General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBreaking - Holder asking Justice Department to reinstate pre-clearance in Texas.
Bravo!!!
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)WASHINGTON/PHILADELPHIA (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department plans to ask a federal court to reinstate its authority over voting laws in Texas, part of a new Obama administration strategy to challenge state and local election laws it says discriminate by race, Attorney General Eric Holder said on Thursday.
http://www.courant.com/news/politics/sns-rt-us-usa-justice-holder-20130725,0,4752066.story
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I think Justice's case is pretty strong here.
DonRedwood
(4,359 posts)that should move it quickly.
madashelltoo
(1,698 posts)They have already passed these laws and they need to be stopped from implementing them.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Before Shelby County v. Holder, states had to be pre-cleared based on their conditions in 1967 (yes, really). Now DoJ has to ask individually for a given state to require pre-clearance.
madashelltoo
(1,698 posts)The Magistrate
(95,248 posts)In fact, pretty much every state with a Republican legislature and governor needs to be braced up sharp....
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Hopefully this will help in their effort...or not.
The Magistrate
(95,248 posts)Only the Federals can be trusted in such matters in those states.
Melissa G
(10,170 posts)See What Tom Delay wrought here in Texas for example.
bigtree
(85,999 posts)Texas. Attorney General Eric Holder announced on Thursday that the Justice Department would challenge Southern states, starting with Texas, that immediately moved to enact or enforce new restrictive voting laws after the Supreme Court overturned a key part of the Voting Rights Act last month. In a speech to the National Urban League in Philadelphia, Holder said that he planned to subject Texas, the first state to jump at the chance to impose new voter-ID and redistricting laws, to preclearance requirements. Even as Congress considers updates to the Voting Rights Act in light of the courts ruling, we plan, in the meantime, to fully utilize the laws remaining sections to subject states to preclearance as necessary, Holder said. My colleagues and I are determined to use every tool at our disposal to stand against such discrimination wherever it is found.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/justice-department-to-challenge-states-voting-rights-laws/2013/07/25/c26740b2-f49b-11e2-a2f1-a7acf9bd5d3a_story.html?wpisrc=al_comboPN_p
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Battleground Texas is getting fired up with many determined to stop the regressives.
malaise
(269,067 posts)Great news
Blue Idaho
(5,049 posts)It's about damn time for the Department of Justice to protect the rights of Americans! While the Supreme Court may have struck down the "map" we still have law and avenues to address ANY state, city, or county for restricting the rights of voters. And it's not just the federal government, ordinary citizens can also file complaints too!
I hope the racist politicians wake up to the fact that they will face their day on court for their unAmerican activities - not to mention the millions they will have to pay in court fees to defend their despicable, wrongheaded acts.