General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Convergence of the ‘Glenn Greenwald Left’ and the ‘Alex Jones Right’
http://thedailybanter.com/2013/07/the-convergence-of-the-glenn-greenwald-left-and-the-alex-jones-right/--- snip
Yes, the Summer of 13 has witnessed the inking of the merger between the Glenn Greenwald Left and the Alex Jones Right.
The paranoia and conspiracy-mongering is truly bizarre coming from the same crowd that loudly blasted President Obama for not including a single-payer system in his healthcare reform legislation. Single-payer, naturally, would be run by the federal government and so a government agency would have access to our medical histories and decide whether we could receive certain forms of medical treatment. Every sexually transmitted disease, every erectile dysfunction prescription and every colon X-ray would be gathered and processed by the government, and since the program would be financed via our tax returns the IRS would provide an investigative and potentially punitive aspect to it. If you dont pay your taxes, youre punished for it. In fact, I remember how we laughed at paranoid Republicans who insisted that the IRS would toss people in jail for not abiding the individual mandate.
But now weve discovered that the government is potentially gathering metadata from Facebook and this is suddenly cause for a collective nervous breakdown.
The government, they say, is sucking up millions of gigabytes every day, and sifting through your phone calls and your emails. Were led to believe that simply because NSA is collecting electronic data it automatically means that NSA is gathering your data and doing something with it. We dont know what, but its something creepy and sinister.
This is Alex Jones territory.
The truth of the matter is that NSA doesnt care nor does it have the capacity to spy on you. But theres an obvious tendency in the age of social media self-aggrandizement to believe that were each important enough for the government to care about what were saying online and then to perhaps use this information against us to either blackmail us, to wrongfully imprison us or to extrajudicially kill us.
And all of this began with a man, Snowden, whos nestled very close to the fringes of the political spectrum, so its no wonder weve arrived at this intersection. Working primarily in conjunction with Greenwald, this story was crafted to incite fear, outrage and paranoid delusions in people who were already predisposed to such reactions. This kind of manipulation is the centerpiece of Alex Jones strategy: take something thats hugely complicated and difficult for people to fully understand, then design the impression that its something more than it is. Repeat. Snowden also convinced people who ought to know better that the U.S. government might actually have him assassinated. Alex Jones also thinks the government is targeting him, Jones, for assassination. In Snowdens case, it was an idea that was legitimized by Greenwald and supplemented by none other than Snowdens presidential choice, Ron Paul, who said that such an assassination might take place using a predator drone.
Or maybe the government will think a drone is too obvious and go with chemtrails instead, while also distracting us with a false-flag operation planned by the Illuminati, Raytheon, IBM and Trilateral Commission. [more at link]
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I had this happen on FB last night!
What a coup.
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)flamingdem
(39,316 posts)The following article was cross-posted from the Raging Chicken Press
Along with Charles Johnson from Green Footballs and Jeff Gauvin, Bob Cesca from the Daily Banter has taken the torch leading the cultish island of denial regarding Glenn Greenwalds and the Guardians blockbuster NSA PRISM scoop. For the past few days, Cesca has taken to the twitter-vesre questioning Glenn Greenwalds journalistic integrity by publishing a blog with 9 points that try to discredit the original PRISM story. In his blog timeline, he wrote (more after the timeline):
5. Furthermore, Glenn Greenwald used the phrase direct access, as in unobstructed direct server access, four times in his article, most prominently in his lede, The National Security Agency has obtained direct access to the systems of Google, Facebook, Apple and other US internet giants, according to a top secret document obtained by the Guardian. Unless the tech companies were collectively lying, Greenwalds use of direct access is inaccurate. And if its inaccurate, the most alarming aspect of this NSA story is untrue.
On Twitter, Greenwald defended his reporting by reiterating that the NSA said within the PRISM document that there has been collection directly from the servers of these US service providers: Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook But this could mean that the data was drawn from the servers, vetted and handed over to the NSA per Googles stated process of legal vetting. And if the data was made available, its possible that the tech companies posted it on a server for the NSA analysts to download, just as you might download a file from work or a friend via Dropbox or an FTP server. Regardless, it seems as if Greenwalds entire story hinges on a semantic interpretation of the PRISM language. And his mistake was to leap from collection directly from servers to direct access.
As of Saturday, Greenwald, unlike the Washington Post, hadnt corrected or revised his reporting to reflect the new information, and, in fact, Greenwald continued to defend his reporting on Twitter. (Its worth noting how speculative Greenwalds article was. The following line was particularly leading: It also opens the possibility of communications made entirely within the US being collected without warrants. Theres no indication whatsoever that the government was gathering information without warrants.)
D23MIURG23
(2,850 posts)Hes never met a conspiracy theory he didnt like. Or basically never, anyway. Jones believes that a pan-global cabal of the super-rich, with its origins in a century-old cult called the Illuminati, is conspiring to exterminate most of the worlds population and enslave the rest. Among the tools of this so-called New World Order: mind control, water fluoridation, the global warming hoax, eugenics, the World Bank and the IMF, flu vaccines, FEMA, the Gates Foundation and psyscho-active drugs, both legal and illegal.
He believes the recent mass shootings in Aurora, Colorado, and Tucson, Arizona, were the work of perpetrators whod been programmed by the government as part of a plot to deprive Americans of their guns. He believes Sen. Paul Wellstone was killed by a microwave gun and dead before his plane crashed. He believes the federal government engineered the Oklahoma City bombing as a coded reminder of the way it had crushed the Branch Davidians in Waco a year earlier.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffbercovici/2013/01/09/who-is-alex-jones-anyway-five-fun-factoids/
A few choice Alex Jones quotes:
"666 is a doubling of 33. And 33 is pi"
"Nerds are the biggest danger in America."
"Devil worshiping pedophiles basically run the New World Order. They love death and they love killing babies."
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Alex_Jones
Yeah, I can see your point. The unwarranted use of the term "direct access" to describe NSA data harvesting is totally akin to believing that the world is being run by a secretive cabal of "devil worshipping pedophiles".
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)But maybe it will "sell".
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)This post received many recs so not sure why you're mad
Zorra
(27,670 posts)they have no serious plausible ideas to work with.
Their whole gig is an absurd propaganda smokescreen to deceive and confuse the public, and prevent democracy from taking root, so that the 1% can further consolidate authoritarian plutarchy.
In normal times, this post would be High Comedy.
An entire piece based on conjecture, speculation, and images from a paranoid imagination, used to fabricate a conspiracy composed of the two groups the individual hates the most.
Here, we get a peek into the workings of a fevered imagination:
A Conspiracy Theory attacking another imagined conspiracy of an alliance between imagined enemies.
At another time, the pure unintended irony would cause uncontrolled laughter and hilarity,
but these are not Normal Times.
Representative of most posts from this quarter (The Valueless Mushy Center),
this OP lacks documentation, references, support, logical development, and Tie-Back to foundation Policies or Party Ideals.
In other words, just One, Great Big Ad Hominem attack on groups the author doesn't like.
Allow me to rebut with my own:
[font size=3]CENTRISM!!!....because it is so EASY!
You don't have to STAND for ANYTHING,
And get to insult those who DO!
Andy823
(11,495 posts)I would not expect to see people on DU with a hero worship complex towards a Paulbot, Snowden, or a libertarian, Greenwald, but then again these aren't normal times!
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Ron Paul, or even Greenwald,
or is this just more paranoid fantasies from a fevered imagination?
Do you KNOW what "Hero Worship" is?
emulatorloo
(44,164 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/102353
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023123618
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022994058
Got other things to do but google will turn up a ton more for you.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)You are confused about the difference between Calling someone a "Hero",
and "Hero Worship."
Calling someone a "Hero" is not unusual or unhealthy.
Heros can be many things to many people,
but they have some general common characteristics.
They have usually given up something of Self (safety, time, sweat, dedication, and extreme cases their life) for the greater good of another individual or community.
Our Rural Volunteer Fire department is a wonderful example, and I have the privilege and honor of a close association with about 15 genuine "heroes".
Not very many people are willing to give up the comfort of a warm bed to answer a bell at 3:AM in the rain, and hustle a 40 year old pumper truck carrying 1,000 gallons of water through the rough back roads of these old mountains,
spend the next few hours working HARD to save other people's lives and property,
and then go off to work a full day, and ask NOTHING in return.
Special people ALL.
Heroes ALL.
...but I "worship" none of them.
Many of us here feel that Ed Snowden scarified a comfortable life to expose Secret Wrong doing, and is now suffering the wrath of the powerful people he embarrassed.
BY these standards, he qualifies for the "hero" status,
and I have seen him called that on DU,
...but THAT is a FAR cry from "Hero Worship".
NOW,
if you can point to a thread that insists that Ed Snowden is beyond all reproach or criticism of ANY kind,
and is now infallible on ANY topic,
and deserves a Special Group on DU where negative statements or criticisms of ANY kind are forbidden,
and Beefcake Photo Threads are posted for adoring fans,
THEN you would have a case for "Hero Worship".
See the difference?
