Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When Reid Thinks A Woman's RIGHT Should Be Voted On, He Needs To Go... (Original Post) OneAngryDemocrat Jul 2013 OP
Why so many others wanted him re-elected in 2010 is beyond me. Dawgs Jul 2013 #1
there is no choice, when the opponent is a Sharon Angle. hlthe2b Jul 2013 #2
Don't disagree that Angle was a 'no choice' candidate. Dawgs Jul 2013 #3
Speechless. idwiyo Jul 2013 #4
I can't stand Reid BainsBane Jul 2013 #5
One more in a long list of reasons Reid needs to go. Scuba Jul 2013 #6
Seems like he is just giving the GOP more rope. tridim Jul 2013 #7
Oh yeah, thanks to this corporate subsidiary, we are the proud owners of Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #13
So, will they fillibuster it? n2doc Jul 2013 #8
Remember, He's a Mormon dballance Jul 2013 #9
. . . Triana Jul 2013 #10
The Democrats re-gained the Majority in the Senate in 2006. bvar22 Jul 2013 #11
We tried, but in what I am now certain was an orchestrated, bipartisan effort, Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #12
 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
1. Why so many others wanted him re-elected in 2010 is beyond me.
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 10:22 AM
Jul 2013

And, yes I realize that we mean Sharon Angle would be a senator now.

hlthe2b

(102,413 posts)
2. there is no choice, when the opponent is a Sharon Angle.
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 10:24 AM
Jul 2013

Not that Reid was a good choice, but Angle's unbelievable ignorance made her election inconceivable.

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
3. Don't disagree that Angle was a 'no choice' candidate.
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 10:27 AM
Jul 2013

But, the Dems would still be in the majority and we'd have a completely different leader.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
13. Oh yeah, thanks to this corporate subsidiary, we are the proud owners of
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 12:30 PM
Jul 2013

thousands of miles of rope and enough dry powder to fill the Grand Canyon.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
8. So, will they fillibuster it?
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 10:51 AM
Jul 2013

Or will they just pass it and see if Obama signs it. We can pretty much guarantee a 3rd party if he does so, but I think Obama is too smart for that.

 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
9. Remember, He's a Mormon
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 11:05 AM
Jul 2013

I'm not bashing Mormons. Like devout Catholics they are very pro-life. It's just a fact.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
11. The Democrats re-gained the Majority in the Senate in 2006.
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 12:17 PM
Jul 2013

The Senate Democratic Caucus CHOSE for their "Leader" this soft spoken, passionless, conservative Senator from a Conservative State with a reputation of being a Milquetoast speaker and weak advocate for traditional Democratic Party values.
The Senate Democrats have continually re-elected him to this position at the beginning of every session.

Have you ever wondered WHY?





You will know them by their [font size=3]WORKS,[/font]
not by their promises or excuses.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
12. We tried, but in what I am now certain was an orchestrated, bipartisan effort,
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 12:27 PM
Jul 2013

we were left with a "choice" of inert corporatist or completely bat-shit crazy, illiterate, moron corporatist.

The same scenario we see played out every other year all over the nation.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When Reid Thinks A Woman'...