General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo,,,,
there is flaw in the self defense law of FL and most other Red Moocher states. As long as you are the only witness. you can legally kill someone by claiming if was self defense. One thing the Red State Moochers do not realize is that this will apply to all. It will only be a matter of time before the thugs will figure out that they can legally kill a white rich kid, by being the only witness to the killing, and claiming their life was in danger and they had killed the rich kid in self defense. .
Only a matter of time!
Never go to Florida without a fire arm. !
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)That's pretty offensive, I think. Maybe you should self-delete.
pointing out a flaw in the law.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)you may not agree but it my opinion...... but am willing to consider others . !
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)how about you?
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)I assume you know the statistics.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)those numbers. I am not concerned with those numbers ,, I am concern with the flaw in these new SD laws that allow for legal murder.
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)That is what you're saying.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)the problem is it can happen no matter what the race of the victim is.
Niceguy1
(2,467 posts)Question is 40 years old and signed in to law by a dem gov.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)the Florida Legislature amended the self-defense laws in 2005, Florida Statutes 776.013, 776.012 (adopting the Stand Your Ground law written by the N.R.A., and since 2005, adopted by 30-odd other states)
Niceguy1
(2,467 posts)And had nothing to do with this case
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)I just gave you the statues, and I have not been talking about the Zimmerman case
mstinamotorcity2
(1,451 posts)thugs who are out to get rich white kids??????????You full of SHIT!!!!!!!!!!
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)that racist thugs exist? Hate to crash you world but they are out there. I'm just pointing out how this flawed law could possible be used for legal murder.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)become very motivated and somebody, guilty or not, will go to jail or be executed.
Edit: Probably the first not rich, not white person they pick up.
onenote
(42,714 posts)They have similar self defense laws to Florida insofar as the burden of proof is on the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not actually have a reasonable and actual belief that they faced imminent death or great bodily harm at the time they used deadly force.
And do you really think that Zimmerman is some sort of criminal genius who figured out a hole in the system that now will be copied by all the other bad guys who never figured it out before?
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)its the way the Law is written it leaves open that possibility of being used by the other bad guys who can afford good lawyers......!
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)not how the mind set works "thugs" (must wonder what is meant by that word) follow "rich white kid" it's for only one purpose according to the mind set that acquitted Zimmerman and no "thug" will ever be found not guilty if the victim is white
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)now with the burden of proof of self defense entirely on the prosecution ,,,,, if the the thug ( criminal) insures that he is the only witness, any defense lawyer should be able to have the thug found not guilty ot case kicked out!
but here and here
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023255859#post8
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023256260
any questions?
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)but neither of your links have anything to do with what I am talking about.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)the first concerned a Black man who shot a white teenager who was threatening his family on his own property he's in prison, the second one was an example of far racial stereotyping, profiling, and outright bigotry go
both have everything to do with your OP
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)reread what I posted. It is about a flaw in this SD Law that allows a person to legally murder someone if there are on other witnesses to the crime. You example have nothing to do with that circumstance.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)but what you're attempting to sell here is that a Black person could get away with killing a "rich white kid" in Florida if there were no witnesses, something that is laughable on it's face, and I think you know that too
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)it makes no difference what the law says. But not all of Florida is Gulf county. Time will tell on my prediction.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Dooley told jurors, "I decided no good can come of this, so I said in a low voice, 'Screw this, I'm going home.' I turned around and started walking back to my house."
He added emphatically, "You would be a fool to even think about starting a fight with [James.]."
But James allegedly followed after Dooley, and quickly the fight turned physical, with the two men wrestling each other to the ground. Seconds later, David James was dead, shot by the 71-year-old.
Dooley said Monday he was simply defending himself that fateful day and that David James, twice his size, was choking him. Dooley said he had no choice but to fire the gun that he had taken out of his right pocket.
Dooley told jurors, "He gave me no other choice. He was killing me. He had me by the neck. I couldn't breathe. He tried to take the gun away from me. If he took the gun away from me, what do you think he would have done with it? I had no other choice. I was on my way home. That's all I wanted to do."
http://www.wtsp.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=283139
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3264623
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)who contradicted Dooley's testimony ,,,, Dooley didnt stand a chance
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)because according to what I posted you are 'mistaken'
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)"The teen told jurors that he did not see James get violent, only that the veteran was on top of Dooley at one point, holding his hands down. "He did not choke him," said Arthur."
http://www.wtsp.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=282747&odyssey=obinsite
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)perhaps you need to read more closely or something
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)to that sort of ummm tactic speaks volumes
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)but it makes no difference,,,,,, it cites that there were witnesses .