No Charge.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)happened to the Occupy website. They were overrun by Paulbots to the point most of the people left of center gave up and left. It was also how Rand Paul won a senate seat in Kentucky. Alex Jones instructed Texans and others to move to Kentucky so to vote Ayn Rand Paul in.
agreed
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Keep pushing...
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)quoting the OP article:
The noticeable upswing in Alex Jones style anti-government paranoia on the left of all places has reached epidemic proportions, and if you havent been infected yet youre regarded as either an unthinking Obama administration automaton or youve fully embraced the worst Bush-era transgressions. Theres never been room for nuance with this crowd; its a pervasive intransigence that happens to be a feature of their paranoia. If youre not screeching about the conspiracy, youre clearly part of the conspiracy.
Response to flamingdem (Reply #37)
Post removed
gcomeau
(5,764 posts)Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)flamingdem
(39,316 posts)I didn't alert. Too bad you chose to agree with something judged as inappropriate.
randome
(34,845 posts)Why do you hate Mother Russia?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.[/center][/font][hr]
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)Olga! Glad for the excuse to dredge her up again
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.[/center][/font][hr]
Broward
(1,976 posts)and the Obama "Left."
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)A filthy virus.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:53 AM
Original message
Edited on Wed Feb-15-06 08:53 AM by ProSense
Bush is spying on Americans: opponents and activist groups. The law can't
be changed to make that legal. The Republicans are trying to pull a fast one with this "law change" tactic by framing the illegal spying as warrantless spying on terrorists; therefore, the law is being changed to give Bush the authority to spy on terrorist. Spying on Americans was, is and will still be illegal. Bush committed crimeS by illegal spying on Americans and breaking existing FISA laws.
I'm sure all criminals would love to have a law passed that retroactively absolves them of their crimes.
...and completing her full 360
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)The last sentence sums it up ...
Bush was bypassing the FISA court completely. That's no longer happening.
I'm curious about this new phenomenon on DU where folks call out other DU members who have not posted in that particular thread.
Perhaps you should send a PM to Prosense directly.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)It's all leeegal now, so I've heard. Legal, and still unconstitutional.
And I've posted it directly to Prosense multiple times; she refers me back to links that simply show that Obama was against in 2006 as well, same as her (surprise!). However, she has been asked at least a half dozen times what changed her mind -- then, she said no retroactive law could make it legal, but sings quite a different tune now. She hasn't deigned to answer.
It's pure, hypocritical, my party (or most likely person in this case) right or wrong bullshit.
gcomeau
(5,764 posts)...that the illegal taps being conducted under Bush simply ARE NOT HAPPEMING under Obama? They're not still happening and got "made legal"... they've STOPPED. The program being run through the FISA Courts on the other hand (which is a *completely different thing* has always been legal.
Do you or do you not follow that?
randome
(34,845 posts)Prepare thyself!
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.[/center][/font][hr]
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)have expanded the program, not stopped it?
Do you or do you not follow that?
gcomeau
(5,764 posts)...between scale and type.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)but with sufficient training,
that can be overcome.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)So was Obama at that time.
Just. Whoa!
They do have a similar tone, don't they?
Assinine OP, but I've come to expect that from this poster.
HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)to a democratic republic (emphasis lower-case 'd' and 'r'). That's the tell, for anyone paying attention.
SunSeeker
(51,646 posts)HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)to a party that would be happy to burn gays and lesbians at the stake (based on some Repubs with whom I've had the 'pleasure' of speaking).
SunSeeker
(51,646 posts)HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)Party over its homophobic stances. I guess his support has been skin deep. He probably had 'other priorities,' just like he did when it was time for him to serve in Vietnam.
You are giving that shitstain way too much credit, imho.
SunSeeker
(51,646 posts)The fact that Cheney has not departed the Republican party does not mean he does not believe in marriage equality.
Cheney can be for marriage equality AND a neocon chicken-hawk.
Saying that so-and-so is against Snowden or for Snowden does not add much to the discussion.
Pholus
(4,062 posts)We can be pissed at a body of secret laws AND be a Democrat.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)we should stick to their STAND on individual Policies and Issues,
and therefore,
ANYONE CAN agree with someone like Ron Paul's stand AGAINST the Failed War on Drugs without being fallaciously attacked as a "Paulite"!!!
[font size=3]
WOW!
What and EPIPHANY!
We SHOULD focus on ISSUES, and NOT Ad Hominem , Guilt by Association, and Kill the Messenger attacks!!![/font]
I absolutely AGREE!!,
but, unfortunately, the OP will not,
since his entire OP is one great big Ad Hominem attack.
Thank YOU for your support!!
I see you Recommended the OP,
you should go back and fix that now that you have has this wonderful epiphany!
SunSeeker
(51,646 posts)Nor is pointing out that they have veered into factless conspiracy theories an ad hominem attack.
Nor is pointing out the irony of calling for single payer while ascribing the worst motives to government an ad hominum attack.
And recommending a thread does not mean one agrees with everything in the blog cited in the OP, just that the thread is worth reading.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,347 posts)is an ad hominem attack.
"they have veered into factless conspiracy theories" - only in the minds of automatic government supporters unwilling to listen to anything not emanating from the official administration talking points. They have plenty of facts.
"the irony of calling for single payer while ascribing the worst motives to government" - if you think that people who work in healthcare have the same ethics as the CIA and military, then you do not understand humans.
SunSeeker
(51,646 posts)It pointed out that the Greenwald left and the Alex Jones right have converged on the same factless conspiracy theory.
And I do understand humans, and in particular government workers, quite well. They take their ethics cues from their leadership, no matter what department they're in.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,347 posts)Wow, that's so naive I can't believe I've seen it here.
The distance between Greenwald and Alex Jones is huge. Jones is a nutcase. They have in no way 'converged', and just because the dumb OP claims they have, it doesn't show it. Jones criticised Bush for invading Iraq. That didn't mean he 'converged' with Obama.
SunSeeker
(51,646 posts)But to say that the CIA, NSA and military are the same under Obama as they were under Bush is so wrong that "I can't believe I've seen it here," to use your lingo.
I agree, there are a lot of differences between Greenwald and Alex Jones. The OP does not suggest Greenwald and Jones agree on everything. But on this one conspircy allegation, they are in agreement.
bvar22
(39,909 posts).. is NOT wrong,
especially if the person provides a logical structure with references for support for his/her personal opinion.
However, manufacturing a fantasy conspiracy with NO support or logical foundation does NOT belong on a credible Discussion Board.
Pointing out that Cheney does indeed have a valid position of Gay Rights IS wonderful,
and attempts to discredit someone simply because they happen to agree with Cheney on his position of Gay Rights IS wrong.
So too, if someone happens to agree with Ron Paul in his position on the Failed Drug War, the expansion of our Military Empire, and protecting the 4th Amendment,
that does not make them a "Paulite", and labeling someone a "Paulite" because of this is also WRONG.
Simply because some on the Left happen to agree with Libertarians on some issues is not a valid basis for an attack,
and not the basis for a Conspiracy.
That is precisely WHY Ad Hominems, Attacking the Messenger, Guilt by Association, and Poisoning the Well ARE [font size=3]Logical Fallacies[/font],
and should be avoided by credible posters at DU.
[font size=3]The Entire OP is based on these Logical Fallacies[/font],
and that highlights your own hypocrisy and internal logical contradictions with bringing up the Dick Cheney example.
You can weasel & dodge, but you can't avoid the logical inconsistency of the situational ethics you have employed in THIS thread.
You can NOT have it both ways.
Cheers!
SunSeeker
(51,646 posts)It was HardTimes99 who made the ridiculous argument at post #72 that
"Anything that traitor Cheney supports is ipso facto anathema to a democratic republic (emphasis lower-case 'd' and 'r'). That's the tell, for anyone paying attention."
I pointed out that Cheney supports marriage equality to highlight the ridiculousness of HardTimes99's statement. Direct your guilt by association objections to HardTimes99.
The "entire OP" is not based on "logical fallacies," and making your font big or all caps does not improve your argument, nor does hyperbole.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)..but you DID point out that HardTimes99 position was hypocritical and invalid.
I merely returned the favor.
You can weasel and dodge,
but you can't have it BOTH ways,
and that is not MY fault.
It is a Law of Logic.
Are you familiar with the expression "Hoisted by his own Petard"?
Do you know what it means?
because now you DO know what it feels like.
No Charge.
SunSeeker
(51,646 posts)I was not being hypocritical. Where have I said that it is ok to argue guilt by association? You, on the other hand, feel compelled to defend HardTimes99 for doing just that.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)The Children's Version of the "Tu Quoque Logical Fallacy".
SWEET!
SunSeeker
(51,646 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)Bush with a vocabulary.
bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)@#$% Ron Paul and his claque.
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)I once got caught up in all of the anti-government paranoia until certain events snapped me out of it.
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)it in such a way that one has to question timing.
The German leaks timed with elections there. GG's book to be released leading up to elections in the Fall of 2014. It sure looks like they planned things for maximum input. At a minimum it's a lesson in how a cult can grab the headlines if they distort information enough.
