Why do you equate the NSA to the EPA or OSHA, or even the IRS?
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 03:21 PM
Jul 2013

There is no comparison. Those other agencies do not do unconstitutional, wholesale spying and storing of the gathered information forever. Or building multimillion dollar storage facilities to do so.

To support the NSA is to support "authoritarianism". That is their purpose. Knowledge is Power.
But you only see labels you do not like? Gibme a break. How about the reality of the NSA as "Enemy of the People"?
For a supposedly a free country this information gathering on all its citizens is unconscionable.
You are supporting the problem by defending the NSA. How un-American of you.



The Secret War
INFILTRATION. SABOTAGE. MAYHEM. FOR YEARS, FOUR-STAR GENERAL KEITH ALEXANDER HAS BEEN BUILDING A SECRET ARMY CAPABLE OF LAUNCHING DEVASTATING CYBERATTACKS. NOW IT’S READY TO UNLEASH HELL.


Inside Fort Meade, Maryland, a top-secret city bustles. Tens of thousands of people move through more than 50 buildings—the city has its own post office, fire department, and police force. But as if designed by Kafka, it sits among a forest of trees, surrounded by electrified fences and heavily armed guards, protected by antitank barriers, monitored by sensitive motion detectors, and watched by rotating cameras. To block any telltale electromagnetic signals from escaping, the inner walls of the buildings are wrapped in protective copper shielding and the one-way windows are embedded with a fine copper mesh.

This is the undisputed domain of General Keith Alexander, a man few even in Washington would likely recognize. Never before has anyone in America’s intelligence sphere come close to his degree of power, the number of people under his command, the expanse of his rule, the length of his reign, or the depth of his secrecy. A four-star Army general, his authority extends across three domains: He is director of the world’s largest intelligence service, the National Security Agency; chief of the Central Security Service; and commander of the US Cyber Command. As such, he has his own secret military, presiding over the Navy’s 10th Fleet, the 24th Air Force, and the Second Army.

Alexander runs the nation’s cyberwar efforts, an empire he has built over the past eight years by insisting that the US’s inherent vulnerability to digital attacks requires him to amass more and more authority over the data zipping around the globe. In his telling, the threat is so mind-bogglingly huge that the nation has little option but to eventually put the entire civilian Internet under his protection, requiring tweets and emails to pass through his filters, and putting the kill switch under the government’s forefinger. “What we see is an increasing level of activity on the networks,” he said at a recent security conference in Canada. “I am concerned that this is going to break a threshold where the private sector can no longer handle it and the government is going to have to step in.”

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/?p=58188

treestar

(82,383 posts)
63. The NSA is just an agency
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 04:23 PM
Jul 2013

It is not correct to state that "supporting it" is "authoritarianism." Disagree with the law if you want, but if people aren't willing to condemn that law outright without further information or even support it, they are not "authoritarians." These laws came up by our normal process.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
64. You are twisting definitions.
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 04:35 PM
Jul 2013

The NSA may have had it's start as being legal, but it's mission creep, now has it well over the line into the unconstitutional.
How many of the "laws" were made behind closed doors? Even our Congress have no real oversight as far as the NSA is concerned. Even then are being kept in the dark.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
4. Hogwash.
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 09:44 AM
Jul 2013

Your pitiful attempt to divert from the REAL issue, via character assassination is duly noted as bullshit and you are dismissed.

Vinnie From Indy

(10,820 posts)
5. The "professional" left, the "righteous" left
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 09:59 AM
Jul 2013

When are you people gonna start calling us "dirty hippies"?

I find this calling out of the vast majority of DU'ers quite breathtaking.

Call me whatever you like! I will still stand up for progressive values and The Constitution. Your insults are ineffective and meaningless to me.

Cheers!

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
6. I don't even know why they're bothering
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 10:00 AM
Jul 2013

It's just the same stuff over and over again. Like a standing wave of bullshit.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
13. That site is notorious, well not really, it's sort of a tiny corner of the internet that only a few
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 10:13 AM
Jul 2013

radicals frequent, having been thrown off most reputable Democratic sites in the past. They thrive on those labels which is why they have zero credibility.

Paid propagandists use those terms for the Democratic Left. Shame to even see that site used here other than for fun.

