Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsArlen Specter challenges Rick Santorum’s account of conversation about endorsement
http://www.boston.com/Boston/politicalintelligence/2012/02/arlen-specter-challenges-rick-santorum-account-conversation-about-endorsement/Vy16TvOosN7TyWTyyiTUUN/index.html<snip>
Former Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter said his former Senate colleague Rick Santorum was wrong when Santorum recounted a conversation they had about judicial nominees during last nights Republican presidential debate.
Santorum responded that he supported Specter because Specter was going to become the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, at a time when the most important issue before the Senate would be the confirmation of two or three of President Bushs Supreme Court nominees.
Arlen Specter as chairman of the Judiciary Committee, we had a conversation, Santorum said. He asked me to support him. I said will you support the presidents nominees? We had a 51/49 majority in the Senate. He said Ill support the presidents nominees as chairman. Santorum said every nominee Specter supported had passed because it gave Democrats cover to vote for it and it gave Republican moderates cover to vote for it.
But speaking on The Michael Smerconish Program today, Specter said he made no such commitment. He is not correct, Specter said. I made no commitment to him about supporting judges. That would have been the wrong thing to do. As chairman of the committee I supported [Justices John] Roberts and [Samuel] Alito because I thought they were qualified for the job. But I made no deal.
---------------------
Truth will out!!! They are all LIARS!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1148 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Arlen Specter challenges Rick Santorum’s account of conversation about endorsement (Original Post)
malaise
Feb 2012
OP
I voted for Specter and I'm not ashamed of it. I would never vote for Mr. Frothy.
HopeHoops
Feb 2012
#7
quinnox
(20,600 posts)1. lol so Santorum is being shown what a lying creep he really is
that last debate was a disaster for Ricky in more ways than one. He sounded like he almost was going to copy John Kerry's unfortunate infamous blunder a few times during his answers - "I voted for it before I voted against it"
MADem
(135,425 posts)2. Rule Number One
Make sure they're dead before you try to put words in their mouths!
malaise
(269,157 posts)3. Bwaaaaaaaaaaah hahahaha
particularly when then have access to TV.
Specter is on Fuckie Todd's program right now tearing Santorum a new one - he does not think that Santorum should represent America.
Nothing sweeter than a ReTHUG feeding feast.
emulatorloo
(44,173 posts)5. True. OTOH Specter is a Democrat.
He's gone after hypocritical Republicans before.
Specter is devouring him
spanone
(135,861 posts)6. he was just on with chucky and said 'conversation' never happened
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)7. I voted for Specter and I'm not ashamed of it. I would never vote for Mr. Frothy.
Specter has integrity. Mr. Frothy is devoid of it.