That won't happen, but it should. He is a dangerous man.

"Scalia rejected arguments that the Constitution is a "living" document that evolves with societal progress".

So wouldn't that mean we should be using muskets for guns? I'm for that. That's what was being used when the 2nd Amendment was written.

in his 'original Constitution'?

Didn't he just say the voting rights act should be repealed because lawmakers can't be trusted to legislate correctly. He essentially defended his right to become a policymaker in that case.

He only says what suits him best at the time he says it. He is a static individual not a living one, you can use his past words against him

about the Holocaust, judicial activism is low on that list. The court system in Germany after 1936 or so was wholly a part of the Nazi Regime. It maintained virtually no independence. In any case, the Holocaust wasn't adjudicated in any court so I'm somewhat at a loss as to what he means precisely.


Even more idiotic is his saying he's a strict constructionalist. Does that mean he believes that the 3/5 compromise should still hold? No vote for women?

He's a poisonous asshole.

"Who in a democratic society should have the power to determine the government’s view of what natural law is?"

Hmm, I don't know, the Ayatollah perhaps, or the Mullahs?

Or Bush v. Gore, or the voting rights act, or any of the hundreds of truly horrible decisions he's made throughout the years.