General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSnowden has no crediblity, and deserves no thanks.
It's one thing to claim that Snowden's actions helped to focus attention on an issue. It's another thing entirely to claim that we should thank him for his actions.
I don't buy into the notion that the only way to have focused attention on the issue was by leaking classified information in the way that he did, via distortions that tried to portray the program as something it was not, and then maintaining that he revealed "criminality."
Snowden's motives have always been suspect. While the debate is welcomed, his actions are still suspect. The fact that he created a circus with his international adventure, sparking international incidents, and injecting himself into the story throughout, shows that his motive was not a debate about the NSA domestic programs. His actions were idiotic and self-serving.
Bush's illegal spying was exposed in 2005 by Thomas Tamm. FISA has always been controversial and challenged by civil liberties groups and some lawmakers (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023009232). Criticism of Snowden's actions that led him to reveal U.S. state secrets to other countries and find himself stuck in Russia have nothing to do with anyone's opinion of the ongoing debate about NSA domestic program.
Don't expect people to overlook Snowden's actions overseas simply because there is an ongoing debate and renewed focus on the program. That's not going to happen.
Snowden is a delusional and self-important clown. He and Greenwald have done everything to help make the story about them.
First, Greenwald announces that he has enough information to bring down the U.S.
He's applying for temporary asylum in Russia.
It doesn't get any more bizarre than that. Well...
Edward Snowden Declares Himself Torture-Proof
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023275112
If Snowden's case as a whistleblower is so strong, why is he afraid to face the consequences?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023236549
Not at all making himself the story, Greenwald to make next shocking NSA revelations, in a book -KOS
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023287918
Russian President Vladimir Putin made it clear Wednesday that he holds his country's relationship with the United States in higher esteem than he does former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, Reuters reported.
When a reporter asked if the Snowden case would negatively affect a September summit between the U.S. and Russia in Moscow, Putin responded that "bilateral relations, in my opinion, are far more important than squabbles about the activities of the secret services," according to Reuters.
"We warned Mr. Snowden that any action by him that could cause damage to Russian-American relations is unacceptable for us," he added, as quoted by Reuters.
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/putin-us-russia-relations-greater-than-snowden
The international freak show brought to you by Snowden.
How the Snowden Affair Became a Freak Show
http://election.democraticunderground.com/10023235597
Also, everyone knew about the programs, albeit not the scope, but that is not justification for Snowden's actions, especially those that compromised U.S. state secrets.
Not knowing the scope is not the same as not being aware of the concerns.
Wyden on Senate floor: FISAs general warrants are like the Writs of Assistance the founding fat
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022081086
Senator Wyden (D-Ore.) calls for oversight of agencies that might be monitoring Americans
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022081177
PATRIOT Act Being Used to Keep Super Duper Government Spy Operation Top Secret
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002440614
House votes to renew controversial surveillance law
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014228212
Obama signs FISA extension..5 more years.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022111527
There is clearly a disagreement about the program, but it was authorized by Congress. The administration stated that there were briefings. Senator Reid called out members for claiming they didn't know (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022999689). The scope of the program maybe in question, but there is still nothing illegal about it. That fact, together with fleeing the country and revealing U.S. state secrets, is why Snowden will not be considered a whistleblower.
Members of Congress have oversight of the program. It's good they're awake now and taking their oversight responsibility seriously.
Sen. Tester Calls On Snowden To Return To America To Face The Music
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023281426
cali
(114,904 posts)wouldn't be happening now if not for Snowden.
Your unbelievable focus on Snowden as the personification of evil doesn't change that.
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)in a different way. He didn't have to run off with 4 laptops full of thousands of documents to Hong Kong and Russia.
Logical
(22,457 posts)pnwmom
(108,990 posts)And not shared documents with a Chinese newspaper about our spying on China (while Obama was in the midst of negotiations with China) and not released information about our spying on Putin's predecessor while we were meeting with Russia. And not threatened to release thousands of other documents to the foreign press around the world, and leave it to them to decide whether it was safe to release them or not.
Our spying agencies are supposed to be spying on other countries, and releasing information about their activities in other countries is harmful to our national security. This is an entirely separate issue from claims that the NSA is spying on Americans, an issue that should be investigated and debated.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)Maybe we would have a few more jobs in America. So I am not that concerned that the Chinese might be angry.
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)about China hacking into US universities and corporations and stealing patent and other business secrets worth billions.
whttevrr
(2,345 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Please tell me youre kidding
Or, admit that you either know nothing about the inter-connectedness of world economies, or you just spouted off the first thing that came to your head.
Here
this might help (please forgive the 2011 numbers, but youll get the point):
https://www.uschina.org/statistics/tradetable.html
Logical
(22,457 posts)pnwmom
(108,990 posts)if he hadn't shot holes through his credibility by his cozying up to Russia.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Those that are trying to make it something different are suspect in my opinion. I don't care if he went to Antarctica for heaven's sake, he exposed something that needed to be known.
tsuki
(11,994 posts)pnwmom
(108,990 posts)the power point presentation about internal US surveillance. He should have kept the focus on that issue, not moved onto the the NSA doing the international spying it's supposed to do.
tsuki
(11,994 posts)worldwide.
I remember MFG. Evening News, Cloying Gravitas Pelley, spent 17 seconds on reporting the "bankruptcy" 3 weeks after the scandal broke. To be fair to Pelley, he is on a mental level of Ted Baxter. But still, unless the story is international, it is deep sixed.
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)spying WITHIN the U.S. That's where the focus should have remained -- IF that's what he really cared about.
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)Many of the same techniques are used in both cases and often the same people are doing both at the same time. And the way that this country has been throwing its weight around on the international stage for many years including illegally engineering coups, disrupting economies, starting illegal wars and killing innocents with drone attacks, I don't have a problem with disclosing information that might hamper our effort to carry out such nefarious activities in the future.
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)presentation, and not threatened to release lists of American "assets" around the world. How can the same people who were in an uproar about Valerie Plame's outing not be outraged about Snowden's threat to do the same thing to countless others?
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)been one of the most vociferous critics of Snowden. That should tell us that perhaps these are two different situations. And while there is no evidence that Snowden has compromised any of our foreign assets, if those assets are up to no good then perhaps they should be outed. Just think if the CIA assets who were behind the assassination of Salvador Allende had been outed before finishing their mission. That would have been a good thing.
7962
(11,841 posts)he's been less than truthful about what his intentions were.
cali
(114,904 posts)snowden has. Not binney or drake or anyone ele.
ridiculous claim from you. shocker.
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)He should have kept the focus on that -- but instead he shifted the focus and lost much of his credibility when he started leaking about our foreign spying.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)luckily Spegel was more responsible than Snowden and declined to print the information.
"SPIEGEL has decided not to publish details it has seen about secret operations that could endanger the lives of NSA workers."
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/secret-documents-nsa-targeted-germany-and-eu-buildings-a-908609-3.html
"You are wrong. The growing backlash against NSA surveillance"
...has nothing to do with my point, and Tester is among the Senator questioning the NSA programs. In fact, he's a co-sponsor of the Leahy bill:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023135750
Aerows
(39,961 posts)but you say it doesn't just because you are PO'ed that it left a stain on the Obama administration. Nobody is fooled as to why you relentlessly attempt to tear down Snowden. It doesn't even have anything to do with being Pro-Democrats. You'd be doing the same if Snowden was a flaming liberal. You are against him solely because he embarrassed the Obama administration by revealing that he is doing the same things that upset people under the Bush administration. As long as it is Obama doing it, however, you are FINE with it.
cali
(114,904 posts)this backlash wouldn't exist and be growing had Snowden not done what he did.
Like him or hate him. That's just factual.
"It has everything to do with your claim
this backlash wouldn't exist and be growing had Snowden not done what he did.
Like him or hate him. That's just factual."
...you missed the point from the OP:
"I don't buy into the notion that the only way to have focused attention on the issue was by leaking classified information in the way that he did, via distortions that tried to portray the program as something it was not, and then maintaining that he revealed 'criminality.'"
The point isn't that he didn't spark a debate, it's that his actions and motives are questionable.
cali
(114,904 posts)it's undeniable that he did focus the attention of Congress and the public on mass surveillance.
I think that's much more to the point than what his motives were. But you're SnowdenCentric so you can't see the woods for the Snowden Tree.
"whether you buy into or not is irrelevant"
It's damn sure is relevant to my opinion and point.
"it's undeniable that he did focus the attention of Congress and the public on mass surveillance."
