General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYemeni Journalist Who Obama Kept in Prison is Free
I posted about this courageous journalist 5 days ago: Why Is President Obama Keeping a Journalist in Prison in Yemen? This pardon from Yenen's President is GREAT news!Also reported in the UK Guardian: Yemeni journalist who reported US drone strike is released from jail
[hr]
Yemeni Journalist Who Obama Kept in Prison is Free
By: Kevin Gosztola Tuesday July 23, 2013 3:27 pm
Photo posted to Facebook by @aljamal2007 of Abdulelah Haider Shaye, after he was freed from prison
...
...
(Iona Craig, a Times of London) Craig acknowledged that Yemen President Abd Rabbuh Mansur Hadi deserved credit for keeping his word and releasing Shaye. She also praised the organization, Index on Censorship, in the United Kingdom for calling attention to Shayes long-running story and the threat his imprisonment posed to freedom of expression.
Farea al-Muslimi, a Yemeni youth activist and writer who testified before Congress this year on the impact of US drone operations in his country, reacted, After FOUR years of jailing him by order from Barack Obama, Yemeni government releases journalist Abdulelah Shaea. He also said, Only Barack Obama can compete with Yemens dictators (throughout history) in jailing journalists and killing civilians in Yemen, and, What a great Iftar Shaeas kids might be having today; having their father back with them after 4 years in prison.
The story of Shaye is told in detail by Jeremy Scahill in his book, Dirty Wars: The World is a Battlefield. Shaye went to the site of a US cruise missile attack in al Majalah where at least 21 children and 14 women were killed. He also tracked down US-born Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki to interview him on how he could support the US Army medical officer Nidal Hasan, who went on a shooting rampage at Fort Hood and why he believed Umar Farouk Abdulumutallab, the Christmas Day underwear bomber, was justified to have targeted a civilian airliner.
...
It takes courage to do what Shaye was doing before he was imprisoned. Sadly, when he wound up in prison, US media outlets virtually abandoned him. He had contributed to outlets such as the Washington Post and ABC News but they do not appear to have ever raised their voices to get answers from the administration on why they were keeping a journalist in prison.
In solidarity, it is good to see Shaye be freed. Obama owes Shaye an apology and reparations of some kind for depriving him of the years of his life that he spent in prison and could not be with his family or out in the field doing journalism. Unfortunately, it is pretty much a certainty that there will not be a peep from the Obama administration where they acknowledge it was wrong to keep Shaye jailed.
http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2013/07/23/yemeni-journalist-who-obama-kept-in-prison-is-free/
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)THAT would be an interesting way to take the Gitmo bull by the horns.
Is this real?
Catherina
(35,568 posts)The pardon was by Yemen's President who had already prepared a pardon for him once at which time Obama picked up the phone to express concern over the release and he was jailed again.
Those poor people in Gitmo are on their own They're not even allowed to die to escape the injustice.
[hr]
White House Stands By Obama Push for Yemeni Journalist to Remain Behind Bars
By Jake Tapper
Mar 16, 2012 3:03pm
White House officials Friday defended President Obamas request that the government of Yemen keep a local journalist behind bars for alleged terrorist ties.
Abd al-Ilah Haydar Al-Shai had investigated a series of airstrikes in December 2009 against what Yemeni officials described as an Al Qaeda training camp in al Majala, finding what he assessed to be remnants of U.S. ordnance Tomahawk cruise missiles and cluster bombs and reporting that among the victims of the strikes were 21 children and 14 women. The journalist also interviewed terrorist cleric Anwar Awlaki, an American citizen who was in September 2011 killed by a U.S. Predator drone. His December 2009 interview with Awlaki for Al Jazeera publicly established the clerics praise of the Fort Hood shooter, Major Nidal Hasan.