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)because fuck it, book sales.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)There are some fine examples of it, immediately above.
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)and that's a fact.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Of course there's an element of coordination. How is that telling the rest of us anything we don't already know? What you and Bob and the others obsessed with proving a larger conspiracy have been unable to do is to get at the real personal motives of the principals that are driving this.
Labeling it as a "cult" is just casting aspersions. Get serious and tell us something that we don't know, if you want to retain credibility, and stop wasting our time with speculation and name-calling.
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)Russia gets a pass with the Snowden, Wikileaks crowd.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Same goes for China.
Russia was obviously a B-list destination for Snowden after the Chinese decided he was more of a liability than an asset. The Russians apparently have come to the same conclusion.
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)he gave the Chinese hacking data to ingratiate himself.
Then there's Assange with his tv show on RT and his buddy Israel Shamir.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)What is your point?
D23MIURG23
(2,850 posts)How would he have their secrets?
matthews
(497 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)was doing some of his best stuff back then.
BUT, then I grew a bit older and realized government is what we make it and allow it to be.
Cynicism is more about passively taking shots at the system. It's not about getting involved and changing things.
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)I have been a member of both the Libertarian Party and Socialist Party.
I once marched on DC in a Ron Paul gathering in 2008.
I have been one of the "both parties are the same" types and watched nothing but Occupy events on Ustream and Livestream for 6 months.
I know where people are coming from when they post things not based in reality. I've been in their mindset. And for some reason, that makes me have a very low tolerance for it.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)and the thin, rather unsubstantial creds you bring to the discussion.
I don't blame you, though. I have been watching politics closely since before you were born so how could you be expected to actually know anything beyond the narrow confines of your personal experience.
You were still in diapers during Papa Bush's war in Iraq and not even on this earth to see Reagan dismantle so much of what was good about America.
Nope, I don't blame you but I think you need a lot more than coffee to catch up on the long arc of American politics.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)But I take it you were trying to be serious, oh well have fun in your 'reality."
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)in my reality.
I hope the libertarian left has fun driving themselves crazy and making big stinks about nothing.
Response to AllINeedIsCoffee (Reply #142)
HangOnKids This message was self-deleted by its author.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)I'm glad you're comfortable being profiled "three hops out" from the 117,000 on the NSA terror list along with a billion other people as potential terrorists.
Personally, knowing that there are consequences to political labeling and mislabeling, not so much.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)Hopefully your thinking will mature as time goes on and you gain more experience.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)But that's how experience works. And I agree too- What you've seen and what you grew up in is a huge thing.
Imagine life before Reagan? I wish I could, but I grew up during his "revolution." I've heard it was better before then, but I wouldn't know what that would even look like. :/
Cha
(297,503 posts)the experience they need to make good judgment calls.
I can imagine a crash course in diversity has been invaluable.
Marr
(20,317 posts)But since you brought it up-- how are you so deeply involved?
freshwest
(53,661 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)The reporting has become LESS SPECIFIC not more specific.
Data mining is boring. Wiretapping sounds bad. Spying is far worse.
Forget that the details don't match up to the words used. The semantic games can be used to imply the worst. That's the entire point.
And the connection to medical records is important. Either we trust our government with such information, or we don't. We can't argue that we want the government to control health care and then also be terrified of the government that would run it.
I doubt that the goal is to get the disgruntled left to join the crazy right. More likely its an attempt to get them to give up on the government completely, and stay home. Fits nicely with the GOP's obstruction efforts. Shrink the electorate such that the crazy right wing is still large enough to matter.
For those on the left, if the government sucks, why vote at all. For the right, if the government sucks, vote GOP, because they hate the government too.
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)timed to match the release of Greenwald's book and the faux outrage he'll be pushing along with his comrades.
riqster
(13,986 posts)flamingdem
(39,316 posts)catches the outrageprone leftie-worm.
MADem
(135,425 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)The irony is lost on you, apparently.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)is willfully ignorant.
Number23
(24,544 posts)You are "encouraging people not to vote" by pointing out how ignorant/uninformed/deranged some of the criticism is around here.
You are "angering half this board" by posting a well received and informative article by an intelligent liberal that goes against the grain.
These folks are so used to living in their tiny echo chambers of political insignificance that they are actually becoming ENRAGED when someone points out this out. The anger is almost palpable. "How DARE you tell me that my skewed and absurd world view which I have taken great pains to cultivate by discarding every single bit of information that runs counter to it is WRONG or even worse, not even close to representing a sizable minority??!1"
It would be funny if it weren't so INCREDIBLY sad. Not to mention frightening and more than a little bit pitiful.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,237 posts)great white snark
(2,646 posts)Kudos to you for being the first to raise the medical records connection.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Connects the NSA "spying" to ObamaCare and medical records.
I've been pointing this out for a while.
You can't claim that the government is evil while also claiming that you want government run healthcare.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)D23MIURG23
(2,850 posts)The federal government is composed of different entities with different purposes and different people running them. I have allowed city inspectors and firefighters in my home with no warrant on several occasions, but I would not give the police the same treatment. The police would be in my house looking for evidence to incriminate me, whereas city inspectors are there to make sure my landlord's fire safety equipment is functioning properly.
The fire department of your city is not the police department. The VA of the federal government is not the CIA or the NSA. These entities are composed of different people with different missions. For more details consult a high school level civics class.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)lately.Extreme fear and paranoia rules both the far right and the far left.Personally,I don't take anyone who embraces this anti government extremist crap seriously,they are two sides of the same coin.
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)how this kind of poster really feels or if they're pushing a line.
Seems like one person's loopy statements trigger another so
my primary sense is that it's catching, like a virus!
LordGlenconner
(1,348 posts)flamingdem
(39,316 posts)from the cache. The poster deleted it, but it's delicious!
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)of security there .
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)What kind of funny hat? Did it have hidden cameras on it..
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Enjoy...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3317745
BTW, most DUers are still scratching their heads. We can't figure out what the OP's point is.
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)I just heard such a reference in this uber paranoid speech by Snowden enabler Jacob Appelbaum.
Let's hope it's a sense of humor thing by the Greenrandian crowd
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)I think some people post insane @#$% just to make this place look silly.
Somewhere a troll is laughing his/her goose off.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)I think it's a deliberate attempt to make this place look foolish.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)that the links they posted from Natural News were hidden.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)like that?
Cause even though I personally use some alternative/holistic medicines, I steer far away from the snake-oil and conspiracy theory crowd.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)They've gone right wing CT as of recent...
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)btw, what ever happened with that scoop about the Spanish ambassador naming the US as the source of the Morales plane rumor?
LOL!
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)that I didn't participate in those threads. Feeble.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)my post would be alerted and hidden and I don't get called for juries.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)I've had DU'ers send me proof I'm being alert trolled. Some of my totally innocuous posts are being alerted for no apparent reason.
If you don't think this kind of juvenile behavior is going on w/the alert system, please think again.
And I'm following through on this particular post to let other DU'ers know what is going on. Don't let anyone goad you into anything. No matter where you stand on any issue.
And, if don't believe me? Here's a cut and paste what someone sent me Saturday, it's an alert on my post:
At Sat Jul 20, 2013, 03:30 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
So start a thread about mass surveillance instead of calling DU'ers posting about Snowden a fool.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3298613
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
No comments added by alerter
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Jul 20, 2013, 03:43 AM, and the Jury voted 1-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said:
Why is this a problem?
Leave it.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Cali is more than a board nanny. Cali's debating "tactics" are often downright reprehensible. The OP itself is an implied insult, whether I agree or not. Even if Cali's intentions are noble, her execution is usually condescending and useless in a debate where the intent is to find common ground. Cali takes the easy road of alienating when the limits of communication skills are reached... Cali should watch Elizabeth Warren from yesterday... and learn.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Alert trolls suck
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No comments were provided. Leave it.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)of the "map reference" baiting double standard, despite the and the "who me?" nonsense.
Bullshit hides, IMO....
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)Surely you don't need to construct a loony conspiracy theory to explain why that might have been hidden.
matthews
(497 posts)I was wandering around the intertubes, looking for Liberal or Democratic sites, and just happened to land on this place at the right time on the right night. I joined a few nights later.
MADem
(135,425 posts)How DARE they provide security...just because a civil rights icon, a sitting member of Congress, a member of the CBC, happened to be attending the event to autograph a comic book, errr...graphic novel (I guess that's what the kids call it)... that he wrote about the movement?
Buncha Nazi-Stasi-Godwinners....GRRRRR!!!!!!! Fight the POWER!
Details: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/reliable-source/wp/2013/07/23/rep-john-lewis-makes-comic-con-debut-to-promote-graphic-novel-march/
Rep. John Lewis has been a lot of places and seen a lot of history in his 73 years. But the civil-rights icon had to admit that Comic-Con was something else altogether.
Its so different! he told us Monday. I have never witnessed anything like it. Hundreds of thousands of people dressed in so many different ways. They looked like people from another planet or from outer space.
You heard that right: The Georgia Democrat made his debut Saturday at Comic-Con the freewheeling conclave of pop-culture nerds who gather every summer in San Diego to gorge on the latest samplings of the sci-fi, superhero and fantasy arts.
