Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 02:03 PM Jul 2013

Officer Donohue statement regarding Rolling Stone cover

Officer Donohue statement regarding Rolling Stone cover

MBTA Transit Police Officer Richard "Dic" Donohue and his family have received several requests from the media relative to his thoughts and feelings regarding the upcoming cover of Rolling Stone magazine. Below is a statement from Officer Donohue.


"The City of Boston and the surrounding communities have faced many challenges since the bombings at the marathon finish line. The new cover of Rolling Stone has garnered much attention due to its sensationalized depiction of one of the alleged bombers. My family and I were personally affected by these individuals’ actions. I cannot and do not condone the cover of the magazine, which is thoughtless at best. However, I appreciate our country’s protection of free speech afforded to us by the Constitution. I am confident that our Boston Strong community will remain intrepid and unshaken by the cover of this magazine."

http://www.tpdnews411.com/2013/07/officer-donohue-statement-regarding.html

54 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Officer Donohue statement regarding Rolling Stone cover (Original Post) The Straight Story Jul 2013 OP
Who cares? naaman fletcher Jul 2013 #1
What's all this hoopla about? Scuba Jul 2013 #2
Basically: The Straight Story Jul 2013 #3
Time covers: Hitler, Mussolini, al Zarqawi, Ted Kaczynski, Karl Rove and Dick Cheney, etc, etc. Scuba Jul 2013 #4
Hitler was Man of the Year! KamaAina Jul 2013 #5
Did they have 'dreamy' pics of him on their covers? B2G Jul 2013 #7
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Scuba Jul 2013 #17
dreamy? burnodo Jul 2013 #22
So you think he's dreamy, do ya? Iggo Jul 2013 #28
manson looks kind of dreamy here... HiPointDem Jul 2013 #34
He looks insane. B2G Jul 2013 #36
so does tsarnaev, then. HiPointDem Jul 2013 #37
people are ridiculous. HiPointDem Jul 2013 #6
Not really B2G Jul 2013 #8
No---this is the newest and greatest outrage trumad Jul 2013 #9
Your opinion, not mine B2G Jul 2013 #10
Oh bullshit... trumad Jul 2013 #20
Well the great and powerful Trumad has spoken. B2G Jul 2013 #25
I only debate people who don't feint over shit like this. trumad Jul 2013 #33
I started to feint but then I kept right on course. nolabear Jul 2013 #46
Larry does not agree with you--not even slightly. MADem Jul 2013 #53
I understand that pov. alp227 Jul 2013 #48
because big criminals have never been on the covers of newspapers & magazines ever ever before. HiPointDem Jul 2013 #12
Photographed like that? B2G Jul 2013 #14
bullshit datasuspect Jul 2013 #16
that's the same picture that's been all over the papers and the news already. HiPointDem Jul 2013 #35
he looks dreamy! datasuspect Jul 2013 #39
yeah, the dreamy photo makes me want to join a cult & murder movie stars HiPointDem Jul 2013 #50
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Jul 2013 #51
Yes, they are. Iggo Jul 2013 #30
ridiculous and stupid as fuck datasuspect Jul 2013 #41
tough shit datasuspect Jul 2013 #11
If you'd had a leg blown off or a loved one obliterated, B2G Jul 2013 #13
you're conflating issues datasuspect Jul 2013 #15
I think I've provided my reasoning on this thread B2G Jul 2013 #18
no datasuspect Jul 2013 #19
Too bad Tiger Beat is no longer in circulation B2G Jul 2013 #23
you're reading WAYYYY too much into it datasuspect Jul 2013 #24
Ditto my response to Trumad. B2G Jul 2013 #27
Cool, an anonymous internet tough guy who has never heard a shot fired in anger ... 11 Bravo Jul 2013 #32
i give two shits for what a fucking cop thinks datasuspect Jul 2013 #38
The more people complain the better the issue will sell olddots Jul 2013 #21
it's fucking goddamn idiocracy i tell ya! datasuspect Jul 2013 #26
No shit. I have never purchased a Rolling Stone magazine in my life. But I will now. ieoeja Jul 2013 #45
And that's exactly what the obscenely wealthy publisher wants. MADem Jul 2013 #54
I suppose it's because the kid had a cute face Whisp Jul 2013 #29
Read on DU today: Iggo Jul 2013 #31
In America, appearances are more important than actual substance. Rex Jul 2013 #40
+1. You said a mouthfull there. n/t Skip Intro Jul 2013 #43
Thanks, just pointing out it is not just DU. Rex Jul 2013 #44
To be fair there was the Militant Michelle cover in the New Yorker. ieoeja Jul 2013 #47
And a lot of folks freaked out over that cover B2G Jul 2013 #49
Dude needs a hobby and a dictionary ("sensationalized"?) cthulu2016 Jul 2013 #42
I think Rolling Stone was making a point of how peculiar this case is. This young man Douglas Carpenter Jul 2013 #52
 

naaman fletcher

(7,362 posts)
1. Who cares?
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 02:08 PM
Jul 2013

It looks like it will be an interesting story. I can't imagine why people are getting so worked up about this.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
34. manson looks kind of dreamy here...
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 04:00 PM
Jul 2013


if you didn't know who he is he could pass for some kind of guru-type...
 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
10. Your opinion, not mine
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 03:37 PM
Jul 2013

There is a long and valid argument about media coverage in these types of situations...that the 24x7 attention ensures these types go out in a blaze of glory.

Putting him on the cover of Rolling Stone in a Jim Morrisonesque pose takes this to a whole new level.

Wonder what his victims think.

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
20. Oh bullshit...
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 03:46 PM
Jul 2013

Read the God Damn words underneath the picture and the picture fits perfect.

