General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsInsufficient brake force blamed in derailment
Just 1.4 percent of U.S. rail traffic in the first half of this year was crude oil, according to the Association of American Railroads, an industry group. Pipelines and tankers remain by far the most important way to move crude. Railroads and trucks together supplied just 3 percent of the crude oil that arrived at refineries last year, according to the Energy Department.
And of all the hazardous material trains carry, crude isn't the most volatile or hazardous. Trains transport materials such as chlorine, phosphoric acid and propane even rocket fuel for the Space Shuttle was moved by train. Railroads also move three quarters of the nation's ethanol which is quicker to explode than crude from Midwest farms to fuel terminals around the country for blending into gasoline.
"Oil isn't scary at all," says Mayor Richard Gerbounka of Linden, N.J., home of Phillips 66's Bayway Refinery. Even if the mayor did think it was scary, he wouldn't be able to stop it local officials do not have the power to restrict rail traffic.
http://www.sunjournal.com/news/0001/11/30/insufficient-brake-force-blamed-derailment/1395923
The headline is misleading as there is very little new information about the Lac Megantic derailment in the article. Blame the editor, not me. There is a fair amount of information about moving oil by the rail industry and the economics and driving forces behind it, however.
Teamster Jeff
(1,598 posts)None of which you will hear in the media. Thanks
http://www.democraticunderground.com/11173222
bluedigger
(17,087 posts)Reducing labor costs is not always the answer, unless the only question is how to make more profit.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Of course, it would have to be standardized and mandated legally, since the cars are not owned by the railroads and move from one to another.
bluedigger
(17,087 posts)Wouldn't that just open them up to sabotage, similar to the fears of autos being subject to tampering? I think I prefer mechanical means and human redundancy on the crews.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Use the RF technology of your choice and an industrial control bus protocol instead.
But climbing onto each of a large fraction of a few dozen freight cars and manually spinning the brake wheel to set the brakes is a lot of work. It is a task that can be automated, instrumented, and checked remotely to ensure that it is properly done.
Leaving humans in the task means that it may not get done or done properly.