As I said, Tester is among the Senator questioning the NSA programs. In fact, he's a co-sponsor of the Leahy bill:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023135750
chimpymustgo
(12,774 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)I'm a nobody with an opinion. Even a nobody is allowed to have an opinion.
Agree?
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)xocet
(3,871 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)and people wonder why I won't trash this thread. It's comedy gold.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)Progressive dog
(6,918 posts)and ProSense got it right. Now he's living in an airport and that is funny.
you mean NonSense is wrong?!?!
-p
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)may their content rest in peace
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)Though as most of us who take this serious have had to say over and over again that it isn't about the person. I still am fascinated about how some obsess over Snowden. As if whatever chink in the false armor this administration had was such a brutal and personal and evil attack that they can only exhibit rage in response.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)It is the same family as "with us or against us"...there are heroes and absolute evil traitors and nothing else....and should you think otherwise you are one of "them".
I am not sure whether this is a genuine belief system or just a way to manipulate people, but is is present in our country now.
polichick
(37,152 posts)Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)liberal N proud
(60,339 posts)But for some reason people have overlooked his crimes against the state to glorify him for exposing that which needed exposed.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)that people could look past politics and realize that sometimes right is exposing wrong doing.
liberal N proud
(60,339 posts)Wrong to tell other governments about our dirty little secrets. Or for that matter provide sensitive information to other governments.
Many can't rationalize that you can still break the law doing what is right if you do not do it correctly.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)that news reports what they want to report, not what actually happened. There is no concrete evidence that Snowden released anything to China or Russia. There is a bunch of wishful thinking that the public will look at that and scream treason instead of looking at what he released, instead.
liberal N proud
(60,339 posts)totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)which it has done often in the past and may be doing now with such things as killing innocent civilians with drone attacks, is it really treason to expose such things? Treason is usually the excuse that totalitarian states states use in order to engineer crackdowns. We can only throw the "T" word around so much. IMO Snowden did not commit treason because the information that he disclosed, even if harmful to some of the activities of our CIA and the NSA, needed to be brought out in the open.
liberal N proud
(60,339 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)Badly! It started a discussion that needed started. Your bias prevents you from seeing it.
whttevrr
(2,345 posts)Or obsession?
You have a lot of threads on this subject... how many of the 4774 posts that you have made in the last 90 days have been Snowden related?
Give it a rest...
redgreenandblue
(2,088 posts)whttevrr
(2,345 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)And there isn't a person on this board that is shocked or surprised by your biases, since you plaster them out there for the world to see.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"You know full well "what the fuck" that person is talking about
And there isn't a person on this board that is shocked or surprised by your biases, since you plaster them out there for the world to see."
I've never posted a single thread or comment about Assange "rape charges." Still, what happened: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023288332#post53
Feature not working?
Linking back to yourself again.
Well that gains you a LOT of credibility. It's your own little echo-chamber. And you wonder why people question your credibility? I trust no one that is their own echo chamber. I *like* people challenging my ideas, because it strengthens my beliefs and reveals holes in my judgment when I am wrong. You need to try that the fuck out, pronto.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)Last edited Thu Jul 18, 2013, 01:55 PM - Edit history (1)
just fine by yourself. I'm just watching it happen.
ETA: Oh, I see. You are insinuating that I am another poster. Considering that I had to submit a driver's license, my address and my signature to be a Mod at DU when it was DU2, that's pretty damn foolish. But please, insinuate away, since I my real identity is known to many here. But nice try at eroding my credibility when your own is under fire. Please, proceed.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)I'd say it's ready for the refuse truck. Maybe you want people to be unhappy so you can achieve most trashed thread?
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Take it for what it's worth.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Me thinks she protests too much, since I was a Mod on DU2 and had to submit identification.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Delusional and livid is no way to live
Take it for what it's worth. "
...I will: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=106893&sub=trans
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Right?
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Response to ProSense (Original post)
Post removed
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)byeya
(2,842 posts)I don't use up my minutes with Dail-A-Joke.
Logical
(22,457 posts)whttevrr
(2,345 posts)Is this a google seo mobius link scheme?
Logical
(22,457 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Too funny!
think
(11,641 posts)Bribery, revolving door, perjury, private contractor, Prism, Greenwald, H B Gary, scandal, , Morales, CIA, whistleblower, indictment, Russ Tice, William Binney, Thoma Drake, J. Kirk Wiebe, Sibel Edmonds, Daniel Ellsberg, Ron Wyden, FISA, 4th amendment, unconstitutional, EFF, ACLU , secret law, classified, gag order, Yahoo!!!! ...
whttevrr
(2,345 posts)dominionism, new apostolic reformation, rick perry, mitt romney, michelle bachman, alex jones, racism, black helicopters, united nation, storm troopers, fema camps, illuminati, freemasons...
Anyone else?
What did we miss?
think
(11,641 posts)News of the World phone hacking scandal, Rupert Murdoch, Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal Alsaud, investments, The Kingdom Holding Company, 911, Bin Laden Family, The Carlyle group, Healthcare, front groups, The Lewin Group, Americans for Prosperity, Freedom Works, Koch brothers, Koch industries, Dick Armey, Trilateral Commission, Diane Fienstein, WMDs, Hans Blix, Drones, more drones, collateral damage, war photos, wikileaks video, Bradley Manning, torture, enhanced interrogation, water boarding, Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo Bay, human rights, war crimes, Geneva convention, Depleted uranium, white phosphorous, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Water boarding, plausible deniability, lies, death, oil, ,truth, love, hope, love, love, peace......
whttevrr
(2,345 posts)What's their new name?
think
(11,641 posts)Academi[2]previously known as Xe Services LLC, Blackwater USA and Blackwater Worldwideis a private military company founded in 1997 by Erik Prince and Al Clark.[3][4] Academi is currently the largest of the U.S. State Department's three private security contractors. Academi provided diplomatic security services in Iraq to the United States federal government on a contractual basis.[1] Academi also has a research and development wing that was responsible for developing the Grizzly APC along with other military technology. The company's headquarters is located in Arlington County, Virginia.[5][6]....
Full entry:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academi
Xe Services LLC, Erik Prince, Al Clark, U.S. State Department, Grizzly APC, Arlington, Virginia, Greystone, target, FedEx, Dow Jones, Sean Trotter, Robert Young, United States Department of Homeland Security, DHS, Robert Richer, Total Intelligence Solutions, Impact Training Center, Bobby Ray Inman, John Ashcroft, Red McCombs, Dean Bosacki, Jason DeYonker, Russ Robinson, Jack Quinn and...
Benghazi!!
think
(11,641 posts)Sure glad he doesn't own the
Edit: But he did bring Formula One to Austin so now there's some mixed feelings...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_McCombs
whttevrr
(2,345 posts)think
(11,641 posts)think
(11,641 posts)~Snip~
Red has a wide range of business interests including automobile dealerships, communications, ranching and real estate. Red began his career in the car business in 1950 and today Red McCombs Automotive consists of nine dealerships in San Antonio. Red was a co-founder of Clear Channel Communications, a global leader in the out-of-home advertising industry with radio and television stations and outdoor displays in 32 countries around the world. He owned the Minnesota Vikings of the NFL from the 1998 season through the 2004 season. Prior to his football team ownership, Red owned the Denver Nuggets and San Antonio Spurs of the NBA. Koontz McCombs, headquartered in San Antonio, is a multi-faceted commercial real estate development, construction and brokerage firm established in 1997.
~Snip~
Full entry is located here.
www.mccombsenergy.com/history.htm
~Snip~
Programs that appear on many Clear Channel talk stations include the Glenn Beck Programgetting his talk show start at Clear Channel owned WFLA (AM) in Tampa, The Rush Limbaugh Show, The Sean Hannity Show, America Now with Andy Dean and Coast to Coast AM, all of which are affiliated with Premiere Radio Networks in some fashion. The Mark Levin Show and The Dave Ramsey Show are non-Premiere shows who air on many (if not most) Clear Channel stations, as did The Savage Nation prior to its ending in September 2012. Limbaugh is almost universally carried on Clear Channel stations in markets where the company has a news talk station, with the exception of New York City: WOR has only recently come under ownership of Clear Channel and has not yet acquired Limbaugh from its current home, Cumulus Media-owned WABC. In markets where Clear Channel-owned news talk stations have not been profitable (such as Boston and Atlanta), Clear Channel has chosen to sell shows such as Limbaugh and Coast to Coast AM to their rivals and change the stations to other formats.