In January 2011, Al-Shai was convicted in a Yemeni court of terrorism-related charges and sentenced to five years in prison but he was reportedly in line to receive a pardon. In February 2011, however, President Obama spoke on the phone with then-Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh and, according to a White House read-out of the call, expressed concern over the release of Abd-Ilah al-Shai, who had been sentenced to five years in prison for his association with AQAP, al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
February 03, 2011
Readout of President's Call with President Saleh of Yemen
President Obama called President Ali Abdullah Saleh of Yemen on February 2 to welcome the significant reform measures that President Saleh had announced earlier that day, and to stress that President Saleh now needs to follow-up his pledge with concrete actions. President Obama asked that Yemeni security forces show restraint and refrain from violence against Yemeni demonstrators who are exercising their right to free association, assembly, and speech. The President also told President Saleh that it is imperative that Yemen take forceful action against Al Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) to protect innocent lives in Yemen as well as abroad. Finally, President Obama expressed concern over the release of Abd-Ilah al-Shai, who had been sentenced to five years in prison for his association with AQAP. President Saleh thanked the President for U.S. support and committed to continuing and strengthening relations with the United States.
On Thursday, ABC News asked White House press secretary Jay Carney about al-Shai, a Yemeni journalist whose case was recently covered by Jeremy Scahill in The Nation. Carney said he didnt have any information, but would get back to ABC News, a White House official did today.
In a statement to ABC News, National Security Staff spokesman Tommy Vietor said that President Obama expressed concern last February about Shai's possible early release from prison on the basis of his involvement with AQAP-a group that had twice launched attacks on the United States. The Presidents comments had absolutely nothing to do with Shai's reporting or his criticism of the United States or Yemen. A Yemeni court, not a U.S. court, convicted Shai. We refer you to the Yemeni government for details on Shai's arrest, conviction, and the status of his detention.
...
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/white-house-stands-by-obama-push-for-yemeni-journalist-to-remain-behind-bars/
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)Funny you should say that because I was just reading this from The New Republic today:
But if Obama comes to understand that these men are not traitors or spies, but whistleblowers who acted in what they believed was the countrys best interestand that what they did was in the countrys best interesthe has a precedent he can follow in dealing with them. He can do for the whistleblowers he has prosecuted what Clinton did for Samuel Loring Morison. Snowden may be out of reach, and if not, should be tried under lesser charges, but a midnight pardon for Manning, who has already suffered during three years of imprisonment, doesnt undermine the law; it makes an exception for certain individuals whose actions are ultimately excusable because of a higher law. Nothing less from Obama will remove the stain of injustice that has sullied his administration.
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/113995/bradley-manning-pardon-obamas-best-option#
The Left is screaming. The Center is screaming. When the New Repbulic, that's usually only too happy to play along, prints that, it's time for the Administration to take notice because the charm has worn off.
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)'where they (U.S. drone strikes) will take place over the next two years.' Is he supposed to be a mind reader?
Also wonder if President Obama will comment on his release.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)byeya
(2,842 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)...
President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi reversed that decision in May, issuing an order to release Shaye "soon", according to the London Times correspondent Iona Craig, who covered the case extensively. "Soon" turned out to mean two months.
...
The White House had no immediate comment on the release.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/23/yemen-journalist-us-drone-strike-released
This was an extreme injustice.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)JFP 4/24: Yemeni slams drone strikes at Senate hearing; Senators demand info
Submitted by Robert Naiman on 24 April 2013 - 8:06pm\
U.S./Top News
1) A Yemeni man told a Senate hearing on Tuesday about a U.S. drone strike on his village last week that he said turned residents against America, Reuters reports. Farea Al-Muslimi, a writer, described his shock at the drone attack and the blowback in public opinion from residents against the United States.
A committee aide said Al-Muslimi was already to have testified at the hearing when it was scheduled a week ago. The hearing was postponed as the panel hoped the administration would send an official to testify, but that did not happen. In the intervening week, an al Qaeda leader and four militants were killed in a U.S. drone strike in the town of Wessab in Dhamar province south of the capital Sanaa, a Yemeni official said.
"Most of the world has never heard of Wessab. But just six days ago, my village was struck by a drone, in an attack that terrified thousands of simple, poor farmers," Al-Muslimi said. "The drone strike and its impact tore my heart, much as the tragic bombings in Boston last week tore your hearts and also mine."
He said the target of the strike was known to many in the village and Yemeni officials could easily have arrested him.
"The drone strikes are the face of America to many Yemenis. If America is providing economic, social and humanitarian assistance to Yemen, the vast majority of the Yemeni people know nothing about it," he said. "Everyone in Yemen, however, knows about America and its drones." Al-Muslimi said that allows the Yemen-based al Qaeda affiliate to "convince more individuals that America is at war with Yemen."
