Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
Fri Aug 2, 2013, 04:21 PM Aug 2013

"When you need help, you should go to your neighbors and church"

Pointless to argue with the crazy, but I've always wondered why conservatives think charity from "neighbors and church" is somehow more "standing on your two feet" than getting help from a government program.

Also, we have lots of history on what life was like back when there was only "neighbors and church" to rely on. It was actually difficult and full of suffering for most people, Abigail Nobel's romantic notions notwithstanding.

It's hard to clearer than this:

Abigail Nobel is a tea party activist in Michigan, who will soon start a speaking tour across the state, urging locals not to sign up for coverage. She expects to rely on a similar message to dissuade people from enrolling, particularly in situations where a federal subsidy might make health coverage more affordable.

“As soon as you mention a government program and Medicaid, you don’t have to talk that long,” she says. “I like that there is still a stigma [around Medicaid]. That people want to stand on their own feet. When you need help, you should go to your neighbors and church. It’s the American way of doing charity.”


The fundamental problem with ObamaCare is that it makes it unnecessary to go to "your church" when you get cancer.
http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2013/8/2/15759/53922
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Warpy

(111,270 posts)
1. Let's put that shitbag in the inner city and watch her try it.
Fri Aug 2, 2013, 04:28 PM
Aug 2013

Now, while poor people are much more generous than anybody out in those fancy suburbs are, they're unable to give anyone enough to make much of a difference since they're already living hand to mouth, themselves.

Let's see how long she survives. My guess is that she'd crack in under a week if she were ever exposed to reality.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
2. The fact of the matter is that when there is a child who is born with a disability and in need of
Fri Aug 2, 2013, 04:29 PM
Aug 2013

lifetime medical care the church could NEVER afford to pay for it. My daughter alone would break our church and we have several disabled members as discribed above.

This woman knows nothing of real disability and the costs. Without Medicaid all of our disabled members would be dead and M. Bachmann would have to take all her signs about how she supports special needs children. How the teaparty people can be so ignorant is beyond me. Disabled people live in every community in our nation. The truth is they do not want to see.

NOLALady

(4,003 posts)
3. And she thinks there is no stigma
Fri Aug 2, 2013, 04:32 PM
Aug 2013

to begging neighbors for help. Especially when neighbors are usually in the same financial boat.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
4. Yah, go to your neighbors and your church and tell them about your cancer.
Fri Aug 2, 2013, 04:33 PM
Aug 2013

They'll pray for you as you die. That'll work...

Me? I think I'll go to my doctor, present my Medicare and Supplement cards and get treatment. The church folks can pray for someone else.

Hong Kong Cavalier

(4,573 posts)
5. If I have cancer and go to a church, they will just "Pray for me"
Fri Aug 2, 2013, 04:35 PM
Aug 2013

Mayyybe they'll have a spaghetti dinner fundraiser to pay for...a few hundred dollars of my bill.

Prayer isn't treatment.

Miserable teabagger shitstain. I've not found a single redeeming quality in any of them.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
15. and that's the point
Sat Aug 3, 2013, 09:21 PM
Aug 2013

Right wingers want to be able to judge who deserves help and who doesn't, and have a basis to get people guilted into supporting the church.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
7. Neighbors and churches are free to pick and choose who they help. And far too many won't
Fri Aug 2, 2013, 04:49 PM
Aug 2013

help minorities, or gays, or folks of the wrong political persuasion, or whatever.

Though I suppose that's the whole point.

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
8. I suppose if you unpack it, that's what it's about
Fri Aug 2, 2013, 04:53 PM
Aug 2013

"If there were no govt social aid programs, I could make sure my money went to help The Right Sort Of People."

muntrv

(14,505 posts)
9. Sorry, but my neighbors did not have $100,000 to pay for my medical bills last year.
Fri Aug 2, 2013, 05:05 PM
Aug 2013

On Edit: Also, I was treated at a Catholic hospital, but they still billed my insurance company.

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
11. it's all part of the fantasy world they think we could live in...
Fri Aug 2, 2013, 06:17 PM
Aug 2013

if it weren't for the wicked, wicked socialist govt. Or something.




Igel

(35,317 posts)
14. Life wasn't easy with private charity.
Fri Aug 2, 2013, 07:27 PM
Aug 2013

It wouldn't work today.

There's not enough social trust to go around and in most communities not enough "community."

If you need help, you go to your support network. That used to be neighbors and your church. Not just any church. You were part of a group. It's one reason that churches and fraternal organizations were so important: As Americans moved, being in the same church or fraternal organization gave you an entree in a new town, a ready-made support network.

This frayed as people found they could take advantage of such networks. It's a kind of "tragedy of the commons". By the Depression, most social networks had frayed badly enough that outside of small towns where you grew up you couldn't count on people. So the response was, of course, to move and hope strangers would help. They didn't.

Some neighborhoods are still more cohesive than others.

Locally some firefighters were killed last May in a hotel fire. Others were maimed. The firefighters are pulling together around them. Yeah, they'll get disability. But one person donated an apt. for one firefighter. One firefighter team is responsible for one of the injured's yard work. They have a rotation schedule to go and take food and do shopping for another. They get regular visitors. As time goes on more is offered and it's more organized. This includes not just the surviving injured, but also the families of the dead.

I was in a fairly close-knit church. We had a special fund for widows. Paid for assorted things for them. If they had a setback, it was undone. Before SS took over, it managed the widows' income and made sure their needs were met. One needed a new roof, and a squad of men, some of which were construction workers, showed up one Sunday and replaced her roof. Another needed a new stove, and she answered the door one day to find it was delivered. One older man had a heart-attack and couldn't mow one widow's property, so a sign-up list appeared. Years later it was still true that every Sunday somebody showed up to mow.

It didn't do much for outsiders. Its funds were taken up by those in the community.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"When you need help, you ...