~snip~
Censorship
Clear Channel has been criticized for censoring opinions critical of George W. Bush and other Republicans. After Natalie Maines, the singer of the Dixie Chicks, told a London audience "we're ashamed the president of the United States is from Texas", the band's radio airplay dropped precipitously. Afterwards, some Clear Channel stations removed The Dixie Chicks from their playlists without any noted repercussions from the company. Gail Austin, Clear Channel's director of programming said, "Out of respect for our troops, our city and our listeners, [we] have taken the Dixie Chicks off our playlists."[63] Clear Channel was accused of orchestrating the radio blacklist by such critics as Paul Krugman, however others claim some Clear Channel stations continued to play the band longer than some other companies.[64] This treatment of the Dixie Chicks is contrasted with Clear Channel's handling of Ted Nugent criticizing President Obama, a Democrat, wherein Nugent was offered air time to explain his side of the issue and blame the "liberal media" for trying to silence him.[65]
Clear Channel-owned KTVX was the only local television station that refused to air the paid political message of Cindy Sheehan against the war in Iraq.[66]
While a smaller percentage of Clear Channel's AM talk/music stations have been in the progressive talk format (featuring the now-cancelled Air America Radio network) and they have also been a media sponsor of Frameline, the San Francisco International LGBT Film Festival.[67]
Use of paid actors posing as callers
Clear Channel, through its subsidiary, Premiere Radio Networks, auditions and hires actors to call in to talk radio shows and pose as listeners in order to provide shows, carried by Clear Channel and other broadcasters, with planned content in the form of stories and opinions. The custom caller service provided by Premiere Radio assures its clients they won't hear the same actor's voice for at least two months in order to appear authentic to listeners who might otherwise catch on.[68]...
~snip~
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_Channel_Communications
sorry...
I think he has Limbaugh taint on him.
think
(11,641 posts)Not sure if that will ever wash out....
tridim
(45,358 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)are bad, and make you look like a self-aggrandizing ... fill in the blank.
whttevrr
(2,345 posts)Is that a newfangled debate technique?
quinnox
(20,600 posts)potential tyranny to the country.
flamingdem
(39,319 posts)running towards the Kremlin?
DontTreadOnMe
(2,442 posts)Imagine an American "hero" who runs off to Moscow... oh the irony.
Prosense.. keep posting.. it drives them absolutely nuts that you point out their hero might end up in jail.
Number23
(24,544 posts)so much that they are either the first posters in her threads or one of them must have posted at least 10 times in this OP answering posts that people have made to other posters with some of the lamest, stupidest shit.
And the fact that people think that this behavior makes them look smart, informed or even sane says everything that needs to be said. Like you said, Keep posting Prosense. Drives the batshits even battier.
Wait Wut
(8,492 posts)...I almost choked on my lunch.
tridim
(45,358 posts)If you post that picture 100 times you get a Neo-DU top-achiever certificate, suitable for framing.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)You'd be posting it .
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)This proves EVERYTHING:
Aerows
(39,961 posts)That never gets old!
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)IDGI
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Where it was claimed that was the flight pattern of the Bolivian President Morales' plane. That was posted as his flight path.
I know. Please go ahead and try to make sense of a map of Moscow as a flight path from Moscow to Vienna, Austria. I couldn't, and the folks that piled into the thread and tried to explain how that worked were worse than the original. It degenerated into a massive pile of fail. Hilarious fail, but fail no less.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Oh, and thanks !
Nope not that one, this one:
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)polichick
(37,152 posts)not to mention the world's side - prosense wouldn't have to keep posting threads like this.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)"if I keep telling myself that, I'll believe it."
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Response to ProSense (Original post)
Post removed
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Someone here has no credibility, but it's not Snowden."
...right: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=270145&sub=trans
Also right that Snowden is not "here."
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)My favorite is from June 17th. You alerted on it before anyone saw it. I hope many more will be able to enjoy it now!
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)What are you trying to hide, DMD?! You libertarian racist Obama-hating traitor!
bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)whttevrr
(2,345 posts)Maven
(10,533 posts)Thanks for the link!
progressoid
(49,996 posts)Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)Some will see beauty while others will just see a mish mash of words and links to nowhere in a Gish Gallop larger than the last.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Definitely.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)Look in a mirror.
G_j
(40,367 posts)I think I'll experiment with the trash feature..just for fun..
bowens43
(16,064 posts)Pholus
(4,062 posts)Rather than tediously repost the links or recyle old posts, I will remind you that I showed exactly what was different from 2005. Snowden's releases now give sufficient evidence so that several legal challenges cannot be automatically shut down by the state secrets argument. For that, he deserves thanks.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)focusing their comments on me, make yourself useful: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023288332#post20
Snowden will likely need the support.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Apophis
(1,407 posts)And another thread to add to my trash.
Have a nice day.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Another one of your anti-Snowden spam threads.
And another thread to add to my trash.
Have a nice day."
...didn't take his/her own advice: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023288332#post51
Hooked?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Implying I'm every single poster that disagrees with you? I believe I've answered you once, but I'll answer you again. I was a Mod on DU2. Submitted my driver's license. My address, my signature, my picture. I couldn't be a sock if I wanted to be. But if it helps you sleep at night, dream that everyone that thinks you are full of it is me, go ahead. I'm a big girl. I can take a little heat, even if it is unwarranted.
City Lights
(25,171 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)They don't even favor. It's strange. Could be the phoniness factor?
Response to bravenak (Reply #55)
darkangel218 This message was self-deleted by its author.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)A big fat PHONY!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)I just like that video, it is amazingly ridiculous. I have no hatred for the man, I should stay away from the discussion since I don't love or hate him. I just can't get a good read on the guy since he's been hiding out since I've first heard his name. I trust him as much as I trust the government. Not at all.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)LOVE!
UTUSN
(70,725 posts)Last edited Fri Jul 19, 2013, 10:47 AM - Edit history (2)
whttevrr
(2,345 posts)UTUSN
(70,725 posts)As a bonus, here's this:
*********QUOTE********
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023225969
[font size=5]If I could interrupt for a moment, how about... the Hate Mailbag![/font]
(by EarlG, DU Administrator)
[FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: yellow"]Democratic Underground may be a contentious place at the moment, but thank goodness there are some common truths which still bring us together[/FONT] after all these years. For example, I think we can all agree that no matter which side of the Snowden vs. Obama debate you come down on, you're a right-wing ratfucking paid-to-post shill. Amirite?!?!
Anyway, [FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: yellow"]if you've been spending a little too much time scrapping with your fellow progressives[/FONT] in the DU bubble lately it may have slipped your mind that [FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: yellow"]there are real right-wing assholes out there who wish for nothing more than to see us all crucified and burned[/FONT] at the stake simultaneously. (Which I've got to admit would make for a pretty sweet heavy metal album cover).
So here's the Hate Mailbag to give you a taste of [FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: yellow"]what conservatives are saying out there in the real world[/FONT], sprinkled with a dash of good old-fashioned WTF. Enjoy!
*********UNQUOTE********
hyperbolic much?
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)shawn703
(2,702 posts)You're dropping turds in the pro-crime supporters punch bowl.
cali
(114,904 posts)yeh, we're just all so awed and cowed by Pro's self-referential posts. she's become a caricature and that's what people are reacting to.
shawn703
(2,702 posts)Is that a lot of the responses on this thread are attacking the messenger rather than focusing on the message. Coming from posters who time and time again say we should be focusing on the message rather than attacking the messenger. Talk about double standards!
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)If it weren't for her, General Discussion would look like a slightly more polished version of Alex Jones' website.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Hmm...
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)She keeps spamming the forum with one repetitive comment after another. I just wish that she could stop for a while and come up for air.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)than someone who's just celebrated a whole week here.
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)No wonder quality posters like ProSense are scarce.
cali
(114,904 posts)standing joke. they're so repetitive and she's posted so many hundreds of them. furthermore, what does she really say? for instance, what is the point of all the links in the op? How do they make the case for the claim made in the title?
Prosense repeatedly uses a lot of words and links to actually say very little. It's as if she believes she can bamboozle people with all the links.
msongs
(67,436 posts)totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)negative comments in her threads shows that.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)And is more interested in "shutting down" her critics with the ROFL smiley or assassinating their characters (usually by linking to their transparency pages).