Just another stupid outrage with the stupid American Morans.

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
25. Well the great and powerful Trumad has spoken.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 03:51 PM
Jul 2013

No wonder we can't have any reasonable debate in this country. We can't even have it here.

I'll consider myself shut down. Thanks ever. Later.

nolabear

(41,991 posts)
46. I started to feint but then I kept right on course.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 04:47 PM
Jul 2013


Btw I think it was surprisingly tone deaf of them to put his photo on the cover, precisely because he is young and pretty, and the RS cover is traditionally a place of honor for entertainers, Manson notwithstanding. I think there's a cultural rift between who they are (for the most part a music mag with some outstanding journalism) and what they think they are (a primarily journalism mag with a strong music component). That photo does indeed look like the seductive promotion of a product.

alp227

(32,057 posts)
48. I understand that pov.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 04:53 PM
Jul 2013

But I see this whole controversy as a result of people shutting down their brains. I hears a bit of the Mike Huckabee show, and he basically said "who cares" about the ARTICLE about the bomber and compared the cover to "reading Playboy for the articles".

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
12. because big criminals have never been on the covers of newspapers & magazines ever ever before.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 03:41 PM
Jul 2013
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
35. that's the same picture that's been all over the papers and the news already.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 04:04 PM
Jul 2013

personally i think charlie looks pretty good in this photo:

Response to B2G (Reply #8)

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
13. If you'd had a leg blown off or a loved one obliterated,
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 03:41 PM
Jul 2013

you might be singing a different tune.

Hopefully, you'll never have the chance to find out.

 

datasuspect

(26,591 posts)
19. no
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 03:46 PM
Jul 2013

the one thing has nothing to do with the other.

you're spewing frothy emotional responses to a non issue.

this isn't new.

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
23. Too bad Tiger Beat is no longer in circulation
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 03:49 PM
Jul 2013

His throngs of adoring teenage fans would go apeshit.

 

datasuspect

(26,591 posts)
24. you're reading WAYYYY too much into it
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 03:51 PM
Jul 2013

if you have the hots for the guy, it's ok.

tons of women adored ted bundy.

NOTHING IS NEW.

just get over it.

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
27. Ditto my response to Trumad.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 03:53 PM
Jul 2013

You're absolutely right. No need to discuss or explore anyone else's viewpoints.

This place had become a farce. And rude. God, I shudder to think how some of you interact in 3D.

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts)
32. Cool, an anonymous internet tough guy who has never heard a shot fired in anger ...
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 03:59 PM
Jul 2013

tells someone who got shot to shit to "Grow a Pair". Remarkably dickish, even for an internet message board.

 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
21. The more people complain the better the issue will sell
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 03:47 PM
Jul 2013

How long will be before the news media comes out with this ?

BREAKING NEWS ----SLOW NEWS DAY FORCES STUPID NEWS STORIES .

 

datasuspect

(26,591 posts)
26. it's fucking goddamn idiocracy i tell ya!
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 03:52 PM
Jul 2013

i keep telling people: IT'S THE STUPID, STUPID.

(I'm not saying you are stupid, btw).

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
45. No shit. I have never purchased a Rolling Stone magazine in my life. But I will now.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 04:45 PM
Jul 2013

This is just too fucking stupid. Murderers are pictured all the time. Some of them quite nice, laughing with family and the like. And often captioned, "he seemed like such a good man," or, "what turned this man who loved his family into a psychopath?"


MADem

(135,425 posts)
54. And that's exactly what the obscenely wealthy publisher wants.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 04:56 AM
Jul 2013

Guess he didn't have a great cover for his US WEEKLY gossip magazine, so he wanted to grab some free publicity by publishing a cover he knew wouldn't go over well in some quarters and would create a news story--poke the bereaved, rub salt in the wounds of the suffering, and cause people to comment about how much or how little they care that the feelings of others are affected.

I agree with Lawrence O'Donnell on this issue:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/18/lawrence-odonnell-rolling-stone_n_3614483.html

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
29. I suppose it's because the kid had a cute face
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 03:55 PM
Jul 2013

almost innocent looking, that some people are upset?

I don't understand the upset, try as I might to be in those shoes in Boston that day - I can't see a photo on a cover of a magazine being something to get upset about considering that day overall.

That's the only thing I can think of why - the pic isn't of an ugly, mean looking creature from hell and this confuses people.

Iggo

(47,568 posts)
31. Read on DU today:
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 03:58 PM
Jul 2013

Q: "Have you read the story?"

A: "I'm more concerned about the picture."

Rubbed my eyes, shook my head, but there it was, plain as day.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
44. Thanks, just pointing out it is not just DU.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 04:44 PM
Jul 2013

It is an American core value. We love the superficial, we hate real substance of any kind.

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
47. To be fair there was the Militant Michelle cover in the New Yorker.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 04:48 PM
Jul 2013

The article was great and a total blow to those who claim Obama came from the Chicago Machine (which shows serious signs of having died some time ago anyway; people just haven't noticed).


But I agree that THIS cover is incredibly innocuous.

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
42. Dude needs a hobby and a dictionary ("sensationalized"?)
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 04:39 PM
Jul 2013

Hard to see the cover as sensationalized... rather the opposite. It is low-key for effect.

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
52. I think Rolling Stone was making a point of how peculiar this case is. This young man
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 01:28 AM
Jul 2013

was hanging out with his friends, smoking dope, talking about rap music and girls - not just months before the Boston Marathon - but just a day or two before the Boston Marathon. Almost everyone who knew him described him as really, really nice kid. But in fact he did go out and commit a heinous crime. The way Rolling Stone displayed his picture on their front page - drives that message home. It is a mind boggling story.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Officer Donohue statement...