Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,939 posts)
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 02:53 PM Jul 2013

SAC Capital Is Arraigned on a Raft of Criminal Charges

Source: New York Times

JULY 26, 2013, 1:13 PM

SAC Capital Is Arraigned on a Raft of Criminal Charges

BY BEN PROTESS

After years of winning criminal convictions against employees of SAC Capital Advisors, federal prosecutors on Friday confronted SAC itself.

In a brief proceeding in Federal District Court in Lower Manhattan, the hedge fund was arraigned on a raft of criminal insider trading charges, making it the first large American company to face an indictment in more than a decade. The appearance came a day after prosecutors announced the case against SAC, run by the billionaire Steven A. Cohen, calling it a “veritable magnet of market cheaters.”

As expected, SAC pleaded not guilty to the charges. Peter Nussbaum, SAC’s general counsel, delivered the plea on behalf of the fund.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

Mr. Nussbaum, in fact, was flanked by no fewer than five outside lawyers from two of the most sophisticated law firms: Willkie Farr & Gallagher and Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison. Martin Klotz at Willkie and Daniel J. Kramer at Paul Weiss have led SAC’s defense.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/07/26/sac-capital-is-arraigned-on-a-raft-of-criminal-charges/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SAC Capital Is Arraigned on a Raft of Criminal Charges (Original Post) Eugene Jul 2013 OP
Sadly, investors, including pension funds, will lose their money. dixiegrrrrl Jul 2013 #1
Probably the availability of evidence. MineralMan Jul 2013 #2
Mary Jo White wants a scalp, and the evidence on this one seems to be strong Recursion Jul 2013 #4
K & R Scurrilous Jul 2013 #3

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
1. Sadly, investors, including pension funds, will lose their money.
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 03:13 PM
Jul 2013

I am dying to know the real reason THIS fund was chosen for criminal penalites, while dozens of others were not.

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
2. Probably the availability of evidence.
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 03:19 PM
Jul 2013

That's often the reason for a prosecution. If the evidence is there, prosecutors will move ahead. If it's not, they won't. That's the real issue with prosecuting corporations in many cases. Not enough evidence to win.

It could be something else, but that's the most likely reason.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
4. Mary Jo White wants a scalp, and the evidence on this one seems to be strong
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 10:01 PM
Jul 2013

White is trying to end the era of "admit nothing" settlements.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SAC Capital Is Arraigned ...