The WALLS OF TEXT and tl;dr format of most of the threads don't help either.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Because ProSense tends to make extraordinarily repetitive threads with selective quotes
And is more interested in 'shutting down' her critics with the ROFL smiley or assassinating their characters (usually by linking to their transparency pages)."
...what? My opinions and threads are "shutting down" my "critics"? LOL!
You oppose transparency?
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Linking to transparency pages has absolutely nothing to do with the actual concept of "transparency." It's just a sleazy, desperate attempt to poison the well by pointing out that your critics have had posts hidden! Oh my! Hide the children! They're monsters!
Puglover
(16,380 posts)Oh and don't ever forget the icon. Why it can silence and shame just about anyone. It's the go to icon for this crowd.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)admonishing people for personal attacks against a post that is nothing more than a personal attack.
shawn703
(2,702 posts)Just pointing out the irony myself.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)The folks who actually think ProSense is contributing to the discussion seem to struggle with basic discourse. I've engaged a couple of them, and the immediate retreat to strawman arguments, attacking the messenger, and just bizarre outright denial of what words mean is a symptom of a wagon rattling itself to pieces.
I'm at a point where, if anyone who still behaves as if the government's infringement on our civil rights is really about how awesome/awful is Snowden, that the only thing that makes sense is to class them in the spongebrain/troll group. It is so painfully obvious that these folks are either mentally handicapped or operating with hidden agendas. With the former I can feel empathy, but the latter are just vile and obtuse.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)And there are a handful of DUers with just as many or more threads on Snowden/Greenwald/NSA et al than ProSense, but since they support the official 'longtime respected poster®' POV, instead of whining complaints and insults (such as those directed at ProSense), their Snowden/Greenwald/NSA threads are routinely schlepped to the top o' the greatest amid great acclaim and huzzahs.
You'd Better Believe It!
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)To name but a few.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"The ACLU, Amnesty International, Daniel Ellsworth, Human Rights Watch and the UN disagree."
...asylum request has been rejected by a number of countries. In the U.S. he is charged with a criminal offense.
Snowden was charged with theft, unauthorized communication of national defense information and willful communication of classified communications intelligence information to an unauthorized person, according to the complaint. The last two charges were brought under the 1917 Espionage Act.
- more -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-charges-snowden-with-espionage/2013/06/21/507497d8-dab1-11e2-a016-92547bf094cc_story.html
This is likely why Hong Kong didn't want him to stay, eventually claiming that the U.S. request included a mispelling of his name.
It's likely why Normay turned down his request.
Snowdens asylum request rejected (Norway)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023170165
The only countries offering Snowden asylum are those wanting to snub the U.S.
Edward Snowden caught in asylum catch-22
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023233134
The ACLU's own text contradicts its case for Snowden's asylum bid.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023231312
Greenwald did not help Snowden by declaring that he is in possession of stolen documents that have the potential to harm U.S. national security (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023261520). He confirmed that Snowden stole information unrelated to the goal of the leak, validating the felony theft charge against him.
Pholus
(4,062 posts)Because it seems like we're simply spending all of the diplomatic capital we have for no identifiable return. Why are so many people so afraid? Is it that they have something to hide? Cause that's why we're not supposed to be nervous about our secrets being stolen.
U.S. Is Pressing Latin Americans to Reject Snowden
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/12/world/americas/us-is-pressing-latin-americans-to-reject-snowden.html
Russia, China reject US pressure over Snowden
http://www.denverpost.com/nationworld/ci_23533848/russia-china-reject-us-pressure-over-snowden
or general anyone who messes with us...
We certainly feel that anyone any country granting asylum to Mr. Snowden would create grave difficulties in our bilateral relationship, and thats a message that weve conveyed publicly and, of course, privately in conversations as well.
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2013/07/211603.htm
Then of course there was the Morales DEBACLE
US admits contact with other countries over potential Snowden flights as it happened
US Ambassador to Austria Responsible for False Claim Snowden Was on Bolivian Leaders Plane: Report
http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-ambassador-to-austria-responsible-for-false-claim-snowden-was-on-bolivian-leaders-plane-report/5342027
This final link has a quote has the analyst agreeing with my own opinion on this...the manhunt is merely a boondoggle.
The money quote:
The Americans are exhausting themselves chasing after Snowden, and their failure to obtain his extradition shows how much the US is struggling to impose its will on the international stage, Snégaroff said.
Snowden's asylum request gives a boost to US critics
http://www.france24.com/en/20130624-snowden-espionage-asylum-usa-civil-liberties-ecuador-cuba-russia
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)courage to confront the USA. However as you know at least three democratic socialist countries in Latin America have granted his request for asylum. I applaud their courage in the face of the big bad boy on the block.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Tugboat
(16 posts)Last edited Thu Jul 18, 2013, 02:27 PM - Edit history (1)
The way I'm reading this is, the American people would not care if every public restroom had a hidden spy camera in it. For the simple reason if they protested it ,they would fear of being locked up, somethings are worth protesting for and your privacy is one of them , 4th Amendment to The Constitution of The United States of America.
last1standing
(11,709 posts)Should the FISA courts be revised? Should materials be declassified when no one is convicted of a crime?
What do you think we should do about the actual problem?
whttevrr
(2,345 posts)I'm a n00b here and even I know that.
Just grab some popcorn
and watch the profligate posters cannibalize each other.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"This is not a solution thread it is a distraction thread...I'm a n00b here and even I know that."
...and look around. The OP is an opinion, the place is filled with them.
whttevrr
(2,345 posts)...errr... 'opinion', over and over. It was getting tedious until this masterfully created distraction appeared. The self linking is a little ego centric, but hey, whatever floats your boat, right?
The point is you really seem to have an inordinately large axe to grind that has almost nothing to do with a solution orientation; and almost exclusively, always seems to be nothing more than a Snowden bash.
I just don't understand the pay off...
What do you get out of it?
cali
(114,904 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)"But I've been watching you post the same thing..."
...why?
I just don't understand the pay off...
What do you get out of it?
I enjoy expressing my opinion. The point appears to be that you don't like criticism of Snowden. Oh well.
whttevrr
(2,345 posts)And of course when you get all character assassinating on others who disagree with your posts. That gets old too...
... just say'n
Ya know?
Maybe take a break from the Snowden sucks bandwagon? Post something about the Taliban leader that sent a 4 page letter to Malala about how she is to be killed, not for seaking education, but for smearing the Taliban...
I dunno
Just something other than "I hate Snowden!"
We get it.
Message received.
Thanks.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"No problem with criticism... It's the repitition Ad nauseum that gets old."
By that logic, Snowden is a hero who deserves thanks "gets old" too.
whttevrr
(2,345 posts)Extremes of any sort are a vexation to ones psyche.
However, I do not have to 'deal with it' because it is not my extreme. I can click off and go about my day, not giving two shits that anyone hates or loves Snowden... it really is no sweat off my balls.
But you might want to talk to someone about your obsession. It seems a little unhealthy.
Extremes of any sort are a vexation to ones psyche.
However, I do not have to 'deal with it' because it is not my extreme. I can click off and go about my day, not giving two shits that anyone hates or loves Snowden... it really is no sweat off my balls.
But you might want to talk to someone about your obsession. It seems a little unhealthy.
..really? I'm sensing a little "obsession" on your part, and "it seems a little unhealthy."
Maybe you should do that "click off" thing.
whttevrr
(2,345 posts)Except...
It's like potato chips...
Even after it get's a little sickening, you kind of want to see if there are anymore chips left in the bag.
And well, there you go... there's more.
But yeah, I've wasted way too much time here this morning. But I am procrastinating, so it's ok. I'll leave you to pontificate your hate in peace.
Enjoy!
La dee da...
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"It's like potato chips...
Even after it get's a little sickening, you kind of want to see if there are anymore chips left in the bag."
...are you saying my opinions are tasty and you can't get enough, but you know you shouldn't keep indulging?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)last1standing
(11,709 posts)I'd like to hear your thoughts on the subject.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)and how they'll be answered
Aerows
(39,961 posts)This poster that just owned her won't be replied to, either. Pro won't take criticism or dissent. Her way or the highway, and not in a good way.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)So. Fucking. Transparent.
I will say it's convenient to have a litany of each and every instance where you twist the story. I appreciate that, it saves on google fu. So thanks for that.
Rex
(65,616 posts)It is all you post about now and kinda creepy. My 2 cents.
"I think he is turning into your obsession. It is all you post about now and kinda creepy. My 2 cents."
...it isn't, and I find the "obsession" with me to be extremely "creepy."
