General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGrayson, the Guardian, and the Soldiers: Defense Amendment Would End Troop Censorship
This is a story that hasn't been covered yet, as far as we know: Alan Grayson is fighting for the right of US troops in the Middle East to read any online news outlet they want - including the one that keeps breaking new stories about the NSA.
Theyre fighting for freedom, but they cant read the story that has captivated the world. At least, Americas troops in the Middle East cant read about the NSA scandal on the British newspaper which broke the story, together with the Washington Post. The Obama Defense Department blocked troops access to the Guardian website on July 1.
(snip)
Rep. Alan Grayson has introduced an amendment to the upcoming Defense Appropriations Bill which is impressive in its economy of language. It reads in full: None of the funds made available by this Act may be used to restrict the access of members of the Armed Forces to publically available online news media during morale, welfare, and recreation periods.
We would expect Graysons amendment to enjoy bipartisan support. National security isnt threatened by providing our troops with the same other Americans have especially since theyre citizens and voters, as well as soldiers. Democrats should support Graysons amendment because it fits well with their pro-soldier and pro-freedom of speech rhetoric. Republicans should support it because its making a potential source of Administration criticism available to our fighting and voting men and women.
http://crooksandliars.com/richard-rj-eskow/grayson-guardian-and-soldiers-def?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
AMENDMENT TO H.R. 2397, AS REPORTED DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL
OFFERED BY MR. GRAYSON OF FLORIDA
http://amendments-rules.house.gov/amendments/GRAYSO_160_xml716131219251925.pdf
Another amendment I proposed bans the awarding of defense contracts to companies convicted of fraud or bribery.
I proposed an amendment to the Defense bill which would stop the NSA from spying on Americans.
https://twitter.com/AlanGrayson
msongs
(67,436 posts)limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)haele
(12,673 posts)Nice try. Won't happen.
As for the first, it's not in line with OPSEC and contaminates the military network that is often the only internet connection most troops OCONUS has access to. There is a real reason for this, even if it seems stupid because it's "a civilian news issue".
Rules are, you're not supposed to have classified material on an unclassified network no matter what the source of that information is, which pretty much limits the online reading of those troops.
On edit again -
However, he should make an amendment that they can't keep the troops from reading news on their personal 3-G/4-G devices so long as the military network is not used to transmit or receive that information.
Haele
Zorra
(27,670 posts)on