PSPS

(13,614 posts)
7. Nice try, but it's still just a standard #13 on the hit parade, maybe with a bit of #9
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 10:02 AM
Jul 2013

NSA/Obama apologist's Ht Parade:

1. This is nothing new
2. I have nothing to hide
3. What are you, a freeper?
4. But Obama is better than Christie/Romney/Bush/Hitler
5. Greenwald/Flaherty/Gillum/Apuzzo/Braun is a hack
6. We have red light cameras, so this is no big deal
7. Corporations have my data anyway
8. At least Obama is trying
9. This is just the media trying to take Obama down
10. It's a misunderstanding/you are confused
11. You're a racist
12. Nobody cares about this anyway / "unfounded fears"
13. I don't like Snowden, therefore we must disregard all of this
14. Other countries do it

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
8. A setup requires a setter-upper
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 10:07 AM
Jul 2013

Who is the right wing mastermind running the show? People like you keep telling me that the teabaggers are behind this, but last I checked, they had difficulty tying their shoes. Who is the right wing mastermind behind this fiendish plot?

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
10. The Baggers fiendish plot against women seems to be working really well for them.
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 10:08 AM
Jul 2013

Tell me again how powerless they are?

lordy.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
15. Ah! Glad to hear you have information on this secret plot.
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 10:17 AM
Jul 2013

Which one of them is it calling the shots? We already know its not rank and file Republicans like Boehner, Cheney, Bush, etc...they're all in agreement with the President's spy programs. I it Rand Paul who frightens you so much? Is it Michelle Bachmann? I'll await your answer with....oh hell, lets stop pretending. You've got nothing aside from blind support.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
21. You misunderstood.
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 10:51 AM
Jul 2013

There have been scandal upon scandal against the President and some people here just wallow and glory in it. Then when the party is over,

the party is over.

Enjoy it while you can, the Cricket Train is coming.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
25. Thanks for the clarification. I now understand that you don't see what's happening
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 10:56 AM
Jul 2013

This isn't going away. Your team has been saying that for weeks now, and it just isn't true. This set of issues trumps politics for many people. Obama has a legislative agenda he wants to push? So what. Spying on Americans is much lower on Maslow's pyramid than legislative priorities. We need to stop the bleeding first, and that's going to serve to prevent lots of people from caring much about the President's priorities. He needs to stop this. Until he does, it will continue to be an issue with a great many people.

flamingdem

(39,319 posts)
35. Everybody on board the Cricket Train!
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 02:23 PM
Jul 2013

I'm going to remember that when this scandal ends with a thud.

LukeFL

(594 posts)
32. They are so powerless that
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 02:06 PM
Jul 2013

Almost all of the states ( not the blue) have a war against our reproductive a rights.

bobduca

(1,763 posts)
12. don't poke holes in this ironclad theory
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 10:11 AM
Jul 2013

"Righteous" take down of the blinded left!

Don't you know Obama is plagued by "stay-behinds" left by Cheney and ROVE!!!
some even say that Obama APPOINTED some of these stay-behinds into his own administration!!!11

Devious Cheney!
Hapless Obama!
Blinded Righteous Left!

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
27. Check out General Keith Alexander
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 12:43 PM
Jul 2013

The Secret War
INFILTRATION. SABOTAGE. MAYHEM. FOR YEARS, FOUR-STAR GENERAL KEITH ALEXANDER HAS BEEN BUILDING A SECRET ARMY CAPABLE OF LAUNCHING DEVASTATING CYBERATTACKS. NOW IT’S READY TO UNLEASH HELL.

Inside Fort Meade, Maryland, a top-secret city bustles. Tens of thousands of people move through more than 50 buildings—the city has its own post office, fire department, and police force. But as if designed by Kafka, it sits among a forest of trees, surrounded by electrified fences and heavily armed guards, protected by antitank barriers, monitored by sensitive motion detectors, and watched by rotating cameras. To block any telltale electromagnetic signals from escaping, the inner walls of the buildings are wrapped in protective copper shielding and the one-way windows are embedded with a fine copper mesh.

This is the undisputed domain of General Keith Alexander, a man few even in Washington would likely recognize. Never before has anyone in America’s intelligence sphere come close to his degree of power, the number of people under his command, the expanse of his rule, the length of his reign, or the depth of his secrecy. A four-star Army general, his authority extends across three domains: He is director of the world’s largest intelligence service, the National Security Agency; chief of the Central Security Service; and commander of the US Cyber Command. As such, he has his own secret military, presiding over the Navy’s 10th Fleet, the 24th Air Force, and the Second Army.

