General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJohn King Completely Passive with GOP Warmongers
http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/why-wont-john-king-make-gop-warmongers-admiWillard made a big show out of making these outrageous and specious claims about Iran:
We must not allow Iran to have nuclear weapon. If they do, the world changes. America will be at risk. And some day nuclear weaponry will be used. If I'm President, that will not happen. If we re-elect Barack Obama, it will happen," he said at the CNN Republican debate on Wednesday night.
That he made such a claim comes as no surprise. After all, Newt Gingrich made this insane claim in the same exchange:
This is an administration which, as long as you're America's enemy, you're safe.
And let's not leave out Rick Santorum:
In the meantime, when the radicals in Egypt and the radicals in Libya, the Muslim Brotherhood, when they rise against either a feckless leader or a friend of ours in Egypt, the president is more than happy to help them out.
When they're going up against a dangerous theocratic regime that wants to wipe out the state of Israel, that wants to dominate the radical Islamic world and take on the great Satan, the United States, we do nothing. That is a president that must go. And you want a leader who will take them on? I'll do that.
Three outrageous claims in the span of six minutes, and a moderator who followed up with each of them asking what exactly they might do to stop Iran, a sovereign country, from arming themselves with nuclear weapons.
Oh, wait. No, John King said nothing. Nothing. No followup with Willard on his claim that he, and he alone would prevent that nation from arming. No followup with Newtie about whether he consulted with Gaddafi and Bin Laden before making such an inane statement. And no followup with Santorum about how he could refer to the United States as the Great Satan while claiming Satan was attacking the United States.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)John King's sole talent is that he's good looking, and he can read.
Other than that, he's about as smart as a rutabaga - just like the rest of Wolf' "F*cking" Blitzer's "Worst F*cking Political F*cking Team In The F*cking History Of F*cking Broadcast F*cking Mass F*cking Mediums."
I wouldn't hire him to moderate a debate between tomato's and tomahto's, since either one is brighter than that rutabaga.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)IMO these pundits are physically afraid of the lunatic fringe. Not necessarily of the candidates but certainly of all the who's out in whoville that subscribe to the views that the candidates spew forth.
Their favorite weapon is the death threat and that surely is enough to intimidate a milktoast TV talking head like John King. For some reason it seems to me that CNN people are the wimpiest of the wimpy.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)division of CNN. Wolfe likes King because he can control him because he's
so un-savvy. Wolfe in un-savvy too.
When is CNN going to diversify and add some intellect?
The only moderator in all the GOP debates that did a half-way decent job was David Gregory.
Think if they had agreed, bet Trump would have at least held their feet to the fire