Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:23 PM Jul 2013

Say it with me sisters: thank the stars for federal judges

In state after state, federal judges have blocked abortion restrictions.

Judge temporarily blocks North Dakota’s six-week abortion ban, calling it ‘clearly unconstitutional’

A federal judge in North Dakota on Monday blocked the state’s law banning abortions as early as six weeks after fertilization, ruling the measure cannot take effect until the legal challenge it faces is resolved.

The preliminary injunction granted at the request of the Center for Reproductive Rights means the nation’s most restrictive abortion law–which would bar abortions as soon as the fetal heartbeat is detectable–will not take effect Aug. 1, as originally planned. it also suggests that even as states across the country enact measures limiting abortion access, some of these laws may never take effect because of stiff legal challenges.

U.S. District Judge Daniel L. Hovland’s ruling criticized the North Dakota measure in the harshest possible terms, calling it “clearly unconstitutional under an unbroken stream of United States Supreme Court authority.”

“The State has extended an invitation to an expensive court battle over a law restricting abortions that is a blatant violation of the constitutional guarantees afforded to all women,” Hovland wrote. “The United States Supreme Court has unequivocally said that no state may deprive a woman of the choice to terminate her pregnancy at a point prior to viability.”

<snip>

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/07/22/federal-judge-temporarily-blocks-strict-north-dakota-abortion-law-calling-it-clearly-unconstitutional/

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Say it with me sisters: thank the stars for federal judges (Original Post) cali Jul 2013 OP
Amen! sinkingfeeling Jul 2013 #1
Not a sister (so to speak). William769 Jul 2013 #2
you're a brother then. and I'm always happy to have men post cali Jul 2013 #4
My pleasure. William769 Jul 2013 #5
any time Chaco Dundee Jul 2013 #16
thanks. quite heartening. cali Jul 2013 #24
it's those few judges Chaco Dundee Jul 2013 #29
We appreciate it, too. Don't ever think we don't. IrishAyes Jul 2013 #34
well said Chaco Dundee Jul 2013 #37
I am very appreciative, even though SheilaT Jul 2013 #3
It's disgusting to me that they are trying to impose these restrictions under the guise of Arkansas Granny Jul 2013 #6
yeah, that's some maddening garbage. Whited sepulchers cali Jul 2013 #7
Yeah, that crap about "we're HELPING women!" calimary Jul 2013 #8
Not a sister, but Amen! nt stillwaiting Jul 2013 #9
Please don't be too confident in Federal judges. The presidents who appointed the Warren Court and AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2013 #10
When it comes to abortion, we have reason to be fairly confident cali Jul 2013 #11
Some have good sense. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2013 #27
The judge that blocked the ND law was appointed to the bench by GW Bush onenote Jul 2013 #21
Yes. I know that. Thanks. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2013 #26
These laws will produce dead woman and a spike in rainbow skin tones. toby jo Jul 2013 #12
Not A sister Mbrow Jul 2013 #13
Welcome and thank you much for cali Jul 2013 #19
Sister, yes! nolabear Jul 2013 #14
Yes, thank you to all the MEN HockeyMom Jul 2013 #15
good! drhobo Jul 2013 #17
Probably not. Oh there will be a temperory stay on at least cali Jul 2013 #22
Good to hear. I feel the same way LittleBlue Jul 2013 #18
k&r n/t RainDog Jul 2013 #20
Stars, Moon and Sun! Agony Jul 2013 #23
For now women have a reprieve. When the RW Skidmore Jul 2013 #25
Depends. Depends on the case- will it be about TRAP laws? which ones? cali Jul 2013 #28
Yet effin' RW state after effin' RW state tries to deprive a woman of the choice to terminate her indepat Jul 2013 #30
Some judges actually care about the constitution and women's rights. bravenak Jul 2013 #31
Thanks for your courageous and honest post. spooky3 Jul 2013 #35
Thank you. bravenak Jul 2013 #36
Yaaaaay for those judges! IrishAyes Jul 2013 #32
Thanking loudly!!! hamsterjill Jul 2013 #33
The Founders knew what they were doing and what the witch-burners are capable of. Coyotl Jul 2013 #38
the trouble is mopinko Jul 2013 #39
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
4. you're a brother then. and I'm always happy to have men post
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:39 PM
Jul 2013

in abortion rights threads. thank you!

Chaco Dundee

(334 posts)
16. any time
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:18 PM
Jul 2013

You ladys stand behind us when we need your support,so backing you up when you only ask for your rights is absolutely the first order.

Chaco Dundee

(334 posts)
29. it's those few judges
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:44 PM
Jul 2013

You are welcome.the few judges who are practicing law instead of controll and agendas is your best hope.but every man out there who has respect and decency is on your side.there will be better days.

IrishAyes

(6,151 posts)
34. We appreciate it, too. Don't ever think we don't.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 05:19 PM
Jul 2013

We all need each other, one big family of humankind. I'm glad you don't listen to the GOP knuckle draggers who I'm sure try to make a lot of men who support us feel disrespected by their own gender as not being masculine enough, perhaps even adding the scurrilous charge that we are man haters.

News Flash, Santorum and Company! We LOVE these ethical men, because they (you guys) are the enlightened ones we can respect.

Chaco Dundee

(334 posts)
37. well said
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 06:06 PM
Jul 2013

The only time I would question my own masculinity would be if or when I would not stand up for my equal friends of humankind.do not worry about the G.O.P. Or satanorum.they are afraid of their own shadow,but much more of you ladys,they might some day have to listen to you.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
3. I am very appreciative, even though
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:32 PM
Jul 2013

I'm well beyond the need for abortion access.