Alexander runs the nation’s cyberwar efforts, an empire he has built over the past eight years by insisting that the US’s inherent vulnerability to digital attacks requires him to amass more and more authority over the data zipping around the globe. In his telling, the threat is so mind-bogglingly huge that the nation has little option but to eventually put the entire civilian Internet under his protection, requiring tweets and emails to pass through his filters, and putting the kill switch under the government’s forefinger. “What we see is an increasing level of activity on the networks,” he said at a recent security conference in Canada. “I am concerned that this is going to break a threshold where the private sector can no longer handle it and the government is going to have to step in.”

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/?p=58188
 

RC

(25,592 posts)
41. That does seem to be most of the problem, doesn't it?
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 02:32 PM
Jul 2013

And a paranoid right-winger to boot. Stir thing up, till the military has to take over.
It's OK if we do it, but if they do anything to counter, we have to retaliate? War monger extraordinaire!

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
22. Yes, Snowden's actual words have no credibility.
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 10:52 AM
Jul 2013

Some of us have been saying that for a while now.

Pay attention.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
16. Let me put this bluntly: I don't give a shit if he's the devil's spawn
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 10:19 AM
Jul 2013

I've never been blinded by Snowden and who he is is largely irrelevant. shit like this article ignores the real issue of massive surveillance and the encroaching and exponentially growing National Security State.

But thanks for playing.

swat.

and bye bye

magellan

(13,257 posts)
18. And somehow Morales convinced EU officials to talk about Snowden
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 10:28 AM
Jul 2013

...instead of stating that his plane was merely under-fueled.



Pull the other one.

 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
23. So the Civil Rights Left shouldn't care?
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 10:53 AM
Jul 2013

We shouldn't care about massive violations of our 4th Amendment rights. We shouldn't give a damn about spying on a scale so huge that Orwell would sit down and need a drink to get his head around the sheer size. We shouldn't say anything about a program that knows more about me, you, and everyone than the Stazi knew about the East Germans?

Snowden is the distraction. Now, if you want to make it about Snowden. Why are they pursing him for Treason if all he is doing is lying?

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
26. Ooh, it's the "divide the party" boogeyman.
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 11:04 AM
Jul 2013

If we truly have Dems who don't support the Constitution, we should be divided from them.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
29. Skinner, we need unrec back...for these kinds
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 12:48 PM
Jul 2013

Of attacks. All that is eft is dirty hippie...get off my lawn!!!!

LukeFL

(594 posts)
34. Why? Is not an attack -you
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 02:15 PM
Jul 2013

All cry babies that don't like to be told the truth. I have been a member for a loooong time, I am not a newbie at DU. Why would you like to silence me? i posted an article. And by your responses they ought be right.

Why are you defending a guy who is filled with suspicious acts, his story don't add up, the fact he accepted a JOB at NSA he KNEW what his job entailed.

He is not innocent and what is truly amazing liberals tend to really smart- and recognize a fake- you are all bring played.


That's the shocking part of this Snowden. Fiasco.

LukeFL

(594 posts)
60. I am not.
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 03:38 PM
Jul 2013

Read my post again. He knew his job. He actually worked there when bush was president- left and went back.

You are being played.

 

Safetykitten

(5,162 posts)
30. I was sitting with friends at the coffee shop, and we were discussing this very same thing.
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 01:04 PM
Jul 2013

Me, Buffy, Buffy2 (because we have two Buffies, is that not a hoot?) Ian, and Ryan-Smith were sitting there discussing our eco-friendly cars and what a pain gas prices were, as we always have to drive to Costco WAY out in the suburbs, and this topic came up. RS was really torqued that his coffee had to be sent back. TWICE! But he is always in a foul mood anyway, not just because some low-wage person can't get the order right. AHYHOO, we all are there, and we think this is a big hoo-doo about well, just making President Obama look bad. They had to have set it up.

Buffy 2 said that she did not care about all that stuff, as her personal wealth manager at JP Morgan Chase who the family has known for YEARS told her that he was like that, socially liberal and open to new things politically, but not that give stuff away part that seems to be so popular now. She said that we need to have things like this to keep us safe. So what's the big deal?