Lewis, a 26-year veteran of the House, was there to promote his new literary venture, in stores next month. March is an account of his early years in the civil-rights movement as one of the original Freedom Riders, a speaker at the 1963 March on Washington and a chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee told in the form of a graphic novel: basically, a more sophisticated variation on a comic book......
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)You do know that ad hom is one of the classical logical fallacies, yes?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)See, the thing is most DU'ers agree on the NSA overreach and lack of oversight and waste of money.
Only a small percentage of DU'ers insist on freaking out over it and exaggerating claims and attacking anyone who isn't showing sufficient outrage.
Edit to add- you tend to be reasonable. I am not referring to you as someone who flies off the rails.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)It attempts to equate Democratic disdain for such policies with hyper extremist right wing kooks.
No amount of obfuscation or minimization changes that fact.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)markiv
(1,489 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)A common way for this fallacy to be perpetuated is one shared trait between two subjects is assumed to show equivalence, especially in order of magnitude, when equivalence is not necessarily the logical result. The pattern of the fallacy is often as such: If A is the set of c and d, and B is the set of d and e, then since they both contain d, A and B are equal. It should be noted though that d existing in both sets is not required, only a passing similarity is required to cause this fallacy to be able to be used.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence
PETRUS
(3,678 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)It's how they 'support' the president, apparently.
frylock
(34,825 posts)they'll just blame the left. it's win-win for them.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)Progressives who question the party away from DU...
But honestly we are stronger than that.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,237 posts)Even his "liberal" support has increased by 5 pts, from the 1st of the month till now. Liberal "Democrats" give him the highest marks, and their "support" increased a whopping 9 pts, from a month ago, to 90%. Real Democrats are smart, we know exactly what's happening with all the "scandal" bullshit. NSA, coming on the heels of all the other fake scandals seems to have had a rallying effect among the president's core "supporters". So, nobody here is changing anyone's mind. The psyops practiced here at DU don't seem to matter to Democrats in the real world.
ABC/WP: Poll of 1002 adults taken from 7/18/2013 to 7/21/2013
Approve 49%
Disapprove 44%
http://www.washingtonpost.com/page/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2013/07/23/National-Politics/Polling/release_253.xml?uuid=Dc60uvOHEeKB-o6Ds4ZMNg
Analysis: The ABC News/Washington Post survey has the highest marks for President Obama of any of the recent released polls, with positive five net approval rating. What may account for the higher rating, to some degree, is the sample that this pollster uses.
Gallup: Poll of 1500 adults taken from 7/19/2013 to 7/21/2013
Approve 48%
Disapprove 44%
http://www.gallup.com/poll/124922/Presidential-Approval-Center.aspx
I think your "hellbent on driving Democrats out of the party" hyperbole is just a bit of rhetorical flourish, much like the whole NSA non scandal.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)Both accusations have the intended effect of stopping debate and dismissing opinions of people you may not agree with.
Whenever I see someone write ad hominem I immediately roll my eyes and think of right wing radio from the 90's. It was a popular thing for winger radio hosts to say to try and stop a conversation when they were on the losing end.
Oh, I'm sorry. Perhaps this post is ad hominem.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)It is pointing out the fallacy of the position.
Person A makes claim, X
Person B attacks person A
Therefore X is false
By the way, you are using another fallacy, false equivalence.
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)Politicub
(12,165 posts)I agree completely with your reply.
D23MIURG23
(2,850 posts)Last edited Tue Jul 23, 2013, 06:47 PM - Edit history (1)
Its a logical fallacy if its a logical fallacy. It isn't the fault of "law school dropout keyboard warriors" that a significant number of people on this board don't know how to construct a cogent argument.
Marr
(20,317 posts)...that person isn't very sharp. I tend to ignore them.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)I thought the post was spot on. And it must have gotten under your skin enough to get you to post a slur.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Do you like ad hominems or not? They're "spot on" when used by someone with whom you agree, but "just rude" when used by anyone else? Even if it's in actual response to the ad hominem used by the party of the first part?
How... tidy.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)Which is rude by any measure. And you recognized that you were rude by saying something about how your post may get deleted because of what you wrote.
So any "mixed signals" that you're getting are your problem. Not mine.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Apparently your problem isn't with rudeness, it's with rudeness directed at people who say things you like. So long as the rudeness is directed at people with whom you disagree, you're not only fine with it, you'll anxiously cite it as "spot on".
So you'll have to forgive me if I find your sudden reverence for propriety so absurd.
D23MIURG23
(2,850 posts)Last edited Tue Jul 23, 2013, 06:50 PM - Edit history (1)
If they can't make a valid point then why shouldn't their argument be dismissed?
markpkessinger
(8,401 posts)Politicub
(12,165 posts)Because I've been around the Internet block for a LONG time, and I see people say something about ad hominem to stifle discussion more than to get a conversation back on track.
dogknob
(2,431 posts)FSogol
(45,514 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)You all are right - it is spreading, as fighting and name-calling breaks out right across the board along familiar lines. This one looks like it'll burn for a while.
markiv
(1,489 posts)not everything in a very complex world, fits neatly into either a square or round hole
the idea of 'outing' anyone who shares an idea with another group is ludacrous
heaven help us if David Duke ever put a weather object on his website, anyone who said it was 'partly cloudy' on a day his site said the same would be branded as klansmen by large numbers of very very very stupid people
Great analogy. Made me laugh.
treestar
(82,383 posts)flamingdem
(39,316 posts)If youre not screeching about the conspiracy, youre clearly part of the conspiracy.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Again, the irony is lost on you.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)I can think of only one "substance" that would be commensurate.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)You don't get anywhere in a debate by finding some word like "smear" for differing opinions.
Response to flamingdem (Original post)
whatchamacallit This message was self-deleted by its author.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Love the pic of Jones, too.
Sid
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)conflating a well known conspiracy theorist, Alex Jones, with Edward Snowden. Maybe something will stick?
But let's just accept that NSA is collecting data on U.S. citizens period. This statement is meant with sarcasm and a question. Is the collection, as you put it, sinister? Who really knows? All I know is there is a lot of scerecy involved in the warrant process which troubles me.
Pre-judging Snowden on his claims before any of us have seen the evidence is as pre-emptive as the reasoning was to go to war with Iraq.
Bottom line, I don't care what the government knows about me and they all ready know a lot. It's the fact they are going to extrordinary methods, building facilities world wide to collect data that is probably mostly useless and spending hundreds of millions doing it....for what? eom
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)I believe he's made a deal with them, information for escape from US law.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)an interesting twist to this story.
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)you want more?
Pray tell us why you believe he made a deal?
I think Putin allows his
presence to piss off the POTUS.....at least there's the 'evidence'
for this conjecture of disagreements of the President and Putin over
Syria and missile defense in eastern Europe. If anything, Snowden
could become a pawn.
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)Even Greenwald admitted he did it to ingratiate himself - google it
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)I know what was purported to have happened in China. You specifically asked for "hard core leaking about Russia."
Ingratiate? It's called survival plus had he said nothing you would have wanted him to leak something to prove he had anything. This is surreal. Bye.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,347 posts)Do you really want to make your argument look that pathetic? He is not a Russian agent. So he won't be leaking anything 'hard core' (god, that makes you sounds like a teenage music fan) about Russia. Your 'beliefs' are made up on the spot to try to say anything bad about the enemies of your preferred authority.
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,347 posts)How many more fucking stupid posts are you going to make?
D23MIURG23
(2,850 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)n/t
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Hello?
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)First person to link argument to Alex Jones loses.
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)JoeyT
(6,785 posts)"I think he's a traitor, Cheney said of Snowden in an interview with Fox News Sunday.
"I think he has committed crimes in effect by violating agreements given the position he had," he continued. "I think it's one of the worst occasions in my memory of somebody with access to classified information doing enormous damage to the national security interests of the United States."
"As everybody who's been associated with the program's said, if we had had this before 9/11, when there were two terrorists in San Diego -- two hijackers -- had been able to use that program, that capability, against that target, we might well have been able to prevent 9/11," Cheney said.
Cheney also raised questions about Snowden's decision to flee to Hong Kong, suggesting he may be sharing sensitive information with the Chinese government. He hinted that Snowden could even be a Chinese spy.
"I'm suspicious because he went to China. That's not a place where you would ordinarily want to go if you are interested in freedom, liberty and so forth," Cheney said. "It raises questions whether or not he had that kind of connection before he did this."
Almost indistinguishable from most of the OPs critical of Snowden on here. Be careful playing guilt by association. Our alleged associates are a little unhinged. Yours are mass murdering war criminals.
Still feel like linking and lacing?
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Somewhere along the line, the irony was lost by the OP. LOL
Marr
(20,317 posts)The silly pictures, the guilt by association, the obsessive attacks of both whistleblowers and everyone on the left... it's just tiresome.
Why not simply say that you don't care about policy or Constitutional rights, and are a loyal, determined supporter of a specific politician? That way, you won't need to explain your 180 degree flip when there's a Republican in the White House.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)he lives under a bridge...
