Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spanone

(135,859 posts)
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 11:43 AM Feb 2012

is this actually democracy?

Donors With Agendas

The presidential primary season is being brought to you by a handful of multimillionaires and companies who have propped up the candidates with enormous donations to their “super PACs.” Just two dozen or so individuals, couples and companies have given more than 80 percent of the money collected by super PACs, or $54 million, according to disclosure forms released on Monday.

Freed of nearly all regulations or good sense by Citizens United and other court decisions, the super PACs are raising money in ludicrously large sums. The $10 million from Sheldon and Miriam Adelson to Winning Our Future, which has sustained Newt Gingrich’s trailing campaign, is the biggest single donation to a candidate. But every candidate now has his own millionaire supporter, and the concentration of wealth in the campaign is growing.

The people writing these outsize checks are committed to defeating President Obama, but their interests don’t stop there. Many are involved in businesses or ideological causes that have clear policy agendas with the federal government. Their huge influence on individual candidates demonstrates the potential for corruption inherent in the super PAC era. Among the biggest givers:

¶Harold Simmons, a billionaire corporate raider, has given $1 million to Mr. Gingrich’s political action committee, $1.1 million to Rick Perry’s PAC, $100,000 to Mitt Romney’s PAC, and $10 million to American Crossroads, the super PAC advised by Karl Rove that is supporting many Republican candidates. Mr. Simmons’s companies make metals, paints and chemicals, among other things, and have gotten into trouble over lead and uranium emissions from previous decades. He also runs a radioactive waste dump in Texas that has clashed with environmental regulators over its proximity to a nearby aquifer. He controls Waste Control Specialists, which has contracts to clean up federal hazardous waste sites, including emissions from other companies he controls.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/24/opinion/donors-with-agendas.html?pagewanted=print

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
is this actually democracy? (Original Post) spanone Feb 2012 OP
Democracy in the US today is an illusion meant to keep the masses under control and propagandized.nt RKP5637 Feb 2012 #1
No, it's not. Icicle Feb 2012 #2
this is NOT Democracy cbrer Feb 2012 #3
No it isn't. white_wolf Feb 2012 #4

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
1. Democracy in the US today is an illusion meant to keep the masses under control and propagandized.nt
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 11:55 AM
Feb 2012

Icicle

(121 posts)
2. No, it's not.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 11:57 AM
Feb 2012

It's influence peddling. These guys don't just drop that kind of cash without expecting a return for it.

We must overturn Citizens United.

white_wolf

(6,238 posts)
4. No it isn't.
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 04:35 AM
Feb 2012

Of course, our "democracy" was always designed to benefit the ruling class. "The executive of the modern state is but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»is this actually democrac...