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)but what it cites and the title of your link is
"Teen skateboarder says in 911 call that shooting was 'my fault!'"
but never fear I'm sure rich White kids have little to fear in Florida, so breathe easy now okay?
lame54
(35,294 posts)and gather all the evidence they can
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)sadbear
(4,340 posts)Institutional racism doesn't work that way.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)Hmmm... could be.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)He's got a steaming pantload o' something, that's for sure.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)a sign of something?
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)What's more telling though is the number of posts PLUS the notion we should be worried about rich white kids getting killed by "thugs" who think they'll get away with it.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)I never said you just stated . I have been talking about a flaw in this law that allows for legal murder to committed by anyone even racist thugs. You do know what a thugs is don't you ?
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)reminds me of some the extreme Right Wingers on other sites.
I will!
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)rrneck
(17,671 posts)Crawl back under it.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)I recommend you self-delete this pantload.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)think this is good Law?
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)I wish people would stop with the red state blue state crap on this one. I happen to think the jury made a bad call in ignoring the many lies that Zimmerman told, but the prosecution did a poor job presenting those lies and making their case.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)but that that does not make these new flawed SD laws a good thing. All of these New SD laws that I am aware on are in the Red states..... maybe they exist in other states but I have no knowledge them..... I do not agree with the jury's verdict either.... He instigated the whole thing,,,, I feel he must have some blame to burden.
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)Blackford
(289 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)your case example still had witnesses to the crime... what I said is an hypothetical example where there are no witnesses to contradict the shooter claims of Self defense.
naaman fletcher
(7,362 posts)in non "red moocher" states any different than they are in Florida?
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)that have this flaw in their "stand your ground " laws that allows for legal murder.
naaman fletcher
(7,362 posts)This was a traditional self defense claim that would have been be same in California or Mass.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)same as 48 other states. The only exception is Ohio. You're absolutely right.
r
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)SD laws..... Google is your friend
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)alleged in this case at all. This was tried under traditional self defense statutes, which are almost identical among 49 of the 50 states (Ohio being the exception). Facts are your friends.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)SYG is added by statues to SD Law. as I have cited
My original post has nothing to do with the Zimmy Case.
My post is about the Law and its flaw.
.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)in effect in Fl and 'red moocher states' is also the law in every other state of the union except Ohio?
sofa king
(10,857 posts)The law is designed to protect only the privileged. Rich white kids are privileged, while your hypothetical assailant is not.
This is a corrupt decision, not a functional defense for anyone but the son of a judge. Just like other important but corrupt court decisions, like Bush v. Gore, it will not be allowed as precedent in other cases, because the court system itself will recognize that it's an insider decision and not applicable to the unwashed masses.
Nevertheless, your observation is still quite valid: murdering your adversary and telling authorities the story that best defends yourself is potentially an effective legal tactic... if you have an ace in the hole.
But if you're a minority or poor, it ain't gonna work for you.
It amuses me that one of my favorite bands as a kid, Scream, foretold all of this in a concise double-song during the Reagan era:
Theyre never wrong, only mistaken
It dont replace your rights that have been taken
They throw the book away, youve been forsaken
For American justice has just been faking
If you got no money then youre just out of luck
Cause the lawyers and legal aid, they just dont give a fuck
Thats why the jails are full of the poor and black
And once they get out, you know they end up just going back
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)but i am talking about professional thugs who are far from being poor. many with lawyer on retainers.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)Because you are probably too young to vote and haven't left your room yet, the red moocher state went blue the last presidential election.
And while your "flaw" is a stroke of zen enlightenment, Florida vs Zimmerman had plenty of witnesses.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)My post has nothing to do that case.
Whoever sold you your Seer license, Hoo-Dooed you .
Im 65 and have voted in ever election that I was in country.
I never mentioned Florida in my orginal post.
but yes FL was a Red Moocher state when it added the SYG statues to its
SD law
Most State that have added SYG statues are Red Moocher States
Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)In the first sentence of this OP
And
If you want me to believe or anyone to believe you mentioned self defense by coincidence two days after the verdict and while DU is blowing up, please...