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Purveyor
(29,876 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,317 posts)It's one thing always having a healthy skepticism of any large entity (be it government or corporate) and another to take the skepticism to the very extreme of speculation... and then denegrating anyone who doesn't see their made-up demons.
Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)I find it amusing that some on this board actually think they are persuading anyone at this point. This is especially true when the usual suspects continue to post such "in your face" bs as this OP. Simply flooding the zone with nonsense will not persuade thinking DU'ers I believe. Of course the "amen corner" will get all squishy pants about it, but for the rest it is most likely becoming quite tedious and boring.
Cheers!
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)accomplishes nothing but disruption.
HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)by a President Santorum or Cruz, come January 2017, whatever our beliefs and sentiments now.
Won't matter then whether you supported Obama or were critical of him. We will all perish together in the police state ushered in by the neo-fascists.
navarth
(5,927 posts)(on edit) I would also interject that none of these kind of posts seem to do any good at all. An intelligent person would surely see, sooner or later, that there was nothing constructive in these kind of writings.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)If I even vote at all.
Listening to this endless drivel and appologizing, the character assasinations, for what is a violation of basic 4th amendment rights, because OUR SIDE is doing it.
Makes me realize the left isn't really there.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)I find it hard to believe people on our side taking this stance, that so long as a D is in office everything is perfectly fine, just shut up and like it. Worse, it appears to be the mindset of many of our elected representatives as well.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,237 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)which they purport to "hate" because it's "propaganda" and "bullshit." The only thing keeping some of these people out is having hidden posts. But I have no doubt they'd still be posting if they could.
I mean, the phrase a hit dog will holler was TAILOR MADE for some of these people around here. They are nothing short of astonishing.
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)Ouch! I thought it was pretty run of the mill actually but maybe it's worth a second round.
I'll post it again tomorrow
Number23
(24,544 posts)Hell, not only should you post it again tomorrow, like I said, this should be pinned to the top of the Welcome and Help section. Because nobody, and I mean NOBODY has nailed GD like this article did. Which is why you've got so many burning calories coming in to this thread posting nasty and moronic comments over and over and over again as well as the low budget copy cat threads.
Well done, flamingdem.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,237 posts)kick the thread over & over to repeat what they've already concluded is "tedious". By the way, "tedious" is shorthand for "stop talking about it, cuz it's probably true".
bvar22
(39,909 posts)...so it doesn't make much difference.
I certainly don't recommend this site anymore.
DU was once a respected site for High Level Political Discussion with 10s of Thousands of readers, and good OPs could garner over 100,000 views and 1000 recs.
Sadly, this is no longer true.
The refugees from the Beavis & Butthead Chatroom at AoL have had an effect.
All of us are now just pissing in the wind on a ghost ship.
D23MIURG23
(2,850 posts)Thanks for that. The effect is unfortunately noticeable on this thread...
Hydra
(14,459 posts)And with Un-rec gone, I can skim and see where things are going.
If the Ministry of Truth Firefighters ever win, we will have lost something of great importance in favor of propaganda.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)It is extremely tiresome.
PSPS
(13,608 posts)Take a #5 and, while you're at it, work Alex Jones into it -- complete with a funny picture! Well, then, I guess domestic spying is OK then!!1!1
Worshiper/apologist Hit Parade:
1. This is nothing new
2. I have nothing to hide
3. What are you, a freeper?
4. But Obama is better than Christie/Romney/Bush/Hitler
5. Greenwald/Flaherty/Gillum/Apuzzo/Braun is a hack
6. We have red light cameras, so this is no big deal
7. Corporations have my data anyway
8. At least Obama is trying
9. This is just the media trying to take Obama down
10. It's a misunderstanding/you are confused
11. You're a racist
12. Nobody cares about this anyway / "unfounded fears"
13. I don't like Snowden, therefore we must disregard all of this
14. Other countries do it
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)Civilization2
(649 posts)Conspiracies are not just "theories", only in America does this silly tag have such meaningless weight.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)This is either severely ignorant, or blatant propaganda.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nt
great white snark
(2,646 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)And, like Medicare, any fraud investigation would NOT include personal information. Single payer means that the government is the insurer not the provider.
And currently, not paying ones taxes can result in criminal prosecution. Thus, if Medicare were expanded to cover all and personal and business contributions raised to pay for the system, those people and entities who don't pay the tax would be (just like now) subject to investigation, penalties and fines.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)See, your 'logic' works both ways!!
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)like Dick Cheney/George Bush and authoritarian left, too.
Alex Jones, nutty as he is isn't responsible for killing a few hundred thousand people. But yeah, y'all can go ahead and be proud of allying with war criminals if that's what floats your boat.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)Where's your six-year old post mocking them for having "hair-on-fire" and spreading "hyperbole?"
Does the NSA data mining "scandal" only deserve mockery when a Dem is President?
June 5, 2007
The Honorable David Walker
Comptroller General of the United States
Government Accountability Office
441 G Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20548
Dear Mr. Walker:
In August 2005, the Government Accountability Office issued a report on data mining
(GAO-05-866) that looked into the specific data mining initiatives of five federal agencies. The
report concluded that none of the five programs examined, including the Federal Bureau Of
Investigation's (FBI) Foreign Terrorist Tracking Task Force (FTTTF), complied with all relevant
federal laws and executive branch guidance. This included administrative, technical and
physical safeguards as mandated by the Privacy Act of 1974, guidance from the Office of
Management and Budget and federal information security standards set forth by the National
Institute of Standards and Technology as detailed in the Federal Information Security
Management Act of2002. Further, the Computer Security Act of 1987, details requirements to
establish security plans for Federal computer systems that contain sensitive information.
The Foreign Terrorist Tracking Task Force was established by the President in the
immediate aftermath of the September 11,2001, terrorist attacks as an interagency group under
the auspices ofthe Department ofJustice. Its original mission was to deny entry into the United
States by aliens suspected ofhaving ties to terrorist organizations and to locate, detain,
prosecute, or deport such aliens already present in the United States.
But documents now indicate that the FTTTF is expanding its mission to encompass the
"detection, identification, and tracking of individuals or entities that pose threats to the United
States and its interests through the use of advanced analytical techniques, technologies, and data
resources." This mission will be accomplished through the use of bulk data analysis, pattern
analysis, trend analysis and other programs, according to Justice Department budget documents
reviewed by the Subcommittee. "The FBI's efforts to define predictive models and patterns of
behavior will improve efforts to identify "sleeper cells," the documents suggest. The centerpiece
ofthis greatly enhanced effort will be a newly proposed National Security Branch Analysis
Center (NSAC).
The FBI is seeking $12 million for the center in FY2008, which will include 90,000
square feet of office space and a total of 59 staff, including 23 contractors and five FBI agents.
Documents predict the NSAC will include six billion records by FY2012. This amounts to 20
separate "records" for each man, woman and child in the United States. The ''universe of
subjects will expand exponentially" with the expanded role ofthe NSAC, the Justice Department
documents assert.
The expanded and sweeping scope ofthe NSAC bears a striking resemblance to the
Defense Advanced Research Project Agency's Total Information Awareness program which
Congress terminated funding for in 2003 because of privacy and other concerns. Sharing critical
information that can help law enforcement officer' s track down known terrorists is
extraordinarily important and needs to be improved. But the NSAC proposes to do much more
than simply track down known terrorist suspects. Eleven of its proposed 59 staff will constitute
a Proactive Data Exploitation unit - tasked with ferreting out "patterns" of suspicious behavior in
the data the center collects. "The NSAC will leverage existing data mining tools to help identify
relationships between individuals, locations, and events that may be indicators of terrorist or
other activities ofinterest," according to the Justice Department budget documents
Data mining experts outside of government see great potential for abuse in this sort of
proposal. Jeff Jonas, a world renowned data mining expert and IBM Distinguished Engineer,
recently co-authored a critical review of "predictive" counterterrorism data mining efforts for the
Cato Institute. "It would be unfortunate if data mining for terrorism discovery had currency
within national security, law enforcement, and technology circles," wrote Jonas, "because
pursuing this use of data mining would waste taxpayer dollars, needlessly infringe on privacy
and civil liberties, and misdirect the valuable time and energy ofthe men and women in the
national security community." Jonas supports other non-predictive or "pattern analysis" data
mining efforts that permit law enforcement agencies to "efficiently locate, access, and aggregate
information about specific suspects," he writes. But he does not believe data mining is suited to
discovering unknown terrorists as a result of culling through massive mounds of data that contain
"patterns" of individual behavior. Jonas argues that with an extraordinarily limited pool of
known terrorist patterns of behavior a hunt for terrorists in this way would inevitably "flood the
national security system with false positives - suspects who are truly innocent." In addition,
argues Jonas, collocating massive amounts of data in a central repository poses significant
logistical and security challenges and may invite misuse of the information.
