Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cal04

(41,505 posts)
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 02:21 PM Jul 2013

Grayson, the Guardian, and the Soldiers: Defense Amendment Would End Troop Censorship

This is a story that hasn't been covered yet, as far as we know: Alan Grayson is fighting for the right of US troops in the Middle East to read any online news outlet they want - including the one that keeps breaking new stories about the NSA.

They’re fighting for freedom, but they can’t read the story that has captivated the world. At least, America’s troops in the Middle East can’t read about the NSA scandal on the British newspaper which broke the story, together with the Washington Post. The Obama Defense Department blocked troops’ access to the Guardian website on July 1.

(snip)
Rep. Alan Grayson has introduced an amendment to the upcoming Defense Appropriations Bill which is impressive in its economy of language. It reads in full: “None of the funds made available by this Act may be used to restrict the access of members of the Armed Forces to publically available online news media during morale, welfare, and recreation periods.”

We would expect Grayson’s amendment to enjoy bipartisan support. National security isn’t threatened by providing our troops with the same other Americans have – especially since they’re citizens and voters, as well as soldiers. Democrats should support Grayson’s amendment because it fits well with their pro-soldier and pro-freedom of speech rhetoric. Republicans should support it because it’s making a potential source of Administration criticism available to our fighting – and voting – men and women.

http://crooksandliars.com/richard-rj-eskow/grayson-guardian-and-soldiers-def?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

AMENDMENT TO H.R. 2397, AS REPORTED DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL
OFFERED BY MR. GRAYSON OF FLORIDA
http://amendments-rules.house.gov/amendments/GRAYSO_160_xml716131219251925.pdf

Another amendment I proposed bans the awarding of defense contracts to companies convicted of fraud or bribery.
I proposed an amendment to the Defense bill which would stop the NSA from spying on Americans.
https://twitter.com/AlanGrayson

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Grayson, the Guardian, and the Soldiers: Defense Amendment Would End Troop Censorship (Original Post) cal04 Jul 2013 OP
they can get rush, that's all the news they need lol nt msongs Jul 2013 #1
K&R. Let them read the news. jeez. nt limpyhobbler Jul 2013 #2
That second amendment would wipe out almost all the DoD contractors. haele Jul 2013 #3
Warren/Grayson 2016. nt Zorra Jul 2013 #4

haele

(12,673 posts)
3. That second amendment would wipe out almost all the DoD contractors.
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 07:14 PM
Jul 2013

Nice try. Won't happen.

As for the first, it's not in line with OPSEC and contaminates the military network that is often the only internet connection most troops OCONUS has access to. There is a real reason for this, even if it seems stupid because it's "a civilian news issue".

Rules are, you're not supposed to have classified material on an unclassified network no matter what the source of that information is, which pretty much limits the online reading of those troops.
On edit again -
However, he should make an amendment that they can't keep the troops from reading news on their personal 3-G/4-G devices so long as the military network is not used to transmit or receive that information.

Haele

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Grayson, the Guardian, an...