Krugman: Obamacare Is the Rights Worst Nightmare
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023284000
Finally, Bank Regulators Have Had Enough
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023287019
Jobless claims show sharp improvement, reach three-month low
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023287067
Regulators Fine Barclays $453 Million Over U.S. Energy Price Rigging
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023279856
Rex
(65,616 posts)That too is kinda creepy. Haven't seen any of those posts, good to know you didn't go over a mental cliff on Snowden. He's not worth it imo.
polichick
(37,152 posts)Well, maybe it is.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)more minor, peripheral players on Snowden's side. Like the guy who, omg, hasn't updated his linkedin page.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)to thank you for being a nice person in your disagreement.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Snowden's no angel, but I believe in a completely transparent government
I see your position, but don't agree
Soda?
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)I get it, and what he revealed.
Kill him
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)I come running because your threads never fail to open up pros and cons and I find that refreshing!
LOL, thanks!
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Moving on...
Warpy
(111,332 posts)There is no need for any more long winded posts. We get it. You hate Snowden.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Oh, give it a rest
There is no need for any more long winded posts. We get it. You hate Snowden."
...do you object to the "long winded posts" in support of Snowden?
Another question: Are you expecting criticism of Snowden to disappear?
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)So, THAT'S what this is.
Warpy
(111,332 posts)of anyone who was that obsessed day after day for over a week.
Enough is enough.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)Kind of your little schpeel isn't it? Don't actually address the issue, kill the messenger. And the never-ending links-to-nowhere. You realize people stopped clicking on your incessant links because they've been cherry-picked by you and usually has NOTHING to do with the topic at hand, don't you? You have no credibility here anymore, if you ever did.
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)I've never seen that emoticon before. That's hysterical!
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)one is OK.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 168 (Thursday, December 27, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S8384-S8410]
**My thoughts. The entire transcript is here. The debate is vigorous and thorough. Any fool can see their concerns. Where they failed, and I believe, deliberately in the case of Leahy, is in in overstepping. This amendment indeed goes further than FISA. Much further. The Judiciary Committee would have had a fit over it for the very reasons Senator Feinstein states, although she didn't say they'd have a fit, naturally. I believe every Senator who voted yea knew it would not pass. Including the author of the amendment. But the yay votes looked good to some of their constituents, didn't they?
I don't mean this to be harsh. That's politics. Actually, it shows that many of them, like Franken, see both sides of the issue and are trying desperately to find a way to shown they do understand. Because they really do. They're not dumb. They really DO believe the same things we do. On the other hand, they have also seen things that would scare the shit out of you. Really. So, here's Leahy's Amendment.
SEC. ___. FOURTH AMENDMENT PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION ACT OF
2012.
(a) Short Title.--This section may be cited as the ''Fourth
Amendment Preservation and Protection Act of 2012''.
(b) Findings.--Congress finds that the right under the
Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of
the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and
effects against unreasonable searches and seizures is
violated when the Federal Government or a State or local
government acquires information voluntarily relinquished by a
person to another party for a limited business purpose
without the express informed consent of the person to the
specific request by the Federal Government or a State or
local government or a warrant, upon probable cause, supported
by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place
to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
``(c) Definition.--In this section, the term ``system of
records'' means any group of records from which information
is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some
identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular
associated with the individual.
(d) Prohibition.--
(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the
Federal Government and a State or local government is
prohibited from obtaining or seeking to obtain information
relating to an individual or group of individuals held by a
third-party in a system of records, and no such information
shall be admissible in a criminal prosecution in a court of
law.
(2) Exception.--The Federal Government or a State or local
government may obtain, and a court may admit, information
relating to an individual held by a third-party in a system
of records if--
(A) the individual whose name or identification information
the Federal Government or State or local government is using
to access the information provides express and informed
consent to the search; or
(B) the Federal Government or State or local government
obtains a warrant, upon probable cause, supported by oath or
affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be
searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
-------
**And here's Senator Feinstein's objection to it:
Mrs. FEINSTEIN. Madam President, I rise in opposition to this
amendment. This amendment is extraordinarily broad. It is much broader
than FISA, and in the course of my remarks, I would hope to address how
broad it is. It essentially bars Federal, State, and local governments
from obtaining any information relating to an individual that is held
by a third party unless the government first obtains either a warrant
or consent from the individual. This is also not germane to FISA. It
has not been reviewed by the Judiciary Committee, which would have
jurisdiction over this matter. For that reason alone, I would vote
against it. Also, it impedes the timely reauthorization of the FISA
Amendments Act.
I also oppose the substance of the amendment. The amendment is titled
the ``Fourth Amendment Preservation and Protection Act.'' In reality,
it seeks to reverse over 30 years of Supreme Court precedent
interpreting the fourth amendment.
In 1967 the Supreme Court established its reasonable expectation of
privacy test under the fourth amendment, in the case of Katz v. United
States. Nine years later, in a case known as U.S. v. Miller, the
Supreme Court held:
[T]he Fourth Amendment does not prohibit the obtaining of
information revealed to a third party and conveyed by him to
Government authorities.
So already you have a Supreme Court case saying that the fourth
amendment does not prohibit the use of this kind of information by the
government.
The Miller case involved the government obtaining account records
from a bank. But in 1979, just 3 years after Miller, the Supreme Court
took up the issue of third-party collection in a case involving the
installation and use of pen registers, which are electronic devices
that enable law enforcement to collect telephone numbers dialed from a
particular phone line without listening to the content of those calls.
The 1973 case is known as Smith v. Maryland, and in it the Court held:
[W]e doubt that people in general entertain any actual
expectation of privacy in the numbers they dial. All
telephone users realize that they must ``convey'' phone
numbers to the telephone company, since it is through
telephone company switching equipment that their calls are
completed. All subscribers realize, moreover, that the phone
company has facilities for making permanent records of the
numbers they dial, for they see a list of their long-distance
(toll) calls on their monthly bills. . . . Telephone users .
. . typically know that they must convey numerical
information to the phone company; that the phone company has
facilities for recording this information; and that the phone
company does in fact record this information for a variety of
legitimate business purposes. Although subjective
expectations cannot be scientifically gauged, it is too much
to believe that telephone subscribers, under these
circumstances, harbor any general expectation that the
numbers they dial will remain secret. . . . This Court
consistently has held that a person has no legitimate
expectation of privacy in information he voluntarily turns
over to third parties.
More recently, in the Court's 2012 decision in U.S. v. Jones, some
Justices have questioned whether the time has come to revisit Miller
and Smith in some form. Now, perhaps they are right, but this amendment
isn't the form they had in mind. And this isn't the time to do so.
This amendment is so broad that the police could not use cell phone
data to find a missing or kidnapped child without a warrant or the
consent of the missing child--impossible to get. Similarly, they could
not ask the phone company to provide the home address of a terrorist,
drug dealer, or other criminal without consent or warrant. They could
not ask a bank if such criminals had recently deposited large sums of
money. In fact, as written, this amendment would prohibit law
enforcement from looking up the name, address, and phone number of a
criminal suspect, witness, or any other person online unless they
obtained a warrant or the consent of the criminal suspect. As you can
see, the amendment is too broad.
As I have already stated, the FAA authorities expire in 4 days. If
those authorities are allowed to lapse, our intelligence agencies will
be deprived of a critical tool that enables those agencies to acquire
vital information about international terrorists and other important
targets overseas, plus what they may be plotting in the United States.
It is imperative that we pass a clean reauthorization of these
authorities without amendments that will hamper passage in the House.
I urge my colleagues to oppose this amendment.
And I would also like to note one more thing in Ms. Feinstein's favor:
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2012_cr/feinstein-lee2.html
SEC. 1032. PROHIBITION ON THE INDEFINITE DETENTION OF
CITIZENS AND LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS.
cali
(114,904 posts)why would Senator Leahy deliberately sabotage his own legislation? oooh, do tell.
And why would he have spent so many years on these issues, introducing legislation?
just what we need; nutty conspiracy crap about Senator Leahy.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Considering his amendment also changes what state and local law enforcement are able to do in emergency situations, which has nothing whatsoever to do with FISA, I would thank you NOT to throw around the words "nutty conspiracy theory crap" about what I wrote. Thank you very much. Have a nice life.
cali
(114,904 posts)and I'll say just what I please: NUTTY CT. got that? good.