I also keep on wondering where the doctors are in all of this. I'm not assuming every doctor is willing to perform abortions, but every doctor who ever deals with women's health should be very aware of what these restrictions will actually mean in the end. Especially, and this is really the most crucial point, as the laws will shut down many other health services women need.

Arkansas Granny

(31,517 posts)
6. It's disgusting to me that they are trying to impose these restrictions under the guise of
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:46 PM
Jul 2013

"protecting a woman's health and safety" when, in reality, many women will die from lack of health services and screenings or from submitting to back alley abortions. All they really care about is appeasing the far right wing of their base so they can maintain enough votes to hold office.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
7. yeah, that's some maddening garbage. Whited sepulchers
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:50 PM
Jul 2013

one and all- to put it in xian religious terms that they might get.

calimary

(81,267 posts)
8. Yeah, that crap about "we're HELPING women!"
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 03:14 PM
Jul 2013

Yeah, thanks but no thanks! That kind of "help" we DON'T need.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
10. Please don't be too confident in Federal judges. The presidents who appointed the Warren Court and
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 03:31 PM
Jul 2013

the judges that existed during the Warren era are mostly gone.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
11. When it comes to abortion, we have reason to be fairly confident
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 03:44 PM
Jul 2013

with the exception of the 5th circuit court of appeals.

Federal judges have blocked numerous laws restricting abortion from Mississippi to North Dakota

onenote

(42,703 posts)
21. The judge that blocked the ND law was appointed to the bench by GW Bush
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:20 PM
Jul 2013

While we certainly can assume that all of his appointees will approach the law correctly, we can't assume that they won't either.

 

toby jo

(1,269 posts)
12. These laws will produce dead woman and a spike in rainbow skin tones.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 03:51 PM
Jul 2013

Keep waiting for this reality to hit the righties. Keep forgetting how slow they are.

Mbrow

(1,090 posts)
13. Not A sister
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:11 PM
Jul 2013

But I'm glad the courts are knocking this garbage down, my only worry is that once it's in the system they can appeal to the Supreme scum bags and have it found legal there. Can supreme court justices be removed? Or do they have to find criminal misconduct or something?

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
19. Welcome and thank you much for
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:20 PM
Jul 2013

standing with women.

Yes, Supreme Court Justices can be impeached under articles I and II of the Constitution, but it's only happened once: Samuel Chase in 1805.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
22. Probably not. Oh there will be a temperory stay on at least
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:21 PM
Jul 2013

part of it, but eventually it will go to the 5th circuit and they are not a good bet.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
18. Good to hear. I feel the same way
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:18 PM
Jul 2013

Not the first time I've thought, "Thank God for federal judges".

Bump to keep above this royal baby stuff

Agony

(2,605 posts)
23. Stars, Moon and Sun!
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:24 PM
Jul 2013

“For the last four decades, the U.S. Supreme Court has consistently recognized a woman’s right under the U.S. Constitution to make her own reproductive health care decisions, and we are confident that the courts will continue to affirm that fundamental right as this legal battle continues.”

I freaking hope so!

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
25. For now women have a reprieve. When the RW
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:30 PM
Jul 2013

zealots finally succeed in getting a core case shoved all the way to the Robert's SCOTUS, we may have to reevaluate those warm and fuzzy feelings.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
28. Depends. Depends on the case- will it be about TRAP laws? which ones?
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:39 PM
Jul 2013

a case with a 20 week ban? When could a case reach the SCOTUS? What case would it take? Lots of variables. The court is no differently constituted at this time as far as conservatives/liberals/swing vote than it was the last time Roe was upheld over 20 years ago, and there is no indication that Kennedy has markedly changed his opinion on Roe.

indepat

(20,899 posts)
30. Yet effin' RW state after effin' RW state tries to deprive a woman of the choice to terminate her
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:52 PM
Jul 2013

pregnancy at a point prior to viability. Why the people don't vote such m'fers out of office is an enigma wrapped in a mystery wrapped in a puzzle that must point to some mental delusion or infirmary?

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
31. Some judges actually care about the constitution and women's rights.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:54 PM
Jul 2013

This is good news. As someone gave birth to a child with a genetic disorder who subsequently died, I feel that women need to have that option available. Had there been a test available for Zellwegers syndrome I would have chosen to spare my child from suffering. I had a terrible time with feeling guilty for not having an abortion when it was suggested to me. I was all right to life at the time feeling so superior to those who had ended pregnancies. I was so stupid. I didn't understand.
Thankfully there were women fighting for my rights that I didn't want.

IrishAyes

(6,151 posts)
32. Yaaaaay for those judges!
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:58 PM
Jul 2013

I miss the one that got shot in Phoenix. They said he leaned left a little. At the very least he seemed to truly care about justice and dignity for everyone, so you know he wasn't any bleepin' conservative.

hamsterjill

(15,220 posts)
33. Thanking loudly!!!
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:58 PM
Jul 2013

I hope the one that was just passed in Texas will be blocked. Hope they are all blocked.

I am SO sick of the fanatics running this country. We need level heads to prevail.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
38. The Founders knew what they were doing and what the witch-burners are capable of.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 06:19 PM
Jul 2013

The war on women is not a new thing in Western culture, it is the norm! What changes is the tolerated extreme of behavior.

mopinko

(70,107 posts)
39. the trouble is
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 11:21 AM
Jul 2013

that is why these morans feel free to pass this shit. they know they are patently unconstitutional, so it is all bluster. it is all a game.
unfortunately, it is a game we must take seriously. (it is also a game that wastes a shit ton of money.)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Say it with me sisters: ...