General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs delaying the business mandate but not the personal mandate, a liability for dems
going into next year's elections?
INDIVIDUAL MANDATE? WHAT INDIVIDUAL MANDATE? The early stages of the massive campaign to sign millions up for Obamacare coverage have been light on one particular element: the individual mandate. The unpopular requirement was necessary, the laws supporters argued, to make sure enough people signed up for coverage to make possible the parts of the law that people like, such as the ban on discriminating against people with pre-existing conditions and eliminating benefit caps. But the marketing has focused on highlighting the value of insurance, as opposed to the requirement to have it. Supporters say the approach makes sense for a few reasons: Just a small slice of the population is expected to face the mandate penalty, and its better to handle discussion of the mandate with an in-person touch. But the major Obamacare marketing effort is ramping up as Republican lawmakers are launching a renewed assault on the individual mandate. The POLITICO story: http://politi.co/1dxZGMO
HOUSE KEEPS FOCUS ON ACA MANDATES The House votes Wednesday on separate bills to delay the employer and individual mandates, forcing Democrats into an awkward position. Will they support a delay for business but not individuals? Thats the message Republicans have been playing up since the administration announced the employer mandate delay two weeks ago.
--Therell also be two House hearings on the delayed mandate this week. The Ways and Means health subcommittee holds its second hearing on the mandate on Wednesday. And the Energy and Commerce oversight subcommittee goes on Thursday:
<snip>
http://www.politico.com/politicopulse/0713/politicopulse11147.html
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)i keep voting for dems for potus and keep ending up with republican lite
area51
(11,925 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)It will be seen as giving deference to the blood-sucking corporations while sticking it to already-struggling families -- which is exactly what will be happening. Obamacare is NOT going to be good for the Democrats in 2014 and 2016 precisely because of the mandate.
cali
(114,904 posts)and I don't think delaying the individual mandate, if they decide to go that route, will help much.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)At a time when we need MORE government regulations and oversight, the TeaKlanners are screaming for less and the mandate will just give them more ammunition with their "keep gummit outta my binness" crap. It will be oh-so-easy to tie it all together. 2014 will not be good for Democrats. 'Course, they could easily counter the other side by running actual, you know, DEMOCRATS who represent We the People as opposed to the corporate-friendly lackeys but they won't.