Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 07:31 PM Jul 2013

Top US military officer: US military intervention in Syria would create "unintended consequences"

The time to protest and contact your representatives is NOW.

General Martin Dempsey, top military officer, warns senators that each option under consideration would be costly and uncertain
Spencer Ackerman in Washington

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/22/us-military-intervention-syria

The top US military officer warned senators on Monday that taking military action to stop the bloodshed in Syria was likely to escalate quickly and result in "unintended consequences", representing the most explicit uniformed opposition to deeper involvement in another war in the Middle East.

Alluding to the costly, bloody occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, said that once the US got involved militarily in Syria, where dictator Bashar al-Assad has slaughtered an estimated 90,000 people, "deeper involvement is hard to avoid".

"We have learned from the past 10 years, however, that it is not enough to simply alter the balance of military power without careful consideration of what is necessary in order to preserve a functioning state," Dempsey wrote to senators John McCain and Carl Levin on Monday. "We must anticipate and be prepared for the unintended consequences of our action."

Dempsey's letter came after McCain announced he would block the general's reappointment to chair the joint chiefs of staff, the most senior position in the US military, until Dempsey provided the Senate with his assessment of the merits of US military action in Syria.


7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Top US military officer: US military intervention in Syria would create "unintended consequences" (Original Post) Luminous Animal Jul 2013 OP
I think we can skip Syria Lurks Often Jul 2013 #1
No compelling national interest AnnieBW Jul 2013 #2
I'm told Syria and Iran are allies. Israel are pushing at Syria hoping to (finally) Fire Walk With Me Jul 2013 #3
Golly, General! You don't say? NuclearDem Jul 2013 #4
Wow General Dumb Shit got something right. L0oniX Jul 2013 #5
They won't listen. TPTB didn't listen to the warnings before Afghanistan and matthews Jul 2013 #6
A General with foresight. Imagine that. n/t cherokeeprogressive Jul 2013 #7
 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
3. I'm told Syria and Iran are allies. Israel are pushing at Syria hoping to (finally)
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 10:06 PM
Jul 2013

create the war they wish with Iran, no matter whom else is involved. Fuck the zionists.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
4. Golly, General! You don't say?
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 10:37 PM
Jul 2013

What history of arming Islamist rebels on the other side of the world might have finally led you to that conclusion?




 

matthews

(497 posts)
6. They won't listen. TPTB didn't listen to the warnings before Afghanistan and
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 11:49 PM
Jul 2013

they didn't listen to the warnings before Shock and Awe.

But they'll probably keep at it hoping to find one they can win. Or that will take us into Iran.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Top US military officer: ...