Mobs of rude people tend to embolden each other. This time you've been directly rude TO me, ABOUT me, for expressing an opinion about something politicians do regularly - try to APPEAR to do one thing when in fact they are not doing ANYTHING. That is NOT nutty CT theory bullshit. It's a simple fact of life. And yes, everyone noticed that you really, REALLY meant to say that I'm full of SHIT but couldn't. How very original of you, Cali!
A couple of other examples of the mob in a thread to those of us who don't care for Snowden's tactics. Since the OP was self-deleted you'll have to scroll down to the posts:
http://election.democraticunderground.com/10023260719#post30
backscatter712 (20,934 posts)
30. You're far too nice to them.
The people who engage in character assassination are SCUM.
The people who practice McCarthyist witchhunting are SCUM.
The people who cheerlead and apologize for illegal and unconstitutional activities that violate our rights and threaten to turn our country into an authoritarian police state are SCUM.
If I was Skinner, I'd tombstone every single one of them. The shit they pull is something that should only be seen in places like Breitbart and Redstate. If they want to act like right-wing bullies, they should go over there.
It's a fucking disgrace they're allowed to do what they've done on a board that purports to call itself "Democratic."
http://election.democraticunderground.com/10023260719#post76
Corruption Inc (138 posts)
76. They are mentally ill, they can't help themselves
Most are Rs anyway.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)to thank ProSense for accusing me of being a sock of every single person that disagrees with her. It amazes me that I could be that creative.
It's truly fantastic that as a former Mod at DU2 when I submitted my driver's license, address and signature, that I could be all of those people at once without anyone catching on. All of you who have talked to me on the phone, and have talked to each other should be clearly impressed with my ability to impersonate so many people at once, just to disagree with ProSense, who isn't full of herself *at all*.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Too funny.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I'm just Aerows. I said I wouldn't trash the thread because it is comedy gold. What disingenuous claim did I make? That I was a mod on DU2? That I know people personally on here and have talked to them on the phone? What the hell.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Sorry about that.
Still, I don't go around accusing posters of being multiple people. I made a mistake.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)is what happened. Your spurious claim was blown to hell and now it's "I made a mistake". Well it is a good thing that you recognize when you do make one. I'm just Aerows. Everyone else disagrees with you because they disagree with you, not because there is some conspiracy of sock puppets.
"You got your butt handed to you is what happened. Your spurious claim was blown to hell and now it's "I made a mistake". Well it is a good thing that you recognize when you do make one. I'm just Aerows. Everyone else disagrees with you because they disagree with you, not because there is some conspiracy of sock puppets."
...I made a mistake. I confused you with another poster in the thread.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)you linked to?
Rex
(65,616 posts)I take it back then, ProSense has gone off the Snowden mental cliff. Wow. Who would have thunk it would be this one issue?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"I take it back then, ProSense has gone off the Snowden mental cliff. Wow. Who would have thunk it would be this one issue?"
...your goal is shit stirring.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I've seen some people get deranged before when they are wrong on the internet, but that one took the fucking cake.
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)you'd not be in a link frenzy butfor his effort
you and the crew should be thanking him yourselves for making himself a target of the BHO fan club. I'm betting that between all the positive reinforcement between yourselves and the moral elevation that has resulted, that the fall and abrupt ending of it is gonna be most painful.
I'm simply wondering how long it will take before you guys do a variation of this song
"Now it's time to say goodbye...."
ANd that's odd -- given all the focus on BHO'S/the NSA's interpretations of Section 215 of the PA and responses to it, that they stepped well outside of what congress thought they were authorizing is no longer questionable.
ANd of course, there's also that little thing about the "foreign" in FISA too.
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)last1standing
(11,709 posts)I have to agree with so many others that you don't want to discuss issues, you seem to only want to smear Snowden. I very much hope I'm wrong about that but when you don't respond to simple questions, it does make me wonder.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)People here believe it's okey-dokey to steal computers and try to sell the contents to the next bidder.
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)Blue Palasky
(81 posts)DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)Here are the rules: In any ProSense thread click on a random link provided to another ProSense thread. Do the same in that thread. Continue until you find a thread that doesn't link to another ProSense thread.
I made it 8 ProSense threads out until I ran into a dead end.
This really makes you wonder what the point of these links are. Supposedly they are provided for you to read. But once you follow a link to read it, there are more links in that thread that you would have to follow. This continues on almost indefinitely. To completely read any one ProSense thread and its included links would require you to actually read more than 50 ProSense threads.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)SunSeeker
(51,662 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)Fortunately, a majority of the American people feel otherwise.
Divine Discontent
(21,056 posts)stlsaxman
(9,236 posts)Just seems quite opportunist (at best) on Greenwald/Snowden's part to bring this up now. Hell- at least Obama went/goes through the FISA courts...
But, no... just when Comey gets confirmation...
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)Greenwald practiced law in the Litigation Department at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz (19941995); in 1996 he co-founded his own litigation firm, called Greenwald Christoph & Holland (later renamed Greenwald Christoph PC), where he litigated cases concerning issues of U.S. constitutional law and civil rights.{6}{18} According to Greenwald, "I decided voluntarily to wind down my practice in 2005 because I could, and because, after ten years, I was bored with litigating full-time and wanted to do other things which I thought were more engaging and could make more of an impact, including political writing."{18}
Unclaimed Territory
Greenwald started his blog Unclaimed Territory in October 2005, focusing on the investigation pertaining to the Valerie Plame affair, the CIA leak grand jury investigation, the federal indictment of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby and the NSA warrantless surveillance controversy. In April 2006, Unclaimed Territory received the 2005 Koufax Award for "Best New Blog".{6}
Salon
In February 2007, Greenwald became a contributing writer at Salon.com, and the new column and blog superseded Unclaimed Territory, though Salon.com prominently features hyperlinks to it in Greenwald's dedicated biographical section.{20}{21}
Among the frequent topics of his Salon articles were the investigation of the 2001 anthrax attacks, and the candidacy of former CIA official John O. Brennan for the jobs of either Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (D/CIA) or the next Director of National Intelligence (DNI) after the election of Barack Obama. Brennan withdrew his name from consideration for the post after opposition centered in liberal blogs and led by Greenwald.{22}{23}{24}{24}{25}{26} Brennan would, however, take up the leadership position at the CIA in March 2013.
The Guardian
Greenwald left Salon.com on August 20, 2012 for The Guardian, citing "the opportunity to reach a new audience, to further internationalize my readership, and to be re-invigorated by a different environment" as reasons for the move.{27}
On June 5, 2013, Greenwald helped scoop the story on the top-secret FISA court order requiring Verizon to provide the National Security Agency with telephone metadata for all calls between the US and abroad, as well as all domestic calls.{28}{29}{30}
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenn_Greenwald
- Looks like he was keeping himself busy to me......
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)[center][/center]
WTF?
Marr
(20,317 posts)DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)RevStPatrick
(2,208 posts)Yeah, we know.
Snowden = Bad.
Obama = Wonderful.
You know, I actually happen to agree with you that "Snowden is a delusional and self-important clown."
I also think that we would not be having this larger conversation if he hadn't acted in a delusional and clownish manner. And I want us to be having this conversation.
So, my question is this:
What are you trying to deflect conversation away from by posting this yet again?
What is it you don't want us to be talking about regarding Obama today?
Are you simply trying to draw Cali in so she doesn't have time to think and post about other things?
Why do you seem to want to draw so much attention to yourself?
Hmmm... sounds familiar...
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"I also think that we would not be having this larger conversation if he hadn't acted in a delusional and clownish manner. And I want us to be having this conversation."
...cool. We agree.
What are you trying to deflect conversation away from by posting this yet again?
What is it you don't want us to be talking about regarding Obama today?
Are you simply trying to draw Cali in so she doesn't have time to think and post about other things?
Why do you seem to want to draw so much attention to yourself?
Hmmm... sounds familiar...
You know that's not going to prevent me from criticizing Snowden, right?
If you want to start a thread about any topic, go right ahead. Forget about me.
Maybe you can explain why only my posts criticizing Snowden "draw so much attention" to myself, but my other posts are ignored.
Krugman: Obamacare Is the Rights Worst Nightmare
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023284000
Finally, Bank Regulators Have Had Enough
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023287019
Jobless claims show sharp improvement, reach three-month low
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023287067
Regulators Fine Barclays $453 Million Over U.S. Energy Price Rigging
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023279856
I think some people hate criticism of Snowden and believe that trying to portray such criticism as deflection is really projecting.
Marr
(20,317 posts)quoting little rhetorical concessions that insult Snowden, I mean.
