Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tanuki

(14,920 posts)
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 08:42 AM Jul 2013

Liz Cheney's husband: "Treasonous Fucker"

I find it rich indeed that Pitiful Pearl Look-alike and war criminal daughter Liz Cheney is touting herself as some sort of breath of fresh air and the fount of youth and new ideas in her senatorial campaign. I haven't heard much about her husband, Philip Perry, so I poked around a bit and found this. There is much, much more about him elsewhere, but this is a start:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-maher/philip-perry-treasonous-f_b_42377.html

(From Bill Maher)..."As documented in this incisive Washington Monthly article by Art Levine, after 9/11 the Environmental Protection Agency looked at chemical plants across the U.S. and concluded that at least 700 sites posed a potential threat to kill or injure over 100,000 people if attacked. In neocon math, that's over thirty 9/11s.

After nearly a year's worth of work led by Christie Todd Whitman and Tom Ridge, twelve senior Bush administration officials met in March of 2003 to finalize legislation granting Whitman's EPA the authority to oversee chemical plant security and require them to submit plans for lowering their risks. But then Philip Perry, at that time the general counsel for the White House Office of Management and Budget, waltzed in, said Congress would never go for it, and the deal was dead. Our chemical plants would have to go back to being protected by the same folks who protected them before: nobody.

It had long been part of the official White House plan for the EPA to oversee the chemical industry, but Christie Whitman said: "They woke up and heard from industry." ...
....."Six months after that March 2003 meeting, Perry left the White House to lobby for the Washington law firm that represents the American Chemistry Council, strong-arming the Department of Homeland Security for Lockheed Martin and General Electric. But in 2005 he returned to the administration -- he didn't leave his lobbying job, just moved offices. In his new job as general counsel for the Department of Homeland Security, he gained authority for DHS to oversee chemical plant security simply so he could require nothing from them. Because it's just so inconvenient for chemical plants to have to lock their doors at night. Not only that, but he also finagled things so that DHS has the power to set aside laws from commie states like New Jersey that have attempted to put stricter security requirements for their chemical plants in place.

People ask why we haven't been hit again since 9/11. The answer is luck. "


[img][/img]

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

starroute

(12,977 posts)
3. Here's a Washington Monthly article with a lot more detail
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 10:15 AM
Jul 2013
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2007/0703.levine.html

Enter Philip Perry. When Michael Chertoff was nominated to head the DHS in 2005, he had asked Perry to join him as the department’s general counsel. The two were not only colleagues at Latham & Watkins but also members of the conservative Federalist Society, and they were of like minds in their general distrust of government regulation of business. By the summer of 2006, as various bills competed for attention, Perry’s services were in great demand. “Industry went back to the well,” says one DHS official.

Perry came through in a characteristically concealed manner. When it became clear that Collins-Lieberman was going nowhere, Perry went searching for a new vehicle to get more industry-friendly results. He would find it in a DHS appropriations bill in the Senate, to which had been attached an obscure amendment giving the DHS short-term regulatory authority over chemical security. Perry reworked the language and helped to get it added to the spending bill in a conference committee. Under the new amendment, the DHS would have nominal authority to regulate the chemical industry but also have its hands tied where required. For example, the DHS would be barred from requiring any specific security measures, and citizens would be prohibited from suing to enforce the law. Best of all for industry, while the bill didn’t mention giving the DHS preemption authority, it didn’t bar it, either, leaving a modicum of wiggle room on the subject. In other words, if Perry was sufficiently brazen, he could claim for the DHS the power to nullify the chemical regulations in New Jersey.

He was sufficiently brazen. When the DHS finally unveiled its proposed regulations in late December of last year, Hill staffers noticed that the department had effectively granted itself the power to set aside state laws, even though the new federal law didn’t expressly grant such authority. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle were livid. “In order to please their cronies in the chemical industry, the Bush administration is willing to put the health and safety of millions of people at risk,” said Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.). Senator Collins, for her part, released a statement accusing the DHS of attempting to create regulatory powers “out of whole cloth.” It was indeed curious that Perry, who had been so cautious about allowing the EPA to claim regulatory authority in the Clean Air Act, should now be so bold in interpreting the language in an appropriations rider. Or perhaps it wasn’t so curious at all.

Cracklin Charlie

(12,904 posts)
4. This needs much more attention!
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 10:23 AM
Jul 2013

Along with Pitiful Pearl! Is this guy still an employee of the federal government?

Tanuki

(14,920 posts)
9. You're thinking of her monstrously hypocritical sister. Dan Savage said it well:
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 11:00 AM
Jul 2013
http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/02/the_passion_of_mary_cheney

(from Dan Savage)...."Again, Mary, nice try. You kept your mouth clamped shut when your father needed the political support of assholes like Dobson. And now that your dad is a despised lame-duck VP, dad’s gay-bashing political allies feel free to treat you with the same contempt with which they have long treated other gay and lesbians. And now you cry foul?

Sorry, Mary, and fuck you. You and your whole fucked-up family crawled into bed with bigots like Dobson when it suited you. And now you and your whole fucked-up family have some explaining to do. So welcome to the political debate, Mary, and remember…

Your side started it. It only serves you right that you’re going to have to finish it."...

Ilsa

(61,697 posts)
10. Why aren't the woman-hating Cons crying about
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 11:01 AM
Jul 2013

Liz Cheney not taking her husband's last name? I don't believe for a minute that they are cool with that.

I bet we could start an internal ruckus over that.

And we need to start by calling him "Mr. Cheney."

Boomerproud

(7,963 posts)
18. Well, hypocrisy is their middle name.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 12:06 PM
Jul 2013

Paging Hillary RODHAM Clinton, whose name was a political football clear up to the being First Lady.

Fantastic Anarchist

(7,309 posts)
13. I'm sure he broke some kind of law by being both a lobbyist and General Council for DHS.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 11:24 AM
Jul 2013

If not, then that's a massive conflict of interests.

Also, maybe a subpoena for bank records are in order? I'd be willing to bet my left testicle that there are some shady transactions involved with this.

Liz is evil; I'm debating if she may even be more evil than her father.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
20. The answer to the question as to why we havent been hit since 9/11 is that it isnt necessary.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 11:20 PM
Jul 2013

One hit looks like it was enough. We are imploding and do not need additional help. The terrorists are laughing, the corporations are grateful. The middle class is dead.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Liz Cheney's husband: "Tr...