Given the scope ofthe NSAC endeavor, Congress has a duty to understand fully what
information will be contained in the "records" it collects, whether the "records" of U.S. citizens
will be included in its database, how this data will be employed and how the FBI plans to ensure
that the data is not misused or abused in any way. A critical question is how the FBI will ensure
that the records it obtains from other agencies is accurate, valid and complies with federal legal
guidelines and policies. The FTTTF, for instance, shares "innovative technology" with the
Defense Department's Counterintelligence Field Activity (CIFA) and the proposed NSAC will
presumably maintain or expand on this relationship. This is of particular concern given the fact
that the Defense Department has acknowledged that CIFA was compiling data in one ofits
databases on non-violent war protestors and civil rights activists in violation of DOD's own
policies. The Bureau needs to beware that it does not repeat the mistakes of other agencies.
Even with those assurances the agency may have difficulty developing and operating the NSAC.
The FBI has historically been unable to develop information systems in a reliable, cost
effective and technically proficient manner. In 2005, after investing $170 million, the agency
cancelled its Virtual Case File computerized records management system because oftechnical
troubles. Sentinel, the replacement for this system, is now reportedly running behind schedule.
Most troubling, last year it was revealed that a FBI-computer consultant managed to hack into
the FBI's classified computer system, gaining access to records on counterespionage and the
Witness Protection Program, as well as the passwords of 38,000 employees, including FBI
Director Robert S. Mueller III.
In March 2007, the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General issued a report
on the FBI's use of National Security Letters. That report found that the Bureau had demanded
personal data without proper authorization, improperly obtained personal telephone and banking
records and underreported to Congress how often it used national security letters to obtain
information on thousands of U.S. citizens and legal residents. Inspector General Glen Fine said
that he found 48 separate violations oflaw in the use of national security letters that resulted in
as many as 3,000 violations among more than 143,000 requests for information between 2003
and 2005.
These examples lead the Subcommittee to question whether the NSAC design,
development and implementation is incorporating the lessons learned by the Bureau from
previous systems. Are the safeguards required for such systems in place within the NSAC's
database? We request a review ofthe NSAC to address the following questions:
1. What is the specific role and purpose ofthe NSAC and what requirements in the
center's mission explain the size and scope of this planned database?
2. What types of "records" will be incorporated into the database, from which agencies
or commercial enterprises will they be obtained and will any other entities be granted
access to the database and under what restrictions?
3. Will the NSAC include any records on U.S. citizens and what provisions are in place
to guarantee that any records collected or accessed are consistent with existing law,
regulation, policy or other agency guidance?
4. How does the center intend to exploit the data it collects by utilizing specific
analytical tools - including "pattern recognition," "predictive data mining," "social
network analysis," and related software programs?
Please have your staff contact Douglas Pasternak, Subcommittee professional staffmember
at (202) 226-8892, Bart Forsyth, Counsel to Rep. Sensenbrenner at (202) 225-6371 or Dan
Pearson, Subcommittee staff director at (202) 225-4494 to discuss this request further.
Your assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
BRAD MILLER
Chairman
Subcommittee on
Investigations & Oversight
JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR.
Ranking Member
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Article has a point.
BumRushDaShow
(129,317 posts)infinite loops, divide by 0s, and so forth.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)The single payer part is downright silly.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,237 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)they already hate the guy they can blame it (whatever wacky thing "it" is) on. Thus, the conspiracy theorists in the "Obama-can-do-no-right" crowd on the left easily merge with the CTists in the "we-hate-Obama-because-he's-black crowd" on the right. OK, that's pretty much the whole right.
That's just my opinion from what I've observed. Plus, people seem to have all sorts of fun with CTs. They're like fish stories. Now we have people with cameras taking pictures of other people with cameras and posting them, claiming the other people are from the government and they're up to no good. Spying on people.
So, I guess the moral of the story is do not take your camera to a big event to take pictures of the event. Because some DU person will take pictures of you and post them and accuse you of being a spy. Hell, who needs big brother when we've got our own little police force right on DU, deciding who's who and what they're doing and exposing them to the world? In the name of privacy.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)IT's true, it's true true true!!
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Conspiracy theorists who've found common ground. Extreme aversion to President Obama and love of woo.
Most liberals don't fall into that category at all. Thank goodness.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)foul and bigoted they were presented on a platform of lies. Cesca claimed DOMA was no longer the law of the land years ago and blasted Choi for asking for rights he claimed we already had.
I don't trust a single word written by Cesca. This sort of extreme McCarthite tripe certainly does not vindicate him but rather echos his history of malicious character attacks.
He went after Dan Choi for helping change the world. Fuck him.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)Iraq War and that Saddam was not developing weapons of mass destruction to use to attack America. The same kooks have not learned their lesson one little bit. They attack President Bush then. They are attacking President Obama today. As they say, "haters are going to hate!!"
Here is a perfect example of two conspiracy theory nuts who were causing trouble for President Bush back then - they are causing trouble for President Obama today --- Conspiracy nuts are going to make up their nonsense just as assuredly as haters a going to hate!,
The NSA's metastasised intelligence-industrial complex is ripe for abuse
Where oversight and accountability have failed, Snowden's leaks have opened up a vital public debate on our rights and privacy
by Valerie Plame Wilson and Joe Wilson
guardian.co.uk, Sunday 23 June 2013 13.00 BST
Let's be absolutely clear about the news that the NSA collects massive amounts of information on US citizens from emails, to telephone calls, to videos, under the Prism program and other Fisa court orders: this story has nothing to do with Edward Snowden. As interesting as his flight to Hong Kong might be, the pole-dancing girlfriend, and interviews from undisclosed locations, his fate is just a sideshow to the essential issues of national security versus constitutional guarantees of privacy, which his disclosures have surfaced in sharp relief.
Snowden will be hunted relentlessly and, when finally found, with glee, brought back to the US in handcuffs and severely punished. (If Private Bradley Manning's obscene conditions while incarcerated are any indication, it won't be pleasant for Snowden either, even while awaiting trial.) Snowden has already been the object of scorn and derision from the Washington establishment and mainstream media, but, once again, the focus is misplaced on the transiently shiny object. The relevant issue should be: what exactly is the US government doing in the people's name to "keep us safe" from terrorists?
We are now dealing with a vast intelligence-industrial complex that is largely unaccountable to its citizens. This alarming, unchecked growth of the intelligence sector and the increasingly heavy reliance on subcontractors to carry out core intelligence tasks now estimated to account for approximately 60% of the intelligence budget have intensified since the 9/11 attacks and what was, arguably, our regrettable over-reaction to them.
Today, the intelligence sector is so immense that no one person can manage, or even comprehend, its reach. When an operation in the field goes south, who would we prefer to try and correct the damage: a government employee whose loyalty belongs to his country (despite a modest salary), or the subcontractor who wants to ensure that his much fatter paycheck keeps coming? - Valerie Plame Wilson and Joe Wilson
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jun/23/nsa-intelligence-industrial-complex-abuse
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)and particularly the not too bright -- starting with the IRS/single-payer angle. When and if we find some cause to make the trade off with our personal communications we'll be making with our medical histories -- putting that info directly in the gov's hands -- let us know. It's also kinda difficult to understand what it is about ones medical history that is likely shared with family and friends anyway, that is even remotely comparable to the secrets we may want to keep from them or others that our travels or communications may show. ANd then there is of course the goals of the two programs that share privacy/secrecy elements (and that's about it) in common which is to provide health care/quality of life and to collect a huge and all but useless for catching terrorists haystack of data respectively. Look up "false comparison". We already give up all kinds of info to the tax man, and particularly if one itemizes their deductions, no? How any of that becomes "just like" the NSA spying, etc stuff is the only leap into lunacy being made here, particularly given the likely illegal/unconstitutional nature of the info acquisitions.
And sure, it's only "Facebook" data collection that has so many up in arms.
ANd then of course there's the "ending", where poor little Bobalouie convinces the gullible, etc, that this NSA, etc, stuff is something hugely complicated that seemingly only those gifted with brain power far beyond that of the common man can grasp. ANd the adoring readers of that tripe are perfectly willing to endure that insult of their intelligence (as well as to those targeted with the GG/Lefty designation who are just putty in GG"s hands) because it lays the foundation for the nefarious but by no means complicated plan to sow irrational dissent, and no doubt in an effort to sway voters of the lefty persuasion so as to lose elections, hatched by GG and Snowden, at the behest and backing of some as yet undisclosed dark political forces. Imagine that, someone charging the use of baseless conspiracy theories in the course of promoting one of their own.
If anybody is being a conspiracy "kook", it's Bobalouie with his projections and portrayal of those concerned with the issue, which at this point, which must pointed out to the gullible, etc, includes a great many in DC with the power to address the issue right now, despite apparently lacking the brains to understand such a "complicated" issue. THey must also be political masochists, because their opposition to it would appear to be leading to their own political demise based on the predictable outcome of the fruition of the nefarious plan hatched by GG and Snowden.
I don't think the issues are that complicated, and that this is really nothing more than a not so fine propaganda piece by Bobalouie directed at the easily manipulated and who are still enthralled with their messiah.
Having the political acumen and real world foresight of an earthworm is not something rightwingers have a monopoly on these days.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)The left is afraid that government surveillance will be used against them if they are forced by desperation to covertly organize a mass revolutionary anarcho-syndicalist takeover of the means of production and the wealth of the 1%.