You did it to me the other day and the impression I received was that you'd stopped reading once the criticism of Snowden had been offered, with a little fist jab into the air and an, "I WIN" breathlessly spoken to no one in particular.
Is that really the case, or is it just policy to capitalize on such rhetorical concessions and feature them as prominently as possible? You know, like when movie studios shorten the statements of movie reviewers like "best movie of the summer to avoid" to "best movie of the summer..." and put it on the posters?
"It is so bizarre the way you do that--quoting little rhetorical concessions that insult Snowden, I mean."
...sorry that you don't approve of the way I express myself. Oh well.
Snowden is a hot topic. From GD's first page
A Letter to Edward Snowden
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023288912
Snowden has no crediblity, and deserves no thanks.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023288332
Glenn Greenwald Responds to Carl Bernstein over Edward Snowden
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023289231
Jimmy Carter issues statement on Snowden. "America no longer has a functioning democracy"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023285237
If I Had to Chose Who is More Dangerous to US Security than Snowden...I'd say this Guy
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023287837
Today, finally, Snowden was PROVEN a LIAR!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023285012
Glenn Greenwald: Growing Backlash Against NSA Spying Shows Why U.S. Wants to Silence Edward Snowden
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023288562
In Snowden's Russia Opposition Leader and Putin Foe Convicted
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023288994
US Threatens To Eliminate Trade With Venezuela If It Provides Snowden With Asylum
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023287575
sheshe2
(83,861 posts)kentuck
(111,110 posts)"Bush's illegal spying was exposed in 2005 by Thomas Tamm. FISA has always been controversial and challenged by civil liberties groups and some lawmakers..."
Nobody seemed to make much progress, did they?
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)be made by one person on the same topic. Spamming this board with the same thing over and over again is getting very tiresome. And yes I realize that I don't have to click on her threads. I guess I am just hoping that for once she will come up with something original.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Maybe DU should change its rules to limit the number of repetitive posts that can be made by one person on the same topic. Spamming this board with the same thing over and over again is getting very tiresome. And yes I realize that I don't have to click on her threads. I guess I am just hoping that for once she will come up with something original."
...Snowden is a hot topic. From GD's first page
A Letter to Edward Snowden
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023288912
Snowden has no crediblity, and deserves no thanks.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023288332
Glenn Greenwald Responds to Carl Bernstein over Edward Snowden
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023289231
Jimmy Carter issues statement on Snowden. "America no longer has a functioning democracy"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023285237
If I Had to Chose Who is More Dangerous to US Security than Snowden...I'd say this Guy
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023287837
Today, finally, Snowden was PROVEN a LIAR!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023285012
Glenn Greenwald: Growing Backlash Against NSA Spying Shows Why U.S. Wants to Silence Edward Snowden
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023288562
In Snowden's Russia Opposition Leader and Putin Foe Convicted
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023288994
US Threatens To Eliminate Trade With Venezuela If It Provides Snowden With Asylum
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023287575
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)Do you want to muzzle her too or just ProSense?
European Parliament Wants Snowden, NSA Chief to Testify on Spying (Thu Jul 18, 2013, 05:02 PM)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023290843
The US Media, Latin America and Snowden's Asylum (Thu Jul 18, 2013, 03:46 PM)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10243489
Glenn Greenwald Responds to Carl Bernstein over Edward Snowden (Thu Jul 18, 2013, 02:02 PM)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023289231
A Letter to Edward Snowden (Thu Jul 18, 2013, 01:26 PM)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023288912
US Threatens To Eliminate Trade With Venezuela If It Provides Snowden With Asylum (Thu Jul 18, 2013, 12:29 PM)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/110820430
Jimmy Carter issues statement on Snowden. "America no longer has a functioning democracy" (Wed Jul 17, 2013, 10:22 PM)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023285237
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)guidelines and in the past around the time of the 2008 election DU did indeed limit op's if I recall correctly to three per day. And the poster you are referencing has 30,000 posts. Prosense has more than 100,000.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)That's congratulate, not condemn/look askance at.
And if we were going to reestablish 2008 guidelines I say we start with the one prohibiting personal attacks (such as accusing someone of being paid to post on DU). There's one guideline that's sorely missed.
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)is true or not. If it's not then Prosense should be able go about her business without that hanging over her head. But if the accusation is true then there are a lot of people who would like to know that.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)It's the gerbil up Richard Gere's butt of nasty rumor mongering fueled mostly by offsite losers & malcontents.
burnodo
(2,017 posts)Not to mention posting within Catherina's threads repeatedly.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Why do you always have to post links? Why can't you debate issues like the rest of us, without a myriad of links??
And why "beat a dead horse" over and over again? Like right now, we already know how you feel about Snowden, why yet another thread?
I'm sure you're sincere about what you believe in, but please tone it down. People have stopped taking you seriously.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Last edited Fri Jul 19, 2013, 05:41 PM - Edit history (1)
so expressing opinions in your own words is dangerous.
Links are safer, because you cannot be held personally accountable for the lying shifts and rewriting of history. You can provide links on Tuesday that say, "We have always been at war with Eastasia!", but proclaim just as confidently on Wednesday through links that "We have always been at war with Eurasia!"
As ProSense has learned well, embarrassing and revealing things happen when propaganda actually expresses an opinion:
Prosense: "Spying on Americans was, is and will still be illegal."
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:53 AM
Original message
Edited on Wed Feb-15-06 08:53 AM by ProSense
Bush is spying on Americans: opponents and activist groups. The law can't
be changed to make that legal. The Republicans are trying to pull a fast one with this "law change" tactic by framing the illegal spying as warrantless spying on terrorists; therefore, the law is being changed to give Bush the authority to spy on terrorist. Spying on Americans was, is and will still be illegal. Bush committed crimeS by illegal spying on Americans and breaking existing FISA laws.
I'm sure all criminals would love to have a law passed that retroactively absolves them of their crimes.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Now I see the double standard, hypocrisy the said poster resorts to.
pretty sad and pathetic. Considering how much she seems to hate Snowden.
ShawnRIN
(48 posts)Whether or not Snowden is a good guy or bad guy is a separate matter altogether from the information he disclosed on US intelligence gathering. He must have taken an oath at some point not to disclose our nations secrets and, like Manning, should be held accountable for violating his promise. How our government chooses to defend us from threats goes back to the freedom vs. security debate which should be public. Could care less about the individual(s).
BornLooser
(106 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Lately, I've been seeing some of them actually refer to you, by name, in threads that you haven't even commented in.
I mean, your posts upset them greatly. And they could put you on ignore, but they don't. They could just trash your OPs, but they don't.
Its interesting to watch them rant and rave.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Has become a repetitive soup of links. Same subjective theme, over and over again.
I'm sure we all apreaciate debates, thats why were here. I remember the OP last year, I used to rec all her threads.
Now people don't respect her because instead of debating issues she just posts links. And lots of them. And same subject over and over again.
This is the truth.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Has become a repetitive soup of links. Same subjective theme, over and over again.
I'm sure we all apreaciate debates, thats why were here. I remember the OP last year, I used to rec all her threads.
Now people don't respect her because instead of debating issues she just posts links. And lots of them. And same subject over and over again.
This is the truth.
...it's your idea of the "truth." The truth is that if you're obsessing over me and referring to me in threads that have nothing to do with me, that's extremely creepy.
Another fact: The "blue links/blue linky" deflection has been going on for years, and I could not care less about the respect of people who resort to personal attacks and focus on links to try to derail a thread.
I mean, you're one of the last people who should be talking about respect: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=286706&sub=trans
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)When you post the same subject over and over again, and link to your posts, that's when its happening.
My 2 cents on Joe's post.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)most of those referring to Snowden, Greenwald, or the NSA would be gone.
And it doesn't explain having one DU member called out, by name, in threads that they have not participated in. I really don't recall ever seeing that here and its becoming more and more common.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)But there is a reason why people do it, IMHO. Not justified, as no one should be laughed at, but aparently that's what repeating the same thing over and over again results in.
If I may ad, posting links to someone transparency page is also a call out. Carachter assassination, or attempt to do that. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Take my post anyway you want, I'm only being honest.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)What I see on DU recently, is the same behavior that I saw of the right wing when Bush was President.
They yelled "Traitor" and "Terrorist Sympathizer" at those who dared to disagree with them.
On DU right now, one is call "Fascist" or "Totalitarian" for not being absolutely outraged about FISA and NSA. That's new.