2) Democratic and Republican senators joined a former deputy chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on Tuesday in urging the Obama administration to make public more information about its targeted killing program amid questions about the legality and effectiveness of hundreds of CIA drone strikes in Pakistan and elsewhere, Jonathan Landay reports for McClatchy.
"I am disappointed that the administration declined to provide witnesses to testify at today's hearing," Senator Durbin said. His frustration was echoed by several other Democrats and Republicans. Durbin called on the administration to make public more details about "its legal authority to engage in targeted killing and the internal checks and balances involved in U.S. drone strikes." The administration also should work with Congress to address how it determines when an American citizen can be targeted, the basis for drone strikes in areas that aren't active battlefields, and the "moral and legal responsibilities" the US might have for confirming civilian casualties and compensating their families.
Retired Marine Gen. James Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from August 2007 to August 2011, said he's worried the administration's refusal to disclose the legal basis and detailed procedures for how targets are identified away from active battlefields have cost the US "the moral high ground."
Cartwright called on Obama to establish a government task force to evaluate secret drone strikes, including the extent of civilian casualties and their impacts on communities; the effectiveness of precautions used to avert such casualties; and the means by which the results of strikes are assessed. An unclassified version of the task force's final report should be made public, he said.
Cartwright said the CIA also should publicly acknowledge its role in drone operations outside Afghanistan, establish procedures for declassifying information on those operations after they're over, and provide information to Congress on the impact of drone strikes on civilians.
3) A bipartisan panel of senators held a spirited and unusually public debate Tuesday afternoon about the legality and unintended consequences of America's targeted killings overseas, the Washington Post reports. President Obama has said he would like Congress to help him establish a "legal architecture" for targeted killing to "make sure that not only I am reined in but any president is reined in," the Post notes. But no such legislative initiative appears to be underway.
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/node/1409#summary
Catherina
(35,568 posts)Koko, thanks for sharing that but it made my blood boil. There's no excuse for this. None. The majority of the people who die from our drone attacks are innocent. If Congress is obstructed from doing their job, who's representing us?
...
Despite claims from the administration that drone strikes have killed very few civilians, multiple independent reports confirm that Obama is severely downplaying the wreckage that these drone strikes inflict. It is ultimately impossible to get exact numbers, but a new study from Columbia Law Schools Human Rights Institute finds that the number of Pakistani civilians killed in drone strikes are significantly and consistently underestimated by tracking organizations which are trying to take the place of government estimates on casualties.
There are estimates as high as 98% of drone strike casualties being civilians (50 for every one "suspected terrorist" . The Bureau of Investigative Journalism issued a report detailing how the CIA is deliberately targeting those who show up after the sight of an attack, rescuers, and mourners at funerals as a part of a "double-tap" strategy eerily reminiscient of methods used by terrorist groups like Hamas.
...
http://www.policymic.com/articles/16949/predator-drone-strikes-50-civilians-are-killed-for-every-1-terrorist-and-the-cia-only-wants-to-up-drone-warfare
byeya
(2,842 posts)matthews
(497 posts)Quite the legacy.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)Remember - signature strikes are drone killings based on metadata gleaned from surveillance. No trials, no right of appeal - just death.
matthews
(497 posts)another kind of drone Obama is good at.) But they're on the economy.
Notice he's not going to talk about what has the country in an uproar. It's change the subject time. Only I think most people are wise to this crap by now.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)chapter about him. I knew before reading the book but it was a great coincidence because I was feeling pretty pissed off after reading that chapter.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)Report on drone strikes, go to jail.
Blow the whistle on mass surveillance, be called a *traitor*. WTF is going on?
RC
(25,592 posts)The rest of the world has other, different opinions.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)it will be a great start.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)and it's incredibly sad to me that this didn't get more coverage when it happened. I remember Democracy Now doing something about it...but, frankly, the news is so horrible every day it becomes a blur and I have hard time sticking with any news story too long because DU forgets it and my family and "Acquaintances" are all Repugs.
Without DU...I'd not keep my memory jogged ...THESE DAYS. It didn't used to be like this...but it's what it is.
progressoid
(49,992 posts)ieoeja
(9,748 posts)I would think you would support all efforts against the Jihadists, even by us evil, imperalist Americans as we drink their blood and eat the bodies of their babies.