The right is afraid that government surveillance will be used against them as they are forced by waning liberties to covertly organize to make their last stand for personal independence in small groups clustered around their bunkers filled with rice, beans, and 5.56 mm ammunition.
Meanwhile, both are worried that the government will find out about their marijuana plants (left) and meth labs(right).
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)though the left is more into solar energy - get off the grid - and less into bunkers!
Your first point is relevant to the Wikileaks cult.
Just listening to this paranoid talk:
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)The right and left rebelliousness against authoritarian and class based government may be the ignored elephants in the room. But they do fuel right and left conspiracy theories and paranoia.
The wider discomfort comes from the fact that most people are chiselers most of the time.
I rarely drive anywhere but that I break one or more laws -- usually the one about going more than 25 on a 25 mph street. If the government had all my GPS data, I couldn't afford the tickets.
So society is based on hypocrisy -- people buy into all sorts of things that they don't actually do. Cheating on your spouse or your income tax is agreed to be bad, but people do it. People ordinarily commit lots of crimes, usually petty, and commit lots of sins, usually venal. Other parts of society may agree that something is not a crime (smoking a joint) or a sin (getting obese, aka gluttony). But everyone is fearful that if they are found out some group, organization, or governmental body will extract some penalty that they are unwilling to pay.
So people want all their stuff to be kept private, lest they be found out.
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)if anyone wants to get over their authoritarian paranoia in the USA, just visit Cuba.
As much as I love the people and island it's a real, though underfunded, authoritarian state.
Upon return one will see the USA as a paradise in relative terms.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Laws limiting people's behavior should be only those that 90% or more of the population agrees with.
Moral and ethical standards should provide for the widest latitude of personal freedom and be arrived at by civil society as a whole, rather than based on religious dogmas.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Leftists are afraid of government surveillance because we all know they just want a socialist revolution to set the 1% straight.
I mean, sure, the FBI might have a history of surveillance, intimidating, and maintaining blackmail files on civil rights leaders, peace activists, draft dodgers, Occupy protestors, left-leaning media outlets, and the ACLU, and the American justice system has made a habit of jailing and suppressing democratic socialists and anti-war advocates. But we know they were all plotting overthrows of capitalism and the US government to institute their socialist-commie wealth redistribution.
As one great Alex Jones fan once said:
Down with the bourgeoisie! FEMA camps harble garble
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)Just who do you think the Democratic Party is supposed to appeal to? The tiny slice of people who don't identify with anything until election day arrives? Here's a hint: the Republican Party appeals to the right.
eissa
(4,238 posts)Teabaggerville. I have a dear friend who now lives in that creepy town. Extremely progressive, but now spouts conspiracy theories that would make Glenn Beck proud. Point it out to her and she turns absolutely rabid and says I've been "brainwashed by MSNBC." I miss her
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)Now anyone who identifies as a Democrat can expect to be attacked by this group. Distressing! I stay away from the Snowden topic with a lot of people now because they'll start spouting garbage.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)Very funny!
Cheers!
Cha
(297,503 posts)don't talk about politics. We tried that.. didn''t work. but, I still get her massive conspiracy emails right before I delete them.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)The left is larger than GG; it existed before, and will exist after.
While I'm generally supportive of GG, I don't like the framing of the left as "The Greenwald Left."
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)but that group is being sucked into the Greenwald vortex. I agree it's certainly not the left as a whole.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)a "framing" of the left to move forward anti-left propaganda. Many on the left may support GG. The left, though, is not about a person, it's about issues. When one person backs some of those issues, we can appreciate it, but we aren't GG.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,237 posts)Actually, the president's numbers have improved with his base since the NSA "scandal". 90% from Liberal Democrats which represents a 9 pt jump from a month ago; +5% for all Liberals; and 84% for all Democrats, up from 81% a month ago. So, this is why the "subsection" is enraged, they can't make people hate Obama enough.
ABC/WP: Poll of 1002 adults taken from 7/18/2013 to 7/21/2013
Approve 49%
Disapprove 44%
http://www.washingtonpost.com/page/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2013/07/23/National-Politics/Polling/release_253.xml?uuid=Dc60uvOHEeKB-o6Ds4ZMNg
Analysis: The ABC News/Washington Post survey has the highest marks for President Obama of any of the recent released polls, with positive five net approval rating. What may account for the higher rating, to some degree, is the sample that this pollster uses.
Gallup: Poll of 1500 adults taken from 7/19/2013 to 7/21/2013
Approve 48%
Disapprove 44%
http://www.gallup.com/poll/124922/Presidential-Approval-Center.aspx
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)Obama had in the polls, funny that! No link for that though.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,237 posts)They can't get him below 40%, and it pisses off all the right people, which is an added benefit.
great white snark
(2,646 posts)The fringe has minimal influence.
On a side note...thanks for sticking around my friend.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,237 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,347 posts)But you say: "Latin America is but a cyst on the anus of the world. "
And you're here ...
Tarheel_Dem
(31,237 posts)phonies. Every asshat, from any part of the world, can dump on the US, and you guys get a tingle up the leg. I have no respect for any part of the world that disses my president. Fuck Latin America! Fuck Mother Russia! Fuck Hong Kong! and it's fucked up, conspiracy pushing leaders. You know the CIA gave Chavez cancer, right?
Fuck 'Em. You can't stand that Democrats and Liberals don't hate the president, can you?
muriel_volestrangler
(101,347 posts)You don't belong on DU.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,237 posts)Puglover
(16,380 posts)Nor does his little posse of admirers that contribute nothing but divisive crap to this site.
I live in Ecuador and I love my adopted country and the people in it. I have been a Democrat for 41 years and I have never seen obscene garbage like this come out of ANY Democrats mouth. Except from posters like this.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)I'll be danged!
last1standing
(11,709 posts)You do Obama and the Democratic Party no favors posting this trash. It only serves to alienate good Democrats.
I've been thinking lately about the apparent glee a few posters take in smearing progressives with hateful comments and lies. It's not a good character trait and makes the person you think you're defending look small and bitter through your actions.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Repeating over and over that two diametrically opposed things are just alike doesn't have the tendency to make the claim any more true or any less ridiculous. If you want to push propaganda for dumbfucks, you'll need to find some dumbfucks who will be receptive to such amateurish claims.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)You know, if you go to the bottom of the OP,
and push that little button that says "Thread Info",
you can even see WHO they are.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)I actually forgot to rec this, thanks for reminding me.
Of course you also know that when ever a "we worship Snowden" thread is started we can also see just who his groupies are too!
bvar22
(39,909 posts)I would like to see that.
or are you just making stuff up again,
like this OP?
Marr
(20,317 posts)There's a small, dedicated group of people here who can always be counted on to help push messages like this one, never offering anything but snark and sophistry.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Nailed It.
SunSeeker
(51,646 posts)D23MIURG23
(2,850 posts)Never mind the fourth amendment. Never mind that when you say the government might "use this information against us to either blackmail us, to wrongfully imprison us or to extrajudicially kill us" you are talking about activities that have been reported by major news sources (Alex Jones is really just a red herring meant to discredit legitimate concern) outside the context of this particular incident. Whether or not we are interesting to the government right now is not the point. If any of us (and by that I mean everyone in the damn country) manages to become interesting to the NSA, for any reason, they'll have lots of material on us already at their finger tips. Google J. Edgar Hoover if you are curious about what that can look like in practice.
My favorite part of the whole piece is this:
"The paranoia and conspiracy-mongering is truly bizarre coming from the same crowd that loudly blasted President Obama for not including a single-payer system in his healthcare reform legislation. Single-payer, naturally, would be run by the federal government and so a government agency would have access to our medical histories and decide whether we could receive certain forms of medical treatment."
As if the FDA or medicare or some other agency focused on health care administration having access to my health records is the same thing as having the National Security Agency recording everything I look at on the internet. Next you'll be arguing that I should let uniformed police officers search my apartment without a warrant, simply because I routinely do the same for city inspectors assessing fire code compliance.
Flamingdem, don't tell me I'm "paranoid about vegetables" just because I'd prefer not to put poison ivy on my salad.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)and given the slam on Medicare for All, we certainly know what side the OP's bread is buttered on
Peacetrain
(22,878 posts)Greenwald is not left.. Alex Jones and Greenwald meeting because they think the black helicopters are coming after them.. I can see that.. strong libertarian streaks in those two.. both would deny it of course.. but scratch the skin.. and
Found this in Wikipedia.. and I think it speaks to both of them.. and their fear of the "other"
In the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Peter Vallentyne defines libertarianism as the moral view that agents initially fully own themselves and have certain moral powers to acquire property rights in external things.[10] Libertarian philosopher Roderick Long defines libertarianism as "any political position that advocates a radical redistribution of power from the coercive state to voluntary associations of free individuals", whether "voluntary association" takes the form of the free market or of communal co-operatives.[11] According to the U.S. Libertarian Party, libertarianism is the advocacy of a government that is funded voluntarily and limited to protecting individuals from coercion and violence.[12][13]
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)we could call that "coercion" if we were to think like Libertarians
Peacetrain
(22,878 posts)ACORN.. you name it.. is strong with them.. they fear anything where the group can come together and actually impact on how people are treated..