Calling out DU members by name in threads that they are not participating in ... that's new.
Personally, I would not provide a link to some one else's transparency page. Even if they are public.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"If I may ad, posting links to someone transparency page is also a call out. Carachter assassination, or attempt to do that. Two wrongs don't make a right. "
...someone who jumps into threads to launch personal attacks complaining about "carachter (sic) assassination" and posting transparency pages. These are public, and only in instances of repeated hidden posts, primarily personal attacks.
If you're going to dish it out, don't be surprised when called on it.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)By all means, carry on. What's new.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)though you and a few others apparently believe it is.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)*sighs*
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)What exactly is your deal?
Marr
(20,317 posts)and you don't understand why some people might get a little suspicious?
I mean seriously, I don't think I could praise a funk band comprised of Jesus Christ, Superman, and Luke Skywalker for 102,000 consistent posts. There'd be at least a few hundred in there where I complained about *something*.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)The author of the OP has been a DU member for about 8 or 9 years.
And when they post an OP, they usually stay around and actually respond to many of those who engage the topic. Better than the hit and run OPs we see.
There are people here for longer who have very low post counts, they just lurk. I have over 16k posts, and I bet I don't have more than 100 OPs, if that. You are allowed to post as much as you want.
If people think this OP posts too much, they could ignore them, or trash their threads ... problem solved.
I certainly understand why some would be suspicious. Particularly those who *always* post with a negative spin against the WH. Their OPs outnumber those of Prosense by about 10 to 1 or so, and those at times have almost the exact same title and reference the same sources ... you'd almost think it was the same person using different names ... if you were the suspicious type I mean.
I can think of many DU members with high post counts who have never said a positive thing about the administration since the day it changed hands. I don't expect them to say anything positive about it for another 3+ years.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)That's even before being on DU. I have donated time and money to his campaign. And so have thousands of other DUers. Just cuz some of us criticize his decisions it doesnt mean we are against him. We simply disagree with him.
And that has nothing to do with the OP posting the same thing over and over again.
Don't you think those who have supported POTUS for years have a say in what's happening? This is a discussion board, not an echo chamber.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Please post a few of these names ytou refer to. I would like to see if you are making up stuff. n-th
"Nearly 102,000 posts on every political issue imagineable, *always* with positive spin for the WH, and you don't understand why some people might get a little suspicious?
I mean seriously, I don't think I could praise a funk band comprised of Jesus Christ, Superman, and Luke Skywalker for 102,000 consistent posts. There'd be at least a few hundred in there where I complained about *something*."
...is that what's bothering you? Being suspicious based on silly reasoning isn't justification for creepy obsession. It just isn't.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Have you EVER criticized President Obama? Ever even once? If so, can you link us to that post?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Have you EVER criticized President Obama? Ever even once? If so, can you link us to that post? "
...not a single time. Now what? Does that make the personal attacks and creepy obsession justified?
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Enough said.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)Very nice tactic. A lot of these folks use it. Eh.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Lmao!!
Marr
(20,317 posts)Obsession is what you're showing with the Snowden thing.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)like the Olive Garden spockperson casting asparagus and getting screwn.
Current DU amusement. Hits keep on coming.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)We like watching all the heads 'splode.
"Obsessed? You mean like 100 posts a day about Snowden? That type of obsessed?"
..."obsessed" like this: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022592785#post6
Here's a pro-Snowden thread: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023291580
You might like it better than this one.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)You may need it. A mental health break from this need to argue, perhaps?
Believe me, I like a good argument, too, but I keep seeing this over and over and I'm wondering why:
1) starting each retort/post by re-quoting what every other poster's just written
2) diminutive comments, recommending your threads be trashed, or others ignore you.
You trying to work this mojo for a reason? Because it sounds less like an argument, and more like you're pissed off. Believe me, this subject's gonna work itself out, regardless of how unraveled you become.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Do you remember that hilarious skit they did on Saturday Night Live a few years ago about that perfume?
That was a killer skit.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)I'm not sure why they keep coming back for more, but they look like damned fools.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)They mention her name in other threads all of the time.
They love to hate her.
Skinner should do something about it.
But, he never will.
And now we have shark jumping contests here every day!!!
flamingdem
(39,319 posts).. chomp!
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Might as well say ...
P2: OMG, so many blue links!!!
P3: I know, right, so tacky.
P2: But your blue links look pretty.
P1: Awe, thank you. (flips hair)
Enrique
(27,461 posts)I know I saw no point in doing so. By the same token, I imagine none of 48 people that recced it read it either.
Did the OP even read all the links? Doubtful.
TBF
(32,086 posts)Cha
(297,540 posts)trusty sidekick, greenfinger, strike again?!
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Maybe that's the plan.
He will be Elizabeth Hasselcrack's first interview when she pops up over there in September.
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)surveillance state. Their good buddy Dick Cheney has been one of Snowden's harshest critics. Snowden would not have a positive experience if he went on Fox and Friends.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Although Hasselcrack touted George Dubya from Day One right after she joined "The View", and said that she didn't care what anybody thought of her political opinions.
She would just love to talk to Snowden for causing President Obama some problems over the NSA program these days.
Mostly because she hates President Obama because she is a racist.
Hasselcrack supported McCain for President back in 2008 and repeated lies about Senator Obama during that campaign.
And she supported Mitt Romney for President last year, continuing her slide into a parallel universe.
It may not have been in her contract when she was at ABC to be a rightwing slug, but they don't have to worry about her credentials at Faux Snooze.
She has convinced many of us that she is truly a rightwing slug.
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)NSA spying and came up empty. However plenty in the GOP establishment have supported the spying programs including John Boehner who called Snowden a traitor and Rep. Peter King who also called him that. My theory is that since Fox News is so close to the GOP establishment they would most likely parrot the establishment's line on this topic.
You are correct that "Hasselcrack" supported McCain in 2008 and he has also come out in strong support of NSA spying and has declined to criticize the Obama Administration on that topic.
But since Snowden has not been on F&F and probably won't be all that either of us can do is speculate about what kind of treatment he would get there.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)And he is BFF with Snowden.
They didn't seem to mind Greenwald talking about the NSA program or tell him that he was wrong to talk about it.
When it comes to bashing President Obama, Faux Snooze is #1!!
I'm series.
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)But aside from FNC I am rather sensitive to the charge that opposing the NSA spy programs and supporting Snowden is tantamount to bashing Obama. That charge has been leveled against DU posters who have expressed opposition to the surveillance state and I think that's unfair. Of course there might be a few trolls and disruptors who are just trying to stir the pot. All Internet message boards have that. But most of us who oppose the surveillance state voted for Obama twice and generally support him on most issues. But the revelations about NSA spying are IMO bigger than politics and bigger than any one man including President Obama.
Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)I have already seen this thread a hundred times.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)well, I'm sure the totalitarians stand with you, too (or vise versa)
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Lame
TOTALITARIANZ!
Jake2413
(226 posts)How he chooses to deal with his situation is up to him. I for one do not want to surrender my personal freedoms for a little security. And if the government had been paying attention it could have prevented 9/11 with the tools it had.
unreadierLizard
(475 posts)Because obama says there's transparency!"
...Man. You gotta do some mental gymnastics to get that conclusion, anti-sense.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Well said
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)Thanks ProSense. Keep them blue links coming. They're kryptonite to the 'bring America to its knees' crowd.
Number23
(24,544 posts)this is where "DU is now" and this is all "because you have no credibility" and the folks jumping up and licking the faces of posters with blaring transparency pages who are insulting you and calling them their "new heroes" are all because you're just a big fat meany.
But the thing is, is that if you really DIDN'T have any credibility and and were just a "paid shill" the way the imbeciles around here think, then there would be NO REASON whatsoever for these blatant, incessant, and moronically stupid pile-ons and personal attacks.
So honey, wear all of this 4th grade stupidity as a badge of honor. You've got the dumbest, most thin-skinned people on this web site scared shitless and gaggling like hyenas jumping over themselves to attack you. If they were so convinced in the superiority of Ed Snowden, they couldn't give a fat flying fishstick what you said or how often you said it.
I personally couldn't be bothered but since you obviously have the stomach for it, do your thing.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)This thread looks like a 4th grade lunchroom food fight.
Thanks
uponit7771
(90,359 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Comedy gold. Just have a laugh and ignore them.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)I agree, they do look ridiculous.
boilerbabe
(2,214 posts)warrprayer
(4,734 posts)and he is above and beyond anything you or any of his detractors on here say about him.