Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SunsetDreams

(8,571 posts)
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 08:16 PM Feb 2012

What Reporters Are Getting Wrong About Gas Prices

Which brings us to the truth of the matter: Ramping up drilling and oil infrastructure can provide some economic benefits, but holding down gasoline prices is not one of them. If we want to be less vulnerable to price spikes, we have to use less oil. Period. That is the context that should pervade news coverage of gas prices.

Economists and energy analysts have repeatedly made this point:

Michael Levi: "Since oil is traded on a global market, the effects of volatility are reflected in the price of every barrel of oil regardless of its origin. This problem can be addressed only by making the U.S. economy more resilient to oil price swings, which includes -- most significantly -- lowering total U.S. oil consumption."

Severin Borenstein: "We should avoid the fantasy of thinking that by choosing a different seller, we are somehow offsetting the impact of Middle East production. To fix the problem, we just need to use less oil."

Tom Kloza: "This drill drill drill thing is tired ... It's a simplistic way of looking for a solution that doesn't exist."

Richard Newell: "We do not project additional volumes of oil that could flow from greater access to oil resources on Federal lands to have a large impact on prices given the globally integrated nature of the world oil market."

Doug Holtz-Eakin: "You can't change the oil price very much with the U.S. exploration."

Ken Green: "We probably couldn't produce enough to affect the world price of oil. ... People don't understand that."

Lou Crandall: "Higher oil prices today are a global phenomenon, and the additional supply from increased drilling by the U.S. would not alter the global balance of supply and demand greatly. ... The only difference is that a somewhat larger share of the revenue would accrue to domestic interests (governmental and private) rather than to foreign suppliers."


Contrast those facts with the framing we're getting from countless news reports:





Beyond the shame of being used by political operatives to distribute a powerful and thoroughly inaccurate message, news reports that privilege the myths over the facts help cement a short-sighted perspective on our energy challenges.


A wealth of information at link: http://mediamatters.org/blog/201202230006

Excellent Read!

See also:

GOP Deceptions About Gas Prices
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Reporters Are Getting Wrong About Gas Prices (Original Post) SunsetDreams Feb 2012 OP
umm oil co record $100 billion + profits = gas WAAAAAY overpriced by design not demand nt msongs Feb 2012 #1
Sure it's demand Spider Jerusalem Feb 2012 #5
And that is a fact madokie Feb 2012 #7
Use less oil? LOL taterguy Feb 2012 #2
I have been trying to tell people this for a long time...thanks Yooperman Feb 2012 #3
What if we stopped exporting as much gasoline? RC Feb 2012 #4
Stopped exporting gasoline that was refined from imported oil in the first place? Spider Jerusalem Feb 2012 #6
. SunsetDreams Feb 2012 #8
 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
5. Sure it's demand
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 08:59 PM
Feb 2012

Or at least a very significant part of it is; world demand for oil is around 89 million barrels a day, production is...around 88 or million barrels a day. There's no spare capacity or overhead for rapid production increases. The US imports most of its oil, and the price is set on world markets. You might have an argument if the US were the only country that used oil, and all of that oil was produced in the US, and there were significant surplus production capacity.

Yooperman

(592 posts)
3. I have been trying to tell people this for a long time...thanks
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 08:52 PM
Feb 2012

for posting the quotes... I will be able to use them as I TRY to educate people.

I usually ask them... "Who owns the oil?" Usually they go blank and wonder why I am asking that particular question. I continue "Private oil companies own the oil."

They still sit there with a blank look on their faces....

I finish with..."They can sell the oil to whoever they want to... the highest bidder. So just because it is extracted on U.S. soil doesn't mean jack shit. More oil wells only means more oil for the profit orientated corporations to make more money."



YM

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
6. Stopped exporting gasoline that was refined from imported oil in the first place?
Reply to RC (Reply #4)
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 09:02 PM
Feb 2012

You'd be taking however many thousands or millions of barrels a day out of the world market by doing that; the countries that were importing that gasoline would make up those lost barrels by buying on the world market, which would drive prices HIGHER since you've decided to keep however many millions of barrels per day (2 or 3, I think) in the US and off the international market. The US imports 11 million barrels of oil per day; be prepared to pay much more for that imported oil and for gasoline if those exports stop. This is how the mechanism of supply and demand works in a global market.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What Reporters Are Gettin...