Ian and Buffy agreed also that this was a tempest in a tea pot and they went very deep into their thoughts, as I never have seen Ian so perturbed. He said that of course everyone spies. Buffy agreed and to tell you the truth, I could see that she liked him more than a friend, as we surmised since that month at the cape. But Ian was on FIRE. He said that this was planned all along. The republicans set this up with some tea party group. That name is adorable! He said they got together after the Kennedy administration and knew this would all be part of a big plan! I had shivers!

So we all agreed that:

1. Go to another coffee shop as they obviously cannot hire good help.
2. Maybe carpool to Costco.
3. Decided that the cape was too touristy, maybe Europe this summer.

flamingdem

(39,319 posts)
42. For me the jury is still out on whether this was planned but if so I suspect
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 02:33 PM
Jul 2013

the right or the Libertarian Right may have helped Snowden. An insider a Booz Allen or elsewhere could share his "beliefs" This is why we need him to stand trial.

But to your point we can see in the posts alone that the Righteous Left or as I call them Purist Left is absolutely blinded by this case and these issues. To the point of hostility. I have 30 new people ignoring me because I am not a Snowdenite

Also, all of a sudden people care about Latin America? That was never of interest in general DU. Now there's a new victim to stick up for, the poor Latin Americans abused by the USA, and a tool to attack Obama and anyone who is not a believer in this newfound solidarity and Snowden's escape.

The upshot is absurdity. We have rah rah posts about Snowden and this supposed revenge on the USA by the Latin Left but no one is thinking -- This guy is a Libertarian, his US lawyer Fein is a neo-con Libertarian and we're supposed to not question their cheerleading of this guy going to Venezuela .. where the security apparatus is influenced by Communist Cuba? If nothing else the purist left needs to grow a sense of irony.

flamingdem

(39,319 posts)
45. Note how quickly you simplify the argument and turn it into name calling
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 02:42 PM
Jul 2013

You can't do any better than that?

How about the irony, over your head?

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
46. I restated your position
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 02:48 PM
Jul 2013

as I see it

I will never be for state surveillance no matter what you or anyone else says, regardless how many false equivalencies are tossed into the mix.

flamingdem

(39,319 posts)
47. What false equivalencies?
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 02:52 PM
Jul 2013

I'm not saying I'm pro state surveillance .. in fact I'm saying how ridiculous it is to celebrate Snowden going to Venezuela when they have a similar apparatus to Cuba, a country I know well, with a massive security apparatus with few protections for civilians.

Get it now??

Mojorabbit

(16,020 posts)
56. This makes no sense
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 03:19 PM
Jul 2013

They are offering him asylum. He does not have a lot of choices. One thing has nothing to do with the other. The issue is spying by the USA. It is not Snowden's girlfriend, garage, politics, or his being forced to choose from a meager selection of countries that will take him in. There are a large group of Senators(mostly Dem) who are asking for more info, There are a lot of countries asking for more info. I want more info.

flamingdem

(39,319 posts)
59. It's called optics. Can't attack Kerry for working from his yacht and not expect Snowden living
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 03:25 PM
Jul 2013

in a super socialist country not to raise eyebrows

or at least irony

something lacking with the supporters of Snowball

Mojorabbit

(16,020 posts)
67. I have never posted on Kerry and the yacht
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 05:14 PM
Jul 2013

I could care less if he lives on one. The fact that he was on one should not have been lied about. That also has nothing to do with the subject at hand-US spying. I beg to differ that anything at all is missing with Snowden's supporters. They have a keen respect for our constitution.

Democracyinkind

(4,015 posts)
53. Such lunacy.
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 03:10 PM
Jul 2013

The evidence that this drivel you link to presents is thus: Some moronic posts by Snowden that are worthy of FR in their callousness. But that's not proof of the conspiracy alleged, not in any way. His political leanings have been known weeks before by the disclosure of his campaign contributions.

Curious minds would like to use this example to note that you can indeed promote unsupported, ridiculous conspiracy theories on DU as long as they fit a certain narrative and not suffer the same ridicule from the "Conspiracy!1!!1 brigade (of which I consider myself a member for the most part).

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
65. LOL, keep trying to use this as the justification for the NSA spying. Notice how there is not....
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 04:37 PM
Jul 2013

50 threats attacking Obama over the IRS scandal? Or Beghazi? That is because we know those are not important. The NSA shit is.
Why don't you get that?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The "Righteous" Left- Bli...