Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
John Roberts: Surveillance Court Decider (Original Post) bigtree Jul 2013 OP
those creepy baby blue eyes bobduca Jul 2013 #1
I found myself reviewing a history of jurisprudence during HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #2
. bigtree Jul 2013 #3
Who should appoint them? The NLA? The POTUS? Congress? KittyWampus Jul 2013 #4
the entire system stinks bigtree Jul 2013 #5

bobduca

(1,763 posts)
1. those creepy baby blue eyes
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 10:58 AM
Jul 2013

appointing the secret judges to make sure that the secret wiretaps are secretly legal.

 

HardTimes99

(2,049 posts)
2. I found myself reviewing a history of jurisprudence during
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 11:06 AM
Jul 2013

the Third Reich, stumbling upon Hans Globke and then turning away from the whole matter in disgust at my descent into Godwin turf:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Globke

Thanks for the 'baby blue eyes' which got the whole thing started.

FWIW, Globke may not even be the most appropriate analogue, as his duties more closely approximate those of John Yoo.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»John Roberts: Surveillanc...