Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 12:50 PM Jul 2013

Lawyers of Black Farmers Will Collect $90M in Fees

Lawyers of Black Farmers Will Collect $90M in Fees

(CN) - Lawyers who made the government pay $1.25 billion to settle claims that it discriminated against black farmers can recoup $90.8 million in fees, a federal judge ruled.

The settlement class in this 2011 case had missed the deadline to submit claims in the Pigford v. Glickman consent decree from 1999. They claimed that U.S. Department of Agriculture officers were racially motivated when they denied benefits to black applicants and ignored their complaints from January 1983 to January 1997.

In the $1.25 billion agreement that U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman approved in 2011, attorneys for the farmers can collect between 4.1 percent and 7.4 percent of the settlement funds after the deduction of implementation costs.

While the attorneys sought the highest amount possible to cover costs and fees, the government urged the court to stick to the lower percentage.

Lauding the efforts of the farmes' representatives, Friedman granted the maximum award of $90.8 million on Thursday.

http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/07/15/59368.htm

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lawyers of Black Farmers Will Collect $90M in Fees (Original Post) The Straight Story Jul 2013 OP
outrageous handmade34 Jul 2013 #1
7% in a contingency case is far from outrageous. Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #2
I know... handmade34 Jul 2013 #3
I can certainly understand that, but they put lots of their own money and time into Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #5
out of control money handmade34 Jul 2013 #6
Just who will ever take a contingency case again jehop61 Jul 2013 #4
That's is a VERY low take, good for them...wish other lawyers COULD do this they're but not able to uponit7771 Jul 2013 #7
 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
5. I can certainly understand that, but they put lots of their own money and time into
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 01:21 PM
Jul 2013

the case and if they lost they get nothing. The farmers are going to get some real money and the firms can now afford to finance other deserving cases.

I'm not a fan of our legal system at all, but starving the attorneys that do good (sometimes by sheer accident) is like the really bad idea of starving government. The basic criticisms are certainly valid, but with this solution you end with a completely dysfunctional organization that can't do anything but fail.

Personally, I think justice (along with health care, banking, and education) should be completely socialized to completely remove the profit motive.

handmade34

(22,758 posts)
6. out of control money
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 01:28 PM
Jul 2013

"...District Judge Paul Friedman approved in 2011, attorneys for the farmers can collect between 4.1 percent and 7.4 percent of the settlement funds after the deduction of implementation costs..."

ok, so taking the 5% "after the deduction of implementation costs" really wouldn't be "starving them"

jehop61

(1,735 posts)
4. Just who will ever take a contingency case again
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 01:14 PM
Jul 2013

if you don't earn money to turn on the lights, pay the rent and staff? Without legal advocates willing to risk not receiving anything, there will be no justice for those with a cause but no funds to sue.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lawyers of Black Farmers ...