Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublican senators discover they got nothing in nuclear option 'deal'
There wasnt any deal. They got what they wanted. We basically rolled over, said Senator Richard C.
Shelby, Republican of Alabama. What changed is the Democrats threatened to change the rules, and they got the agreement without changing the rules.
Senate Republicans preserved the right to surrender in the future, Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, said on his Twitter feed.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/07/19/1224917/-Republican-senators-discover-they-got-nothing-in-nuclear-option-deal
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 774 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republican senators discover they got nothing in nuclear option 'deal' (Original Post)
kpete
Jul 2013
OP
Scuba
(53,475 posts)1. Well, the rules still haven't been changed, so a single R can still block anything and everything.
They got that.
LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)2. It's deja vu all over again
Although it is not provided for in the formal rules of the Senate, the threat of the nuclear option has played a key role in filibuster reform historically.[9] A series of votes in 1975 have been cited as a precedent, although some of these were reconsidered shortly thereafter.
The maneuver was brought to prominence in 2005 when Majority Leader Bill Frist (Republican of Tennessee) threatened its use to end Democratic-led filibusters of judicial nominees submitted by President George W. Bush. In response to this threat, Democrats threatened to shut down the Senate and prevent consideration of all routine and legislative Senate business. The ultimate confrontation was prevented by the Gang of 14, a group of seven Democratic and seven Republican Senators, all of whom agreed to oppose the nuclear option and oppose filibusters of judicial nominees, except in extraordinary circumstances.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_option
The maneuver was brought to prominence in 2005 when Majority Leader Bill Frist (Republican of Tennessee) threatened its use to end Democratic-led filibusters of judicial nominees submitted by President George W. Bush. In response to this threat, Democrats threatened to shut down the Senate and prevent consideration of all routine and legislative Senate business. The ultimate confrontation was prevented by the Gang of 14, a group of seven Democratic and seven Republican Senators, all of whom agreed to oppose the nuclear option and oppose filibusters of judicial nominees, except in extraordinary circumstances.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_option
This could be Karma.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)3. K & R