General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums‘You are so smart…why did you become a teacher?’
This was written by Carol Corbett Burris, principal of South Side High School in New York. She was named the 2010 New York State Outstanding Educator by the School Administrators Association of New York State. She is one of the co-authors of the principals letter against evaluating teachers by student test scores, which has been signed by nearly 1,400 New York principals.
By Carol Corbett Burris
The best part of my day is before the first bell rings. I get to spend time in the halls and cafeteria with our students. I have spent over two decades of my professional life among teenagers, and I must confess each year I enjoy them more. They have a perspective that is insightful and clear, and they are always on the watch for what is fair and what is not, especially when it comes to rules.
This past week, I read the evaluation deal between NYSUT (the New York teachers union) and the State Education Department. I was surprised, and I was angry. I was particularly struck by the lack of logic and fairness in the rules of the deal. And so to gain some perspective (and to lower my blood pressure) I went to the cafeteria at lunchtime and sat with some kids.
I bought some bags of chips and put them on the table and told them I wanted input on grading, a subject near and dear to their hearts. The first scenario I gave them was this
.
more . . . http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/you-are-so-smartwhy-did-you-become-a-teacher/2012/02/19/gIQA2vBNNR_blog.html#pagebreak
elleng
(131,191 posts)Attending X0 graduation anniversary in September, visiting classmates this summer.
Those were the days and that was the place, FINE public education!
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)Must be a good school.
elleng
(131,191 posts)and continues to receive 'outstanding' evaluations.
Our principal was pretty good, and teachers excellent. Fortunately they didn't have to go through the stuff of today.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)and support it. I am surprised you are quoting an administrator's union representative to critique a teacher's union settlement. From the new york times link in your OP the largest teacher's union in the state supported this.
I think that giving principals 4 options of competency levels is better than giving them merely 2. Granted, the principals may have to do more work. But I think that work is to the benefit of the students.
elleng
(131,191 posts)Didn't read the article, eh?
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)In NYC/NYS the principals and other administrators have a different union from the teachers.
If she isn't a union rep then why is her opinion on a union-brokered deal relevant?
On edit--granted,this is more work for this principal, but isn't that a good thing?
elleng
(131,191 posts)'I am describing the future one in which children lose great teachers. The reason the above band system is so flawed is because of the obsession of Albany with test scores.
Our states rule-makers wanted to design a system in which the teachers whose students scores are in the lowest ten percent could under no circumstances be anything other than ineffective. It created a ludicrous system where teachers who are effective across the board can be rated ineffective overall.
This was recognized by the August 2011 decision of Justice Michael Lynch, who wisely noted that the scoring ranges for the four categories were invalid, because the ranges did not allow the 60-point category to have meaningful impact in the final score. He noted also that these ranges would rate a teacher ineffective solely on the basis of student achievement. The judge understood what NYSUT and the State Education Department cannot test scores should never trump all. Yet in the agreement, NYSUT caved, condemning our schools to become joyless, test-prep factories.'
'This principal' does plenty of work, it appears.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)I've no doubt this principal is a good worker..just trying to understand what
in hell is wrong with better standards supported by the teacher's union?
.
elleng
(131,191 posts)because they are not properly measured.
Link is provided in the OP article, by Principal Burris: 'by the lack of logic'
Lengthy quote is from Principal Burris' article, and describes why the agreement is bad. Among other things, 'Our states rule-makers wanted to design a system in which the teachers whose students scores are in the lowest ten percent could under no circumstances be anything other than ineffective. It created a ludicrous system where teachers who are effective across the board can be rated ineffective overall.'
I have no idea why the teachers' union supported it.
ashling
(25,771 posts)Taylor Mali on "What Teachers Make"
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)And found out he went to college in KANSAS.
Really funny in person.