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Your equation of Obama and party critics with idiots like Alex Jones is dishonest at minimum.
You open with a mis-characterization of government run healthcare. Sure, a government agency specifically in place to manage health care, would have access to all of your medical data. So what? As long as privacy safeguards are present, there should be no issues. The VA as an example has managed this for decades. And the IRS? What does that have to do with anything? They can throw your ass in jail now.
The issue with the NSA acquisition of metadata is not that the "government" has access to it but that it is suctioned up for no reason. If the process was transparent (it's not) with specific, open safeguards in place for this data then there might be more palatable to the 'left' that you keep equating with Jones and his ilk. But that is not the case. There is no reason on the earth for the NSA to gather any information about me, my family, or my neighbors if there is not probable cause to gather it. That is the issue here. The NSA has no business obtaining this information unless it is directly related to a crime. Whether it is creepy or sinister is irrelevant. they have no right to possess the data at all unless it is directly related to a criminal investigation. Thus far the administration has done nothing to show that the metadata gathered is relevant to any investigation.
If the truth of the matter is that the "NSA doesnt care nor does it have the capacity to spy on you", then there is no reason to gather the data at all is there? It has nothing to do with self-aggrandizement to not want my personal data to sit in some NSA storage facility somewhere. Why was it gathered? Who has access to it? What are the safeguards? Why do they have it at all? These are the questions that most of us are asking.
Snowden has done us all a great service by shining a light on the inner workings of programs that have been in place for a decade. Where he is on the political spectrum is irrelevant as are his reasons for exposing the NSA programs. Your right about one thing though: Greenwald and other investigative journalists have indeed been 'crafting' their stories in such a way as to incite fear and outrage. And well they should because the gathering of all this data is an outrageous violation of privacy and due process that should cause us all to fear what the reasons are for the gathering it the first place since the administration has been less than forthcoming as to the reasons.
This story is not complicated or hard to understand. The NSA has been gathering private data on all Americans for no other reason than because modern technology allows them to do so. The data is not relevant to any investigation, therefore it is being collected in violation of the Bill of Rights. It's that simple.
I'll stop here because the rest of your OP descends into poop flinging.
matthews
(497 posts)hand wringing and the lack of awareness (or the refusal to admit) that at one time, when a former administration was doing what this one is doing now, these very same people were screaming foul right along with the rest of us.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.[/center][/font][hr]
matthews
(497 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)The things I'm afraid of are front and center, not buried in some amorphous fear of what someone in the NSA might be doing.
You or Snowden or Greenwald show me some evidence and I'll be glad to add the NSA to my list of fearsome foes.
In the meantime, there are plenty of real monsters to fight.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.[/center][/font][hr]
matthews
(497 posts)As Ricky Ricardo once said
Lu-cee, you're just so ree-DIC-cu-lous!
randome
(34,845 posts)Oh, well. No evidence pretty much answers my question. Or maybe you count as 'evidence' anything Snowden tells you. The guy who said "I am not here to hide from justice" from his 'undisclosed location' in Hong Kong.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.[/center][/font][hr]
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)The point I wanted to make was that I don't think anyone -even Joe Biden- complained about metadata back in Bush's day, did he?
Correct me if I'm wrong.
But even so, apparently he didn't think it serious enough to do anything about it.
For the reasons I've posted before:
* Metadata is not our property.
* Having copies of metadata is not the same as 'bulk surveillance' to most people.
* Without the NSA having a copy, they would need to issue a warrant to every single telecom in the country anytime they wanted to search something. I'd say that essentially ruins the goal of getting a warrant in the first place.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.[/center][/font][hr]
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Biden was talking about metadata back in Bush, Jr's day.
But he pretty much said there should be an investigation, not an outright ban on such information.
And if having the metadata available truly helps in investigations, I don't see that it will be stopped. But we should know whether or not it actually helps. The NSA could release some statistics about that without revealing too much of how they go about their jobs.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.[/center][/font][hr]
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I s'pose I'm apolitical as I've never invested any time or effort to listen to either one.
However, there is this one convergence I'm guilty of... Stalin enjoyed Tchaikovsky as do I; therefore I may wind up being guilty of starving 20 million Russians before my time is done.
MjolnirTime
(1,800 posts)sagat
(241 posts)SaveOurDemocracy
(4,400 posts)........................................
randome
(34,845 posts)There is a lot of sick shit going on in the world today but some of you simply want to fret and whine about what somebody, somewhere might be doing that you object to.
What's next? Fighting for the right to camp out in public parks?
This crappy 'concern' about metadata should not even rate a mention with all the other shit that's going on today.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.[/center][/font][hr]
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Considering the poster, that's to be expected.
I wouldn't know Alex Jones if I tripped over him chasing a Turd Way, Authoritarian/Surveillance/Police State pig off my property with a ballbat.
napoleon_in_rags
(3,991 posts)To create a new superstructure, where the validity of all political points can be judged by the people who say them! Unfortunate side effect: NAMBLA Nazi Satanists hold all power over political discourse by simply saying the opposite of the policies they want, and watching people run away from their statements to their opposites to not be associated with them. But hey, that's a small price to pay to make politics so easy, isn't it?
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Good on ya
Sid
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)& those feathers are kinda easy to ruffle, aren't they?
Number23
(24,544 posts)Saw the pity party over there. The fact that Greenwald got that person's "recommendation" is all the proof that anyone should EVER need that Greenwald has totally jumped the rails. And man, do I mean TOTALLY.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,237 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)If that doesn't sound all too familiar to every single person here, then NOTHING EVER WILL.
The paranoia and conspiracy-mongering is truly bizarre coming from the same crowd that loudly blasted President Obama for not including a single-payer system in his healthcare reform legislation. Single-payer, naturally, would be run by the federal government and so a government agency would have access to our medical histories and decide whether we could receive certain forms of medical treatment.
OH MY GOD!! I've seen so many posters say that same thing! Was it DCBob, geektragedy or BeyondGeography that has made this point over and over again???
Holy Hell!! Isn't somebody's signature line something like "this message is being read by the NSA" or some other such foolishness??? Either this man regularly reads DU or these folks who shriek and scream for a living aren't nearly as new and unique as they think.
Good gracious. Bob Cesca absolutely MUST read this forum.
This article needs to be pinned to the Welcome section of this web site. He has absolutely NAILED General Discussion. No wonder you could hear the wounded braying in that other thread from around the Internet.
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)Sometimes ya realize there are a lot of people lurking at DU. Like Cesca! Nice he's getting inspiration from the place
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)I've seen people on this site claim this.
Like anyone here is high value enough to waste a $70,000.00 missile on.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)when you concede the argument.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)have been used as insults over the last month. What we have actually seen is the convergence of the sensible center with Limbaugh.
bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)Last edited Wed Jul 24, 2013, 11:38 AM - Edit history (1)
Taverner
(55,476 posts)There are no secret cabals - there are corporations where its very charter means destroying democracy.
This is no secret...corporations are legally bound to be liable to their stockholders.
Everything done is done in full view.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)"Squirrel!!"
"Racist!"
"Paulbot!"
"Ratfucker!"
"Snowball!"
As distractions. As you say, it's all in the open and in your face.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)Reach much in order to pardon unConstitutional acts by "the president"? Reach much further and you're going to break something from stretching so unnaturally.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)One that would fall apart in an instant if either one is quoted more often than the other one on Glenn Beck's blog.
I think it is called "The Blaze."
By the way, I saw that Beck was appearing on Daystar tv last night, a religious cable channel.
Evidently he was preaching at some seminar the right-wing loonies were having.
He was the guest speaker for a group calling themselves, "Christians in Support of Israel".
Which sounds very similar to many of the Christian Identity groups that have arisen here in the Great Northwest over the last 30 years.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)flamingdem
(39,316 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)flamingdem
(39,316 posts)Nice try there.
Out of respect for Skinner I will refrain from reposting!
We wouldn't want too much of a good thing.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)happened to the Occupy website. They were overrun by Paulbots to the point most of the people left of center gave up and left. It was also how Rand Paul won a senate seat in Kentucky. Alex Jones instructed Texans and others to move to Kentucky so to vote Ayn Rand Paul in.
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)They're insidious.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)here. The ghosts and ghouls of the John Birch Society are laughing at us all.
Number23
(24,544 posts)I find it absolutely fascinating. Just yesterday someone posted a thread where 3rd rate, has been Republican actor said that Obama's race speech didn't go far enough. The article was from The WASHINGTON TIMES and was posted solely to stir the shit.
Not a single post in ATA. Not ONE.
You post a link from a liberal in a liberal publication noting the very obvious, blatant joining of forces between a certain tiny, loud fringe on the left with a not so tiny, much louder fringe on the right and all hell breaks loose. This place is a mess. A hot, funky mess.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)& found it on my first try. Thats just funny.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)I just knew it had to be that one.